Climate Reality: The Diagnosis We Can’t Escape by Roger Hallam
Posted by RobinBoardman@reddit | collapse | View on Reddit | 69 comments

The climate crisis is no longer a future threat — it’s a terminal diagnosis, and the only moral response now is to act like everything depends on us, because it does.
—
There comes a point in your life when the facts won’t let you look away. You feel it before you know it: something is terribly wrong, and we are running out of time. So let’s begin with something simple. How do you know something is true?
Take the example of cancer. If you feel a lump or have symptoms, you don’t just ask your mate what they think. You go to a doctor. And not just any doctor — you want a specialist. Someone who’s legally obliged to tell you the truth, however hard it is to hear. You want the tests, the scan, the data. And above all, you want a number: “What’s the likelihood I have it?” Because that number changes everything.
You don’t want vague reassurances. You want the truth. If the doctor says there’s a 50% chance, your life changes in that moment. You go into action. You start making decisions — fast. Because the alternative is death. And no one can run from that.
It’s this same clarity, this same objectivity, that we need to bring to the climate crisis. Because the truth is — and I mean this literally — the planet has cancer. It is spreading. It is terminal. And it is going to kill us if we don’t act, immediately. This isn’t ideology. It’s not politics. It’s not “just your opinion.” It is physical reality. And just like cancer, it doesn’t care what you believe.
In 1989, NASA scientist James Hansen warned the UN that if we didn’t slash emissions, society would collapse. That was 35 years ago. In 2025, global temperatures have now risen to 1.6°C above pre-industrial levels. And the rate of warming is accelerating. For most of the 20th century, the rise was around 0.18°C per decade. In the last ten years, it’s more than doubled to 0.37°C per decade. We’re now on course to hit 2°C around 2035 — and that’s being optimistic.
But what does that number mean? A landmark peer-reviewed paper, “The Future of the Human Niche,” published by Tim Lenton and colleagues, makes it brutally clear: at 2°C of warming, around 1 billion people will no longer be able to live where they currently do. That’s 25% of the Earth’s surface becoming uninhabitable. One billion refugees — in just a few years.
To put that into context: there were 50 million refugees after the Second World War. That was the worst war in human history. What’s coming is twenty times worse. And that figure — one billion — only covers the effects of extreme heat. It doesn’t include what happens when rising sea levels drown coastal cities, when droughts kill crops, when wildfires consume whole regions, when freshwater disappears. The truth is, climate collapse is not just an environmental issue. It is a full-system breakdown. It affects food, health, housing, energy, migration, and war — all at the same time.
Still think this is just about polar bears? If you’re still not convinced, don’t take it from me. Take it from the insurance industry. In 2024, the British actuarial society — a group of people whose job it is to measure risk for a living — released a report projecting that at 2°C of warming, we’ll see 2 billion deaths. At 3°C? 4 billion. That’s half the population of the Earth.
And this is not worst-case modelling. This is their baseline. This is what the people who insure your life, your business, your pension, believe is most likely to happen if we stay on our current course.
It gets worse. Because climate breakdown isn’t a one-off crisis — it triggers runaway feedback loops. Ice melts and reduces the planet’s ability to reflect sunlight, which makes it heat up faster. Permafrost thaws and releases methane, a greenhouse gas 80 times more potent than CO₂. Forests burn and release carbon. Soils lose their ability to absorb emissions. Everything begins to feed on itself. Even if we stopped all human emissions tomorrow, these systems may continue warming the planet — potentially beyond the point of recovery.
Most tipping points are estimated to be triggered between 1°C and 2°C. We are already at 1.6°C. We are now in the danger zone. There is no longer a buffer. There is no margin of error. This is happening in real time.
So what do we do?
Well, the answer is no different from the cancer patient. Two things: stop making it worse, and start trying to repair the damage. That means ending fossil fuel emissions as fast as humanly possible. That means scaling up emergency carbon removal. That means mobilising everything we’ve got. Will it work? We don’t know. But what we do know is this: if we do nothing, billions will die. And not in some abstract future. In our lifetimes. In the lifetimes of our children. This is not a problem for “someone else to solve.” This is your responsibility, your emergency, your world.
And if you think you still have a choice — let me be blunt: you don’t. If your actions or inactions contribute to this collapse, you don’t just destroy your own future. You destroy the lives of everyone around you. You condemn entire generations to hell on Earth because you couldn’t face the truth. It’s not just foolish. It’s not just selfish. It’s evil.
Let me speak personally for a moment. I’ve met hundreds of people who, after hearing this reality, decided to act. Ordinary people. Teachers, nurses, students, grandparents. They quit their jobs. They faced arrest. Some went to prison. Not because they were heroes. But because they understood this one, simple thing: if we don’t fight, we die. If we don’t rise up, we burn.
You can’t half-commit to this. You can’t give a little donation, feel a bit guilty, and move on. Once you’ve heard the truth, you are accountable. And the only question left is what you’re going to do about it. So this is your moment. This is the turning point. If you’ve read this far, you already know. You know what’s coming. You know the scale of the crisis. You know the failure of our leaders.
You also know this: we are not powerless. There are millions of us waking up. Rising up. Organising. We are building the resistance that history will remember.
Join us. Because history is watching. And your children will ask what you did. And one day, in the final hours of your life, you will ask yourself the same question. Don’t wait for the flood. Don’t wait for the fire.
We have no choice but to act. And act we will.
—
Join Roger at https://rogerhallam.com/#/portal/signup
rustybeaumont@reddit
Thoughts on overpopulation?
herpderption@reddit
A self-correcting challenge on long enough timescales but if the population is able to see the crash coming it’s really scary for them.
Physical_Ad5702@reddit
Just as big a factor as overconsumption.
They're birds of a feather
rustybeaumont@reddit
I’d say more important.
The people that consume the least live in squaller and would gladly consume more if given the chance.
And with 8 times the pre-industrial population, I’d say we’re pretty much forced to use nonrenewable resources to survive.
Interestingllc@reddit
The only real issues we face are pollution and the fact that we are hotboxing ourselves to death.
TanteJu5@reddit
Werner Herzog’s book "Every Man for Himself and God Against All" nails a harsh truth about how we live. He’s got a point when he said in an interview that 8 billion people is a mistake, honestly, it’s hard to argue when you see how things are going. This global system we’re stuck in pushes everyone to look out for number one, and it’s tearing us, the fauna, and the flora apart. Unless something big shakes us up, like widespread destitution or famine, nothing’s gonna change. Maybe small communities can pull off something good, but on the big scale? It’s just the same old story since we started farming: new boss, same as the old one.
James Hansen the UN
The UN is a toothless puppet, dancing to the tune of the US and its allies, just like its predecessor. It flexes its muscles on small nations and US rivals, but when it comes to real power? Spineless. Remember Nikki Haley threatening to slash UN funding over disagreements on Syria/Palestine?
And don’t get me started on the Industrial Revolution. It was sold as the cure for poverty, a shiny new era of progress. What did we get instead? 2 catastrophic world wars and poverty that’s still creeping up in 2025. We’re not saving the world, we’re the cancer, the most dangerous animal that is spreading chaos and calling it progress.
HousesRoadsAvenues@reddit
Thank you for the reminder to read Mr. Herzog's book. The same one sitting on our bookshelf!
harryelch@reddit
The UN is only toothless because big privileged nations stopped brushing them. UN Charta is just an aim for how it could work if everyone brushes their teeth on a daily basis. They can't force anything they can just ask politely to apply common sense.
accountaccumulator@reddit
Agreed on all points. Climate change is not the cancer, humans are. CC is a symptom of that.
Godly_Shrek@reddit
The Third of May 1808 nice
LargeLars01@reddit
Hello? This is 1972 calling - we knew, we didn’t save ourselves
aRatherLargeCactus@reddit
Yeah, we should just give up and die. What a fantastic strategy that totally doesn’t exclusively benefit the people who put us in this position.
It is possible to save a non-insignificant number of us still. Doomerism isn’t helpful, it’s self-fulfilling and not actually based on scientific data. We still have a few years left before our locked-in emissions take us over the point of no return. Saying “give up, we’re all dead” only serves to placidly carry us over the finishing line to death’s door.
feo_sucio@reddit
Self-delusion that it’s not too late is helpful?
aRatherLargeCactus@reddit
We have not yet hit 2c. We still have <5 years left to prevent hitting 2c. It is not too late.
bluebellmilk@reddit
yeah i’m sure all the billionaires are totally okay with instantly reversing industrialization and capitalism! i believe they will. let’s bet our savings on it!
aRatherLargeCactus@reddit
That is exactly the opposite of my point. Are you just going to roll over and let the billionaires do that without any fight, like a coward? Or are you going to do something about it to somewhat minimise the damage, even if it’s just for a few people?
Fox_Kurama@reddit
Then describe as much as you can without breaking Reddit rules that we should do.
aRatherLargeCactus@reddit
Peacefully and calmly create an alternative economic system that doesn’t reward and mandate mass ecocide, death, destruction, exploitation and violence.
Go talk to your neighbours. Go find out where the gaps in preparation for the next few decades are, and address them. Go read theory on economic systems that disempower the billionaire ghouls who are rewarded by capitalism for destroying our planet. Disable the things killing you and the people you love. I obviously can’t tell you the secret to fixing the climate crisis in a reddit comment but it sure as fuck isn’t “we’re all doomed, give up and die without any resistance”
CranberryTime664@reddit
Damn… you either need to do more research into what little options and time we have left or are in a crippling state of denial, which I envy the peace of. But as an engineer who has diagnosed the problem as behavioral which is unsolvable in the current state of the world, what magical solution do you think we have in store in the next 5 years? 5 years is mighty optimistic btw considering tipping points start their probability curves at 1.5C which we have breached already. That skew to the happiest sounding timeline alone tells me a lot about how you think and why you hold onto irrational hope for a fundamentally unsustainable way of life. I suggest you start learning how to make sunblock and grow drought AND flood tolerant plants
waffledestroyer@reddit
I think we're already at over 600 ppm CO2e. It's over. It's a terminal diagnosis.
KaMilAnRavgs@reddit
lol.
CorvidCorbeau@reddit
Well, that's not gonna happen. Prevention is out of the picture under any realistic scenario. The only way it won't be, is if there are some unknown negative feedbacks as well, that will stabilize warming before 2°C
And I don't see that happening.
What can be done is mitigation, but losses and damage are guaranteed. Knowing us, it will be huge losses and extreme damage.
CorvidCorbeau@reddit
If you don't immediately put out a fire, and it grows 1000x larger than it should have, do you just let it keep burning?
The building, society in this case, may receive critical damage either way, but the extent of the damage varies.
I fully agree it's too late to prevent huge damage though. There's no longer a safe path, just bad, worse and even worse.
SanityRecalled@reddit
Toxic positivity.
AdoreMeSo@reddit
We all die eventually, that is something you must come to accept.
Life will return again, and personally, I would prefer it to be free of slavery and borders. Even if we could save this, would we want to? Ecosystems have long since collapsed and the health of nature is terminal. Only 4% of all mammals are free in the wild. Almost all sea floors accessible have been trawled and 90% of all big fish have disappeared in the past 75 years. 75% of insect populations gone from the global use of pesticides and constant driving of cars. Nature has already collapsed… we are just living in a world of humanity.
If you want to fight, than fight. But for me, I wish to return to the earth. Life is in every breath we breathe, underneath every rock… it will come again. All that will be remembered of us, is a very thin layer of plastic and rubber millions of years in the future. It’s not doomerism, it’s acceptance. A parasite realizing it’s hurting it’s host, it’s world, and being ok with letting go.
aRatherLargeCactus@reddit
I prefer to die having lived for something than die rolling over to the whims of billionaires who have corrupted our very humanity.
And billions of lives will end before then. Sorry, but “life will happen again eventually” is a pathetic reason to give up. We have a chance to limit the death, suffering and pain of billions of beings. We must take it. “We’re already doomed” is fundamentally counterproductive to that goal.
I don’t want to maintain our current economic system, if that’s what you mean by “this”. If you mean humanity and life on this planet - obviously the answer is yes. I wish to prevent the suffering caused by the richest 1% of the population who have brainwashed the poor serfs into believing there is no fight to be had. I do not wish to let them accomplish their dreams.
AdoreMeSo@reddit
Returning back to the hunter and gather lifestyle we are supposed to be living is impossible with the current state of ecosystems. We must farm, and we must enslave animals to survive. Like I said, only 4% of mammals are free, the rest that aren’t us, live inside of cages or behind fences. You like this life a lot huh, probably because you were born human.
Most of the farmland we have been using is dead soil btw, from the constant removal of nitrates. We have to pump nitrates back into the soil which is catalyzed in factories. The nitrates must bind to ammonia which is produced by fossil fuels. There is literally, no possible way, to mass farm without the use of fossil fuels and use of factories, oh and pesticides too. Because of this, food is literally not nearly as nutritious as it used to be, when the ecosystems and soil were healthy.
Anyway, call me a coward or pathetic for my doomer mindset. But good luck trying to stop something from breaking that’s already been broken. We are in overshoot, people are going to die. This is what happens when a species doesn’t have a natural predator to control population.
aRatherLargeCactus@reddit
Didn’t say we had to hunt at all. Lab grown meat and vegan food are easy to provide on a mass scale without decimating ecosystems, if we simply stopped farming for profit over literally everything else. I’m literally a vegan who fights for animal rights, I just don’t arbitrarily stop that fight when it comes to the 2 BILLION people who are going to fucking die immeasurably horrific deaths if we do not throw everything at stopping the death machine.
Human diets do not need to be ecologically homicidal. They are because it is cheap and easy, not because it’s what we need to survive.
Consistent-Fill1327@reddit
What is your brilliant plan to completely change the political, economic, energy, transportation, farming, mining, and manufacturing sectors? If we phase out coal and diesel, how will we deal with the aerosol whiplash? Most have no idea how to live off their land base without massive supply chains. How will populations mitigate climate disasters without fossil energy? Trying to stop the omnicidal machine will probably just be used as an excuse to ratchet up fascism. There's always a reaction from the far right. We can go out, kicking and screaming, while keeping up the delusion that we might still be able to control nature without destroying it or moving beyond it. Or we could admit that trying to control nature and other humans was the wrong path. Science is heavily influenced by the culture of the people who utilize it. There are many blind spots, even in science. Everyone is a specialist. If we admit that it's probably too late and we can't control the outcome, then we can move through the stages of grief. Focusing on fixing things in the future distracts from resisting in the present where exploitation is everywhere. The dominant culture is cancer, is hyper stimulated, has not the tool set to resist, revolt, organize, nor to protect the land base from burning everywhere. The feedbacks will make everything unrecognizable and technology will never undue the damage it's caused. Hope and delusion can easily be used as excuses to continue consuming.
buttonsbrigade@reddit
Babe, it’s a doomerism sub. We are not the target audience for hopiem.
AKIP62005@reddit
It's too late and we are doomed by the dumbest of us. I don't have kids and have tried to warn people about the coming reality for the last 15 years, my account is proof of that. The fact is nobody cares enough to act and it is too late to save our ecosystem and ourselves. It depressing and heartbreaking but it's reality. I've decided to make the most of our remaining time by doing what I love with the people I love.
drewbehm@reddit
AI generated
ImportantCountry50@reddit
Funny how the framing can radically alter the prognosis:
- Cancer. This implies that yes, the condition is life threatening, but there are still 'things we can do'. It need not be terminal if we ACT NOW! This fits in well with Roger's goal of mobilizing a mass movement. Difficult to motivate people without a call to action and "sorry, you're all gonna die soon no matter what" doesn't quite fit the bill.
- The Titanic. The whole shit-show is going down, too much damage has already been done, and at this late stage there's nothing the passengers can do about it. Except maybe find a lifeboat, if you're lucky. Well, lucky not to be dead yet anyway. Lifeboat ethics can be a hideous affair, the people in the lifeboat being forced to make truly gruesome and horrific choices, if the ordeal hasn't already driven them mad.
- The slow motion train wreck. The train has already sailed off of the cliff, several decades ago by some estimates, and is hurtling towards the ground. The odd thing about it being that it is happening in such incredibly slow motion that the passengers don't comprehend the grim reality of their situation. This is my personal favorite, capturing the existential horror of realizing that you are already dead, sailing through the air and just waiting for that moment you finally hit the ground.
Fox_Kurama@reddit
There are no lifeboats, and if there were, there is no Carpathia coming or else coming to pick them up. The best we have techwise is the equivalent to a single life preserver that will at least keep one person'a head comfortably above the freezing water without needing to flair their arms or hold dearly onto some flotsam until they all pass out regardless.
At this point, the only hope left would be to develop the best interstellar distress signal we can and HOPE that there are compassionate aliens with FTL drives out there.
Bandits101@reddit
Yes and claiming “hundreds of people quit their jobs”….guess what! Those jobs were instantly filled, perhaps by a person that previously didn’t have the means to pollute.
The commons is being obliterated and it’s a tragedy.
karl-pops-alot@reddit
He means to get arrested and go to prison
Mad_Martigan001@reddit
Nah we'll adapt and overcome...as always : ( Unfortunately, humans are more resilient than cockroaches and rats
ttystikk@reddit
The planet does indeed have a cancer.
It's called "humanity."
Sleep-more-dude@reddit
Long live the Squid Empire!
Collapse_is_underway@reddit
Of course you can half-commit, that's what a lot of us are doing.
The most obvious and direct way to stop the extermination of complex lifeforms as we know it is to make the current globalized supply-chain system crash as hard as possible, because that way you also make the extraction, production, transport and use of products pretty much dissapear, and with it, all the pollution generated in extraction, production, transport, usage (be it from fossil fuels, petrochemicals in the form of plastics, PFAS, etc.).
But I'm in too much comfort to try and make a hard crash happen as soon as possible.
But if I found a bacteria or another lifeform that could turn diesel/oil into solid matter and it fucked the globalized supply chain ? I drop it in the system ASAP. But I'm not a bio-chemist nor do I know if it's possible, so I engage in local associations that are trying to prepare for a world with much less energy available for everyone, that way I remain in comfort while trying to very slightly change the consequences of ignoring reality in the 20th century.
But it doesn't chance the hard fact of "the sooner we crash, the better it'll be" for so many reasons and for so many species, us included.
Technical-disOrder@reddit
I have no problem when people use AI to help them with information or to clean up a script/essay, but having it create everything is lazy and makes me question the authenticity of the one posting.
Ouroboros308@reddit
... Was this written with chatGPT...?
mezmekizer@reddit
very likely, has no soul in it whatsoever. sounds like it mimics some motivational speech. honesty is missing. nobody really cares about ecological collapse or the polycrisis. its too overwhelming. and the ones who care are marginalized and portrayed as crazy. the ones who have moved forward, are organizing and making something useful. these people, however, are the 1%, or at least it seems so. and I'm not saying we even need the masses to be doing that, it would be too highly expected. we have to ask what's the ultimate purpose here anyway? least amount suffering? guess we are already doing good work in that by covering the pain with pleasure. seems to lead nowhere.
most people do not care of collapse because it serves no practical use for them. although I disagree because collapse awareness is also understanding the nature of this life, indifferent and impermanent. and understanding is power.
I think the ultimate purpose is defending reality. the truth must be open for those for seek it.
Democracy is the best social model we have come up with so far. It isn't just laws and ballots, it’s people talking, thinking, and staying sane together. If the system is to work, the minds within it have to be clear. So maybe the real question is: are we well enough to govern ourselves?
individual_328@reddit
That's some shitty AI to pick a Goya painting for this.
RobinBoardman@reddit (OP)
Oh - I picked it as a scream against institutional violence and helplessness.
individual_328@reddit
It depicts the the harsh French reaction to a violent rebellion the day earlier. Are you calling for violent rebellion? Because it's not a great idea to do that publicly.
Interestingllc@reddit
it begins and ends in silence
Junior-Consequence12@reddit
i would have gone with the drowning dog.
Darnocpdx@reddit
I'd go with a lobster in a pot in a stove.
Collapse/climate change isn't an event, it's a process of natural law correcting the delicate balance it wants to maintain.
Humans aren't much different from other species who outgrow their ability to support their populations beyond what the environment can provide. Pretty much every species on earth pushes it's boundaries, it's just we do it at a global scale rather than biome scale.
daddyneckbeard@reddit
i would have gone with another goya painting - u know the one
Brilliant_Creme_2249@reddit
All I got to say is the river in Texas that flooded, rose 26 feet, in 45 minutes.
PicklesOverload@reddit
With respect, I really need sources to take an academically-presented piece of writing seriously. Even if they're well-known sources, it proves something credible by it's diligence. It shows that the author is sticking very closely to the facts (as outlined in the introduction to this piece.)
Physical_Ad5702@reddit
Roger is screaming into the void. Honorable, no doubt about that, but a lot of people know where we are headed and thanks to things like the sunk cost fallacy, maximum power principle and dreams of a technological solution to overshoot just keep calm and carry on...for now.
alacp1234@reddit
I’ve been trying to warn people for a decade and almost all of them don’t want to hear it or change. Been ridiculed as paranoid or alarmist.
I’m not risking my life or my time left on Earth for them.
MusicHound823@reddit
hundreds of people isn't really a lot
i also like how this post simultaniously talks about how fucked Earth is going to get regardless of what we do, but also "that you should do something or else you're evil" like bro what
ParamedicExcellent15@reddit
That’s just it. History won’t remember
blastermckaster@reddit
Yeah I think there's no stopping this train, but trying is the only hope we have.
Cereal_Ki11er@reddit
All of the people in power are committed to the status quo and the accumulation of capital, even at the cost of billions of people’s lives. Some of them live in denial of what they are doing but as consequences continue to mount they will remain steadfast to their initial behavior.
Feels like a train car moral dilemma where saving the human species from itself requires personal martyrdom and most people you save will not even thank you for it.
roblewk@reddit
Worse than the status quo. Modi, Trump, Putin and so many other leaders want things worse than the status quo. They want to take us backwards. (China, to their credit, wants to increase all forms of energy, at least including green energy.) Science lost. Fascism wins. Science will make a comeback only once every other avenue has failed, and then it’ll be too late. (Ok, ok, is is already too late)
Cereal_Ki11er@reddit
Yeah the status quo I was referring to was industrialism. That’s what isn’t up for debate. imho ending industrialism is required to preserve a habitable climate for our species.
But yeah I agree with you fascism is what’s for dinner now, I think for years academia has been predicting this would be something that falls out of collapse.
TheArcticFox444@reddit
I hate long submission statements like this, OP. No chance to isolate parts (or even all of it) to reply to.
(Yes, I know how it's supposed to work...but, like so many things these days--including the whole climate problem/solution issue--it just doesn't.)
I'll follow your thread...for a while, anyway. The same old warnings, the same old blame, the same old outrage, the same old fear, despair, frustration, etc...well, it just gets boring after a while.
Even my own two-cents worth bores me. (At least, OP, your long, long submission statement has spared me that.)
So, I'll do the only sensible thing left to do...I'll leave it up to Mother Nature. After all, she got us into this.
And, as BD's character said in the movie All About Eve, "Fasten your seat belts...it's going to be a bumpy night."
TheExaltedTwelve@reddit
More AI generated flavour text. Bravo
Gyirin@reddit
Its from a blog of an environmental activist, bro.
icklefluffybunny42@reddit
Because Roger Hallam - who is also a published author - and his team of assistants couldn't possibly write something eloquent could they? Totally impossible in 2025 for anyone to do that. A skill that has existed for millenia, suddenly lost to time, and replaced 100% by a silicon ghost writer. Without exception.
This McCarthyism style AI* LLM witch hunt is getting beyond absurd. It stinks of paranoia and fear, lacks any hint of critical thinking, and is rapidly heading towards some sort of state of mass delusion, divorced from reality.
LLM slop is bad, but not all slop is LLM. In the same way that not everything that is well written is LLM output. Maybe we should all limit our posts or comments to single sentences and not use words in excess of 2 syllables or use any words beyond a typical 6th grade vocabulary.
NyriasNeo@reddit
" We Can’t Escape"
Of course we can. Never heard of death?
Lord_Vesuvius2020@reddit
I hope this piece isn’t AI curated or generated. I think by now everyone on this sub knows collapse by climate change is coming. While this is true, at the same time it’s more and more obvious that collapse due to political instability, war, geopolitics, and financial collapse will be stopping by even sooner. Maybe if the first collapse is bad enough it will help with the climate change collapse?
icklefluffybunny42@reddit
M.A.D. Mutual Assisted Degrowth.
'In an insane world, it was the sanest choice.' /s?
StatementBot@reddit
The following submission statement was provided by /u/RobinBoardman:
Submission Statement: This is from Roger’s Blog from prison on the latest climate science and our collapse future.
Please reply to OP's comment here: https://old.reddit.com/r/collapse/comments/1ltyd59/climate_reality_the_diagnosis_we_cant_escape_by/n1tysgu/
RobinBoardman@reddit (OP)
Submission Statement: This is from Roger’s Blog from prison on the latest climate science and our collapse future.