Zero difference in applied technology. That is why the a400m uses turboprops that are more efficient at lower altitude than the turbofans commercial planes use.
ABSOLUTELY ZERO DIFFERENCE GUYS!

You really need to start reading posts to understand discussiin. responding to the last post without reading the reat makes you just shouting at clouds.

Are you saying there is no turboprop comercial planes or you skimmed the post and didn't understand what was written.

No these planes are indeed built to very different specifications. Now an empty commercial plane can do similar things that is true. But you ahve to eep in mind that an empty plane is also flying way below specs. No airline or military in the world asks for a plane that performs well when empty. They specify those things for load.

Again , you did not look at the thread and you are shouting at the clouds.

We SPECIFICALLY talking about airshow performance of ...wait for it... EMPTY, SET FOR MAX PERFORMANCE cargo plane.

And i can assure you fully loaded commercial planes can't pull of the stuff that a military plane can. Also goes the other way round by the way a military plane can't do some thigns commercial ones can. These things are built for a job and they are good at that job. If you try to do another job with them they might still be able to do it but there are specialists out there that are simply better.

Loats of words that mean nothing to anybody with even basic interest in aviation.

There is very little difference in performance of military planes and comercial pla es, infact some comercial planes outperform military cargo planes for the simple reason that they are build to be as efficient as possible and save as much money as they can, while being as efficient at speed.

Meanwile military planes main objectibe is to cary cargo and not brake while being roughly handled.

Technology applied is exactly the same.