Tulsi Gabbard releases a newly declassified draft of a December 8, 2016 Presidential Daily Briefing that stated there was no Russian election impact
Posted by WashedMasses@reddit | tulsi | View on Reddit | 26 comments
bigmt99@reddit
Yeah yeah yeah, declassify the Epstein list
Fair-Explanation@reddit
Help me understand how you fine citizens haven’t realized that you’ve got it bass ackwards. If the Epstein list were damning to Trump, don’t you think Biden would have released it? Obama? They tried every way possible to put Trump in jail. They went to extreme lengths to keep him out of the White House WHILE having full access to the Epstein files. If there was dirt on Trump in them, they would have released the information and proof. So saying that these releases (much are VERY heavy and clear) are a distraction from the public knowing what was in those files that the dems had in their hands for 12 of the past 16 years is absolutely stupid. Talking about the Epstein list now is the deflection, though I too am frustrated that Trump ran on releasing the Epstein files/list and is now downplaying it. Everyone, be subjective and use your brains. This shouldn’t be partisan blindness and believing everything we each hear in our echo chambers. Gotta put some deductive reasoning in here.
bigmt99@reddit
Programmed response
Fair-Explanation@reddit
Ok so, like all libs, run away from the discussion. I asked a question. I posited my logic. Sheep don’t have logic. Those who fling insults at someone trying to have a logical conversation or debate are sheep, because they can’t stand on any facts.
Own-Lengthiness-3549@reddit
The Epstein list is not Tulsi’s
That is on Pam Bondi and DJT
17_Bob_Trey_O@reddit
These people are so dumb.
LordXenu12@reddit
Russian election interference was confirmed, tulsi is corrupt trash
VetGranDude@reddit
If you truly believe this, it proves that media driven by propaganda and confirmation bias is extremely effective. Russiagate has been exhaustively disproven and debunked for years. Tulsi's thread on X summarizes some of it, but still barely scratches the surface.
The shocking part of Tulsi's allegations is that Obama himself was involved. That was previously unknown. Everything else was already known if your media sources don't have tunnel vision ideology.
If you're interested in it, I highly recommend following Matt Taibbi on Substack. He has been covering it for years and provides plenty of documentation. He doesn't rely on quotes from "unnamed officials" or "sources at [whatever]" that nobody can confirm. He posts the actual documents and provides real names.
twolvesfan217@reddit
Ha, yes…totally and completely unbiased Matt Taibbi
VetGranDude@reddit
Easy to dismiss someone if you completely avoid everything they're saying. That's the problem with today's ideologically-driven divisiveness. "My side showed me some zero context quotes and told me he's bad, so now I think he's bad."
Don't believe me. Don't believe Matt Taibbi's opinions either. Look at the actual evidence, then decide.
Fair-Explanation@reddit
Amen. It’s wild that you’re part of the conversation and get downvoted. It’s like they get their feelings hurt by evidence against what they embrace. How’d we get this far down into the toilet?
peppyhare64@reddit
This states that Russia did not do a malicious cyber attack on US election infrastructure it does not say "no Russian election impact".
The 2016 Russia interference investigation wasnt about cyber attacks on US infrastructure
This just seems like a poor and suspicious way to try and cover for the current administration.
Kaszos@reddit
I’m shamelessly stealing this
LordXenu12@reddit
That’s the only way to cover for the current admin
therin_88@reddit
Beautiful!
Kaszos@reddit
This states that Russia did not do a malicious cyber attack on US election infrastructure it does not say "no Russian election impact".
The 2016 Russia interference investigation wasnt about cyber attacks on US infrastructure
This just seems like a poor and suspicious way to try and cover for the current administration.
PubliclyDisturbed@reddit
Covering for Trump is not “putting America first” it’s putting Trump first
bigmt99@reddit
Cult
WashedMasses@reddit (OP)
Tulsi follow-up: https://x.com/DNIGabbard/status/1946271402971312514
Kaszos@reddit
This states that Russia did not do a malicious cyber attack on US election infrastructure it does not say "no Russian election impact".
The 2016 Russia interference investigation wasnt about cyber attacks on US infrastructure
This just seems like a poor and suspicious way to try and cover for the current administration.
CalRipkenForCommish@reddit
OP is trying really, really hard to get people to stop paying attention to the fact that trump campaigned hard on releasing the Epstein files and ending the Russian invasion into Ukraine in 24 hours, and has turned into TACO man over it. OP refuses to post anything about it.
But then, Biden didn’t campaign hard on releasing the Epstein files and kicking Russia out of Ukraine, someone else did…who was it?
WashedMasses@reddit (OP)
Lol I want the Epstein files released as much as anyone. This is a Tulsi sub and this is what she's been working on lately.
NewArtist2024@reddit
She’s working on distracting from the Epstein story all right because she’s a slave to a fascist pedophile
CalRipkenForCommish@reddit
Then we need to put the pressure on - from all sides. The president is a pedophile, and he’s using levers to protect himself and many, many other pedophiles
NewArtist2024@reddit
The report saying “ Russian and criminal actors did not impact recent US election results by conducting malicious cyber activities against (election) infrastructure” does not mean that there was no Russian election impact and the fact that we are nearly 10 years removed from this shit and you morons can’t distinguish between the two claims still is very telling
watching_whatever@reddit
Who cares, old news anyway.