What do you just don’t understand?
Posted by CeeAre7@reddit | AskUK | View on Reddit | 966 comments
Like something you just don’t understand no matter how many times it’s been explained to you?
For me it’s how commercial planes manage to stay in the sky. It’s heavy with over 200+ passengers, luggage’s and whatever else.
I’ve been documentaries on YouTube, but just still can’t fathom how such a big flying object can stay in the sky like that, or maybe I’m just daft.
AdultADHDer@reddit
The scoring in tennis - it just won't commit to my memory because it makes NO sense!
kittyvixxmwah@reddit
The numbers involved are totally arbitrary, it's true. However, my mum is a big tennis fan, so I'll try and explain it to you the way she explained it to me.
You need at least four points to win a Game. The scoring goes 15, 30, 40, win.
However, you have to win a game by two clear points. Therefore, if the score reaches 40-40 (as both players have scored three points), it becomes Deuce, which is another way of saying 40-40.
From that point, a player must score two points in a row to win that game. The first point is called Advantage, so the scoring would say Adv-40. If the other player then scores to bring the points level, it's back to Deuce. This can technically go on for as long as the players have the energy for.
That's how a Game is scored.
To win a Set, a player must win at least six Games. Again, the lead must be at least two games.
A Match is usually best of three or best of five Sets.
There's various extra things in there such as tiebreaks, but that's the gist of it. 🙂
AdultADHDer@reddit
Thank you so much and sorry for taking so long to reply! This helped me greatly whilst watching the final yesterday with the other half - I actually got excited during it too!
kittyvixxmwah@reddit
Yay! I'm glad it helped!
Majjestyk@reddit
Why does history keep repeating itself, and the fact we never learn from it
Disastrous-Buddy4632@reddit
Education system is to blame for many
Otherwise it’s not caring and arrogance aka narcissism or psychopathy
Azlamington@reddit
The season in relation to sunrise/sunset.
Here in Britain, I found it easy to understand from childhood. Summer, the Earth's tilt has brought Britain a little bit closer to the equator, warmer weather, sun appears higher in the sky therefore it has further to travel = longer days. 5am sunrise 10pm sunset. The opposite for the winter, 8am sunrise 4pm sunset. Simple.
But then I went to Jamaica on holiday in June. Sunrise was around 4am, expected that, but sunset was around 4pm!! Why?, How?. I don't think I'll ever understand this!
Disastrous-Buddy4632@reddit
Longer days are relative to longitude. The further north you go, the longer the days are in summer, the shorter the days are in winter. This is due to the tilt of the earth.
Hotter in summer because earth is closer to the sun on its oval shaped orbit.
MerlinTrismegistus@reddit
How rhe shadow on the moon shows a half moon. How can spherical objects create a straight line. I try to imagine it but struggle
Disastrous-Buddy4632@reddit
The shadow isn’t from the moon, what you see is the part of the moon that the sun is currently shining on.
Thevanillafalcon@reddit
Maths in general. I’m pretty sure I have maths dyslexia. I can’t remember the name. Maybe I don’t but I’ll tell you what it’s like
I can do basic sums, but it takes a long time to get my head around stuff and if you change something my brain falls apart.
I recently started studying to do my network plus exam and part of it is working out IP addresses from binary, I won’t bore you the the details but they guy explained it pretty well, and then he said “oh if you reverse it you can do X with it” and my head just exploded
Like I can maybe do stuff with a lot of practice but it’s very rigid the second you tell me that I can do something else with it my mind just slips away.
Disastrous-Buddy4632@reddit
Dyscalculia.
YeahOkIGuess99@reddit
I don't understand the concept of spacetime. I mean I am nowhere near a physicist or astronomy person, but I like reading about space. How can time be linked to space? How can a black hole bend time as well as space?
It hurts my brain trying to get my head around it.
Disastrous-Buddy4632@reddit
Time slows down by a black hole which makes time travel to the future theoretically possible.
Disastrous-Buddy4632@reddit
How do small wires like headphones wires get so tangled without doing anything to make them tangled?
griffaliff@reddit
How to play poker and the offside rule. Tried so many times to learn and it just doesn't compute or sink in.
PaintingJams@reddit
there has to be 2 defensive players between the attacker and the goal at the point the ball is kicked. If an attacking player was ahead of the last defender (i.e just the attacker vs the goalie) a the point the pass was kicked then the attacking player was offside.
the variations and complications come in to exactly how we measure the offside-ness of the position. Back in the day there used to have to be daylight between the players (i.e you were a full stride ahead of the defender), then sometimes it was purely about leading foot. Now with VAR its about any "goal scoring" part of the body, so shoulders and hips count, but hands do not
griffaliff@reddit
I won't lie this makes little sense to me but I appreciate the effort mate!
Upset-Elderberry3723@reddit
Poker is pretty simple, right? Everybody gets a hand, and there are (in most variations) cards laid out on the table (in my experience, typically five). Players must decide, based upon their hand, whether they want to fold (give up that round) or continue playing by raising the stake (putting more money/chips into the centre to be gambled).
Once everybody has decided whether to raise the stake or fold for the round, another card is revealed on the table, giving further context to what possible hands may be possible for the players at the end. Once all of thr table cards have been turned upwards, all remaining players reveal their hands and, whoever has the highest-ranking combination lf cards wins the money.
Texas Hold Em is a different variation entirely where everyone gets 5 cards and then has to decide how many of them they want to keep. Any cards that aren't kept are replenished with new cards from the dealer, and that's the player's finalised hand. So, you want to try and predict what cards are coming up and keep only the cards that you think will add to a good hand.
Bad_Combination@reddit
Poker I really struggle with, but even Blackjack I’ve had explained to me more than once and it just doesn’t sink in.
_ShredBundy@reddit
Blackjack is pretty easy, and this is coming from someone who only knows how to play blackjack. My brain starts combusting as soon as someone even attempts to explain a card game to me.
Beannie26@reddit
A ponzi scheme.
ThePlasticHippy@reddit
Computers, how the fuck does a load of materials fit together, connect to this magical invisible land called the internet and allow me to get the answer to any stupid question that pops into my head.
DisMyLik18thAccount@reddit
YES
I've Tried reading into how computers work before, and it kinda makes sense on face value, but I still don't know how we got to that point from raw materials. Like I get a certain set of 1s and 0s means a certain thing to a computer, but how did you get an inanimate object to 'know' that?
colei_canis@reddit
Computers strictly speaking don't 'know' anything, they simply follow the rules we define in software to whatever their conclusion may be. Even something like ChatGPT which appears to 'know' how to speak English is really just an enormous pile of maths.
As for what's happening on a physical level, the rawest material of a computer is a transistor. In the context of computers you can think of a transistor as a switch, electricity flows through the transistor but this flow can be turned on or off with another electrical signal. This gives us two distinct states our 'switch' can be in, which we can represent mathematically as the digits 0 and 1.
We can choose to say 'when the voltage is more than x volts it's a 1, and when it's less than y volts it's a 0' but this is very much our choice, not the computer's. Our use of the number 10 as the base (ie where numbers 'slide over' to the next significant figure) is also an arbitrary choice based on the fact we have 10 fingers, with binary numbers we use 2 as the base rather than 10 as its more practical. However, whether we choose to represent the number twenty two in decimal as 20 + 2 = 22 or in binary as 10000 (16) + 100 (4) + 10 (2) = 10110 it's the same number.
Transistors that take these binary inputs and outputs can be arranged into logic gates, their job is to perform logical operations on these binary numbers. An example would be an AND gate, it has two inputs and one output. The output is 1 if the inputs are both 1, but otherwise it outputs 0. Using these logic gates we can do maths, certain arrangements of logic gates can do binary addition or subtraction for example.
A CPU contains many of these arrangements of logic gates, all with specific purposes. You have things like registers, cache, clocks and so on all which all play a role in handling the logical operations the processor can do - many of these rely on precise timing. These are defined in an 'instruction set' which is a description of all the things you can tell the CPU to do. This is 'low level', it speaks entirely in terms of what binary numbers you need to give to a specific processor to make it do a specific bit of maths.
When a programmer writes software, they describe the maths they want the computer to perform in a 'high level' language which means they don't care about the ins and outs of the specific instructions a processor needs, instead they write in a langauge easier for humans to understand. There's many different high level programming languages for different programming tasks, but they all have to be turned into a specific sequence of binary numbers the processor will blindly eat through - following the logic to its arbitrary conclusion.
When the programmer wants to run their high level code, they use compilers and assemblers which are programs designed to automatically translate their high level languages to the low level 'machine code' defined in the instruction set. This would be extremely tedious to do by hand, for the same reason you don't mow your lawn with a pair of nail scissors.
This is an extremely oversimplified version of what's going on (from a software guy rather than a hardware guy no less), but the machine doesn't 'know' anything other than the logic gates that were etched into it when it was made according to its instruction set. At the end of the day it's just electricity representing maths, with limitless time and space you could do anything a computer does with pen and paper!
Lower_Inspector_9213@reddit
Thanks for this ^^ 😮
ThePlasticHippy@reddit
Thanks for taking the time to write that, very interesting, not going to lie still over my head slightly but very helpful.
colei_canis@reddit
No worries!
Mithent@reddit
The other answers are correct, but on the more philosophical side, you can also question how much our brains are essentially very complex analogue computers ultimately made from inanimate raw materials which, when put together just right, gives form to thinking creatures which experience "knowing" things.
forgotpassword_aga1n@reddit
It doesn't know what they mean. It just blindly performs mathematical operations on the numbers you give it.
paolog@reddit
If you've got 7 and a bit hours to spare, this answers your question: https://youtu.be/alnpuKsegO4
KarlRichards572@reddit
I got my masters in computer science last year.
I understand how it all works, but it still confuses me. Like how in the hell did people figure this out? Im 100% convinced they are magic at some level, they gotta be
Matt_Moto_93@reddit
I think its one of those things that started out quite simple, and as the years rolled on and the collective hive-mind intelligence around computing kept developing the hardware, it just got too complicated for any one person to ever understand. At this point i couldnt imagine even reverse-engineering some of the things. You need to develop tech to continuing developing tech, its just so at odds with itself
Dashie_2010@reddit
I'm one of those strange people who willingly subjected themselves to an EEE course. Studied semiconductors for a bit.. I cannot be convinced that it isn't just black magic released in the form of smoak when I fuck up.
Jolly-Minimum-6641@reddit
Computers eventually get so low level that it's beyond "computer science" and is in the depths of EEE and physics.
MattHatter1337@reddit
Wait till you learn about the computer they made in minecraft......that runs minecraft.
That one gets me. I truely dont get that.
RhinoRhys@reddit
That is a very simple case of "too much time on their hands"
Frazzle_Dazzle_@reddit
Didn't someone order pizza through minecraft?
sihasihasi@reddit
Fairly sure some guy made a phone that you could actually make video calls from, too.
cherryandfizz@reddit
First thought when I saw this post honestly. Actually mental, I can’t fathom it.
CriticismTop@reddit
I was at a tech conference a couple of weeks ago.
A dude did a demo of making a really simple computer. He did 5+3 and got 8 and his "CPU" was literally just some switches - absolutely brilliant.
Had had dinner with him that evening (along with a bunch of other nerds) and had a great time. Waitresses must have thought we were all nutters though.
rssvitamins@reddit
I recommend this playlist by Ben Eater. Creates a computer from the absolute basics and explains it along the way.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyznrdDSSGM&list=PLowKtXNTBypGqImE405J2565dvjafglHU&index=1
PsycommuSystem@reddit
You might want to start by reading about how basic circuits work and logic gates.
phatboi23@reddit
we taught a rock to math REALLy REALLY fast.
gogybo@reddit
Same here. I get transistors (sort of), I get logic gates, I get binary and machine code and operating systems and programs...but I just don't get how I can press a key on a keyboard and see the letter appear on the screen. Or how I can press (Run) and execute a piece of code. It's baffling.
turkishhousefan@reddit
Switches. Trillions of switches.
ThePlasticHippy@reddit
Don’t baffle me with your magic…witch
Ornery-Vanilla-7410@reddit
And one of those materials is sand
Strict-Soup@reddit
How people believe what they read on social media and the daily mail
thisismyuaernamr@reddit
Chinese writing
beetlejuiceandlydia@reddit
How about the fact that satellites, including the ISS, are in constant free fall plummeting towards the earth. But the lateral speed of the satellite combined with the earth's rotation means that it never loses actual altitude. Sounds made up, right?
Dissidant@reddit
Dog poo bags on tree branches
wordsfromlee@reddit
What about it don't you understand?
People are lazy. Thats all there is to it.
Repulsive-Life7362@reddit
If they’re lazy why don’t they just leave the dog shit on thr ground. It’s actually better to do that. What good does throwing it up a tree do? You’ve already picked it up. It baffles me too
jelly-rod-123@reddit
Stick & flick is actual uk gov advice if your near a hedge or woodland
bornfromanegg@reddit
Is it? Where dis it say that?
jelly-rod-123@reddit
here it is for you
bornfromanegg@reddit
lol. Thanks for the help. Although this is part of the top result:
jelly-rod-123@reddit
Less popular but still legal
Polldit220@reddit
Theory has it that you hang the bag on a low branch on your dog walking round so that you pick it up on the return and bin it to save you carrying it all the way round. At least that’s what you say to yourself and then conveniently forget to pick the thing up.
_InvertedEight_@reddit
Or, you use bio-degradable bags and have tried to chuck said bag of poo into a wooded area where people are less likely to walk, and at some point on its flight path, an errant tree branch catches one of the handles, thus creating the “shit bauble”.
herbertbeard@reddit
It's because the dog pooped in sight of someone, maybe there's a house and someone might have been watching from the window or whatever. So they pick it up, then they throw it when they're 100% sure there's no one around.
MaxMouseOCX@reddit
A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals and you know it.
Morris_Alanisette@reddit
I've met plenty of people who are stupid all on their own.
MaxMouseOCX@reddit
Well I guess it hit way better when agent K from men in black said it hu?
_InvertedEight_@reddit
Ah…. “Shit baubles”.
Ambitious5uppository@reddit
Judy Dench is to blame for these you know?
But she's a national treasure, so what can you do?
She got arrested for it
Traditional_Tea_6425@reddit
People who leave these should also be put in a similar situation as the bags they leave.
Nothing ruins a nice country walk more than seeing (and smelling) these.
Familiar-Woodpecker5@reddit
Oh this is high up in my piss me off list! Lazy bastards!
WatchFamine@reddit
Answer to OP: Reddit and dog poo bags on tree branches.
I regularly walk on multiple leafy routes popular with dog walkers, including one where there are no bins, and never see it. How has this become a cultural cornerstone?!
Dissidant@reddit
Plus when the weathers nice the sun hits them and they wind up looking like old man balls
inevitablelizard@reddit
And smelling worse.
Honestly it's fucking embarrassing as a country that this problem is so widespread. Lazy fucking troglodytes who just need exterminating.
Any-Talk-2307@reddit
It is a cult. The lazy dog owner poop haters.
ErectPotato@reddit
I’ve known dog walkers to hide a poo bag somewhere at the start of their walk with the intention to collect it on their way back because they know there’s no bins.
So I reckon putting them in a branch is a way to remember it.
It’s still fucking rank though. Even if they do remember to take it, it basically means that tree is permanent ooo tree
Randy_Baton@reddit
adverts and advertisements.... they piss me off more than anything. Like if coke didn't advertise for a year would it actually harm sales more than the 2 billion they spend on advertising.
Evil_Sponge_666@reddit
The way this was explained to me by someone who works in marketing: Coca Cola is essentially identical to any other coke. The only difference between the two products is the brand. Coca Cola spends a lot of money on maintaining its position as /the/ coke brand.
zagreus9@reddit
Coke's marketing it amazing. They have total market saturation, they cannot get more peopel to buy coke. Their marketing now is purely to get you to buy MORE coke, and remind people the brand exists.
It's brand awareness, and yes, if they stopped advertising their sales would go down as other adverts for other soft drinks filled your conscious
MrMotorcycle94@reddit
I work in IT infrastructure and I still hardly understand Sharepoint permissions and custom access groups...
Evil_Sponge_666@reddit
Even Microsoft don't understand that
RuaRuaRua81@reddit
Everything I know about sharepoint, I self-taught from Google as our IT support doesn't know how it works either 😅
idontlikemondays321@reddit
Photographs It will never not blow my mind that we can press a button and that second in time is there forever. I’ve had it explained to me but it’s it still feels like some kind of sorcery
redwheeeeelbarrow@reddit
Same here. This and music being captured and then stored in vinyls, cds or tapes
Aztecprincess94@reddit
This is one that really sticks out for me. I’ve always been amazed by it, like how do you capture real life? I’ve looked it up but the explanation was too technical for me. I need a simplified version.
frankchester@reddit
If you truly want to know I recommend trying to make yourself a pinhole camera. It helps you understand the light aspect of the camera. The "capture" part is the complex chemical bit. The light bit you can do yourself at home.
When I was at uni, if I kept my bedroom curtains in halls open a crack I could see the shapes of people in the square below walking around reflected on my ceiling.
yeeyeevee@reddit
that happened for me once too! confused the hell out of me until i realised i’d accidentally made a pinhole camera
BenAdam321@reddit
Not to oversimplify, but think of it this way:
Photo means light. Graph means drawing.
A camera sees light in front of the lens, and sensor ‘draws’ (or captures) it onto film or an SD card.
No-Communication3618@reddit
I always thought of cameras as time machines. By exposing the camera sensor to a set amount of time (shutter speed) you are essentially capturing that moment in time via light exposure.
Working_Bowl@reddit
I’ve never really thought about this before, it’s made me have a bit of an out of body existential crisis and now I’ll never be able to unthink it.
No-Drink-8544@reddit
Of course it's magic
Donjeur@reddit
What we see is our brain making sense of the signals coming into eyes. What a camera captures is what’s really there with no processing. Imagine if the images we captured were different to what we see!
Astrohurricane1@reddit
And the fact you can see something and think, that looks pretty, press a few buttons on your phone and a second later someone on the other side of the planet can see it too. 🤯
DisMyLik18thAccount@reddit
My understanding is it's kinda like how a projector works, but the light burns onto the surface it's being projected onto
Idk how accurate that is though
Jolly-Minimum-6641@reddit
And digital cameras use a very similar process, except it's electronic sensors which save the data as a file.
essjay2009@reddit
Kind of depends whether you’re talking about digital or film photography.
Colour film photography is magic. I can’t believe we invented it as relatively early as we did to such a high quality. The chemistry at all stages is mind bending.
Defaulted1364@reddit
Colour film is one of those inventions that shouldn’t have happened, it should’ve been made obsolete by digital before we figured it out but somehow we managed it.
pringellover9553@reddit
This actually made it make sense to me. But how does it work now on phones since it’s not on paper and not always a flash? How does it capture the image??? I don’t get it man
Theratchetnclank@reddit
It's just a light sensor chip. Electrons in the chip get excited when hit by light and produce a current, that's recorded as digital data which is the image you see. It's less crazy than film cameras imo.
Sweaty-Adeptness1541@reddit
That is pretty spot on.
Con_Clavi_Con_Dio@reddit
It's a actually pretty simple. The camera uses its mirrors and lens to steal your soul and holds it captured in time until it is copied to a computer or in the days of film, developed. This is why babies shouldn't see their own reflection in a mirror.
Own_Art_2465@reddit
Original photographs-imagine shining light through a clear sheet with different shades of images on it (did you have a projector at school? Same as that). The image that is projected is then burnt onto film via chemicals that react to light exposure
ManTurnip@reddit
Ironically I can get my head around conventional photos a lot easier than I can digital photos.
cjeam@reddit
Yeah, wet film process? Easy, chemicals reacting to light. A CCD or even worse a CMOS array? Basically magic.
Ok_Donkey_1997@reddit
I studied Computer Science in university, and probably the main thing that motivated me to do this was one day as a kid when I was watching TV and they were talking about video game programming and and I was completely blown away by the idea that the games I was playing was just the result of some electricity flowing through some circuits and somehow this results in an interactive, virtual world appearing on a screen.
Having gone through university, and having worked in the software industry for more than a decade, I now know how a lot of this stuff works, at least on a technical level.
It still feels like magic to me though. The sheer amount of things that have to happen, just so you can read this text is absolutely mind-boggling. There is just no way this can be real.
Feelincheekyson@reddit
I’ve never thought about that before and now my brain is absolutely frazzled
MattHatter1337@reddit
No sarcasm etc.
How well do you fathom/deal with painted pictures/drawings?
Jlaw118@reddit
Never thought of it like that and I’ve studied photography and filmmaking for countless hours when I was in education 😂
Clear-Mix1969@reddit
Same for me. Doesn’t seem right
GregSame@reddit
How Radio/TV signals work. I understand a transmitter sends a signal and the aerial receives it...but how/what it sends and how it gets turned to a picture/sound...forget it.
colei_canis@reddit
Think of radio signals as behaving a bit like light. You have this oscillating field called the 'carrier wave' which your reciever can 'see' like the beam of a lighthouse, and you encode the information you want to send by what you do to that beam. Altering the beam according to the signal you want to send is called modulation.
With AM (amplitude modulation) you vary the amplitude of the carrier wave according to the signal you want to send, this is a bit like connecting your lighthouse to some music and altering the brightness of the light in time with it. With FM (frequency modulation) you keep the 'brightness' constant and instead change the colour slightly according to the music. Either way, your reciever can see the beam and the changes that happen to it, and by reversing these changes in a process called demodulation you can get the original signal out.
GregSame@reddit
I retract my previous statement! Thank you kind stranger.
Trace6x@reddit
I guess they're just signals we don't have the hardware to detect as humans. Like sound waves we can hear because we have ears, light waves we can see because we have eyes, radio frequencies need an electronic reciever to decode into light and sound waves that we can see (on a screen)
fireeyedboi@reddit
I do not understand the differences between temperature scales. I’m sure I could learn it easily but I just don’t care.
True-Abalone-3380@reddit
Air is a fluid like water, just not as dense.
When you swim you sort of float and thrust yourself forward.
Try sticking your arm out of a moving car with a flat palm. Tilt the front upwards like a wing and you'll feel the air pushing your arm up. That is lift. Get enough lift with enough trust and you'll fly.
Never every try to work out how helicopters work.
Scary-Rain-4498@reddit
You dont even really need lift. With enough thrust a brick could fly, which is how modern jets can continue to fly when aero stalled. Very good low level explanation though
Leader_Bee@reddit
Not quite correct, the curved surface of a wing causes air to move faster over it which generated an area of low pressure which "sucks" the plane upwards into it.
Youll find a similar situation occurs between the fast flowing water coming from a shower will often suck a nearby shower curtain towards it, this is because it is causing a pressure differential.
Obligatory I am not an aeronautics specialist, so, I can't get more specific and explain it with maths.
True-Abalone-3380@reddit
I posted this in another reply.
I draw your attention to https://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/k-12/VirtualAero/BottleRocket/airplane/wrong1.html and https://www.scientificamerican.com/video/no-one-can-explain-why-planes-stay-in-the-air/ as to incorrect lift theories.
SureElderberry15@reddit
with that helicopter comment you've unlocked Pandora's box. this comment section is absolutely fantastic.
True-Abalone-3380@reddit
I know, it was just meant to be a throaway comment hinting that it's all black magic & prayer keeping those whirlybirds up in the sky.
Good to see a wide variety of sensible and not so sensible comments :-)
GlasgowTA95@reddit
Hate to be that guy, but your hand example is air resistance aka drag (there may be marginal lift forces being generated but not really noticeable). It's a fun example though.
What people forget is that the surface area of a wing is pretty huge and the velocity quite fast, so quite a lot of life is able to be generated.
True-Abalone-3380@reddit
If you hold you hand at an angle, particularly up to about 45 degrees, you will get lift as demonstrated by your arm flying up or down.
GlasgowTA95@reddit
That's air resistance aka drag you are feeling. Maximum force is felt perpendicular to the direction of flow which is because it's air resistance and not lift. It's the vertical component of the drag that you feel as "lift" but that's not what "proper" lift is... As I said, there's likely a very very very very small amount of lift being generated, but that is not what you are feeling when your arm moves!
HotRabbit999@reddit
Only helicopter pilots call planes "fixed wing" aircraft. Wings are supposed to be fixed otherwise they'd fall off...
FloydEGag@reddit
It’s like being in a ship but with air instead of water. Air has a mass. This is what I tell myself during turbulence, anyway
True-Abalone-3380@reddit
And that's how airships work, light gas displaces air so they float.
ThePumpk1nMaster@reddit
I assume you meant “thrust,” and pilots aren’t just getting to the end of runaways going, “Ah well, fingers crossed!”
True-Abalone-3380@reddit
LOL, good spot however perhaps trust is needed more that thrust!
generic-username9067@reddit
Witchcraft and devilry as far as I'm concerned. The helicopter, not the noble and reverent aeroplane.
Reasonable_Blood6959@reddit
I’ve been flying commercial jets for 6 years. Helicopters are definitely black magic. They shouldn’t exist. Helicopter pilots have mythical levels of coordination. I’ve tried a few helicopter simulators and I can’t fly them for shit. Im convinced helicopter pilots need a bond with their beast like a Targaryen riding a Dragon.
Tom_FooIery@reddit
I used to build aeroplanes back in the day, and I’m convinced helicopters work like Green Lantern ring and it’s only the pilot’s willpower keeping them in the air.
S3lad0n@reddit
Guardians of the Universe as Hal crashes a Chinook: this is a violation of our bullshit you can’t use the ring for personal gain
dmmeyourfloof@reddit
I was told as a cadet that the helicopters rotor blades don't keep it in the air, they're just there to keep the pilot cool.
You can tell this is true, because as soon as the rotor's stop turning in mid air, the pilot starts to sweat uncontrollably.
NerdLevel18@reddit
Aeroplanes fly using the laws of physics. Helicopters beat them into submission.
Creepy_Radio_3084@reddit
I've read that, according to the laws of aerodynamics, a bumblebee shouldn't be able to fly, either. Who's going to tell them?
Badger_1066@reddit
Sorry to be a party pooper, but that's a myth. They don't break the laws of physics.
SouthernWait8750@reddit
Boo this ^ person! Why spoil the party? Don't be sorry, just don't do it.
Badger_1066@reddit
Can't help it. I'm a bore.
SouthernWait8750@reddit
Who am I kidding? We love you man, bore or not.
You add so much to this community and you are an asset to society at large. Please don't change who you are.
Dolgar01@reddit
They have proved how bumblebees fly. It’s to do with their wings being flexible and not stiff. So they produce more lift then people thought at first.
konwiddak@reddit
If you treat a bumblebee like a fixed wing aircraft - then yes they can't fly. However it's pretty obvious that they aren't a fixed wing aircraft.
True-Abalone-3380@reddit
No, they are drones......
Creepy_Radio_3084@reddit
They aren't helicopters either...
RoutineCloud5993@reddit
Bumblebees and helicopters fly in pretty similar fashion if I remember correctly.
QVRedit@reddit
The calculations were correct !
Bumble bees really cannot fly like aeroplanes do….
They fly differently…
Signal-Ad2674@reddit
A lively urban myth unfortunately disproved by both physicists, biologists and reality.
Willsagain2@reddit
Bumblebees fly because they dont know how not to (Major Neuheim)
Creepy_Radio_3084@reddit
And this has always been my favourite 'explanation'! 😂
Ze_Gremlin@reddit
I told a bumblebees in my garden and it immediately dropped to the floor and started crawling.
It's just their ego that keeps them up in the sky, they think they're all that because they make delicious flower-spit goop.. cocky little bastards..
Creepy_Radio_3084@reddit
😂😂😂
-Kyrt-@reddit
Maybe it’s one of those ‘enough knowledge to be dangerous’ things. As in, you think you know how the controls should respond but they just don’t work that way.
I have flown RC models for decades and helicopters used to be very difficult to fly compared to planes, especially hovering ‘nose in’ (ie when it’s facing you but not moving forward) - the controls are reversed which is a nightmare when you need to make constant instantaneous tiny corrections - it has to be muscle memory. This is made worse because the flybar (there to make it at least possible to fly) dampened everything. At least in a full scale helicopter you are actually sat in it so forward is always forward and left is always left. Plus the size of it slows everything down making it easier to make the adjustments to keep it still. Put it this way, I found a full size sim much easier to fly than a real RC heli. For anyone reading this who doesn’t agree they are hard to fly, know that these days an RC heli is much easier because the gyros keep it dead on stable and you don’t have to worry about thousand tiny stick movements just to stop it crashing. They still crash just as spectacularly though - when a blade travelling that fast hits something the energy transfer is no joke. And I suspect scaled up they’re still harder than planes for the same reason - you just cannot fly them ‘hands off’ whatsoever, they require constant input in at least three axes at the same time.
But in terms of why a heli is able to fly, I don’t really get the difficulty (at least if you do get aeroplanes). Rotors are just wings travelling at a squillion knots - why wouldn’t they provide lift? For me the coolest part of a helicopter is doing it without power - ie autorotation - though even then it’s not so different to diving and flaring in a fixed wing aircraft.
Defaulted1364@reddit
There was a (I believe BBC) programme many years ago where they stuck a load of ordinary people in flight simulators to see who could do it with no training. Most of the participants managed to takeoff and land a small plane, a fair few managed to figure out the larger planes and if I remember correctly one bloke got off the ground in the helicopter and immediately crashed.
westofcentre@reddit
I flew a helicopter once under instruction. It was like riding a bike without using the handlebars only 100x as difficult. Maybe balancing on top of a giant beach ball is more accurate. It was definitely feeling it balance through my body rather than using the instruments. I've got the video to prove I did it but never again.
Bladeslap@reddit
If it makes you feel any better I'm a helicopter pilot and I struggle with flying helicopter simulators!
Familiar-Woodpecker5@reddit
What an exciting job you have!
colin_staples@reddit
A helicopter is made from thousands of parts, all of which are trying to kill you.
CriticismTop@reddit
I was once building an RC helicopter with the founder of the company where I worked. We were connecting the tail rotor with an elastic band when he says "this is exactly like my full size helicopter!"
Yes, one of the many "only" things keeping you from dying is an elastic band.
colin_staples@reddit
I'm guessing the real thing uses a toothed drive belt...
Bladeslap@reddit
No, it's multiple V belts. They're used on piston helicopters and the belts are tightened or loosened so they act as a clutch - you would need one hell of a starter motor to turn the engine over with the rotors meshed to the engine!
You wouldn't automatically die if the belt snapped though, helicopters can glide
-Kyrt-@reddit
Ironically RC helis generally do use a toothed belt, or these days even a torque tube. I honestly don’t remember any with a plain elastic belt, though admittedly I didn’t own one before 2000ish.
If the tail belt were to snap in one it would be pretty catastrophic though for almost any pilot, it’s pretty hard to manually sync a freewheeling tail rotor with the main rotor sufficiently that the pitch of the blades can actually keep the nose straight, it’s hard enough to autorotate a model heli at all, let alone having to think about the tail separately, given you only get a couple of seconds before you hit the ground.
TBH I’m not sure how you’d actually physically do it in a full scale heli either - I get how you can use your movement to generate rotation in the main rotor but it seems fundamentally not possible for a freewheeling tail rotor.
Bladeslap@reddit
I have to admit the only RC helicopter I know much about is a year 2000 TT Raptor, which had a centrifugal clutch. I assume they're still the same?
In a real helicopter the main and tail rotors are connected by a drive shaft (torque tube if you prefer, but they're referred to as a drive shaft). The engine crankshaft is more or less parallel to that drive shaft, and the belt links the crankshaft pulley to the drive shaft. If all the belts snap then engine drive is lost but the main and tail rotors are still linked so you still retain full tail rotor authority (but need a good bit of right boot to compensate for the loss of torque). If the tail rotor drive shaft broke then the tail rotor is useless anyway, as any power demand on it would slow it to stall almost immediately. In that case the procedure is generally to maintain forward airspeed at 60+ knots so the vertical stabiliser compensates for torque then perform an autorotation to a run on landing. I'm in no hurry to test the theory though!
-Kyrt-@reddit
Ok so that is different then. In a model heli the belt is what transfers power to the tail rotor not the entire drive, that’s usually done with a pinion on the motor driving a main gear, and that main gear is driving both the main rotor shaft and a pulley that the belt is attached to. So if the belt snapped then the main gear would be powered but the tail not. Whereas if the pinion is stripped or some other failure then the main gear would lose power and both rotors would freewheel at the same rate.
I think the previous commenter was referring to the elastic being the connection from the drive to the tail rotor though, ie the way the RC model using an elastic band (belt) rather than a drive shaft.
Bladeslap@reddit
The belt drives the tail rotor drive shaft, but that drive shaft runs from the TR gearbox to the main rotor gearbox. I've never seen a full size helicopter with a belt driven tail rotor. There are some pics here - what might not be clear is that the driveshaft continues through the other side of the pulley (or sheave).
-Kyrt-@reddit
Yeah I know very little about “1:1 scale” construction heh, maybe whatever heli their boss had really did have a tail I have no clue I just know that’s where the belt is on RC models - the thunder tiger raptor models also used a belt to drive the tail rotor AFAIK.
Theratchetnclank@reddit
The Jesus nut if the scary bit on helicopters.
Diavoletto21@reddit
Not exactly, the aircraft he's referring to is probably a Robinson helicopter. They use V bands to transfer drive.
The platforms that I've worked on however, abit more robust, metal drive shafts etc.
colin_staples@reddit
Well TIL
CriticismTop@reddit
No, his was definitely an elastic band. His helicopter was outside and he took me out to show me. It was just a big elastic band.
Something like an Apache or a Black Hawk probably more robust, but I don't care.
words_in_helvetica@reddit
Helicopters don't want to fly. They hate it that you make them do it, and spend the whole flight in a rage, fighting with your every input, trying to kill you in a fit of spite.
Diavoletto21@reddit
They naturally want to vibrate themselves to bits but we have a load of control measures to reduce vibrations. That's the main factor of the aircraft wanting to kill itself.
Fit-Custard-1842@reddit
The Chinook is known as two angry palm trees flying in close formation.
Diavoletto21@reddit
Funnily enough that is the aircraft is the one im working with these days
Fit-Custard-1842@reddit
I stopped flying and working them in 1994 just after the D version was introduced to the UK after it's MLU at Boeing.
I was avionics.
Ze_Gremlin@reddit
Lazy little fuckers
marli3@reddit
Nah they put effort into falling out the sky, only the incantations of the engenseers and magcanics keep them there. (Look up acoustic harmonics if you think I'm fully joking)
giantthanks@reddit
Wait till you see the flying cars from Slovakia
nafregit@reddit
always feel with helicopters it's not if you'll crash it's when you'll crash. I've been in one once, sightseeing over Niagara Falls. Never again.
the_gwyd@reddit
I've just done a degree in engineering and can confirm that helicopters are powered by witchcraft and devilry
generic-username9067@reddit
Congrats on your degree! Solid effort :)
moleymolo@reddit
I’m an aircraft engineer and I still say witchcraft and devilry is what keeps it up in the air.
V65Pilot@reddit
Helicopters. Way too many parts, all moving in the wrong direction.
MrDankky@reddit
I always thought if you can generate over 1g of upthrust you’re countering gravity. How wrong am I?
AE_Phoenix@reddit
Same principle... just more circular.
Big fan, innit. Fan blows air down, push air down means pushing helicopter up because equivalent forces and all.
Bootglass1@reddit
I mean, how helicopters fly isn’t that complicated. Big fan push air down, something something Isaac newton, helicopter go up.
How they steer and control themselves is witchcraft.
No-Oil9121@reddit
After watching a Redbull Helicopter fly the entire length of the runway upside down last month i don't think I know how helicopters work
Diavoletto21@reddit
Im a maintenance engineer for a certain helicopter and the control mechanisms responsible for pitch / roll / yaw / collective are magic
Almost_Sentient@reddit
I've only ever built model helicopters, but the linkages that send the swashplate inputs to control the pitch of the paddles, which manipulates the angle of the beam they're on after they've wafted through the air , which then gets mixed with the swashplate again AT A DIFFERENT PHASE ANGLE, blows this electronics engineer's mind.
I've had some expensive piles of parts after forgetting threadlock on one of those bolts. I'm glad there are no bags of guts and muscle depending on me for my meagre aeromech skills.
I'd suggest to some of those who think that because they understand cyclic and collective they fully understand it, that actually there is some pretty ingenious stuff going on to make sure it doesn't go unstable.
And to you, Mr. Swirly bird mechanic, thanks! You legend.
jobblejosh@reddit
The craziest part is the interactions. You move the cyclic, and part of the helicopter's thrust is redirected to move it in the direction you move the joystick. But that means that there's now less lift going to keeping the helicopter up. Which means you need to increase the collective to maintain a stable altitude or rate of climb/descent.
Then you move the tail/rudder pedals. The tail rotor changes speed and causes the body of the helicopter to rotate (because the tail rotor thrust is now mismatching the counter-rotational force of the main rotor).
The motion of the body means that the relative speed of the main rotor through the air changes. Which means that depending on whether the body is rotating right or left, you'll need to increase or decrease the collective to again maintain stable altitude.
But wait! There's more!
When you increase/decrease the collective, to compensate for the relative airspeed change, you then increase or decrease the amount of counter-rotational force. Which means in order to maintain a stable rotation, you need to alter the pedal input. Which means you need to offset the collective, which means you offset the pedal, which means....
And there's even more! When you move the cyclic, you then move the collective to compensate, which means you then move the pedals to account for the new collective position!
It's like you're trying to ride five different unicycles all at once, and every unicycle changes the speed of every other unicycle.
And if you get it too out of balance, the unicycles kill you.
I can only imagine that if you practice for long enough it ceases to become a thought process and instead becomes a natural habit like how long-term video game players cease thinking directly about the controller inputs and let the subconscious brain deal with it.
Diavoletto21@reddit
The platform I work with kind of flies itself these days. They've come along way since they first came into services in the 70's.
The engine fueling is electronically controlled so no need for a throttle lever like the old Huey's. The flying controls have alot of assists to minimise pilot workload.
The real magic is in the avionics which control the aircraft.
jobblejosh@reddit
I was expecting that. I work in automation and so I was imagining a bunch of PID loops would work wonders for it (and I'm not surprised that as soon as they could be made to work they'd be fitted in).
Do you think there's still merit for new pilots to learn the manual controls way? I'm imagining that there's a requirement to be able to fly it with the barest of control assistance in case something shits the bed.
It's not quite like modern hypermaneuvrable fast jets which really are metastable and need constant computer assistance to not fall out of the sky.
But yeah, avionics is magic, be it the hardware or software.
Diavoletto21@reddit
I mean if you're only really planning on flying on 1 platform which is fairly modern in its control systems, I can't imagine there's much point in training the old fashioned way. It'd be like asking a mechanic to train themselves on carburettor based engines.
Although if you're a young pilot looking to be good at what you do, I'd highly recommend learning the old systems, no knowledge is bad knowledge.
I originally came from car mechanics before I entered aviation and every bit of knowledge, even though its abit redundant on modern systems, has helped my understanding of engineering as a whole.
jobblejosh@reddit
Completely agree with you there. I'd also add that if you're looking to be advanced in doing anything, an understanding of the fundamentals is vital.
Rote memorisation of the tools and techniques for a specific job will get you so far, but if you're looking to either diversify or progress, a solid understanding of the actual engineering/maths/framework/foundation which the single application is built on will make it a million times easier to learn a different platform/application, and it will aid in understanding the first platform at a deeper level.
It's the same in software development. Good programmers are taught how to program in the language they'll be using. Great programmers are taught (or learn) how to program.
Fit-Custard-1842@reddit
Check out the Chinook's DASH. (Direct Airspeed Hold) actuator if you want to blow your mind!
Diavoletto21@reddit
There doesn't seem to be anyone i know at the company that fully understands the mechanical flight control mechanisms. Not to mention the intricate avionics control modules that keep the aircraft stable and controllable for the pilot. Its nuts.
The whole aircraft can go any direction you want it to but there are only 2 control beams that actuate the swash plate. How you get seemingly infinitely intricate control of the aircraft from just 2 inputs to the swash is magic.
tartanthing@reddit
I've heard that only children who are able to pat their head and rub their belly at the same time are marked out at primary school as future helicopter pilots and then trained in secret while the rest of us get shitty "qualifications" and bad paying jobs for the rest of our lives.
ManTurnip@reddit
A helicopters blades are just a wing like a plane has, they just happen to spin as well.
ukslim@reddit
It's that they - through mechanical devices possible in the 1930s - change angle (when flying forwards) the back is lifting you slightly more than the front, each time they make a rotation.
ManTurnip@reddit
Yeah, they're essentially a combined elevator and aileron combined into a spinning wing. Clever though.
RoutineCloud5993@reddit
Well the rear rotor is what stops the cabin spinning around with the blades
marli3@reddit
*Against
Dildo_Shaggins-@reddit
Favourite comment I've read in a wee while. Thanks for the chuckle.
ASpookyBitch@reddit
That’s where the little fan 🪭 n the back comes in.
tonyferrino@reddit
Two basic mechanisms of control - the tail rotor to counteract the tendency of the airframe to rotate in opposition to the rotors, and control of the pitch of the rotor blades in order to direct the airflow in a certain direction. Basically.
tartanthing@reddit
All down to the Jesus nut.
Freedom-For-Ever@reddit
... And I can't believe that glass is also a fluid... just extremely viscous!
daddy-dj@reddit
I believe I can fly
thechuckingwoodchuck@reddit
Can you touch the sky though?
Willsagain2@reddit
I believe I can touch the sky
Ze_Gremlin@reddit
No no, the plane has to trust you. Its like when you gain the trust of a horse and it let's you climb on its back
dwhite21787@reddit
I’m clapping for you Tinkerbell
Formal_Sherbert1369@reddit
But surely helicopters to the layman make way more sense than planes because people are familiar with fans and it just looks like a massive fan pointing down?
marli3@reddit
A planes just a really big fan blade with rockets on.
slade364@reddit
Using the fan analogy, the base would be under the blades, so wouldn't it be pointing up?
Formal_Sherbert1369@reddit
I don’t think people are that stupid to realise which way the air is being pushed….?
slade364@reddit
They are.
Tankleton91@reddit
My understanding has always been that they just take the laws of physics and just punch them into submission.. They are magnificent to watch.. Just not worth the headache to understand.
SouthernWait8750@reddit
Yes, trust is key.
timind25@reddit
They don't fly, they're just so ugly that the earth repels them.
ThierryMercury@reddit
Helicopters don't fly. They are so ugly the Earth rejects them.
grimm_the_opiner@reddit
The sea is just the thick bottom part of the atmosphere. 😲
Majestic_Matt_459@reddit
Hi when you watch an A380 coming in to land at approx 150 knots (mph equiv) that’s really really hard to believe.
I had a Pilot explain it better to me once by taking about the flaps and the angle of thrust but I love plane spotting and I still watch it and think. That can’t be possible lol.
ShakeUpWeeple1800@reddit
I live near the flight path for Glasgow airport and I love seeing the heavy iron come in to land. I think that there's an odd kind of beauty in watching something so massive move with such . . . grace? Is that the word I'm looking for? The size distorts our perception of speed to make them look so much slower than they actually are.
I'm a control freak, so although I love planes, I absolutely despise flying. I'd feel a lot safer if they just let me drive, although I suspect that feeling would be rather short-lived.
HollywoodBrownMusic@reddit
That last paragraph is exactly how I feel about planes and flying
Kaiserlongbone@reddit
And I'm baffled by how big things look like they're moving so slowly, when they're actually moving so fast!
AdhesivenessNo6288@reddit
My dad was in the airforce and hates flying unless he's the one doing it. Some reason I think.
Majestic_Matt_459@reddit
I’m pretty much the same as you. I can watch them for hours and you’re right re the size. But when I found out they landed at a speed I’d done in a motorway once it really threw me.
And yes I’ve blown hundreds of times but still scared the helm out of me
V65Pilot@reddit
A landing is just a controlled crash.
Majestic_Matt_459@reddit
Thanks that makes me feel much safer ;) :)
Con_Clavi_Con_Dio@reddit
Walking is just controlled falling if that helps?
Watsis_name@reddit
"Any landing you can walk away from is a good landing."
True-Abalone-3380@reddit
And if they can use the aircraft again, that's a bonus.
nafregit@reddit
why is it that even though thats 172mph, it doesn't look like 172mph? It looks closer to walking pace.
Majestic_Matt_459@reddit
Yes soooo true lol
TheSecretIsMarmite@reddit
One of the smoothest landings I've had was on an A380 too. You'd think it would lumber onto the ground like a beached whale but I've had harder landings in a 737.
gazchap@reddit
If you were on a 737 you were probably flying on Ryanair... their pilots deliberately smash the plane into the ground hard because it improves turnaround times.
TheSecretIsMarmite@reddit
TUI and their partners use 737s too, and some of those landings have been rough.
matt_smith_keele@reddit
Exactly the same, just they only move their wings through the air (in a circle) to produce lift, rather than moving the whole vehicle through the air.
Then you tip the wings, same as tipping your hand in the car example, and the lift is directed in the direction they want to move.
NibblyPig@reddit
Now explain how they fly upside down without getting pushed down!
True-Abalone-3380@reddit
Same way, turn your arm upside down and angle your hand so the front is higher than the back.
If the fuselage was at the same angle to the ground then the "lift" would push it down. What matters is the angle of attack of the wings against the airflow.
E420CDI@reddit
"Man, eternally optimistic, kept trying..."
MrlemonA@reddit
Surly you can do the same exercise with hands out either side and spin, you won't generate enough lift obviously but it's the same principle. I appreciate you probably know all this already
JamsHammockFyoom@reddit
Any machine that has the wings moving faster than the rest of it should be fired into the sun, they're a freak of physics.
Bladeslap@reddit
It's only a problem if the average velocity of the rotor blades is different to the velocity of the rest of the aircraft!
drivingagermanwhip@reddit
According to all known laws of aviation, there is no way a bee should be able to fly.
frodo8619@reddit
Helicopters are so ugly the earth repels them
RankBrain@reddit
Something others are forgetting, the engines on commercial jets are much, much more powerful than you probably think.
redditwhippet@reddit
They work exactly the same way. Each rotor blade is a long, thin wing. Being attached to a central point that spins means the wings can move through the air, and hence generate lift, without the body of the helicopter having any forward motion.
My old flying instructor used to say that controlling a helicopter in a hover was like trying to keep two plates spinning while riding a unicycle. That was enough to put me off the idea.
Diavoletto21@reddit
Nah these days the avionics systems control the aircraft for you. Then again, the people designing that stuff are performing witchcraft
3nt0@reddit
Helicopters are 3000 parts spinning rapidly around an oil leak
ShipSam@reddit
I did a degree in Aviation and not once did we ever talk about helicopters.
CriticismTop@reddit
Helicopters just beat the laws of physics in to submission. It's not elegant, nor pretty. Just stay away from helicopters.
chasimm3@reddit
Same principle, but happening on both sides of the helicopter. The rear rotor prevents the helicopter from spinning with the main lift rotor. The same can be achieved by having 2 counter spinning rotors that balance each other out.
Any-Talk-2307@reddit
Wow. I’m 31 and I think I finally understand. Thank you.
Skoodledoo@reddit
Funny thing is, with your demonstration it makes how helicopters work easier to understand than fixed wing aircraft. Helicopters move by directly changing the angle of the airfoil (your arm/hand) via the swash plate. Fixed wing aircraft move by adjusting all sorts of little moveable bits.
PaintingJams@reddit
technically not correct for airfoils as they are pulled up rather than pushing down due to pressure differentials.
True-Abalone-3380@reddit
I know it's not technical, I tried to ELI2 :-)
I draw your attention to https://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/k-12/VirtualAero/BottleRocket/airplane/wrong1.html and https://www.scientificamerican.com/video/no-one-can-explain-why-planes-stay-in-the-air/ as to incorrect lift theories.
PaintingJams@reddit
personally my favourite form of flight is rockets... who needs lift from foils or wings. I just point where I am going and generate so much thrust gravity can't stop me
True-Abalone-3380@reddit
The theory is simple, it's the technology to keep it heading where you want it to whilst not blowing up that's difficult. Combustion / fuel pressure and oscillations was a really tricky problem.
PaintingJams@reddit
exploding - but slow enough to not die
jayeffnz@reddit
Genuine question, What's the difference? If the foil is being held aloft because the pressure above is lower than the pressure below, is that not the same thing as saying it's because the pressure below is higher than the pressure above?
PaintingJams@reddit
because the pressure above the foil is lower than the surrounding air, the pressure below is the same as the surrounding air. The difference the foil has made is the pressure drop.
Random_Guy_47@reddit
Similar idea really.
The main rotor spins and that generates lift much like how a plane wing does when it's moving forwards.
The spinning of the main rotor causes an equal and opposite reaction which causes the main body of the helicopter to spin in the other direction. The tail rotor provided a sideways push to counteract act this spin.
The jet engines then provide the forward thrust.
nonoanddefinitelyno@reddit
For a long time it was considered physically impossible that bumble bees can fly.
BadBassist@reddit
BaldyBaldyBouncer@reddit
James May said helicopters batter the laws of physics into submission.
throwaway18754322@reddit
The world, people, interactions, societal systems - everything is immensely complex. Yet your average person treats them as overly simple.
The world in its many many shades of grey consists of people thinking in black and white. E.g., politics (left, right)
NefariousnessDull916@reddit
Why people in Australia aren’t upside down. Because in relation to us, they are lol
SureElderberry15@reddit
I understand it but it still facinates me how 1s and 0s turn into images and sounds, and how everything digital exists.
cariadbach64@reddit
Apparently the easiest way is to ask what's keeping your car up off the road. The answer is not the tyres but the air inside them. Basically the plane has a similar reason and instead of tyres they have wings and flaps
bouncer-1@reddit
The title in this post
GoodFirefighter4137@reddit
Why toast always falls butter side down when you accidentally drop it
Kitchen-Lab-2934@reddit
A telephone! I will never understand how they work!
sim_kaur@reddit
Our conscience. Like how do we have an internal voice when we think? And how do some people not have that? And we’re talking in our minds but how does it work?? What causes our thoughts? How is all even possible?! 😩
Bebibobi@reddit
Quantum stuff
Icy_Meringue_5534@reddit
Yes. It's just made up nonsense.
BeatificBanana@reddit
It really isn't. Just because you can't understand something doesn't mean it's nonsense
Icy_Meringue_5534@reddit
No. It really is.
I've read books about this and can confirm that's it's all just words strung together to look like sentences that make sense.
BeatificBanana@reddit
That, once again is a you problem!
Icy_Meringue_5534@reddit
It's a cult.
(You do realise that I'm posting tongue in cheek don't you?)
BeatificBanana@reddit
I did not! It's the autism, can't always tell tone of voice over text
blozzerg@reddit
Space shit.
I know we’re a rock and it’s taken millions of years for us to get to this point but we’re really small in the scale of things so what is beyond?
Surely if space is that big, that eventually out there somewhere will be a rock subject to the same, or similar things this rock has been through and so there’s a good possibility life does exist elsewhere. Maybe that life is still millions of years behind and the dinosaurs are out there. Maybe it’s millions of years ahead an AI has taken over. If space is really that big, then the odds are quite likely, surely.
SGTingles@reddit
That's exactly the thing: space really is THAT big.
“Space is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist's, but that's just peanuts to space.”
― Douglas Adams, The Hitch-hiker's Guide to the Galaxy
That is, it really is quite plausible that there's other lifeforms and indeed other intelligent lifeforms out there. There are a LOT of stars in the universe, and increasingly we're finding that planets around them are pretty common. Yet the distances involved are so astronomically (there's no other adjective for it) vast, the chances of us ever even getting to know about them during the lifespan of your average civilisation are quite vanishingly small.
The very nearest stars, Proxima Centauri and Alpha Centauri, are around four-and-a-quarter light years and four-and-a-third light years away respectively – so even trying to send radio messages there and back, at the speed of light, would take somewhere in the order of nine Earth years just to say the hellos. And that's next door, on a stellar scale. Most of the stars we can see are dozens, hundreds, or thousands of light years away. Unless we develop the ability to use some sort of wormholes or warp drive, it's simply not possible to contact or visit them within any meaningful timeframe.
That's just the relatively close bit of our galaxy, too. The Milky Way is about a hundred thousand light years across. A ship travelling from the other end at light-speed could've left in Palaeolithic times and still not got here yet. And the next nearest galaxy outside it, the great Andromeda spiral, is something like 2 million light years away – what we see now, when we look at it, is actually the light that left it back when the earliest proto-hominids here on Earth were only just climbing cautiously down from the trees. Yet, again, these are – on a pan-galactic scale, the immediate neighbours. We, and them, and a few other 'nearby' galaxies, make up what's known without a flicker of irony as the Local Group. Even the closer bits of the wider universe are at distances at orders of magnitude higher again.
There may well be places and things remarkably like us, to a greater or lesser extent, out there somewhere. But it's almost certain that if so, we'll never know.
Lopsided_Soup_3533@reddit
I had an hour long discussion with my husband about how feasible a nanned mission to Mars is. He says its not realistic I said it is neither of us know fuck all about space travel
PoshTigress@reddit
I'm not sending my nan to Mars.
Lopsided_Soup_3533@reddit
Oh ha ha ha didn't even spot that. I'm leaving it in more people should consider sending their grandparents to Mars.
blozzerg@reddit
I think the biggest challenge is how long it takes to get there, isn’t it something like half a year to a year depending on various factors? It’s not like a cruise ship with endless leisure, imagine the toll of putting humans in a box for over a year with nothing but basic survival gear. Lockdown was bad enough, but you can’t even form a bubble with your neighbour in space.
Not to mention the risk of it going wrong, imagine buckling down for 10 months only to misjudge the landing and blow everything and everyone up on impact.
Lopsided_Soup_3533@reddit
Yeah 7 to 10 months. So when we talking about it I googled and from what I understand it is theoretically possible but there's a lot to consider from the super complicated science stuff to going stir crazy.
Yeah if you think about the ppl who went to the international space station for a couple of weeks and ended up there months.
If anything went wrong on the trip to Mars they die it's that simple and there's so very many things that could easily go wrong.
blozzerg@reddit
But imagine a planet out there who are at a super advanced stage, the year is 7634 and they do offer leisure cruises through space lol
theotherquantumjim@reddit
If you’re not familiar with it already I’d encourage you to look into the Fermi paradox. And to read a book called Rare Earth, which offers one possible solution to the aforementioned paradox
Available-Ear7374@reddit
The Fermi paradox is extremely easily answered:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friis_transmission_equation
Plug some numbers in for a realistic interstellar comms system and you will quickly realise you shouldn't even try and use radio. You need phase coherent laser communications.
Now think about a civilisation communicating over interstellar distances.. it's all lasers, so chances of picking up a signal is infinitely small, and we don't have the technology to demodulate such a signal even if we did grab a few photons of it.
I've designed radio systems for over 30 years, radio is useless for interstellar comms, which is why the SETI effort is doomed to fail they way they are doing it today.
theotherquantumjim@reddit
That’s not really an answer. Some question why the galaxy is not filled with self-replicating AI controlled probes yet, given the age of the universe and the relatively short timescale a civilisation could get there from around our current starting point (probably less than a million years).
Available-Ear7374@reddit
People stand in amazement at our Voyager probes.
They are not quite 50 years old, and have needed to be "rescued" by software patches a few times.
IMHO AI probes built to deal with thousands of years of interstellar travel present challenges that are beyond this universe.
I have a suspicion they'd need to be biological to reduce mass and to effect self repair at the lowest level, which would be crucial.
Then you have AI (or just intelligence) and suddenly we're talking about life and a whole host of new problems erupt.
And now we want to control it for thousands of years. (herding cats?)
Honestly I'm not convinced an AI controlled self replicating probe would stay on task, even if it did survive. and one using plain logic where it would stay on task wouldn't be sufficiently resilient to survive the timescales necessary, it would be worth reading up on radiation hardening.
Also I think the self replicating requirement is much harder than people acknowledge.
I came across an archaeological project some years ago, trying to replicate a type of ship from something over 1000 years ago. The project failed because some elements of the ship type relied on obtaining certain material (like very long thin wooden poles or something of that order) that just weren't available in current times no matter how much money you spent. 1000years ago they were readily available. The point is society has certain resources freely available and it's easy to forget the depth of the supply chain necessary to provide those. Starting from scratch it can be very hard to generate everything you need. I really do understand the idea of In Situ Resource Utilisation, it's the only way we're going to expand beyond earth. But I believe the idea of being able to automate the entire process to replicate a probe in this manner as a stand alone project is a step too far. IMHO the only way that could be achieved is to expand the base society and send out probes from each colony, which makes the process a lot slower.
So we come back to detecting communications, tightly beamed communications, like is being used on stealth fighters to maintain stealth but improved by several orders of magnitude.
That and detecting inadvertent signatures.
Familiar-Woodpecker5@reddit
My brain is does not function to a standard to understand it yet my daughter wants to be a physicist so there is hope!
Kaliasluke@reddit
Literally no one understands it - when I studied quantum mechanics, my teacher was like "look, the maths work and that's what matters, don't try & rationalise it"
fussyfella@reddit
The universe is under no obligation for it to make sense to primate brains that evolved to understand Newtonian dynamics (and they understand that really well, it's why you can catch fast moving objects or even fly a supersonic plane).
Luckily we developed a precise language that can describe the universe better than our instincts. It's call mathematics. Use it.
Datnick@reddit
Quantum physicists and engineers understand it decently well. Its just not intuitive to general public but that goes for a lot of thinsg. But we do have the math for it and we are building Quantum computers so that's good.
BromleyReject@reddit
If you haven't already, try Alastair Rae's Beginners' Guide to Quantum Physics. It's a decent read and it's interesting. I consider myself an accomplished thicko and managed to understand the basic concepts, even if the applications were a bit out there. There's also stuff about how nuclear power works and greenhouse effect which you can use to stump climate change deniers (if you want)
amboandy@reddit
About 10 years ago I decided to stop challenging these guys. Their arguments are never based on science so it can't be defeated with logic. I just remark "oh you're one of those, have a great day"
Polldit220@reddit
I love it. The only essence of a potential afterlife that I can begin to believe in exists in the quantum wave. It’s incredible.
Wonderful-Cow-9664@reddit
Algebra
PaintingJams@reddit
algebra is just maths with unknown values. Technically all maths is algebra
10+2 = a
therefore a=...
bornfromanegg@reddit
23!
PaintingJams@reddit
Grade: U
bornfromanegg@reddit
🙁
ResolveEmergency863@reddit
It's an undergarment that mermaids wear.
miked999b@reddit
Took me a few seconds 😂
GlamGemini@reddit
Algebra for me. Also fractions . Just makes no sense at all. Maths isn't my strong point . My brother is in finance and honestly it makes my head hurt 🤣
Particular_Piece2965@reddit
How we never see the other side of the moon. I’ve had it explained to me with balls and watched videos, I just can’t get my head around it.
StevieJax77@reddit
The moon has been there a long time. And it’s not a perfect sphere. Over enough time the side with most mass will lock towards the nearest biggest gravitational source. If it helps picture it, the moon isn’t a golf ball, it’s an egg, and at one point the egg was spinning but over time the gravitational pull on the fatter end took the momentum out of the spin.
I wonder. So at one point the moon span in relation to the earth. Does that mean that there was a period where it rocked? Not enough momentum to complete a spin and the gravity pulled it back the other way? Like a Weeble toy, just over a really long time. A decaying oscillation?
bornfromanegg@reddit
I don’t know about that, but the moon definitely wobbles, or “precesses”. So does the earth for that matter.
sorelytempted3@reddit
If you swing your friend around by his arms you'll never see the soles of his shoes
IronMark666@reddit
Imagine you have a tennis ball that is earth, place a golf ball to represent the moon at the tennis ball's 9 o'clock and draw a dot on it facing the tennis ball (earth). Now rotate the golf ball 180 degrees so the dot is facing away from the tennis ball (earth), then move the golf ball to Earth's 3 o'clock, the golf ball has rotated 180 degrees but in the exact same time it's taken to do that, it's moved from Earth's 9 o'clock to Earth's 3 o'clock so everyone on Earth sees the black dot at all times.
International-Bed453@reddit
Yes, me too. Tidal locking. I just can't grasp it no matter how many times I've seen or read an explanation. Sometimes I think I've understood it but it slips away!
Carinwe_Lysa@reddit
Couples who have a rough split up and one side tries to ruin the life of the other. I just cannot wrap my head around why you'd go to such lengths to be honest.
I've always had very amicable/pleasant break ups with exes, some I even remained friends with afterwards. But I've had friends or family who've broken up, and their ex was such a horrible cruel piece of work, trying everything and anything to make their lives harder & ruin them afterwards.
Always make me want to ask them what the hell are you doing, just get on with your own life.
Icy_Meringue_5534@reddit
It's a cult.
(You do realise that I'm posting tongue in cheek don't you?)
Dramatic-Growth1335@reddit
Adjectives , nouns and verbs. Like I get they describe what type of word it is but I don't have the bandwidth to remember which is which
Upset-Elderberry3723@reddit
You have omitted adverbs, which are like adjectives but instead of describing/detailing nouns they detail verbs.
So,
Noun (a physical or conceptual thing/item): Ball.
Adjective (additional context/descriptors for the thing/item): Squishy. A squishy ball.
Verb (an action): Bounce/Bounced.
Adverb (additional context/descriptors for an action): Slowly. It bounced slowly.
Put those together and you've got:
The squishy ball bounced slowly.
Or: The [adjective] [noun] [verb] [adverb].
bornfromanegg@reddit
Wait til you get to gerunds and gerundives, which are verbs acting as nouns/adjectives. 🙂
Extension_Common_518@reddit
This is a good starting point and one that links the word to the outside world. You can flip the Necker cube and create linguistically self-referential categories. Instead of linking to some essential feature, you can list its typical linguistic behaviours.
(Note: This is for English. Other languages may vary in the details)
Noun:
A word that can be used after an article or determiner (A/THE/THIS/THAT dog)
A word that can show number (DOG/DOGS) or be quantified (SOME WATER)
A word that can appear in the subject, object or indirect object slot of a sentence.
(The DOG bit the man. The man kicked the DOG. The woman gave a bone to the DOG)
Verb
A word that shows person (I, you, he, she, it, we, they etc.)
(I LIKE dogs. He LIKES dogs )
A word that shows tense
(I EAT cake. I ATE cake)
A word that shows aspect
(I ATE dinner. I HAVE EATEN DINNER)
Adjective
A word that can be used in comparisons
(He is TALLER than her)
A word that can be used in superlatives.
(He is the TALLEST in his class)
A word that can be graded.
(He was VERY TALL. She was SLIGHTLY LATE)
A word that can be used in an attributive sense.
(Look at that TALL guy!)
A Word that can be used in a predicative sense
(He is TALL!)
Adverb is a bit of a dogs dinner so i won't go into detail here.
I know it seems counterintuitive, but describing the linguistic behaviour can unpack a word's part of speech in addition to trying to describe some essential characteristic. Nouns can be items (table) substances (water) or abstractions (knowledge) but they have certain linguistic behaviours in common.
Is the verb KNOW really an 'action' in the same way that JUMP is? Kinda cognitively different, but they have similar linguistic behaviours that place them in the verb category.
not_steve_5000@reddit
I’m guessing you, like me, weren’t taught English with regular reference to these (and other) terms. I’m still lost when it comes to thinking about it, but kids in primary school these days can often tell you all about them. They also know about split digraphs and all sorts of things I’d never even heard of.
jobblejosh@reddit
For those wondering, a Split Digraph is a phonics term.
A Digraph is simply two vowels (like 'oa' in Boat, or 'ea' in 'treat').
A Split Digraph is when you have a consonant between them.
They're almost all ending in an 'e', and the impact is that it 'lengthens' the vowel sound of the unmodified vowel before the consonant.
'Can', with a split digraph after the 'n', becomes 'Cane'. 'K-a-n', and 'K-ay-n'.
'Tob', a nonsense word, with a split digraph after the 'b', becomes 'Tobe'. 'T-o-b', and 'T-oa-b'
'Flin', another nonsense word, with a split digraph after the 'n', becomes 'Fline'. 'Fl-i-n, and 'Fl-ei-n'.
scusemelaydeh@reddit
It’s still odd to me that the 80s/90s education system just completely bypassed teaching proper grammar (apart from very basic lessons).
ignoramusprime@reddit
And we literally need no knowledge of this to speak or write fluently. The structure of language is learned and developed intuitively but linguistic analysis breaks it down and exposes the underlying structure. And then they make kids learn it. For no apparent benefit.
BassJeleren@reddit
I've always remembered the phrase Noun is the Naming word, been saying it to myself since I was a child
BattleScarLion@reddit
How to do a Rubik's cube.
thrrowaway4obreasons@reddit
It’s simple mathematic algorithms. As a former maths teacher, I still can’t do them…
Glittering_Copy8907@reddit
I don't know how all the speed ones do it, that's just some crazy shit.
But actually solving it, if you dedicate a bit of time, it's not that hard. There's only a handful of "moves" to memorise, and you just follow through a process and trust in the process!
I can confirm, however, it's a completely useless skill
Aaron123111@reddit
It’s not a completely useless skill, it keeps the girls at bay
Matt_Moto_93@reddit
Fuck girls!
Few-Pepper858@reddit
Just tell them you're a redditor, same effect
AARonFullStack@reddit
I can do it under 50 seconds legit, and because I do magic I have some methods which can solve a cube in about 1 second. Even better have someone else solve the cube with it tied behind their back.. that’s always a good one
It’s really easy to solve once you know how. If you know how you can mostly do it with your eyes close
f_inthechat__@reddit
The speed solving is also just algorithms actually is really simple only challenge really is getting the muscle memory good and then getting a lucky scramble
Redditor274929@reddit
Honestly if you know how to do it, its not too difficult to get it "impressively" fast if you have a decent cube and lots of practice. My record is 40 seconds and while im not winning any competitions, most people who saw me think its amazing. Only took me about a week after learning how to solve it to get my time under a minute
OliB150@reddit
Pretty much where I got to with it. Just steadily learned the different steps and practiced until it was muscle memory. I’m down to a minute pretty consistently, with the odd 50 second one if the stars aligned and it solves before the last few steps. I figure that the headline of “can solve a Rubik’s cube in around a minute” is good enough for most and I don’t think I can get any faster unless I learn proper speed solving algorithms and the knowledge that comes with that!
Redditor274929@reddit
Exactly like me! Everyone is impressed and the extra effort to be better is way more than the extra wow I would get from people so its just not worth it. I honestly dont like I could learn the speed cuber methods like cfop. I just do the regular beginners method with a few changes that I realised make it faster. 1 minute is impressive enough for most people considering they have no idea how to do it at all.
ExcitementKooky418@reddit
Next step is the 4x4. Which seems much more complicated on the surface, but after the first few steps you solve it the same as the 3x3, except for a couple of special conditions that can occur, which I have not quite memorized the algorithms for
OliB150@reddit
I also struggled with learning the moves for that one, but I’m sure I could get there if I stuck with it. 5x5 and 7x7 etc are pretty easy though I found, just some simple ish algorithms to memorise then just solve like a 3x3!
Redditor274929@reddit
Im sooo slow at a 4x4 and havent memorised the special algorithms either yet. I did memorise one of them but its been ages
ExcitementKooky418@reddit
The one for switched edge pieces seems really long and complicated, but I'm sure it's probably just a combination of other algorithms and I'm just not seeing the pattern to it
sihasihasi@reddit
Yeah I could routinely do it in around 30s in the 80's.
Haven't got a clue now, though.
Extension_Common_518@reddit
Indeed, solving the cube is one of those perishable skills. I've learned and forgotten three times since they first came out.
Memorizing the moves to get each piece in place is not that hard. How the hell someone worked it out in the first place is beyond me.
NoAvocadoMeSad@reddit
Yeah it took me about an hour to memorise the moves needed and after another hour or 2 of practicing I got down to 57 seconds
People are baffled by it but I have no plans of telling people they could learn to do it that fast in a couple hours
Redditor274929@reddit
Honestly im impressed bc it took me like a week to learn and another week to get that fast.
I feel like theres 2 types of people. Those that are kverly impressed bc they dont realise how easy it is, and those who are under impressed bc they really misunderstand what people mean by "its just algorithms". Actually saw someone comment on a guy doing it blindfolded saying its not that hard bc you just memorise the moves, clearly not understanding how that actually applies to solving a cube bc they arent all solved with the exact same moves every time
NoAvocadoMeSad@reddit
Yeah that's wild, sadly the internet is full of people like that lol
PinkSodaBoy@reddit
It's not useless if you get enjoyment out of it!
madcow87_@reddit
The key to the speed is being able to see where the pieces will be in your head. Recognising those patterns to complete it is one thing but understanding what it'll do to the rest of the pieces when completed and how to chain the next move to it in the most efficient way is the real skill.
Feggy@reddit
Okay I’ll try to explain it like you’re five:
First thing to understand is that the cube is quite limited. At first it may seem like any piece can move anywhere else, but that’s not true. The centre pieces are stuck where they are - blue opposite to green, red opposite to orange and yellow opposite to white. Then notice that there are only 8 corner pieces, and they can’t go anywhere but switch places with other corners. Finally there are 12 edge pieces that have 2 colours each.
Rubik’s Cube is just a tidying up exercise, sliding those edges and corners into their right places.
You know those sliding tile puzzles (the 2D ones), where you push the pieces around to complete jumbled picture? They are hard to complete because when you try to arrange the bottom half, you mess up the stuff you’ve already tidied. Rubik’s Cube is very similar and beginners usually solve it by tidying one layer at a time.
The way to not mess up your work is to use a couple of different special set of moves (called algorithms) which help you move tiles around while keeping everything else in its place. There’s one set of moves which swaps the corners around, another which flips an edge so it’s red/blue instead of blue/red, etc.
Once you’ve memorised the few necessary sets of moves, you can solve the whole cube easily.
PoshTigress@reddit
Solving a cube on the tube makes people talk to you :)
GreyStagg@reddit
I agree.
Every single time I've seen somebody explain it, it feels like they think they've explained it, but nobody else does.
wellyftw2@reddit
Take the individual blocks off the cube and refit them in the correct order. 👌
nafregit@reddit
I've done that an removed the stickers!
ExcitementKooky418@reddit
That's actually WAY more fiddly than doing it legit
wildOldcheesecake@reddit
I’m too lazy for that
miked999b@reddit
I used to be able to do it as a kid. Then I bought the Rubik's Revenge (a 4x4 cube) and was completely baffled 😂
major_tennis@reddit
There are really easy guides
elmo_touches_me@reddit
A Rubik's cube has 20 pieces that move around.
You solve it by breaking it down in to sections, and solve each section separately.
How do you solve the 3rd section without messing up the 1st and 2nd 'solved' ones?
You use clever sequences of moves that result in only some pieces moving, while others stay in the same place - you make sure to use sequences that don't affect the bits you've already solved, and do affect the bits you still need to solve.
That's the general approach.
In practice, people just find a tutorial that takes them through a simple method, with the minimum number of sequences required to solve it.
It's so easy, young children can learn it in a day or two. You just need the patience to follow a tutorial, and the perseverance to not give up the first time you get something wrong.
NecktieNomad@reddit
A Rubik's cube has 20 pieces that move around.
You solve it by breaking it down ~~in to sections, and solve each section separately.~~
Gets hammer
alancake@reddit
My 12yo son is a cuber. It's a series of set algorithms basically. Still looks like witchcraft!
colin_staples@reddit
It's a mathematical puzzle thing.
Every Rubik's cube can be solved in 20 moves or fewer.
These people who solve them really quick spend time looking at all 6 sides, working out the solution in their head, and then performing the moves
You can get an app for your phone that does it. You use the camera to show all 6 sides of the cube to the app, then it shows you what moves to do.
(No, I can't do it)
james_t_woods@reddit
I've tried. I just don't get it...
madcow87_@reddit
You can youtube this and learn how to do it in a couple of days to be honest.
turboRock@reddit
Just need to remember a few "algorithms" depending on what the current state of the cube is
SnooRegrets8068@reddit
I can't do them for anything but my 12 year old had mastered about 14 different designs and shapes by 10 at insane speeds. Just takes learning and practice.
_poptart@reddit
You can’t just “twist it a bit” and solve it. My husband watched some YouTube videos and learnt the moves and now can do it every time. You have to learn the patterns. I have no interest in learning myself but it’s still impressive he can do it
Late-Champion8678@reddit
WiFi.
Gaoler86@reddit
Magnets
theotherquantumjim@reddit
Well you’re not alone there. When you get down to it, physicists aren’t really sure what magnetism is
DeinOnkelFred@reddit
Not even the great Richard Feynman: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MO0r930Sn_8
maggiemayfish@reddit
Ok, what? Like, making magnets? Collecting magnets? Playing with magnets?
2litrebottle22@reddit
Just magnets
maggiemayfish@reddit
I'm just gonna put snowboarding
Gaoler86@reddit
Thos guy gets it.
BINGGBONGGBINGGBONGG@reddit
yeah. fucking magnets, how do they work?
BungadinRidesAgain@reddit
Found the Insane Clown Posse's reddit account
bilbosfrodo@reddit
How the St. George's flag is offensive.
CanidPsychopomp@reddit
Hi, I can help.
No abstract symbol is inherently offensive. Spoken words are just soundwaves that mean something within a given language system. Written words are just abstract patterns of lines.
A flag or other visual symbol only has the meaning attributed to it, often by association with a group that has adopted it. Eg the swastika was adopted by a group that wanted to murder all Jews, Gypsies, homosexuals and socialists, so displaying it is usually considered to be a conscious affiliation with those beliefs.
While the St Georges flag is the flag of England, for most of modern history since display of flags to represent countries really became a big thing the United Kingdom flag (popularly Union Jack) has been much more prominent. The St George flag, displayed as a marker of Englishness rather than representing the UK as a whole became associated with nativist and even racist groups, including football hooligans and pubs you would avoid if you were not a local.
Hope that helps you understand this, thanks for asking an interesting question!
bilbosfrodo@reddit
So, do we now see the northern ireland flag as racist as well since they rioted about immigration not long ago?
CanidPsychopomp@reddit
lol. Reading skills, eh?
bilbosfrodo@reddit
Pardon?
RockNMelanin@reddit
It isn't.
It has however, been used by people who want to weaponise it and use it as a tool for fear.
turkishhousefan@reddit
Yeah wasn't aware that it is offensive. Who is saying that it is?
OldLondon@reddit
Ah that’s easy - as it’s been co-opted over the years by racists and idiots.
InternationalRich150@reddit
People. I don't understand people at all. It's like there's a grey area always where I just can't comprehend anything.
Wits_end_24@reddit
Welcome to autism 🤣
InternationalRich150@reddit
My sons autistic and sometimes I'm like, dude I totally get what you're saying.... I've often wondered,but I'm too old to get assessed. Wouldn't change how I view the world.
Familiar-Woodpecker5@reddit
People are the worst!
Slugdoge@reddit
People, what a bunch of bastards
ExcitementKooky418@reddit
Bastard coated bastards with bastard filling
pastie_b@reddit
Hi Roy.
handtoglandwombat@reddit
They never say what they mean, and their actions never match their words. But honestly, I could tolerate them if they just started picking up their dogshit.
wildOldcheesecake@reddit
Many Redditors don’t either tbf
musicfortea@reddit
Yep, people are shit and incomprehensible.
LagerBitterCider197@reddit
"Hell is other people" - Jean Paul Sartre
SnooRegrets8068@reddit
"All his mates were French" - David Lister
DEADB33F@reddit
Quaternions
sew_fabulous@reddit
How to use games console controllers for anything other than basic navigation. I used to be a software developer so I'm not idiot, but I just don't understand the controllers.
_Calmarkel@reddit
Cells.
Cells are alive. Okay. I'm alive. Sure. I'm made up of millions or billions of cells. I'm a living thing made of millions of tiny living things. What the fuck? That's just so screwy.
FinalFan3@reddit
Trillions.
_Calmarkel@reddit
That's worse
Pitiful_Shoulder9730@reddit
Gravitational time dilation. No matter how many times I read about it my head just can’t comprehend how time isn’t uniform.
morganselah@reddit
What is Gravitational time dilation?
OldManChino@reddit
strong gravity can slow time (relatively for an observer).
it's why blockholes have an accretion disc around them, it's basically such strong gravity that it slows time so much that to an observer things get 'stuck in time' on the edge of it
morganselah@reddit
Sounds impossible!
RhinoRhys@reddit
Not at all. The clocks we use are accurate enough that all the satellites in orbit have to account for it. GPS satellites have to be constantly updated and time synced with ground stations otherwise the accuracy of your location would drift significantly.
They also have to contend with time dilation due to speed.
Moving clocks run slower, high altitude clock run faster. Overall GPS would gain about 38 microseconds a day if not corrected.
morganselah@reddit
I still can't get my head around gravity causing time to move slower.
OldManChino@reddit
Once one gets their head around time, distance and speed all being interlinked it starts to make more sense.
What goes in must equal what comes out, so gravity must be fucking around with distance and / or speed to affect time
flowering_sun_star@reddit
I did a PhD studying the area just outside supermassive black holes, and I could never get my head round general relativity. Just far enough out that I didn't have to worry its effects with the model we were using. I mean the model didn't work, but I got a PhD out of it and moved on with my life.
I just couldn't wrap my head around the notation used for the maths, and bounced off it every time. Didn't even get as far as the equations, let alone understand them!
devcmacd@reddit
I read something the other day that really clarified relativity for me: you are always moving at the speed of light (through spacetime). If you're going faster through space you must be going slower through time.
I guess if you throw in the idea that gravity is warping spacetime it might make it easier to see how it changes your experience of time.
RhinoRhys@reddit
Sorry but that's pop sci bullshit. It's completely wrong.
Motion is entirely relative and two observers at distance will always see the other aging slower.
There is no motion in spacetime, because motion by definition is the rate of change of position over time. Objects exist in spacetime as extended lines, called timeline curves or worldlines. Saying something moves through spacetime is about as accurate as drawing a line on a piece of paper and saying the line is moving at 10cm per metre.
The only thing that is relevant is that time dilates and length contracts so that the speed of light is constant for all observers.
devcmacd@reddit
Thanks that really cleared it uo
Hyper5Focus@reddit
You don't get it because you're thinking of time as a separate thing. Time is nothing but a concept we invented to keep track of matter decay. The closer you are to a black hole, or any gravitational source, your movements and the decay of matter slows down due to the grav field affecting the rate of decay. We don't know yet how, but there are actual experiments that have proven this, for example a clock on Earth ticks a tiny bit faster than one in orbit
DeifniteProfessional@reddit
There's a reason why "spacetime" is a thing. Time and physical space is tied. You can have more of one than the other, but they all add up to a maximum amount (ie. considered the speed of light).
Time is also subjective. So to us, light takes 8 minutes to get from the sun, but actually to a photon, it's instant.
Gravity speeds up space, and therefore slows down time.
Makes no sense to me either
Drwynyllo@reddit
Get a copy of "Why Does e=mc²?" by Brian Cox and Jeff Forshaw. It's got the best explanation of time/space dilation I've come across (and it's very early on in the book).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Why_Does_E%3Dmc%C2%B2%3F
Curiousinsomeways@reddit
Something I saw on a science programme (I think) was to think of space as a giant rubber sheet, then you place a bowling ball in one part and it distorts the sheet, then do that it different places with different sized balls and the affects differ. The trouble is we think of time as our life passing on a clock moving I suppose.
MattHatter1337@reddit
Agreed. I accept it. But I don't understand.
I get it at relativistic speeds.
But if youre just in a rocket flying away....
williamshatnersbeast@reddit
But is time linear?
ConPem@reddit
No
AnonymousTimewaster@reddit
You just need someone to poke a hole through some paper with a pencil to make it make sense
_InvertedEight_@reddit
People who think the Zionists are right. 🤷♂️
UKPerson3823@reddit
Imagine you lived in the ocean. It's hard to move because there's thick water all around you slowing you down. You can swim up and down because you can press off against the thick (but not solid) water.
Well, you do live in the ocean. The water is just thinner. The surface of the earth is a gas ocean. You are just so used to being in the ocean that you don't usually notice it. A windy day is a gas ocean current. Trying to run or cycle against a headwind is swimming against the current. Golf is hard because you are hitting an object through ocean currents.
Planes are just optimal swimming devices that work in a thin ocean.
Most of the universe is empty and has no similarity to being on the surface of Earth. You are just so used to living with a heavy layer of gas pressing down on you that you don't usually notice it.
_InvertedEight_@reddit
So technically, aircraft are a form of submarine, which gets weirder when you factor in that we also have submarines, and weirder still when you consider we have brine pools, so technically, we need a sub-submarine as well!
Special_Artichoke@reddit
I think when I heard a cubic metre of air weighed a kilo I finally got it. Lighter than water sure but I'd be straining picking up a room full of air
zagreus9@reddit
Holy crap this is an amazing way of explainging it - my nephew has reached the questions age and when he inevtably asks me this, I'm using this explaination
focalac@reddit
There’s a kilogram of force pressing down on every single square cm of your body at all times. It’s enough force to slowly compress your spine during the course of the day.
JohnnyOneLung@reddit
Electricity- black magic fuckery.
Beginning-Still-9855@reddit
Drive on the motorway and stick you hand out of the window and feel how it changes when you change the angle of you hand. At certain angles you feel your hand being pulled upwards. It's that but bigger and faster.
ZeroCool5577@reddit
The stock market is pretty confusing to me
generic-username9067@reddit
Oh I like this one :)
You have a company that makes lemonade. You sell lemonade for £1 a bottle and you sell £100 of lemonade a year. You are the sole owner of your lemonade company.
You want to buy a new stand to sell your lemonade, but to do this you need money. You don't want to take out a loan as it's too expensive to repay, so you ask your mum, dad and dog to give you some money in return for a percent of your company. Lets say £50 each for 10%. This values your company at £500 (1 'share' in your company being worth £5, with your dog having bought 10 shares for £50).
You now own 70% of your company worth £500, which is £350 worth of shares in your company you own.
You buy your stand, and business SKYROCKETS! You sell your lemonade for £2 a bottle now as you have a rep for sick juicin's, and you sell twice as much to boot!
Your turnover (the money you make in a year) increases by 4x, 2x because your price has doubled and 2x because you're selling twice as much. Now your £100 a year is £400 a year, so it stands to reason your company is 4x as valuable now than when you initially sold those first shares, right?
So your 70% share worth £350 has gone up 4x in value to £1400, and your mum's, dad's and dog's shares have also gone up 4x in value to £200ea.
As shareholders, they are entitled to dividends which is profit doled out by the company. You'd get 70% of any dividends drawn and your family get 30% while still retaining their shares. Dividends are usually drawn each year.
People all over the world now want a piece of your hot lemonade action, but due to you wanting to retain the majority shareholder status, and thereby earning the most money and having total control, you only allow that original 30% of shares to be sold. The more people who want to buy those shares, the more valuable they become. This is supply and demand.
Suddenly there is news that lemonade cures cancer, and everyone in the world wants to invest in (buy shares in) lemonade companies, with 1 share worth £5 originally now trading for £1,000,000.00 each. Your dog becomes a millionaire overnight by selling 2 of his original and keeping the other 8 as backup.
This is how the stock market works :)
prcslaia@reddit
How does the stock market get its live point in time valuations though?
Zabkian@reddit
Great explanation, I became thoroughly engaged once the dog became an investor too.
That is the type of PR that creates interest, if Warren Woofet is investing it must be a Buy!
I_really_love_pugs@reddit
Same 😂
Aggravating-Desk4004@reddit
Didn't understand any of that but now I want some lemonade. Do you know where this lemonade stand is?
generic-username9067@reddit
No, but my rich-as-fuck neighbour who is a dog keeps rubbing face in his wealth, irritating bastard
GreyStagg@reddit
This is where you lost me.
generic-username9067@reddit
If you sell 10 out of 100 shares of your company (or ten precent of your company) for £50, that would make each single share worth £5 (£50 divided by 10 shares is £5).
The TOTAL amount of shares in your company is 100, of which we've decided 10 of them are worth £5 each, so it stands to reason the other 90 would be worth £5 each too, so the total value of all the shares of the company is £500, make sense? :)
GreyStagg@reddit
Yes, thank you! But kind of hard for a non maths person to keep track of in their head as they read the rest of your explanation but I'll give it my best shot 😂
generic-username9067@reddit
You're all good, think of it like a pie chart, if 10% of the pie chart is worth £50, then 100% of it must be £500 :)
Of course all of my explanation is very simplified but it's the bulk of it
GreyStagg@reddit
I managed to understand it now, thank you!
Something else I have wondered. Say you need cash quick and you want to cash in your share of a company.
Does the company have to buy it back if you want to sell it? Or if not, does that mean you have to wait until somebody else might want it (which might not happen?)
generic-username9067@reddit
Both can happen.
A share buy back might happen where a business wants to own more of it's own shares.
Supply and demand dictate the share price. You can sell an Apple share all day long as it's pretty solid and so commands a high price proportionate to the value of the company it belongs to (Apple being a 3trillion dollar company), but you might struggle to find someone to buy a share in your chocolate teapot company, so you reduce the price until you find someone who wants to buy it.
GreyStagg@reddit
But it's not my company, I have a share in someone else's company hence I cant reduce the price (can I?)
generic-username9067@reddit
The market dictates the price for you based on the demand for your share :)
Luckily for you, you don't have the only share in the company, there are 1,000,000 floating around out there at any one point, and people holding onto them makes them more valuable, people selling them and supplying the market with them makes them cheaper to buy as there are more of them.
This is why your local newsagent isn't listed on the stock market - the initial demand for their 1,000,000 shares just doesn't exist so they'd be a fucker to buy and sell.
If however your dad gives you a 10% share in his business and then you decide to sell the share as you need cash, you would either need to find someone else who wants to buy it or sell it back to your dad for whatever it's worth. It's worth something, but only to someone who has the demand for it
GreyStagg@reddit
Thank you so much for typing all that out.
generic-username9067@reddit
No worries, I like to talk about things that interest me 🤷♂️
Otherwise_Leadership@reddit
Okay. Here’s one for you then. At the end of The Big Short, when Mark Baum has all his short positions he insists on holding off to sell, until right at the last minute?
When he does sell, who’s buying his shares in these companies about to explode?
Any why?
generic-username9067@reddit
Shorting is different to buying and selling stocks.
When you short, you're betting against the stock movement.
Say a share in a bank is worth £100 on 01/01/2025.You short it, and you say 'I bet that this stock is going to be worth £1 on 31/12/2025'.
You are obligated to repay anything over £100 back to the bank on 31/12/2025. However you keep the negative money.
You're not buying and selling shares, you're gambling on their performance, or shorting it. I'm not sure if we have that in the UK though.
Otherwise_Leadership@reddit
I’m pretty sure we do. Except I think if I wanted to do that, I’d “borrow” the shares I wanted to short. From you, say, for a premium. I sell them straight away, but you still want them back.
My gamble is that the price drops, so I can buy the same number of shares for less, return them to you, and keep the difference.
But if the price doesn’t drop, or worse, climbs, then I have a problem. You still want your shares back.
My question re: Mark Baum was, essentially, where/who/what was the market enabling him to sell or close his position and make all that money?
Still don’t get it..
generic-username9067@reddit
Exactly that - he's borrowed the shares of a bank at $1000 per share, expecting the price to collapse after a given date, and sold it on for $1000.
He's then rubbing his dick with glee that the share price falls to $1 on the date he has to repay it, as he pockets the $999 he's sold the share on for, only needing to repay the $1 back to the bank.
Otherwise_Leadership@reddit
So he’s already “kind of” made the money, he just doesn’t get to “realise” it until he returns the shares? So he isn’t really “selling” anything at the end of the film, he’s just “closing his position”?
Placid_lake304205@reddit
Those people would have placed their orders for the stock weeks or months prior, when the prices were normal. On delivery day, he's holding nothing & just has to go out into the market to source & deliver these stocks for pennies, but the buyers are still on the hook for the 100s that they may have paid him. Market moved in his favour.
generic-username9067@reddit
He's placed a huge bet on the banks which provide the mortgages for millions of houses.
He's borrowed the shares and sold them, but he is obligated to repay the difference if the price increases, which is why the guys selling him the shares are laughing and saying 'fuck yeah, take as much as you want' with the implication being that banks don't fail or their share prices fall. It might fall by a dollar or two over a month or so, but generally they go up.
So yes, I guess technically somewhere he's got a bank account with millions of dollars in, BUT throughout the entire film the bank's share prices just keep going up which is why Michael Burry's investors (the people giving him the money to make the bets) keep threatening to pull their money out/leave. He's potentially on the hook to repay all of that money back plus more as the share price has gone up, until the housing market collapses
PaintingJams@reddit
and then the value stops being linked to how well you are doing and just by clever PR and people's predictions of the value of the share itself and thats how Tesla and Apple can be the most valuable companies in the world while making much less profit than companies worth way less
Infernode5@reddit
Agree on Tesla, but Apple had the second highest net profit of any company in 2024.
You could maybe argue their share price is still overvalued based on P/E ratios, but Apple's is fairly standard for a tech company.
Astrohurricane1@reddit
Didn’t Tesla at one point become one of the most valuable companies in the World despite having never made a profit?
I know it has made profit since then, but when its value skyrocketed I believe it hadn’t ever made a profit.
RuaRuaRua81@reddit
I know someone that used to work in the stock markets, she's tried explaining it before and just baffled me. You, in a mere few paragraphs, have made it so simple! 👏👏👏
generic-username9067@reddit
Thank you :)
Jealous-Action-9151@reddit
Great explanation, but the basic stock selling/buying is easy to understand. What’s difficult is derivatives and how they are regulated. For example, credit default swap (CDS), I mean I understand but why such things allowed to exist? :)
generic-username9067@reddit
My understanding of this comes exclusively from watching the boring bit of that film where the central plotline is Margot Robbie in the bath.
I don't think we had them in the UK, but the collapse of the US banking system dragged everyone else down with them was my take home, but I'm a pleb so it might be total bollocks
wildOldcheesecake@reddit
I understand the stock market and how it works due to it being related to my line of work. However, I just want to commend you for this explanation. Engaging and very helpful. Nice one.
generic-username9067@reddit
Thanks! Was worried it was a bit waffly and I wasn't fully confident of my explanation :)
Wise_Sundae3741@reddit
Good explanation. One comment re your point on not wanting to take out a loan. How would you explain a situation where a Company would rather use debt as an alternative to equity? I.e., less dilutive, lenders only care about downside (usually - some take warrants etc, but ignore that for now) so you keep any upside (you need to believe in the business plan re this point).
I guess my question is - in what situations would debt be more attractive than equity, and does the equity route matter (i.e., VC, PE, IPO etc)? IPO, whilst significant from a reporting perspective, would probably be more attractive than PE because a) valuation b) control c) PE behaviours / investment horizons etc
Bit garbled - but hopefully you see what I am getting at!
Jlaw118@reddit
When I did business studies for my GCSE options 15+ years ago, I remember my teacher touching up on stocks and shares and I raised the point that “it’s pretty much like gambling then isn’t it?” Where he turned around and said “yeah it’s exactly that.”
It’s hard to know what will perform positively and negatively within the future. You can do mountains of research on algorithms and patterns but they’re not a guarantee that a business will perform how you’d like them to.
I once invested in an American electric vehicle company that had strong projections. Thinking to the future I thought it’s where we’re heading with electric vehicles and investment into them. Though the company had one day where the shares skyrocketed and then in the space of a couple of hours they plummeted. They went up slightly when FedEx placed a large order with them but I ended up selling them at a loss in the end
Infernode5@reddit
Well yeah, investing in single companies is essentially gambling, but no one giving investment advice is telling you to do that.
Investing in a diversified ETF gurantees returns over a long period (>5 years). It's like gambling if you had the house edge. You may lose money in a given short period, but over several years you're guranteed to come out on top.
scusemelaydeh@reddit
I recently watched “Industry” on BBC and just tried to ignore all the financial talk and acronyms. It goes totally over my head.
KonkeyDongPrime@reddit
It is designed to be confusing. The confusion increases the likelihood that the clever people who do understand it, can extract money from the people that don’t.
Datnick@reddit
Its not designed to be confusing, it's pretty simple. In general, people create simple systems where they can since it increases likelihood of success and improves efficiencies....
You're buying a piece of pie, hopefully that piece of pie will become better over time and therefore more valuable so that you can sell it for more money down the line.
Its literally not any different in opening a bakery and dividing the ownership amongst your family. If bakery is good, you'll have more customers, you'll be able to expand, more people will your goods, more people will want to invest at less favourable rates than what did originally since you took more risk earlier on. Over years your business will have grown to 20 chains and someone might want to buy your share of the business for a lot more money than what you originally put in.
KonkeyDongPrime@reddit
Or are you trying to argue that the products which led to the last market crash are simple and transparent? The market facilitated those products and continues to do so now.
KonkeyDongPrime@reddit
The concept and individual stocks are pretty simple, I would agree. The market has become overly complex along with various innovative derivatives products.
pip_goes_pop@reddit
You're not alone, which is why I find it a bit concerning that there are plans to limit the amount people can put in a cash ISA, and push them towards Stocks & Shares ISAs instead. The idea being to invest in the economy but I do worry it could open people up to something they don't understand and could lose a lot of money in.
I have an S&S ISA myself, but it's taken a lot of reading up on subs like UKPersonalFinance to make sure I wasn't being too risky.
Aaron123111@reddit
Just put money in the S&P500 (vaug) for compounding interest and leave it alone. Don’t have to do anything.
It’s basically the top 500 companies broken up into tiny pieces.Some days its goes up, some days it goes down but as long as you don’t panic and sell on a red day you’ll be fine.
I’m putting all my son’s child benefit in it each month so he will have a decent sum when he turns 18.
Fred776@reddit
If you are going to make a specific recommendation it would probably be better to recommend something a bit more diversified like a global index rather than the S&P500.
Also, it's misleading to imply that you get compound interest. You might get something that, after the fact and over a long enough period, can be interpreted as compound growth at a particular rate, but it's not predictable and steadily growing like interest.
pip_goes_pop@reddit
Yes, I know this because I’ve done some research on it. But the issue I was raising is that many people will be pushed towards a S&S ISA without any kind of guidance. They’ll end up cherry picking individual stocks they like the sound of, and getting in a real mess.
SnooRegrets8068@reddit
They are trying to push more money into the ftse. Tho anyone doing any research gets a much more varied tracker anyway. Especially if they ask on reddit finance subs
pip_goes_pop@reddit
I agree UKPF is a brilliant sub, been very helpful indeed over the years.
Sadly the vast majority of the population aren't on Reddit, let alone a finance sub. I just hope Martin Lewis (who is against these proposed changes) does some kind of education campaign about it.
SnooRegrets8068@reddit
What's worse is even more won't have any money to put into them to begin with. Think it's only something like 15% that actually use them at all.
SenSel@reddit
Also that it's advised by a large number of individuals that it's best not to invest if you plan to use the money within 5 years.
Snr_Wilson@reddit
"Graph goes up more than it goes down, so given enough time I'll make money" is about the extent of my financial knowledge. And it's worked out ok for me over the last few years.
(Referring to the performance of the S&P500 there).
AnonymousTimewaster@reddit
The complete and utter lack of compassion for other human beings on a very large scale, and how those same people also completely fail to understand how complex the world and it's systems are.
Smashley505@reddit
This but not just for humans. It makes me feel utterly alone in my compassion towards the environment, animals, and people. I feel absolute disgust at how self absorbed humans are.
amintowords@reddit
Don't let the handful of billionaires, corrupt politicians and big media be your guide. Your average person is pretty decent, unfortunately there's a massive amount of disinformation out there that works like mind control on the masses.
Smashley505@reddit
I would love to believe this. However, the people I speak with daily have absolutely no idea about the damage the average person is doing.
Here's just one example: I live in a room on a very large semi-rural property. This very large property is surrounded by other very large properties all owned by families or retirees. They are all OBSESSED with mowing their huge lawns. The landlady's usual mowing service had been delayed by 2 months and so thale grass had grown long and lush. I suggested that she leave the grass at the top of the garden to grow into a meadow to support insects, wildlife etc. It was looking absolutely beautiful. We had so many butterflies and wildlife appearing. She even commented how much she was enjoying it. However, instead of leaving the otherwise unused piece of land to support wildlife, she chose to cut the lawn as soon as she was able. The UK has lost 97% of it's meadows since the 1930's. This is such a small thing that people in these privileged positions could be doing. Instead, they choose to prescribe to absurd cultural norms.
populardonkeys@reddit
I mean isn't this statement full of self absorption?
AnonymousTimewaster@reddit
I can understand the environment even if I disagree with it. It's big, complicated, and always seems like it's far away in the future. But how on earth people don't give a single solitary fuck when a child fleeing a warzone washes up on our shores, or worse, advocates fucking using the navy to shoot at them is completely beyond my comprehension.
Henegunt@reddit
Usually they aren't explicitly saying it about the kids. They are complaining about the system that allows random people to turn up at our beaches and stay.
AnonymousTimewaster@reddit
But when you bring up the fact that there are often children on those boats they say "it's the parent's fault for bringing them with them". These people don't give a shit.
Henegunt@reddit
Sometimes children on the boat yes, mostly men if I Remeber reading correctly.
Still disingenuous to pretend they are implying they want the kids to suffer.
AnonymousTimewaster@reddit
The fact that it's mostly men doesn't mean there are no children though. There have literally been multiple headline stories of children washing up on shores. They might not actively want kids to suffer but they still don't give a shit if they die. That's the point.
Henegunt@reddit
We don't have any control over the boats I think is the mindset and they want them to be stopped.
I feel terrible when any kid dies but also it has nothing to do with us as a country when they do, their parents have chosen to leave France and make a really dangerous crossing, I feel bad they have terrible parents.
AnonymousTimewaster@reddit
It does if we start popping boats in the Channel using the Royal Navy as these people very frequently and seriously suggest.
Henegunt@reddit
We aren't seriously considering that and have never done that though, in fact we do the opposite and save them.
"Very frequently" isn't true.
AnonymousTimewaster@reddit
Who's "we" ? You might not be considering it, but I've spoken to multiple people in my life and seen enough crappy posts on Facebook to know that people absolutely want this.
The government isn't considering it, obviously, because it would be horrific. I'm talking about people who suggest this as some sort of solution.
Come to West Lancashire some time and you'll see how true it is.
Henegunt@reddit
We as in a country, we as in the majority of people here, we as in our government, we as in it's not a popular thing to say in public.........
We do the opposite and save them.
AnonymousTimewaster@reddit
Why are you talking about we as a country? I'm talking about a specific group of people that actively advocate for using the Royal Navy to kill slaughter people in the dozens. I never once mentioned that this was anything even remotely official.
jiggjuggj0gg@reddit
The answer is, unfortunately, that billions are pumped into forming propaganda to hijack our lizard brains, and it works.
As good as it makes us feel to call everyone who thinks that way evil and stupid, we’re actually falling into the same trap by doing so. We’re being divided and conquered as we speak.
populardonkeys@reddit
So you care for all people equally, or does it depend on genetics/locality and how similar they are to you? Do you care about people who died in the past? What sort of mental bandwidth should I dedicate to caring about people I'll never meet and have close to zero chance to being able to help in any manner?
You can feel really bad about the world, there's plenty of material. It's more of a reflection of you though and what your brain likes to cycle round endlessly than anything else.
betterman74@reddit
"Listen, while we're at it, there are systems for a reason in this world. Economic stability. Interest rates. Growth. It's not all a conspiracy to keep you in little boxes, all right? It's only the miracle of consumer capitalism that means you're not lying in your own shit, dying at 43 with rotten teeth. And a little pill with a chicken on it is not going to change that. Now come on, fuck off!"
Otherwise_Leadership@reddit
Nicely put. Not sure I get the chicken pill tho..
betterman74@reddit
Ha. It's a stolen quote from Peep Show. Sadly I can't rant anywhere as good as above .
flimflam_machine@reddit
I hate that lack of empathy and my initial reaction is "how can you be like that". It's almost like some people just haven't had that revelation that other people are just as conscious as them. On the other hand the world is also big and scary and complex and people want simple comforting answers, so I do understand what causes some people to be that way
MintyMarlfox@reddit
Where she wants to eat
i-am-a-passenger@reddit
“I know what we are eating, you will love it, can you guess?”
Say this and then just go for one of their first few guesses.
Redditor274929@reddit
Unfortunately I am one of those people and this wouldnt work for me bc I'd just start guessing his favourite places that I like but not necessarily where I actually fancy eating but maybe thats just me
ZestycloseStyle88@reddit
Unfortunate for you. Fortunate for the person asking the question
Mundane-Research@reddit
It wouldn't work on me either. I'd just say "I don't know... tell me" 🤣 to be fair, most of the time I don't know what I want to eat either... I just know what I don't want
Aletheia-Nyx@reddit
I'm this way. I don't know what I want, but when you suggest something, I know if I don't want it. It goes for everything, like if I'm wanting to play a game but can't decide? I list potential games to friends and get them to pick one, and then if they do, sometimes I realise 'actually I don't wanna play that one'. It's as annoying for us as it is for them! I wish i knew what I wanted.
Redditor274929@reddit
THIS. Im so glad you understand what I meant by it rather than assuming im just withholding information like some people seem to believe. Thought maybe I hadn't explained myself well but seem like some people really would assume we sre maliciously withholding information rather than believe we are honest when we say we dont know or dont mind...
Usually he asks what I want, idk what I want, he suggests smth and he makes suggestions until he says smth that I don't not want (99% of the time im happy eith whatever he says first)
Ground_Better@reddit
i don’t want to be a dick, but that sounds like a problem lol
Redditor274929@reddit
I mean, idk about a "problem" so not sure what you mean but honestly im pretty aware im pretty difficult.... For what its worth, we (well i anyway) dont mean to be difficult and I think I might just overthink it
Ground_Better@reddit
if you can’t communicate your wants and needs, how are you supposed to be on the same page? if you’re aware your difficult and just expect someone to put up with that as well then resentment is gonna build up in both sides from you always feeling like you compromise and him never knowing what you want
Redditor274929@reddit
See now this is the issue when you make assumptions about other people's lives.
I communicate my wants. I communicate my needs. So does he. We ate know the same page. I acknowledge that its difficult as my partner has told me, but here's the Interesting part, there isnt any compromise. Now this might sound awful bc sometimes compromise is necessary but I honestly dont know how to compromise in this situation. I mean if he wants pizza then we can have pizza, its not a compromise.
Well it would be rather stupid for me to expect him to know when I didnt even know.
You choose to assume I refuse to communicate which really isnt the issue. The issue is, I genuinely dont know what I want to eat. I cant communicate what I dont know, sos should I just lie? 99% of the time I genuinely dont care so if he wants smth then we usually have that and theres no compromise bc as I said, i have no preference or know what I want. If my partner resents me for nothing being fussy and open to what be wants, then he wouldnt be the man for me.
When I said "difficult", I meant in the sense that if I were told that statement, I'd overthink it and (unintentionally) wouldnt answer it with the expected thought process
Sometimes people arent deliberately trying to sabotage their relationships and settling for shitty food you know
fused_of_course@reddit
Wow. You've just changed my life!!!
This works for dinner at home too - guess what I'm making you tonight
Ratiocinor@reddit
Just be careful it doesn't backfire
PippyHooligan@reddit
"Dorsia?!"
Oh crap.
LlamaDrama007@reddit
Nobody goes there anymore.
i-am-a-passenger@reddit
lol that’s why you don’t always agree to the first guess!
BeatificBanana@reddit
That would really backfire with me because I would make guesses based on where I know he likes to go, rather than where I necessarily would want to go!
coopertron5000@reddit
This and making sure you mark in your diary when she's having a hair cut so you can remember to compliment her on it are the key to a happy marriage!
Jolly-Minimum-6641@reddit
Doesn't matter anyway. She'll just not be hungry and then steal around 1/3 of yours.
messedup73@reddit
In my case as a woman I shop and plan for meals weekly so I really like my husband to pick where we like to eat occasionally.Plus I pretty much eat anything and I am not fussy.
BobBobBobBobBobDave@reddit
You just have to work by elimination. Keep suggesting places that she doesn't want to eat, and eventually you either get an answer, or you bore her so much she suggests something.
gregrph@reddit
We play that stupid game every week. This past week it was 40 minutes worth of suggestions followed by "no" or no reply. This is after I asked her the day before and the same morning to think of something. I'm picky about the type of food I will eat but not where to eat. I don't like Mexican or Indian food but if we've been to a restaurant recently, I'm good with going again to the same one or type. It's an exhausting game.
Antonio1901-@reddit
Or be a man and choose the place yourself.
FinalEgg9@reddit
This joke is the thing that I don't understand. Do you guys just... never get that mood, where you're hungry, but once a place or food is mentioned your brain goes "nah not that"? Do you always just want to eat literally anything when you're hungry?
ResolveEmergency863@reddit
What do you want to eat
"Anything"
Fancy a Chinese?
"No"
Extension_Common_518@reddit
Have you secretly bugged my house and are now reporting what the microphones picked up?
Ciato78@reddit
This should definitely be pinned 📍
colin_staples@reddit
"I really don't care where we eat"
It's a trap!
SnooRegrets8068@reddit
Just keep picking yourself til they decide they want something else
brit_motown1@reddit
Why islamic women deal with being in a religion that treats them the way it does
Major_Bee4483@reddit
I can never understand why they don’t question it. Men 1000’s of years ago making up rules to keep them under heel
CeeAre7@reddit (OP)
Questions we’d never know the answer to, oh wait we do. Apostasy
Whithorsematt@reddit
Ask a bumblebee.
izzyrapl@reddit
The difference between qualitative and quantitative research
BeccaaCat@reddit
The economy.
Literally do not understand how we are so beholden to this weird make believe system that is completely intangible.
Inflation? Just don't put prices up and then inflation doesn't happen? If I decided tomorrow to start trading in poppy seeds instead of cash and enough people agreed the whole thing would collapse? And how can the whole world be in debt?
It's fucking bonkers don't even try to explain it I'll just get mad. I cannot wrap my head around it.
See also: space. Too complicated. Do not understand.
Major_Bee4483@reddit
Just print more money lol
One-Prior3480@reddit
Yes! The whole world being in debt is the bit that really gets me. I did an economics module at uni and that didn’t help at all. One day we were doing opportunity cost and bliss point, and I thought ‘well this is all straightforward enough’ the next day we were deep into macroeconomics and……nope!
BeccaaCat@reddit
No idea what any of that is and it's still confusing lol. I can't get beyond the fact that it's all just made up. People literally kill people over money and at the end of the day it's just a sheet of paper or like numbers on a screen that someone decided had a certain value. Absolutely bizarre.
One-Prior3480@reddit
Summed up by Terry Pratchett…. ‘And that proves gold is only valuable because we agree it is, right? It’s just a dream. But a potato is always worth a potato, anywhere. A knob of butter and a pinch of salt and you’ve got a meal, anywhere. Bury gold in the ground and you’ll be worrying about thieves for ever. Bury a potato and in due season you could be looking at a dividend of a thousand per cent.’
BeccaaCat@reddit
This is incredible. I run community gardens for a living and have been in horticulture for over five years so the analogy is particularly apt for me. Long live potatoes.
Major_Bee4483@reddit
That you can phone the other side of the world & they answer right away
blackcurrantcat@reddit
WiFi. How am I watching Netflix on a screen which is just plugged into the wall? How has Schitts Creek somehow floated from the router in my bedroom to the tv in the lounge, through walls, all in the right order with the sound matched up?
Moodster83@reddit
Bc schitts creek is amazing.
trulycantbearsed@reddit
The ‘off side rule’! Despite my husband and children’s best attempts..I don’t get it.
Kirstemis@reddit
https://youtu.be/GePlbCsGniA?feature=shared
Odd-Recognition4120@reddit
Best way I've heard offside explained is this: a team that has Messi in it would have an easy winning strategy, parking Messi in front of the oppositon's goal to stand there the whole time, while everyone else works to bring the ball to him and his job is just to stand in front of goal and score.
Off side rule just means Messi is not allowed to do just stand in front of the goal. He has to be behind the opposition players, until he gets the ball. Only when he gets the balls he can be closer to the opossition goal than the opposition players.
miked999b@reddit
Is it the nuances of it that you don't get, or the basic concept?
Tulcey-Lee@reddit
Yeah, planes, cars, ships- all witchcraft and magic. I remember my grandpa explaining how a car works and I was like ‘nah that’s magic’
Kirstemis@reddit
Exchange rates for different currencies changing all the time. How can a pound buy you more or fewer euros/dollars/pesos/yen/baht/krone this afternoon than it did yesterday morning?
NoStoryTerritory@reddit
I don't understand how compound interest works in stock market. Value goes up and down but amount of stocks stay the same, where are they compounding? Especially when it's unstable. I have watched a lot of videos, but just give up.
Poo_Poo_La_Foo@reddit
My friend once explained the offside rule to me in a pub using a few packs of ciggies and some glasses and it was SO SIMPLE and made so much sense. But I can never remember it, so I still don't understand it.
Hermitmaster5000@reddit
Cryptocurrency. There is no simple explanation that makes you go "Oh I see, that's all very clear, I understand how it all connects and I can see the point of it"
Winter_Parsley8706@reddit
Politics. Can't grasp it at all
Inevitable-Key3788@reddit
Concept of infinity
HalfAgony-HalfHope@reddit
How fax machines work. Never understood it. Thankfully, theyre pretty much obsolete nowadays!
Fred776@reddit
Printers still exist though and they are pretty much the same thing. The only real difference is that the data for the sheet to be printed was sent over a phone line rather than over a local network.
Scorpiodancer123@reddit
Is there a genuine reason why my printer can't print a black and white text document because it's run out of cyan ink or is it just HP programming to screw me for buying more ink?
zagreus9@reddit
it's just HP being dicks.
Scorpiodancer123@reddit
Thought as much.
HalfAgony-HalfHope@reddit
That's the bit I dont get. 😂
For that matter. I understand a chemical reaction on film, but digital cameras also confuse me 😶
Fred776@reddit
The printer and the digital camera case are similar in a way. You are breaking the page or the image into small points. The position of those points can be represented as numbers (think of coordinates).
You can then use another number or numbers at each point to represent what exists at that point. In the simplest case of a basic black and white text document with no grey shades, all you effectively need is a 1 or a 0.
For a colour image you need more information to represent the colour (such as red/green/blue values) but at the end of the day it's just numbers. The sensor in your camera records some numbers at a coordinate based on the light that hits it (this is the equivalent of light hitting film). When the image is displayed on your monitor, it's being sent some numbers at coordinates to say how to light up the pixels at each point of the screen.
steeley90@reddit
People sitting in the middle lane of the motorway at 60 mph
Aggravating-Desk4004@reddit
Electrickery.
Fungho_jungle@reddit
The Balance of Payments.
In economics, the balance of payments is an accounting equivalence, stating that if a country exports more than it imports, then it is as if it's investing an equivalent amount abroad. That has always escaped my understanding.
Scatterheart61@reddit
How some people can't see images in their head. Like I know it's a thing that some people can and some people can't, but i just can't understand how it's possible to not be able to see anything. Do these people dream? And if so how do you dream without seeing anything? What about memories? How do memories work without seeing anything? Is it like text, or audio? How do they know what their friends and family look like when they're not in front of them? How do they find their car in a car park, do they just look around until they see one they recognise and think 'ah that must be the one'. I just can't wrap my head around it
Educational-Bus4634@reddit
How marbles are made, although it's on purpose. When I was a kid my dad would have us 'figure out' a chosen thing every few days; we'd pick a subject, spend a few days hypothesising how we thought it might be made/operate (I think we did phones once?) and then research to find out the actual answer, and whoevers prediction was closer would win bragging rights. Marbles were the topic we were hypothesising about the week he went into hospital, and since they didn't want me seeing him in that state, they were the last one he ever left me to think about when he died a few weeks later. Didn't feel right to find out the actual answer without him
Good-Career-8317@reddit
Rainbows! If it's an optical illusion, how come we all see it in the same place and the same colour. Why are the colours in that order too??
sparxcy@reddit
Fish and how they breath under water!!!
amintowords@reddit
How come when the fertility rate is going to be 2.1 soon, or might already be there, which is meant to be population's break even point, that the population is forecast to grow and grow for another two or three decades.
Shanzy8@reddit
Guitarist for 30+ years cant grasp music theory Caged system to unlock the fret board cant b that hard got to grade 3 in school but cant switch on and apply myself to understand no matter how many times ive heard it explained
CatMum_xo@reddit
Maths.
Just can't make sense of it past the basic bits.
ItsSuperDefective@reddit
Effect Vs Affect.
Don't bother explaining it to me, I've looked it up a hundred times and I understand it when I do. The problem is that for some reason my brain seems to be incapable of remembering the difference for more than five minutes.
Conscious-Ball8373@reddit
Don't worry, OP has just as big a problem with the English language.
Dull_Banana5349@reddit
I have a degree in English Language and I still can't understand/remember the difference.
Own_Art_2465@reddit
I learnt it once but I believe you can now just use both to mean the same thing
palishkoto@reddit
I use the phrase 'raven': Remember, Affect Verb, Effect Noun. I can't remember the difference for long so I'm always repeating that in my head as I'm writing.
oktimeforplanz@reddit
The only way I manage to do it is by reading my sentence out to myself a few times, really emphasising the e/a and seeing if one sounds weird.
EmeraldRaccoon@reddit
Affect = Action Effect = Result
kittysparkled@reddit
Unfortunately there's also the noun affect, referring to the facial depiction of an emotion, and the verb effect, to cause or to make something happen.
He had a gentle affect She helped effect a positive change
EmeraldRaccoon@reddit
Of course!
kittysparkled@reddit
I'm fairly certain that the use of the word "impact" has risen massively at my workplace* because no one can remember which one to use 😬 Ah, English
*I'm the copy-editor
WeakExamination3209@reddit
Most things to do with maths
rosegoldqueen28@reddit
Same. I never really saw the point of all the algebra rubbish.
GlamGemini@reddit
Same!
samwise_94@reddit
Electricity
Gjmoore@reddit
The offside rule.
Dark_Foggy_Evenings@reddit
Chinese writing.
dualdee@reddit
It's been dawning on me lately that I literally cannot describe faces. It's just like "he had eyes but I didn't notice what colour, and a normal-sized nose, and a mouth that was the usual shape and size".
irv81@reddit
It's the collective will of all on board!
Souce: former pilot
Thuggish_Ruggish66@reddit
The title of this thread took me a moment tbh
Freedom-For-Ever@reddit
I don't understand the result of:
Is it 1? Anything divided by itself is 1...
Is it 0? 0 divided by anything is 0...
or is it infinity? Anything divided by 0 is infinity...
blackleydynamo@reddit
Economics. Specifically the addiction to "growth".
On the one hand we're repeatedly told we have too many people, especially as far as immigration is concerned. Then the same people will tell us that we need "growth". Where do they think it's coming from? There's only so many things a person can buy...
donut_forget@reddit
About 100 years before the Wright brothers, Sir George Cayley came up with the principles of heavier than air flight: lift, weight, thrust, and drag. It is these, working together in the design of aircraft, which allow a plane to get off the ground and stay in the air.
No-Drink-8544@reddit
Same way birds stay in the air
redhead_bookworm@reddit
Space. I just can’t comprehend that it’s that big, and endless…how can it just keep going? And then people say space is expanding, but what is it expanding into? Surely if it’s expanding into another area then that area is also space??
It turns my brain into old school TV fuzz
GreyStagg@reddit
The moon's gravitational pull affecting the tide.
I believe it, but i dont understand it.
If i have a bowl of water sitting on the table, why doesn't it have waves being pulled in one direction or another during the night as the moon goes over?
Why aren't other things pulled by it? Why aren't grains of flour or sugar in my cupboard pulled by it?
Zog9074@reddit
Particles of air are pressing on the wing all the time. The engines pull the plane through the air. The air in the way of the wing can't go through the wing so has to go round it.
The shape of the wing let's the air passing underneath it go a shorter distance than the air passing over the top which has to go all the way round bit theyre about the same smount of air. So the air passing over the top gets stretched out to cover the distance in the same amount of time and there's less of it per meter to press on the top of the wing than the bottom. Because it's stretched out over a longer distance
The amount of pressing that happens on the bottom of the wing is greater than the top now, and in fact is so much more because the wings are so big and the engines are so powerful that it can apply more force than the weight of the plane pushes down and this lifts the plane!
Donjeur@reddit
Binary - and how you can use it to build a computer that I can play games on or buy a hat
strawberrypops@reddit
That thing where a car is going forwards but the tyres look like they’re going backwards.
zeviea@reddit
Do you mean in videos due to frame rate?
GreyStagg@reddit
It happens in real life too. Our eyes actually have a "frame rate" in a sense.
franki-pinks@reddit
I’ve seen it in person.
oktimeforplanz@reddit
I've seen it happen through a fence.
HugsandHate@reddit
Peeking through fences, eh. I know your type..
zeviea@reddit
Oh that's cool
grimm_the_opiner@reddit
Basically, for a theoretical 1 spoke wheel, if the wheel continually completes slightly less than a full rotation from one frame to the next, it will look like it's moving slowly backwards.
Add more spokes, and all that's required is for each spoke to end up slightly "before" where any spoke was in the previous frame.
For extra fun, an old sports car with "knock off" wheel nuts and wire spoked wheels can appear to have the spokes going one way and the hub going the other! 😆
Random_Guy_47@reddit
Imagine your eyes work like a camera, by taking a series of photos and then displaying them as if its a movie.
Now imagine the wheel rotates 359 degrees in the time between photos.
Once you put those photos together in to a video it looks like it's going backwards.
Rev_Biscuit@reddit
Persistance of Vision.
You don't see in real daytime though. It needs something to break up the visual process....artificial light, car going behind lots of railings or the most common occurrence being on TV/Film where the framerate of the film. If the frame rate is say 10 frames per second hand the car spoke is 10 revs per second then the spokes will always appear in the same place on the film.
Glittering_Copy8907@reddit
Our brains are designed to process motion in quite a "fluid" way and this weird illusion happens when you lack the "full" information and your brain starts making assumptions about movement.
If you imagine you have a rotating stick:
You can see from that sequence which way it's moving. But if you start removing some frames:
It's impossible to actually say whether it's going clocwise or counter-clockwise.
The same happens with your brain automatically, but it makes assumptions. So if you can see a wheel and it's in one position, then the next "frame" it's in a different position, your brain might think the wheel has gone counter clockwise instead of clockwise etc.
THat's a pretty badly worded explanation, but I hope it makes sense. It happens sometimes on videos because videos are a series of point-in-time photographs, not actually smooth motion like our brain is used to seeing in reality
missuseme@reddit
Music. I don't understand any of it really. How can two instruments play the same note when they sound completely different? How the hell to musicians play at the same time perfectly synced up in time with other musicians? Plus so much more, it's like magic to me
Dissidant@reddit
Its to do with our eyes
Like the "bendy pencil" trick we did in school
GreyStagg@reddit
How people can't tell that certain celebrities are bad people and then act shocked and outraged and like they have been personally lied to all these years when something awful eventually comes out about them.
Maybe some people just go through life believing the best in everybody but I can't help noticing glaring red flags and I genuinely don't understand that others don't. I think it must be nice for them though (until the shock and disappointment anyway).
thumbsupchicken@reddit
How a differential works, I have watched 29 videos but how can the wheels spin at different speeds?
RuaRuaRua81@reddit
Star, the ones in the sky, that we see them as they looked in the past and most of them are basically already dead and we're seeing their light from 1000's or millions of light years ago 🤯
Not even sure I explained that how I meant too or right 😅
SallyWilliams60@reddit
For me the real difficulty I have is knowing when to use affect and effect. Feel free to explain it as many have but I still don’t get it
BlackberryNice1270@reddit
Crochet. I've tried to learn from books, from Youtube, I've had someone sit with me and go through it step by step, and I just can not get it. Witchcraft.
SnooDonuts6494@reddit
Why religion is treated as a special case for belief in nonsense.
We openly laugh at people who believe in faeries or Santa, but apparently we're not allowed to laugh at people who believe in a magical sky-god.
I'm not trying to start an argument. In genuinely baffles me.
franki-pinks@reddit
Agreed. If tomorrow I started living my life a certain way due to believing aliens want me to live this way people would think I was mad. Say it about a man who’s an all seeing but unseen entity and it’s ok and no only is that normal but no one is allowed to tell them it’s not normal.
franki-pinks@reddit
The difference between affect and effect.
gapgod2001@reddit
How people dedicate their entire personality to a political group. Never having a personal opinion.
franki-pinks@reddit
Couldn’t agree more with this one.
pip_goes_pop@reddit
This particuarly baffles me when looking at America. I just can't imagine people in the UK ever being that fervently obsessive over a politician. MAGA just looks like a cult.
neilm1000@reddit
Not about a politician, but the cybernats are a deeply obsessive bunch.
Curiousinsomeways@reddit
Or a sports team.
neilm1000@reddit
https://youtu.be/xN1WN0YMWZU?si=-QmyvgbfrFKsMLT1
miked999b@reddit
'Cult' is only one letter out.
These people are just unimaginably stupid. To a level where it's hard for people who have been raised in a country with a functioning education system to comprehend.
kittyvixxmwah@reddit
What confuses me is that they're a very individualistic society (as long as I get what I want, fuck everybody else), but at the same time they're desperate to find a tribe to belong to. It seems like two ideas that are completely at war with each other.
SnazzyPaws94@reddit
Vinyl records. I’ve watch many videos on how they’re made and how it works but I don’t get how the music works
Wild_Region_7853@reddit
Why you need to change gears on a car and just how that whole situation works in general. After 10 years of failed driving tests in manual cars I finally passed first time in an automatic. Turns out I was never a bad driver I just couldn’t get my head around gears and I need to understand the workings of something to use it.
bebelmatman@reddit
Have you ever ridden a pushbike with gears, and/or examined and considered the gears and mechanism you can see on said pushbike?
Wild_Region_7853@reddit
Not since I was a teenager, and no I never thought about it
bebelmatman@reddit
If you’re interested in understanding how the gears in a car work, it might be a good experiment. I personally find it easier to comprehend systems like this when I see them and feel them, like you do powering yourself on a bike.
It basically comes down to the difference in power/distance input (how much gas you give the engine) compared to power/distance output (how fast the wheels move).
It might help to first imagine how levers work, THEN how a pushbike works, THEN a car.
Picture a seesaw. You’re looking at it sideways on. But it’s not evenly balanced…the fulcrum (the thing it’s resting on) has 2 ft of board on the left side, and 10 ft of board on the right side.
If the short end is all the way up, it’s 2 ft from the ground. If the long end is all the way up, it’s 6 ft from the ground (or however much it is…but it’s higher, just picture it.
If a fat fuck like me sat on the short side, a little guy like you could sit on the end of the long bit or just push it down while standing next to it and I’d lift up in the air easily. But I’d only lift up a couple of feet, and you’ve pushed the other end down 6 ft. It feels like little effort to push down, but you’ve pushed your end down by a greater distance than you’ve lifted me. You’re not pushing (what feels like) a great weight, but you’re pushing a great distance. At the other end, I’m not moving a great distance, but I am a great weight…and you’ve moved me for very little effort. This is like first gear, so now let’s look at a bike…
In first gear, I am pushing round a small gear (spiky wheel thing with 10 spikes) with my feet. The small gear is attached by a chain to a big gear which moves the back wheel (this spiky wheel thing has 100 spikes because it’s bigger). Because of the difference in gear sizes, I can pedal my feet round 10 times and the big gear will only turn once. I am moving my feet a great distance, but it feels easy…because at the other end of the bike chain, the rear wheel is not moving a great distance, but it is moving the fat fuck sitting on the bike. (This is like you pushing down on the long end of the seesaw; moving the machinery a great distance at your end, feels easy, and at the other end a fat fuck moves a small distance.)
Once the bike has started moving, you have momentum. So you don’t need to pedal 10 times for one rotation of the rear wheel, you can move to a larger “pedal” gear and/or a smaller “rear wheel” gear, so you pedal 8 times for 2 rotations of the rear wheel. The higher the gear you move into, the less “work” you need to put in and the more “distance” you get out at the other end. But you can only do this as you gain speed and momentum. The faster you’re already going, the less hard you have to pedal.
With a car, you have a similar system with different sized gears, but instead of pedalling with your foot power you’re just pressing the accelerator harder, making the engine work harder at the “front” end of the system.
I don’t for a moment think that I’ve explained this very well, so I invite you to play around with a pushbike. Turn it upside down so you can see and feel what’s happening with the gears as you turn the pedals (and switch gears) with your hands. Be careful, have fun. Good luck.
HegemonyOfDichotomy@reddit
Bathroom basin taps. Why aint there a mixer mate. I either burn myself or freeze. Why!?!?
XDVRUK@reddit
Bad music taste
AdThat328@reddit
The question..
Jolly-Minimum-6641@reddit
Chemistry. I genuinely don't get it.
Like, why does adding an extra hydrogen atom there make it do something else. Why does a "longer carbon chain" mean that it doesn't blow up when you set it on fire? Why is adding an extra oxygen molecule to that thing so dangerous to human health?
ArtichokeDesperate68@reddit
Pre decimalisation currency! I’ve had grandparents, neighbours and customers talk about it and cannot get my head round it! I’m a whizz with Excel but old UK Currency fries my brain!!!
catdog_man@reddit
This is a great shout. Not least because of the bonkers nomenclature of the different denominations.
Jolly-Minimum-6641@reddit
That'll cost you three guineas and half a crown.
What the bloody hell is that.
Jolly-Minimum-6641@reddit
My parents are 70 and said even at the time it was silly and made little sense.
D_Milly@reddit
How to correctly spell Restaurant
Jlaw118@reddit
Chemistry. I struggled a lot in school and teachers were baffled as to how I just couldn’t understand it.
I could name elements on the periodic table and understand the chemical compounds, but it was more the mathematical equations that come into play
Jolly-Minimum-6641@reddit
Chemistry was the one subject in school where I was literally hopeless. No amount of tutoring helped and I dropped it as soon as I could.
Wild_Neck_5580@reddit
bluetooth aka voodoo
Jolly-Minimum-6641@reddit
Like absolutely everything else, it's just another type of radio signal that's interpreted in a certain way.
wasdice@reddit
Portuguese
Jolly-Minimum-6641@reddit
It's a horrible language to listen to. Sounds like Spanish after a bad head injury.
Even Brazilian Portuguese ("Brasilero") sounds almost tuneful, European Portuguese is like nails on a chalkboard.
wildOldcheesecake@reddit
I love how they say no. My colleague is Portuguese and has lived in the UK for a while. She will stay say no the Portuguese way when speaking English
_ShredBundy@reddit
I actually started learning Portuguese a couple years ago, it’s quite easy because they use the English alphabet. The only confusing part of the process is differentiating between European & Brazilian, because there’s like a thousand different ways of saying the same thing.
holdawayt@reddit
I have A levels in English language and literature, got As in both. Still don't understand adjectives, nouns, adverbs etc.
gazmbuku@reddit
How to say "Siobhan"
ConstantReader666@reddit
Cricket
Suitable_Balance101@reddit
Chinese
woodythecb8@reddit
The title of this post yoda
Cheshirecatslave15@reddit
Computers, it seems magic how code can produce everything they do.
EmergencyDry658@reddit
The 2 slit experiment for electrons? They act normal when observed completely different when not? Are they living things? Atoms are intelligent? We’re in a simulation? Real life GTA? Who knows
EUskeptik@reddit
As an aircraft starts down the runway, there is zero lift from the wings. As it gathers speed, the increased airflow over the wings generates more and more lift. The speed increases until there is enough lift for the aircraft to rise into the air. At that point the pilot operates the elevators and the aircraft takes off.
In flight, the aircraft must keep moving forward at a speed that allows the wings to generate enough lift to keep it in the air.
Ornery-Assignment-42@reddit
I’ve tried so many times to make music theory be something I can use to make music rather than my natural way of making music by ear.
But I’ve played by ear for so long and I’m so much faster at it than I am trying to use music theory to get to the same place.
I’ve been at it long enough that I have absorbed a lot of theory but it really slows me down if I try to use it in the moment.
ForesterDean23@reddit
Religion. The absolute total and utter bollocks that people believe. In the face of all logic, reason and just plain facts, they resolutely persist in believing totally nonsensical fairy stories. It has always amazed me and I think always will.
Naive_Product_5916@reddit
I don't understand the concept of inflation and infinite growth. I'm like the Christian Bale character in The Big Short wondering why it hasn't all tanked by now.
Serious-Sample-249@reddit
And it's not even flapping his wings!
JackLovitt@reddit
Poker
Cool_Finding_6066@reddit
The obsession with football. Especially premier league and how people get so upset about it.
tacticall0tion@reddit
Why people do the extreme cave diving where they squeeze through the equivalent of a tictak box size gap that you have to go through exactly right, or you risk becoming stuck with no real way to get help
More-Magician4492@reddit
Why I can’t always see a full moon.
mrfluffypants1504@reddit
Your question. Its badly written. But also everything electronic and using waves etc. Its all beyond my intelligence. I can understand how satellites can ping stuff and take photos from so far away. Or how computers actually work. Or how I can really speak to/see someone a thousand miles away and its like I'm next to them.
sdaveak47@reddit
I don’t understand why I burn so much more being out in the sun on a clear day when it’s 30 degrees to when it’s like 20 degrees now - the sun it literally the same distance away and it hasn’t got any hotter - I know warm air makes it hotter but I’m talking about the time it takes me to go red
Pentax25@reddit
WiFi.
Like all this information is just flying through the air and knows exactly how to arrange itself on my phone screen to show me things, play me music and communicate. It’s absolutely mental and it’s all in the palm of my hand
knightsbridge-@reddit
Amps, watts and volts.
I've had it explained to me a dozen times. I know a few vague notions about how they interact, but I've never grasped exactly what the difference is and when it's appropriate to use each one.
PaintingJams@reddit
if you imagine electricity as water in pipes - amps is the amount of water travelling down any given spot of the pipe, like the pressure (literally amps is current)
volts is how hard the water is flowing. In electrical terms it is "potential difference" which is basically a measure of how strong the attractive force it pulling/pushing the electrons. Like you know when you rub a balloon and it goes all static and gently pulls your stary hairs toward it? that's low potential difference (low voltage) and if you rub more it pulls harder? thats a higher potential difference (high voltage)
watts is power which is energy over time. So while amps and volts are amount of flow or strength of flow at any given moment - watts is the total flow over a given timeframe
anastis@reddit
When a battery is full vs empty, what is it that decreases? The volts, the amperes, or the watts?
PaintingJams@reddit
All of the above?
anastis@reddit
I have no idea. Electricity is black magic to me.
PaintingJams@reddit
Again using the water analogy if no water is flowing, there is no current, no pressure and no flow-over-time
anastis@reddit
Right, bad question I guess. What if it was half full? I mean, if I knew how to use a multimeter, what would I be looking for to determine the charge state of a battery?
PaintingJams@reddit
I could be wrong here, not an electrical engineer but over use the amount of potential energy in the battery declines over time (depending on the battery type it is undergoing a chemical reaction and the components are literally being used up)
with the lovely smart design of modern batteries you will not detect any change in their output until they get really low in which case it is voltage that will decline (which in turn reduces watts)
anastis@reddit
Thanks!
H1ghlyVolatile@reddit
Well I’m glad someone understands it and they don’t rely on me 😂
knightsbridge-@reddit
Yeah, I've heard the "water in pipes" explanation a few times. It's a really good explanation!
... Unfortunately, it leaves my brain about 30 minutes after I read it, every time. I don't know why. I just can't retain it at all.
H1ghlyVolatile@reddit
I’m exactly the same, it doesn’t stick at all 😭
gogybo@reddit
Volts is pressure in this analogy
PaintingJams@reddit
you are correct, I'll edit
ItsSuperDefective@reddit
To put it roughly.
Amps: how much "electricness" is flowing per second.
Watts: how much energy you get/use per second.
Volts: how much energy you get per unit of "electricness".
Dramatic-Growth1335@reddit
This is me with verbs, nouns and adjectives. In fact I'm also like this with your electric thingymajigs
CollegeOptimal9846@reddit
Microchips.
The blast a wafer thin slice of a piece of rock with lasers until it can think.
Surely it's alien tech.
Any-Conversation7485@reddit
Why a mirror reverses left to right and not up and down. Well I kinda get it but it does my head in.
BenjaminEssex@reddit
How chickens make eggs, so frequently, given their small bulk, what they eat, and the physics of an egg shell.
alfienoakes@reddit
Why Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have worth.
HeHadSomeGoodIdeas@reddit
How cameras work, how data is stored in cd for films music and games. IDC if someone explains it to me it still shouldn’t work
Narrow_Ad1119@reddit
Ironically, people who cannot construct sentences properly.
Tough_Conclusion271@reddit
How processors / CPUs are made... So you melt sand, chop it up and shine light on it ? ... Ok mate
TMSQR@reddit
Caterpillars and butterflies are two versions of the same animal.
They're separate and completely unrelated as far as I'm concerned, and always will be
Mavericks7@reddit
Overly sensitive people.
Sensitivity is normal, but when someone can't handle any kind of feedback or even a simple conversation without taking it personally, it becomes exhausting. You end up walking on eggshells around them just to avoid setting them off.
It turns a normal, everyday exchange into something way bigger than it needs to be.
wopsywoo@reddit
Money. How can we as a country be in debt, why can't we just print more?
I've had this explained to me a hundred times and I just can't get my head around it.
Otherwise_Leadership@reddit
Went to RAF Cosford yesterday. Here’s my favourite lady, the TSR-2. One of two prototypes, this one never even got to fly before the program was cancelled.
Looking at the wings, you might wonder how that would have worked.. I’m a glider/sailplane pilot - this one still amazes me
itsableeder@reddit
How computers work on a circuit level and how that interacts with software. I've tried for literal decades to get my head around it and it just seems like magic to me.
LauraHday@reddit
Vinyl records. How do they print them to make noise. Like how are the grooves so exact that they can replicate the exact pitch/sound/cadence of a voice or instrument? Who figured that out?
SmellSuch7189@reddit
Im expecting to see a lot of comments here saying 'the difference between your and you're' reveal yourselves.
Status-Brilliant-572@reddit
The Monty Hall Problem.
I've read explanations online and it still doesn't make any sense to me,
presterjohn7171@reddit
Quantum physics.
peanutbudderlover@reddit
Video calls. Like facetime or WhatsApp. I just find that mind boggling!
Sad_Lingonberry_7949@reddit
The offside rule. But, I usually lose interest after a few seconds anyway.
Tuesdaynext14@reddit
Don’t feel bad. Many years ago I was working on a textbook with BAE systems. We had a section on how do planes fly. We added the usual lift, drag, weight, thrust section only to be told that that official big boys actually design planes answer to “how do planes fly?” Is … “we don’t know.” There are a few possibilities and it’s probably the same reason that ships float but officially, you guessed it the answer to that one is also we don’t know. There are highly accurate models to use to ensure you plane will fly but they may not describe what actually happens.
turok2@reddit
How the plane on the treadmill (the speed of which is matched to the speed of the plane) could ever take off.
Everyone who's tried to explain it to me has assumed that I think planes are powered by their wheels.
Electrical_Spirit917@reddit
Bluetooth, bc what??? lol
kayleighlfc2019@reddit
Homophobia/ Racism anything like that, like why does it bother you what other people are doing or what colour they are??? It genuine baffles me
Defaulted1364@reddit
Electric and wiring, every time I think i understand it something ignores all of the rules and works totally differently.
I used to do a fair bit of wiring on HGV trailers and I didn’t understand what I was doing at all I just knew that I’d been told the correct way and that seemed to work most of the time.
DifficultySalt4231@reddit
How water companies are private entities.
Realistic-Analyst-23@reddit
How otherwise intelligent people can believe in ridiculous conspiracy theories.
SnooGrapes2914@reddit
Time zones.
I get the general concept, but where does the change happen? Is it a gradual thing, a minute for every meter or can I straddle the imaginary line and have on foot at 11 o'clock and one foot at 10 o'clock?
What about the international date line? Can I just wander back and forth over it, losing and gaining a day as I do it?
Totally fries my brain for some reason lol
awkward_toadstool@reddit
Landline telephone wires.
I almost understand mobile phone signals easier, because for reason radio waves, satellite signals, etc, make sense in my head. But I cannot wrap my head around voices travelling down a physical wire to the right telephone
NecktieNomad@reddit
Taps. The water is always there, at some pressure, whether it’s in the pipes or in a water tank. It’s just the tap that stops it pouring out. And what makes the water flow? Gravity? Other water pushing against it? Is someone just constantly topping up the OG water tank? Specifically, and to an extension my query applies to hosepipes. When I turn the hose off but the supplying tap is still on, why is the pipe not ballooning like in cartoons?
And eyes. Specifically how can I know if your blue is my blue?
Shitelark@reddit
We can't. However assuming you aren't color blind to part of the spectrum we can assume given the same structures in the eye and brain produce the same colours.
NecktieNomad@reddit
I was imagining there might be a theoretical answer such as how we know dogs only see certain colours, maybe by examining cones, but imagine that’s not possible?
I assume colour blindness is diagnosed by inability to recognise certain colours when contrasted with other colours? What if colour blindness was the norm and everyone else was a ‘super visualiser’? I’m recalling I may have read something along these lines.
So. Many. Questions.
Shitelark@reddit
No dude. There are empirical ways of measuring which frequencies we are sensitive to. Most people see the same, don't overthink it.
NecktieNomad@reddit
I can’t not overthink it, it’s a classic subject for this particular thread!
slimboyslim9@reddit
The Wire
So many people tell me it’s the greatest show ever to be on TV. Actual critics, Reddit and also real life friends. But I have tried multiple times and different seasons and start points and I don’t understand. I don’t get who’s who and which I’m supposed to root for, I hear and know every word they say but somehow don’t understand what they’re actually telling each other half the time. Maybe I’m not street enough but I have friends who are waaaay more middle class than me who look at me like an alien if I level that argument at them.
One-Prior3480@reddit
I tried to watch it about 5 times and finally had to just plough through the first 3 or 4 episodes before I finally got into it. Maybe a bit too much when I found myself saying ‘I’m going to the shop to re-up the milk’….
Birdy8588@reddit
Punctuation, especially commas and semi colons and that type of stuff.
Ironically I got a BB at GCSE level but it's something I've always struggled with and it doesn't matter how many times someone explains it to me, I. Just. Don't. Get. It!
PeedieBit@reddit
The difference between affect and effect.
I’ve looked it up so many times and still have to write sentences in alternate ways so I never have to use either.
generic-username9067@reddit
Instagram and TikTok.
Obviously there is a huge appetite for it, but I don't understand watching people you don't know pretending to be in situations for rage bait or japery.
Reddit is letting me down too, it used to be way more intellectual and educational but most of the stuff that isn't American politics is now recycled TikTok videos.
The internet used to be a cool place for lame people, and everyone else getting access to it ruined it as far as I'm concerned.
entitledtree@reddit
You need to rework your algorithm 'cause I'm definitely not getting any recycled tik tok videos.
I only ever use the home page though, never the popular page so could be that
generic-username9067@reddit
See I like the popular page because it's where I would find new things that interested me, whereas it's now just saturated with US politics and shit
wildOldcheesecake@reddit
This is what people who hate tiktok and the like don’t get. My algorithm is fab! It’s lots of cooking videos, crime explanation videos and skits.
I’ve also come a across some incredibly niche content and it allows people to showcase their interests. One fella I watch goes around trying “grim things in tins.” Things I’d never dare try myself
Trace6x@reddit
tbh I'd bet that 95% of tiktoks viewership have absolutely no clue that so much of the content is entirely scripted/fake. Also it's just inherently addictive
FactWestern5578@reddit
Women.
crooktimber@reddit
Why a note on a trumpet isn't named the same as the same pitch on a piano.
One-Prior3480@reddit
With you on this. Makes no sense at all.
catdog_man@reddit
Trigonometry.
Not the Sine/Cosine/Tangent selection process - I understood all that at school - but the actual input order on a scientific calculator. More specifically, I just never understood when to press the sin/cos/tan button during the calculation.
Quite obviously, the answer was always different depending on when I pressed it and I was too stubborn to listen and happy enough with the grade I got (for very little work).
I'm now old enough to know I don't need to perform trigonometry calculations on the day to day/hardly/ever but it still fucks me off a bit that everyone's always like "Just remember SOHCAHTOA" when it's clearly not just that.
Apprehensive_Ad4172@reddit
Probability. As far as I’m concerned a thing will either happen or it won’t. Either I will roll a six, or I won’t. Don’t try to convince me otherwise!
newnortherner21@reddit
The Duckworth-Lewis method used in one day cricket (or DLS as it is now called).
nafregit@reddit
there's only two people in the world who understand how the Duckworth-Lewis method works.
newnortherner21@reddit
One as I think Mr Duckworth died last year.
nafregit@reddit
R.I.P. Jack.
divine_pearl@reddit
Stock market/ financial industry. What do they do that they make so much money. I get it it’s all about supply and demand, market forces and invisible hand but how are companies whose revenues are so small worth hundreds of billions.
How do people who work in that industry make so much money.
ab5602@reddit
Consistent new investments in individual brokerage accounts and retirement 401(k),'s IRAs, 403(b)'s, etc. It is gambling, but the main reason why the market consistently earns value.
WatchFamine@reddit
Imagine you own a nickel mine and you're trying to budget for the next year. You know how much nickel you'll produce for a given expenditure in labour and expenses, so you make a spreadsheet trying to decide how much you should spend in order to make the maximum amount of money. Well: you don't know, because the spreadsheet only gives you a relationship between input money and output nickel, not input money and output money. You would have to gamble on what you think the future demand for nickel would be.
One way to work around this is to change from selling nickel to selling the rights to future nickel. Then, you can 'sell' the nickel before you even take it out of the ground. This lowers your risk/exposure/upside by passing it on to someone else. That's a service, and they take a fee in the form of the difference between what they pay you and what they expect to get back from it. They might have deeper pockets and be able to wait longer to sell it on. They might have a market report on electric vehicles that tells them there will be more nickel used in cars next year.
Often in finance, things in one domain will end up looking like things in another domain. This is an example of that, because you've effectively bought insurance against the price of nickel going down. Some religions do proscribe insurance as a form of gambling but I think this example shows that it can actually be the opposite. There's less risk in the system, so people who depend on nickel as an input can operate with tighter margins, making everything downstream of them cheaper and more efficient. The same goes for your employees, who won't have to worry about being made redundant at an otherwise financially viable mine.
The next year you might need to buy a big mining vehicle, and a similar story would apply for how you would evaluate loaning money as a prerequisite for continued revenue. And then again, when you're thinking about retirement, and trying to avoid having all your money tied up in the nickel market.
Even without gambling and cheating, there's a lot of money to be made because a) it's tapping into the massive value of increasing the efficiencies of every business and b) you've been able to do it all around the world without standing up from a desk ever since the invention of the telephone.
Naturally this attracts a type of personality and culture with an inpersonal approach to money.
Fit_General7058@reddit
I understand the basics, but the financial instruments they create, swooh, right over my head
oktimeforplanz@reddit
Revenue isn't the only thing that gives a company value. Maybe they own the rights to something very valuable - a brand, a patent, etc - or they could just have loads of valuable assets. In traded companies, there's also the perception of the prospects of the business. Low revenue now, but very high potential for growth in the future can lead to a high market valuation now, as people buy in with the expectation (hope...) that the growth happens and they win.
This is why Uber, which hasn't turned a profit basically ever, has been so highly valued for so long. The investors aren't looking at what returns they'll get right now (which is nothing except whatever movement there is in the share price, if they sell). They bought in anticipating Uber investing every penny it makes into dominating the taxi market (and other related markets) in the future. Once it's in a dominant position, the expenditure will slow down and prices will go up to move Uber into a profit-making position and it can start paying out dividends to investors. In theory. Whether that'll ever actually happen, who knows. But this is why it's kinda gambling to invest directly into individual companies. You're punting money in now in the hopes that the company's trajectory is positive in the future.
devcmacd@reddit
It's worth bearing in mind they do still make money when they lose, if they're managing other people's money
WatchFamine@reddit
Not all of them
devcmacd@reddit
Most of them, which is all that matters for this thread
oliverprose@reddit
The simple answer is that it's gambling, and traders are salesmen who are paid in commission by other people wanting to take those bets and those who have things worth betting on.
AndAnotherThingHere@reddit
It's basically just posh gambling, with a bit of inside information.
shipshaped@reddit
The Monty Hall door thing, if someone very smart and very good at explaining things takes me through it at some length then I can get it but it's like the understanding is this very ephemeral, shimmery thing and the second someone stops explaining the problem to me it fades and dulls and I don't understand it again.
PenneTracheotomy@reddit
Exactly this. I understand it for as long as the conversation is about the Monty Hall problem, but 5 minutes later it just refuses to make sense
alltorque1982@reddit
Cruelty. I just can't fathom people who are cruel. Whether it's to children, animals, or driving like a cockwomble, I just don't understand how people like that exist.
ETA, I'm not comparing bad driving to animal abuse, it's all a sliding scale.
Con_Clavi_Con_Dio@reddit
Ever been around really young children? That's what we are. They take what they want, they hit others who try to stop them, they get angry when they can't have what they want. We teach them to share, to be kind but it isn't our natural state.
Some people are born without empathy. With loving parents they can learn kindness, but without loving parents they never will. Other people have empathy but have awful upbringings and never experience kindness themselves, so they treat others how they've been treated as that's their experience of human interaction.
jtr99@reddit
Hello babies. Welcome to Earth. It's hot in the summer and cold in the winter. It's round and wet and crowded. On the outside, babies, you've got a hundred years here. There's only one rule that I know of, babies-"God damn it, you've got to be kind.”
-- Kurt Vonnegut
alltorque1982@reddit
That makes me sad. I try to be kind all the time. It's not always easy, but I try.
The other day I got blocked in a narrow alley whilst driving, by another car who decided to park at the end of the alley. He was sat in the car still, so I gave a very short pip to let him know I was there.
He jumped out of the car, stormed over and started yelling how I shouldn't 'fucking blast my horn at him, how fucking dare I etc' before storming back and moving.
What the hell is wrong with people???
Just to add balance, I held a gate open for a dad who was struggling with child and bags at a park yesterday and the gratitude on his face spoke volumes.
Con_Clavi_Con_Dio@reddit
We aren't meant to be living the way we are. We used to have tasks where we did something and we had a reward now we endlessly do tasks and gain nothing. We live too close together, we're surrounded by noise and unnatural light, carrying devices that have turned us into Pavlov's dogs seeking rewards by being validated by strangers.
Then we wonder how someone can throw themselves in front of a train.
jtr99@reddit
There are indeed a lot of assholes who tax one's commitment to kindness. Well done you for sticking with it.
iiiBus@reddit
How we can't see anything around our vision yet our vision is a specific size
iEuphemia@reddit
Measurements. I just can't visualise cm/inches/feet/yards etc.
iiiBus@reddit
For me it's how we were able to decide how big a cm is and manage to maintain that worldwide
DenyTheIdeals@reddit
How Vinyl work
CreativeCoder0@reddit
Planes are big compared to us but very small compared to the sky
smushs88@reddit
Small, or far away?
theotherquantumjim@reddit
Yes
flyingshrimp21@reddit
I don't get it
RhinoRhys@reddit
Father Ted reference
Rev_Biscuit@reddit
Like cows?
SpiritedVoice2@reddit
Electricity, like the physics of it. Tried a few times to grasp it but still seems like magic.
affogatohoe@reddit
Electricity and how it works, I have two science degrees and a PhD in an engineering field (obviously not electrical engineering lol) and yet I just cannot cannot cannot get to grips with electricity and batteries and all that jazz
I'm going to have to live my life without understanding this wizardry
Geordieinthebigcity@reddit
Catweasel rightly named it electrickery 😀
rsbanham@reddit
Affect
Effect
Don’t try.
Many have. All have failed.
giantthanks@reddit
You are not daft. The truth is that no-one really knows. I'm serious. There are a lot of mathematically complex physics concepts, not a consensus and certainly no definitive proof. This has always blown me away. I kind of like that though, but not as much as I like those clever people who really do think they know how it's done. I've enjoyed many happy hours on search and AI and in discussions, so funny!
NFTArtist@reddit
Why people enjoy owning dogs. Just some of the BS to deal with: shit, pee, barking, crying, attention seeking, smell, bite, parasites, health issues, unhygienic, expensive, limit travel, damage environment, etc.
Own_Art_2465@reddit
Simultaneous equations. Been trying since year 9
Imaginary_Desk_@reddit
The constellations and stars having been around since- seemingly- eternity. That ancient civilisations saw exactly what we do.
I understand why on a basic level but it seriously blows my mind when I think about it and my mind just goes blank at the sheer incredulous feeling and thoughts.
50ShadesOfCroquet@reddit
Aeroplanes and how they fly - it’s been explained to me countless times but I just don’t get how a vehicle can just “magically” ascend into the air and stay there for such a long time.
55caesar23@reddit
How the universe is 13 billion years old, but the universe is 93 billion lights years across and nothing can travel faster than light.
Shitelark@reddit
Light is stretchy.
Igroig@reddit
Why anorexics do not eat even when though they are skinny. I know it is a mental health condition and there is no rational reason for it but it still boggles the mind.
KeysUK@reddit
Parents during school rush.
The way they park risking kids' lives because "there's no where to park" needs to get studied.
Ricky_Martins_Vagina@reddit
I just don't understand this Tracy Emin art 🤔
Previous_Ad_8838@reddit
Infinity and complex numbers
Logically I know what infinity is and what it represents, but the more I think about the fact that between 1 - 2 there's an infinite amount of numbers in the decimals the more I feel I hit an existential crisis
SaabAero93Ttid@reddit
The difference between effect and affect.. I am normal good at these things and often able to come up with a good explanation to clarify things for others.. But to my shame I can't get this one.. To make it worse I almost feel there is a mandelaism at work here too as I believe the explanations have changed
Pauczan@reddit
“Fucking magnets, how do they work?”
LHM1989@reddit
How to set the timer on my boiler
Traditional_Tea_6425@reddit
Long division.
I swear it's impossible.
BonAsasin@reddit
Why people have plastic tubs in their sink. It just doesn’t make sense! Just use the sink!
brigidichka@reddit
Locks, as in canal locks. Don’t bother trying to explain; I just DO NOT understand.
No-Dog5105@reddit
affect vs effect - it just does not stay in my head
The only time I get it right when talking about a persons affect, otherwise I default to effect but I know I probably get it wrong!
StandardYellow6762@reddit
WiFi, TV.. any technology really!
You're telling me that pictures appear because tiny pixels are transported through the air and it's not magic? Or how OG Charlie and the chocolate factory explained it?
Honestly it's witchcraft!
Gallusbizzim@reddit
Op, is your real name Arthur Knapp Shappey?
FinalEgg9@reddit
How car engines work. It's been explained to me countless times by many different people, I've read about it, watched videos... I still don't get it. I just accept that they work.
faisalness@reddit
Any subject apart from civics and ethics.
ramsvy@reddit
Where the universe is. Like yes obviously it's all around us, but what is it inside of? How can it exist without something else to exist within?
Time-Excitement-1317@reddit
That is THE question
Death_By_Stere0@reddit
Quantum mechanics. I feel like i am getting a grasp on it sometimes, but then something new blows my understanding apart.
AppleUpset396@reddit
60% of my job
Sea-Environment5246@reddit
How stuff gets onto a screen. TV? Typing?
Magic.
Time-Excitement-1317@reddit
😂😂
fused_of_course@reddit
This post
FilmFanatic1066@reddit
How to write joins in SQL
Ok_Leadership_2967@reddit
How that single groove on a record goes through enough processes for our ears to eventually hear it as music. All those voices/instruments contained in a groove barely detectable with the naked eye, then the amp and then the speakers. What's even more incredible is that someone actually discovered this.
Intelligent_Put_3606@reddit
All of that similar angles stuff in trigonometry
How to crochet (despite numerous attempts with books and videos)
Imaginary-Friend-228@reddit
People who can't form simple sentences like "what do you just not understand?"
professorbubbleworks@reddit
Clocks going forward and back. I just can’t -
Jazzlike_Standard416@reddit
The Game Show problem.
You have a prize behind one of three doors. You guess Door A. Host opens Door C - nothing. Host offers you the chance to change your guess. If you do, you have a greater chance of guessing the correct doir. How ?
GreenDolphinGal@reddit
How bridges are built. All bridges really but bridges over the sea make even less sense to me.
thatscotbird@reddit
I don’t that understand either. I don’t know how big boats stay afloat. Like how is a 20 floor massive cruise ship with like rollercoasters and shit on it not sinking?
And also yes planes I don’t understand how they get up in the sky and what keeps them in there.
Also I’m trying to buy a house just now and keep getting offers rejected, I thought saving up £15k was the hard part
I don’t understand how WiFi works either
jonewer@reddit
The cruise ship is less dense than water
OldEcho@reddit
For the boat it's basically a gigantic balloon with steel skin. Since it's full of so much air it floats because air is lighter than water, even though the steel is heavier.
Planes fuck me if I know, I think it's something like how straws don't work because of your suction force, but because you suck the air out and so the vacuum is filled by water because everything is being pushed down by the atmosphere all the time. So it pushes the water into an empty space. Which is also why if you hold the top of the straw with liquid in it it doesn't fall out - it's being pushed by the air. The shape of airplane wings cause the same effect when the air is running over them fast enough, sucking the plane up into the sky. But you'd have to ask an aeronautics engineer lol like I said I dont actually really understand it myself.
PaintingJams@reddit
steel is heavy, air is light. Your big steel boat just needs enough air in it for its overall weight to be lighter than the same volume of water and it will float. Water is surprisingly heavy.
plane wings have a curve on the top and are flat at the bottom. Meaning the air travelling over the wing has to go further than the air under the wing. This creates a partial vacuum pulling the plane upwards.
the housing market is fucked - no explanation possible
wi-fi is just radio carrying a lot more data than your old FM radio
yearsofpractice@reddit
Honestly? It’s how some people can just be so bloody confident about the grand plans they want out of life and then how to get it. I’m happy enough with my quiet life and just living to enjoy myself.
Aggravating-Ant-6767@reddit
Pensions, what any of my friends actually do for jobs, and how cruise ships float
jonewer@reddit
The cruise ship is less dense than the water it displaces
PaintingJams@reddit
water is heavy, steel is heavier, most of the cruise ship is air. Floats the same as anything else that floats. And a decent amount of it is still under water
Aggravating-Ant-6767@reddit
I appreciate the effort in explaining, but I think it may be wasted on me
PaintingJams@reddit
why does an empty plastic bowl float in your sink?
its the same but all the numbers are bigger
Ciato78@reddit
Quantum Mechanics.
nafregit@reddit
very niche, but train headcodes.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Train_reporting_number
I know that the 1 relates to an express train, 2 is a local train etc but the other three digits puzzle me. Even more so you can see a photo from 1974 with a headcode and someone will tell you the exact service it was on, even though that headcode can be in use on different services at the same time on the same day.
My brain hurts.
Secret-Sky5031@reddit
mimicry - you see an insect that's evolved to look like a snake, or a flower that evolved to smell like rotting meat, basically, how?!
zagreus9@reddit
Millions of years of mistakes, random mutations, and luck.
They don't evolve to immediately look like a snake or flower, they'll have a mutation that makes them look a bit more like one. Then, as they survive and pass down the genes, it can mutate again, sometimes for the worse and those die, sometimes for the better and those genes survive.
The hard part is remembering quite how long it's gone on for
Gerrydealsel@reddit
Most of those explanations still use Bernoulli principle, which is not really how planes fly. So it's understandable why you don't understand it!
sprauncey_dildoes@reddit
How something can fall into a black hole if time stops at the event horizon. I mean, when does it happen?
zagreus9@reddit
How does a computer actually work?
How do fancy rocks and electricity know things?
robster9090@reddit
Why I can’t repeat a good golf Swing , I hit some good shots, feel iv got it fixed and then i top it 30 yards with no understand what iv done wrong
No_Application_8698@reddit
How vinyl and tape can be used to record sound (& picture, for videotape) and how they can then be replayed on the appropriate equipment. Seems like the most beautiful magic to me. (I don’t really fully understand how digital recording and playback works either, but that is more easily acceptable I think).
Also stocks/the stock market. I understand the theory, and it’s been explained to me in person by someone who used to work as a trader, but it does not compute for me.
How could anyone have ever made sense of it all, with all the shouting and scraps of paper all over the floor?! How could it have been accurately logged and assigned, especially given the chaos and the stress/drugs/corruption involved? I know money is also a construct but the sticks thing just seems like they’re taking the piss, bordering on ‘fortune teller’ levels of credibility.
Familiar-Woodpecker5@reddit
Space! It blows my mind! Yet my 9 year old can explain it very well!
Worth-Income4114@reddit
Crypto.
spinning_and_winning@reddit
Dare I say cience education needs to be increased in the UK.
Dazz316@reddit
What creates gravity?
There's such a skill gap between how gravity works vs where it comes from
ploopitus@reddit
Diffusion Models (ie. the 'AI' that generates images from prompts (the LLM bit).
I've been using computers for over forty years, I've done a lot of graphics work, including 3D; I 'understand how computers work' internally, from binary upwards through the stack and I don't consider myself to be completely stupid - but how these fuckers work their magic? I have a knot in my stomach every time I try to get it, and I've read up on them and everything.
I. Just. Don't. Get. It.
maryantoinette02@reddit
Crypto
Velo_Rapide@reddit
Dativ, akkusativ, genativ.
Yerfdog121@reddit
There are more possible combinations of a deck of shuffled cards than there are atoms in the universe. I will never understand how this is possible.
Calackyo@reddit
Why everyone on this planet is so god damn negative about everything.
And before you start, yes, I know life sucks and this is all a nightmare that we didn't consent to.
But letting that make you negative is letting it win. I'm a positive motherfucker out of straight spite and it genuinely makes my life so much better.
miked999b@reddit
Honestly, if there's one thing I've learned it's that life becomes so much better if you can generate your own happiness.
It's a big 'if', of course.
slade364@reddit
Vinyl records.
I understand that it's an imprint of the sound wave. I understand that it works and why it works.
But I really, really think it shouldn't work. That little groove is Bohemian Rhapsody? Really?
Witchcraft.
DaisyDazeXO@reddit
The Offside Rule. To be fair, I'm not really into football, but whenever I hear it mentioned or try and think about it logically, my mind goes blank....
CobaltBlue389@reddit
Electricity. Like how does putting an earth cable on my radiator save my life.
And how can something instantly cut out and trip as a safety feature rather than travel through my body to the ground...
Choccybizzle@reddit
Vinyl. I understand the principle but how it makes music I can hear is mind blowing to me
Local-Breakfast-7159@reddit
Long division
RichMagazine2713@reddit
Record players.
Will never make sense to me. It seems more advanced technology than modern streaming etc.
kittysparkled@reddit
Wi Fi
Similarly radio
There's all these noises and images and words being beamed around me then somehow they come out of a screen or a mouse box but I can't hear them or see them when I'm walking around and it makes no sense to me.
I can almost grasp x-rays being a form of light that I can't see but I don't understand x-ray pictures.
I did understand MRIs sort of at one point but then I realised I don't understand magnets (no one does) and was flummoxed again.
ClassroomDowntown664@reddit
my cats telepathy as she knows she dashes out 10min before the bin lorry gets to my street so she can watch them
ExcitementKooky418@reddit
Mass production machinery. I've seen loads of videos of all sorts of production line stuff bending and stamping things into shape and I can't get my head round how they come up with the machinery to do it
AnyOlUsername@reddit
How the atoms that make up matter are mostly made up of empty space and yet we can’t walk through walls. Seems a bit unfair.
ans-myonul@reddit
NFTs - apparently it's a picture with some documentation to show that the picture is unique? But also it's possible to just screenshot the picture to copy it?
Trace6x@reddit
I think the 'documentation' is a cryptographic signature that can't be replicated. It's technically unique, the same way you could just take a picture of the Mona Lisa, there's still the original copy that's verified to be unique original. Same thing just digital which is partly why people think it's dumb, but I think the idea is kind of legit.
kittyvixxmwah@reddit
But in your example, there's only one physical Mona Lisa that can be hung in a gallery and people can walk up to and see it.
A digital picture, by nature, can be copied an infinite number of times and the experience will be the exact same for the viewer with every copy, so there's no value to owning "the original".
Trace6x@reddit
The value is owning the unique cryptographic signature, which makes it a digital 1 of 1. I think the concept is cool but you're right, the execution is dumb because it doesn't really have any value except for the value that people give it, like anything really.
Curiousinsomeways@reddit
You aren't actually buying the picture, you are buying the proof of authenticity.
Banksy makes his fortune in an analogue way. His agent confirms a work to be real once you've signed a contract, don't do that and you don't have the provenance.
PaintingJams@reddit
NFTs were and still are a scam by crypto bros and they mean nothing. They created "value" from nothing and then they died
JimmyHaggis@reddit
Jedward.
loveswimmingpools@reddit
How they universe was created. I mean what was there that first happened? How did the first thing happen?
miked999b@reddit
Space. It's so interesting but so complex
ChiefMeowsOBrien@reddit
Left and right ( I have dyspraxia)
FigPsychological7324@reddit
How some people can’t get grammar right…
CeeAre7@reddit (OP)
Sorry
adsm_inamorta@reddit
You should add grammar to your list
CeeAre7@reddit (OP)
Sorry
ishallbecomeabat@reddit
the infinite bus hotel thing
engineerogthings@reddit
Glass! It’s solid, its atoms and protons and electrons, billions of them so densely packed they form a hard solid lump. But light doesn’t care about that.
prismcomputing@reddit
glass is liquid, very very slow liquid.
engineerogthings@reddit
No it’s not.
prismcomputing@reddit
it's an amorphous solid
engineerogthings@reddit
Yes, not a liquid. Structurally similar but a solid nonetheless.
banedlol@reddit
The title of this post
Jizzlamic@reddit
This is gonna get me downvotes but Islamophobia. Their book literally says I’m going to be tortured forever for not pressing the subscribe button. This naturally causes people to give up on life and just spend their entire time either trying to hurt me or convincing me to press that subscribe button
OldEcho@reddit
Islamophobia is bad because almost invariably islamophobic people give other religions which do the same thing a pass. Or indeed are part of those religions.
It's okay to be anti-religious I think, if it can make you a bit insufferable. Bit when you're like "Islamic people are terrible because their prophet was a pedo" and ignore the fact that RIGHT NOW, TODAY, politicians in America defend child marriage because Mary was like 12 when God impregnated her, it does make me a bit suspicious that you actually just hate brown people.
Like oh yes the pedo-y religion mostly followed by brown people is terrible but crickets about the pedo-y religion followed mostly by white people.
Jizzlamic@reddit
Plenty of religions don’t have this subscribe button ideology, these cause problems in the world
OldEcho@reddit
Plenty do but not Christianity (or indeed most of the major ones.) Beyond which, Islam is a lot less ridiculous about the whole heaven/hell thing than most Christian denominations. You don't just get into heaven for being a Muslim. You have to actually do good things and not do bad things.
"those who refrain from doing evil, keep their duty, have faith in God's revelations, do good works, are truthful, penitent, heedful, and contrite of heart, those who feed the needy and orphans and who are prisoners for God's sake."
Simultaneously I think a majority of the major Muslim schools agree that you can get into heaven as a non-Muslim (you just probably won't get into the BEST heaven, which imo yes is obviously ridiculous.) You just have to be good and not evil. This is leagues ahead of the Anglicans and Catholics who believe you MUST be Christian or Catholic respectively. Also it's common belief that you can get out of hell, maybe, if God feels like it I guess. But again better than most Christian sects which aside from Jesus harrowing hell one time ever, you're fucked.
Anyway we're getting away from my point. Basically if you constantly criticize Islam and rarely if ever Christianity (at least Anglicans and Catholics) it's obvious you're just a racist hiding behind religious differences. They're both completely degenerate if you read into them. They both have extremists who make and have made everything miserable for everyone. And the average random fellow who follows either is probably fine.
Peac0ck69@reddit
How the moon has something to do with the tide.
Or what an ocean on another planet would be like.
benzilla04@reddit
Play war thunder and suddenly planes make sense
EitherChannel4874@reddit
This witchcraft people do with electrical chords that are stuck.i can watch all the videos but don't understand any of it.
inevitablelizard@reddit
How a sewing machine makes a stitch. I know it's using two bits of thread but I can't get my head around how it works. I choose to believe it's magic instead.
LAcasper@reddit
Fractions, decimals and percentages.
I'm not thick - I passed every exam except maths. I just don't understand it.
Prize-Piano2146@reddit
Bitcoin .
drpandamania@reddit
I was going to say this. All that business about mining bitcoin, there being a limited number, blockchains and all that malarkey. Makes no sense to me at all, no matter how many times I’ve read about it.
southeway@reddit
The way lift works still blows my mind too, like, I get the physics explanation, but seeing a massive metal tube defy gravity still feels like magic every time.
reasonable-frog-361@reddit
Fridges
Mc_and_SP@reddit
How people can watch Deal or No Deal and act like there’s some kind of master strategy behind it all.
TSC-99@reddit
When you use past and passed
_feedmeseymour@reddit
Inflation. Like don’t get me wrong, I understand it in its basic form, but what I don’t understand is the idea that it exists as it’s own entity that we can’t control/stop.
It’s a human invention, and I don’t understand why or how we let it get to where it’s at now. I don’t understand why we can’t just go ‘we’re not inflating prices this year’.
ChipCob1@reddit
Active noise cancelling headphones...I know how it's supposed to work but it all seems to happen too quickly!
metechgood@reddit
Consciousness , but that's because nobody understands it. I work in computer science and have become a bit obsessed with the implications of conscious AI. This has led me down a whole rabbit hole of Idealism and Integrated information theory and the more I read the less I understand and the more mysterious the whole universe becomes. There is literally no known way that physical processes and phenomena can give rise to conscious experience and that gap in our understanding perplexes me. Then I get to the work of Hume and discover how little we really know of the actual physical processes because to quote Hume, there is nothing betwixt them. We have grand predictive mathatical models but no real understanding of what is actually happening. Consciousness then is more than just a hard problem, it is an impossible one to understand.
ResolveEmergency863@reddit
How vinyl records work and play music,
I get the needle in the groove moving against the peaks and dents within the groove but exactly how that translates to complicated music is absolutely magic to me.
Individual_Cod_2499@reddit
Wired earphones or anything music related. How does music travel through technology
sorelytempted3@reddit
Data transfer over radio waves and electric wires is hard enough to understand but contactless transfer blows my mind. How does my mobile translate air into something new on my phone?
ggssmm1@reddit
We’re here to chat about all the stuff we just can’t get our heads around, yeah? But now we’ve got some clever clogs rocking up, breaking it all down in a way that actually makes sense.
Are we all meant to go back and faff about editing our posts to add a list of everything else we do not understand? Or should the mods just boot out these brainboxes who seem to have it all sussed?
barcodez@reddit
Magnets
Fick_Thingers@reddit
The link between digital resolution and DPI for print. I've tried and tried to understand how one relates to the other, but still cannot make cleat sense of it in my head.
Enraged-walnut@reddit
Why some people feel the need to blow everything wildly out of proportion?
the_star_lord@reddit
war, religion etc. Why people can't look at the mistakes their countries/ religion/ parents / ancestors did and just admit that people are shitty but promise to do better and actually follow through.
Maybe I'm to white to understand it.
sockeyejo@reddit
Long division. Couldn't do it when we were taught in primary school. Still don't understand it four decades later. Thank fuck a) I rarely need to use it and b) all those teachers who said we'd never have a calculator in a pocket whenever we needed one were oh so wrong.
Perversia_Rayne@reddit
Astronomy. My brain just cannot comprehend the massive sizes involved.
jerifishnisshin@reddit
Peopel submmiting tittles with out proffredding them fast.
Heavy-Conversation12@reddit
Well it's actually pretty basic, Philomena
iamthefirebird@reddit
How a sewing machine works. I've looked it up, I've had people explain it to me, and I know how it must work - but I've never been able to figure out how the thread from the needle goes under amd around the bobbin. That must be what happens! But how‽
Goodbyegreysky@reddit
Calculators
Captaingregor@reddit
Mechanics and forces around curves. I just can't do them. I do not understand how the equations work. I can muddle through regular mechanics ok-ish but curves are right out. I got lucky with my physics A-level exam that there weren't too many questions on mechanics in general, and only one or two on circular mechanics, but I do kind of feel that my grade isn't quite deserved as I completely didn't understand a reasonably large part of the course.
Fortunately I did further maths As-level because that meant I did both Statistics 1 and Mechanics 1, allowing me to do Statistics 2 instead of Mechanics 2 at A-level.
FluffyMumbles@reddit
Soap operas. How anyone can watch a fictional show, written about the most depressing characters you can imagine, night after night, is beyond me.
missuseme@reddit
Music. I don't understand any of it really. How can two instruments play the same note when they sound completely different? How the hell to musicians play at the same time perfectly synced up in time with other musicians? Plus so much more, it's like magic to me
Upset-Elderberry3723@reddit
The note/pitch of a sound is determined by it's herz (Hz). The higher the Hz, the faster the soundwave is moving and the higher a pitch/note it produces.
If you wind a string really loosely and pluck it, it will produce a bass-y/low note (low Hz), but a tightly-wound string will produce a higher note when plucked (higher Hz).
As to why different instruments sound different - it's because no note that you produce is actually 'pure', in the sense that it's just a pure, isolated Hz wave. You have other, small vibrations (soundwaves) occuring as a result of your big, intended soundwave, and these layered waves affect the overall sound being produced. There's a lot of peripheral/erroneous noise in there.
Also, you're probably not constantly producing the same Hz. If you pluck a string, you'll initially get one Hz frequency but, as the string rapidly loses energy, the Hz also slows and you get different different 'microtones' (differences in Hz that are not sizeable enough to constitute a difference in note, but are still different sounds/pitches) in there.
Different materials tend to produce different patterns of other soundwaves occuring, which is why brass instruments all tend to sound largely the same and why all drums tend to sound largely the same etc.
As to how all of these notes, built into chords, sound nice together? Mathematics. The note progressions and chord progressions that sound fitting tend to do so because the Hz ranges of them are multiplying or dividing factors of each other. The brain seemingly has an intuitive grasp of this and just prefers Hz changes that are more orderly and clean.
As to how musicians stay on the same beat as each other? Muscle memory, intuitive ability to base your timing on others' playing that you are hearing, and time signatures (which are beats that humanity has essentially constructed as a standard system of timing music).
Specialist-Box4677@reddit
I can play with my band or by myself and invent a new song every day with heaps of different parts, I'm a published musician of thirty years, etc. But try to explain the most basic music theory to me and I'm lost instantly. And I've tried.
EuroSong@reddit
A pure Sine wave is a clean tone. Everything else is harmonics. Instruments sound different because they produce different harmonics.
shares_inDeleware@reddit
dangle the back of a spoon under a running tap, which way do you think the spoon will move?
zoomoovoodoo@reddit
Money. It's just made up, we could all live just fine. Idk what we're in debt to no matter how it is explained I just can't grasp it.
AstronautDouble9036@reddit
Remember sticking your hand out the window as a kid and letting the air lift and drop it based on the angle. It's basically that, just with a tiny car engine instead of a monstrous Rolls-Royce engine.
PaintingJams@reddit
actually not how airfoils work sadly. As much as it logically feels correct. Airfoils make low pressure above the wing that sucks the plane upward, not pushing down on the air
amboandy@reddit
It's ingenious really, they're just shaped so that air has to travel further across the top of the aerofoil than it does at the bottom....so yeah, witchcraft
True-Abalone-3380@reddit
I posted this in another reply.
AstronautDouble9036@reddit
Damn, I've lived a lie!
PaintingJams@reddit
I know, I was devastated when I was corrected too, it just makes so much sense
Trace6x@reddit
What a cool explanation
Soggy_Temperature788@reddit
Telephones - how does talking into this thing in my hand travel through the air and get played LIVE to someone else almost anywhere in the world? I couldn't fathom it as a child when wires were involved but this is taking the piss! Witchcraft
HeyItsKriss@reddit
Crypto! Someone explained it to me once and I pretended to understand to not come across as a complete idiot!
orangesapplespears@reddit
Crypto currency. Seems stupid and fake.
I also am often fascinated by how data has no weight. That might sound stupid but imagine you're adding more and more information into your phone, your laptop, your SD card, and they don't get heavier. That's crazy. Maybe it has the most microscopic weight that has no tangible impact for us but it's still wild.
Lopsided_Soup_3533@reddit
The touchscreen technology I'm typing this on right now. My husband has tried to explain it to me but what I hear is
Blah blah blah conductivity blah blah blah electric blah blah blah finger. Blah blah blah. circuits
Al I learn is the crime shows that use dead people's fingers to unlock the phone is bullshit cos a corpse doesn't have the electrical signal required.
kateeee_pants@reddit
Why the UK uses metric and imperial systems
DengleDengle@reddit
Multi storey car parks. A car is SO heavy. Thousands of cars in one place?! It freaks me out so much. I have no understanding of how these places can be strong enough, except the reassurance that they have been built and quality checked by people much smarter than me who DO understand.
ScottChegg81@reddit
I don't do understand the question.
unninvitedguest@reddit
I know I’m showing my age here but Fax Machines. How do they recreate the image via a telephone line?
docju@reddit
How people fall for obvious parody accounts like RAF Luton or the Onion
ShameSuperb7099@reddit
Why people eat McDonald’s and so on
Glittering_Copy8907@reddit
I'm a pilot and I still look at passenger planes with amazement.
It's easy for my brain to comprehend on the scale of a small aircraft - I mean, they're light enough to push around. But getting something which is close to 500,000kg's to 30,000ft blows my mind.
And, tbh, IME - people who think they understand it rarely do. I spent some time around aerospace and aerodynamics and while you can distill the explanations down to "Easy enough for a pilot to understand", the reality of it is insanely complicated
flashbastrd@reddit
Sorry, but its not "insanely complicated". The reason a very light bi-plane can fly is more or less the same reason a 747 can fly. Propulsion causes the plane to move forward, the wings create high pressure below and low pressure above, thus causing lift.
Glittering_Copy8907@reddit
Imagine typing this about the field of aerodynamics.
flashbastrd@reddit
It’s not completed to understand the principles, which OP and responder are suggesting is really hard.
Yes, designing a 747 is insanely complicated. Comprehending the principles of how and why a plane can fly, isn’t too difficult imo
Glittering_Copy8907@reddit
I'm the responder. What I wrote was:
Trace6x@reddit
Isn't it basically more air pressure under wing than over wing = lift? Combined with insane amounts of thrust, like from a jet engine and it makes sense to me.
BobBobBobBobBobDave@reddit
Honestly, pretty much anything to do with physics.
Like, I get that everything is made of atoms, and different properties and charges, etc. and I roughly understand how things like magnetism, gravity, momentum, etc. work, but I don't get WHY.
And I have tried. I have read what are supposed to be basic intros and it always feels like they leave something out. Like, why do the atoms stick together? Why does gravity exist? Etc.
Upset-Elderberry3723@reddit
Science can never tell you why something happens - only how it occurs. This is one of the conceptual pitfalls of English when used to describe processes.
'Why is the sky blue' isn't really possible to answer, but we phrase it that way anyway. 'How is the sky blue?' is answerable.
Ornery-Vanilla-7410@reddit
I feel like Prof Brian Cox knows 'How' but even he doesn't know 'Why' they exist
coderallensmith@reddit
What do you not know what it is?
Paint? Radio? Granpa Crosby's real age? ~~Where Matthew Crosby lives?~~ No, scrub that. We all know where he lives.
Rico1983@reddit
TikTok.
eat_play_love@reddit
In a Rubik's cube, if all the cubes can twist horizontally and all can twist vertically, then they're not attached either vertically or horizontally. What are they attached to?!
prismcomputing@reddit
Take one apart, there's a central hub with spokes.
Rasty_lv@reddit
Bluetooth and WiFi principles.
I get it in theory, but I still can't understand it.
And thats coming from someone who loves tech.
Ok-Camel-8279@reddit
How does a conventional bicycle stay upright whilst in motion? I thought this would be fully understood and documented but no, it seems no one has ever worked it out.
South_Leek_5730@reddit
The New York Times effect on man.
pinkdaisylemon@reddit
Oh I'm with you, it totally baffles me!
FoxGranite@reddit
Black holes.
FoxGranite@reddit
The engine makes the plane go fast, the wing splits the fast moving air.
The air above the wing is going faster and the air under wing is going slower.
This causes higher pressure under the wing and lower pressure above the wing.
The higher pressure wins the pressure differential and it pushes the wings upwards.
Able_While_974@reddit
The off-side rule.
And crypto
RadioDorothy@reddit
Television. As a 70's born child I just couldn't grasp how the pictures got sent to the box and screen through an aerial. My mother explained it as thousands of smaller broken up pictures send to a receiver, and that blows my mind to the degree that in today's culture of internet, social media and AI - all of which I understand just fine - I STILL can't visualise the original Television concept and how we watched programmes on a screen.
LandofGreenGinger62@reddit
The off-side rule. But on the other hand — I also don't care very much... 😁
elogram@reddit
Tensegrity. I’ve watched plenty of videos but I just do not get it. It looks like forbidden magic.
DisMyLik18thAccount@reddit
Time dilation, as in if you travel at light speed you age slower
Bitch time is time
Iamleeboy@reddit
Ha I was coming to say the same thing. I have watched and read a lot of sci-fi that makes use of this and I still do not understand it.
Like if you set off at lightspeed to a new planet and then a year later I do the same, you will be a lot older than me when I get there. I don't get how you could not just be a year older.
Or if I stay on earth and you travel at lightspeed for a year and then come back again, I will also be way older than you.
I am yet to see an explanation that makes sense to me. I tend to just gloss over it in books and accept that what the author says is true. A recent one I read was Exodus by Peter F Hamilton - amazing book, but I still didn't get why some of the main characters were thousands of years behind the others after a few hundred year journey.
TrueInspector8668@reddit
but what if time wasn't time? *vsauce music plays*
Kamikaze-X@reddit
How modern cameras focus
How does the camera know when it is in focus? I've read a number of explanations and it still doesn't make sense to me
How does a processor that is about as powerful as a cheap calculator first "see" the image and then determine that the image is in focus or not?
Equivalent_Ask_1416@reddit
Why people will just leave your life suddenly and go somewhere else, like if you had a friend who you've known for years and just disappears.
helenemayer@reddit
suddenly blocking someone you love and acting like they don't exist
flashbastrd@reddit
Sometimes its the only way to make them get the picture, unfortunately
engineerogthings@reddit
How times slows the faster you go. You travel at the speed of light for a couple of days and you come back and everyone is a month older, kind off.
gogybo@reddit
Don't let anyone here try and explain flight to you. I have a master's in aerospace and have worked at Rolls-Royce/Airbus for 10 years and I promise you, it's just magic.
Mountain_Rock_6138@reddit
How colour effects heat radiation and absorption.
I understand the wave lengths and light absorptions, but you can have white chocolate, dyed black with black food colouring, which will now melt faster than non-dyed chocolate, despite being the exact fucking same, excluding for colour.
onedayitshere@reddit
I really don't understand anything.
PaintingJams@reddit
accepting that is actually a sign of greater intelligence/understanding than thinking you know things
Basic-Pudding-3627@reddit
Gravity. I can’t believe that mass bends space and time! I know it does, I can’t believe it.
danddersson@reddit
Do you understand how a kite flies in the air?
Aeroplane: engine = kite string, and it moves through the air rather than air moving (wind) past the kite.
AlwaysKernow@reddit
The blue and red lines with the weird flags on weather reports.
Something about pressure but I'll never understand it and I've given up trying.
MattHatter1337@reddit
Why kids love the taste of Capn Crunch.
InfiniteDjest@reddit
Time and space. Nobody really, truly understands that shit.
lil_chunk27@reddit
Tectonic plates.
MattHatter1337@reddit
Under the crust theres magma (simplified) bubbling around churning. It moves the plates on top (like rollers at a shop till). But some move in different directions pulling the thing on top apart. And in some places they come back together....violently.
They're also slow. Like.....imagine a glacier. Its the Flash compared to tectonic plates.
Hope that helps.
eraseMii@reddit
Volts and amps and ohms. I've read all the analogies under the sun and I still don't intuitively understand electricity property. The whole pressure and volume water analogy makes no sense to me
ManTurnip@reddit
Wait until you find out how electrons actually move around, you'll think Ohm's law is the most understandable thing in the world then.
raccoon-overlord@reddit
Electronics. Give me anything with moving parts and I can fix it or build it. But anything above a simple circuit and I just don't get it, had people try and explain it and read books on it and I just don't get it
sjintje@reddit
funny, I was just reading recently how the physics of flight is a bit more complicated than the old "air has further to go over the top of the wing than the bottom, so lower pressure" explanation, so maybe you were right.
on that topic, I've always struggled with jet engines, specifically how the compressor at the front is driven by the fan at the back - it just sounds like "that's not going to work"
CptCave1@reddit
Plane stays up due to lift, plane moves wings make a pressure difference and lift is generated by the wings due to thrust of engines.
Something along that lines. My pilot friends can explain a lot better than me.
Stumblingwanderer@reddit
A good example of this is if you put your flat hand out the window of a car it will naturally push upward due to the same principle.
zeviea@reddit
Quantum mechanics
Narrow-Marionberry90@reddit
You're not daft, it's a pretty magical 'sweet spot' of combination of a few different forces.
If you're a person who plays video games, play Kerbal Space Program (the original) and read a guide to learn to build a plane in it. It might be better if you learn hands-on through trial and error, as thats how I came to understand it properly.
AutoModerator@reddit
Please help keep AskUK welcoming!
When repling to submission/post please make genuine efforts to answer the question given. Please no jokes, judgements, etc.
Don't be a dick to each other. If getting heated, just block and move on.
This is a strictly no-politics subreddit!
Please help us by reporting comments that break these rules.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.