What's your take on the QI show?
Posted by Ok-Fondant2536@reddit | AskABrit | View on Reddit | 87 comments
We germans got a similar panel show called "Genial Daneben", but the german media landscape is not known for its word wide marketing value.
DotComprehensive4902@reddit
Your guy, Henning Wehn is one funny man when he's on it
JCDU@reddit
He's brilliant on ISIHAC, his singing has elevated him to the status of the new Jeremy Hardy.
someonehasmygamertag@reddit
Apparently he's pretty unknown in Germany. My other half's family is German and hadn't heard of him. When I spoke to her uncle (who lived in the UK) they said when they said hello to him in Germany he was surprised as he normally gets recognised here.
ZygonCaptain@reddit
When he’s on anything, tbf
Ochib@reddit
Well he is the German Comedy Ambassador to London
quite_acceptable_man@reddit
It's only right. He is, after all, the UK's most popular German comedian.
ExpectedBehaviour@reddit
I both absolutely adore QI and haven't watched it for years.
ghostofkilgore@reddit
Same. I don't know if it really just isn't as good now that Stephen Fry isn't there or whether I just reached my limit with it but I haven't watched a full episode in more than 5 tears.
ABashfulTurnip@reddit
Personally I think Sandi is doing a great job as a host, and I was quite sceptical of her taking over at the time as I was less of a fan of her as a contestant on it.
I just think it is getting to the point where we have exhausted the formats potential. I'd happily have any season of it playing in the background while I work or if I want something chill on while I game or whatever, but Its not something I feel any drive to seek out.
Boldboy72@reddit
I love to watch it on iPlayer, that way I can avoid the episodes with people I don't find / never have found funny like Jo Brand or Josh Widdecombe
Zr0w3n00@reddit
I love the idea and I think the execution with Fry was great. Once Sandi took over I didn’t much care for it.
Less funny and less chemistry.
Specialist-Alps6478@reddit
I respectfully disagree, I think Sandi was a great addition, and had great rapport with the panelist’s. I just think so many years of Stephen setting the bar as high as he did may have worked against her.
GeraltOfDissidia@reddit
I prefer Sandy to Stephen. I like her humour and I feel she is more succinct than Stephen. I think she is also quicker with her retorts.
I used to think I preferred Stephen, but after watching Sandy for so long, I found going back to the originals less enjoyable.
Spudbanger@reddit
Yes. I found Fry really annoying in the way he behaved as if he actually knew the answers o all the questions rather than being provided them by the writers and researchers. Sandi is cheery, funny, and not smug.
Specialist-Alps6478@reddit
I personally prefer the newer episodes too, although the older ones definitely have a nostalgic element!
When I say it worked against her, I mean that some lifelong fans would have disliked anyone who took the position after so many years.
PassiveTheme@reddit
I think the Fry's later years lost a bit of the magic and Sandi brought it back, but it still hasn't quite reached the heights of peak Fry. That said, I haven't watched it other than the odd episode for a few years now so it's possible that my view isn't too accurate.
GrumpyOlBastard@reddit
I'm very much pro Sandi. There was zero wrong with Stephen, but I just like Sandi, always have
nicotineapache@reddit
There's also a change of culture shift since there's so much more online content to get lost in. I remember when I was at uni in the early 2010's and you didn't have as much Youtube to watch, plus it wasn't standard on TV's. QI was constantly on freeview, so everyone had it.
Stephen left at just the right time.
stevekeiretsu@reddit
I dont have any issue with Sandi but I've still gone off it (roughly) since she took over. I don't find the panellists that great anymore. Not just a QI thing even, I can't think of any panel show or standups who amuse me much these days. Idk to what extent that's me getting old vs changing trends in comedy
PaintballProofMonk@reddit
I was totally the same. Loved it when Fry was on it, Sandi utterly ruined it for me.
feeb75@reddit
It was better with Stephen Fry
Adventurous-Rub7636@reddit
Insufferable
SingerFirm1090@reddit
It's okay, but occasionally perpetuates myths by repeating facts that are untrue. To be fair, the show openly admits this so there is no deception, but don't take everything they say as facts.
Soggy_Amoeba9334@reddit
I used to really enjoy it, but was getting a bit bored with Alan Davies and lower-quality guests. I gave it a go after Stephen Fry left, but soon gave up.
LaraH39@reddit
Sandi is actually better than Stephen. Far funnier and has better interaction with the guests.
Maximum_Scientist_85@reddit
Agree totally, she’s fantastic on it
PaintballProofMonk@reddit
Couldn't disagree more. I find her insufferable. Unfunny. No gravitas or likeability. The guests are worse. They don't take it as seriously. She doesn't have the natural authority Stephen has. Literally no one I know likes her on it.
LaraH39@reddit
Are you 12? Literally nobody you know likes it? It's one of the best performing shows on the BBC. A "jewel in the crown".
Nobody takes it seriously? It's a comedy game show, it is not, nor was it ever, supposed to be "taken seriously". You don't need gravitas for a comedy game show 😂
Look I love Fry. He's incredible. And yes Toksvig is different, but she's far more affable than Fry. Fry was like a school master, Toksvig is more like a chum. And having met her several times in her position as a patron of Humanist a UK I can tell you she's a really kind, funny, decent person.
PaintballProofMonk@reddit
Is it the best performing show since she took over or just overall, taking into account the majority of its run which Stephen did? Also why would it being well performing or being called a jewel mean the people I know like it?
On the contrary, Fry gave it much more of a well blended tone, a mixture of seriousness and humour which kept it grounded and rich. You absolutely need gravitas to host a game show well.
Doesn't sound like it, otherwise you'd be able to appreciate the ways in which he's superior. The fact you don't suggests not only a lack for him, but an odd bias.
She's quite infamously prickly where Fry is famously charming... No idea where you're getting the idea people find her affable.
Well, because he was a school teacher, it's much of what gave the show its unique character. It's also why he had so much gravitas and charisma.
To who? She did multiple seasons of bake off with Noel Fielding and when asked about him, acted so EU and dismissive of him it genuinely turned the stomach.
Ah, that explains it.
The person who started off their response to me with an insult is adjudicating on what qualifies as kindness. Very credible.
LaraH39@reddit
First Fry was never a teacher.
Second Noel Fielding is a deeply problematic man, he was 30 dating a 16 year old, he's a creep and lots of people have issues with him.
I insulted because your reply was childish.
Toksvig is not "infamously prickly".
And I know this may be hard for your little mind to grasp, but I can be a fan of Fry AND Toksvig and I can still be a fan and prefer someone else doing a job he once did.
PaintballProofMonk@reddit
If you're an ardent fan of QI you'll recall he stated he was once in a position of authority over students, dealing with them in their dorms and such. Oddly I can't find mention of it on his wiki, because he very particularly claimed it on the show itself. Weird.
He had a relationship with a legally consenting adult? What's the issue?
I think the person who began being insulting is probably more childish...
From all I've seen she is.
LaraH39@reddit
A 16yo is not a legally consenting adult. A 16 year old is a child and the fact that you have no issue with 30yo dating a child explains a LOT about you.
You think a man dating a child is OK. You're not a reliable source for judgement of anyones character.
Fenrir-The-Wolf@reddit
In the eyes of the law a 16 year old is a legally consenting adult.
We can say and think it's fucking dodgy for a 30 year old to shack up with a 16 year old (it is), but it's legal.
LaraH39@reddit
No at the age of 16 someone can give consent to sex. It does not make them an adult in the eyes of the law.
And if you don't think a 30 year old man, didn't coerce a 16 year old CHILD then I don't know what the fuck is wrong with you either.
Fenrir-The-Wolf@reddit
Well it's somewhat more complicated than that.
18 is the age of legal adulthood, but it'd be accurate to describe your teenage years as a period of transition, where the rights of adulthood are gradually allowed to you.
I also already said it's dodgy, so keep your vitriol to yourself, will you?
LaraH39@reddit
Nah. I'll not be tone policed by someone who tries to find "nuance" to a grown man dating a child.
PaintballProofMonk@reddit
Here:
"What is the age of consent in the UK?
The age of consent across the whole of the UK is 16 - this is the minimum age when young people of any sex, gender, or sexual orientation can legally take part in sexual activity."
I dated an older person at 16 and it did me no harm. You need to stop infantilising legally consenting adults.
LaraH39@reddit
The age of consent does not make someone an adult. Did you see the words "young people" not an adult. Your not classed as an adult BY LAW until you're 18 you creep.
PaintballProofMonk@reddit
Again with unnecessary insults. So immature.
LaraH39@reddit
Hardly unnecessary.
PaintballProofMonk@reddit
I guess you're just an unpleasant person and you're clearly self aware about that and comfortable with it. I can't do anything to help you grow from that, but I wish you development. All the best.
LaraH39@reddit
Yeah. I'm not the one ok with a grown man being in a relationship with a child. And trying to justify it. That's not something I need or want to "grow from". You on the other hand, may need your computers checked.
PaintballProofMonk@reddit
I don't even own a computer, just a phone and anyone's welcome to check it. I engage in nothing illegal. Just like Noel Fielding didn't. Great guy. So much funnier and lovelier than Toksvig.
Poo_Poo_La_Foo@reddit
I think she's great, I loved her show about unusual properties to stay in too. Very soothing. She just seems like a great, kind, smart, level headed person.
PaintballProofMonk@reddit
Not the impression I've ever got off her, but each their own.
feel-the-avocado@reddit
I am chiming into the conversation from New Zealand. I think QI is absolutley awesome and I wish they would make more episodes more often.
unnecessaryaussie83@reddit
Some of there “facts” are questionable and have been proven false
Overthinker-dreamer@reddit
Didn't watch it to start with, but love watching it now. Hubby likes Sandi better than Stephen.
Good easy to watch in the evening when the kids are asleep
Lunchy_Bunsworth@reddit
Goes without saying that the quality varies depending on who is on the panel. Certain guests such as Rosie Jones and Nish Kumar I switch if off and do not watch it. Alan Davies can also be tiresome at times. The some roster of comedians seem to be on it in rotation which can be boring.
NortonBurns@reddit
Love it, both incarnations.
Recently rewatched the whole lot from A to current.
Once spent two days on set with Stephen Fry when he was in the Keifer Sutherland show, 24. It was like being in two days of QI. He's just the same off camera as on.
random_username_96@reddit
I love it. I enjoyed it with Stephen Fry but honestly I just love Sandi so very much. I love her chemistry with the guests, love the little running gags, and I learn so much interesting stuff! Her passion for knowledge really shines and I enjoy when panelists have little nuggets to share too.
jvlomax@reddit
Legendary is the only word I can use to describe it. But the last few seasons it has felt a bit like they are now just sailing the ship into harbour as fast as they can and sew up season Z so they can call it done.
Poo_Poo_La_Foo@reddit
I've not watched the show for a long time (come to think of it, I've not have a TV for ages!). BUT I love No Such Thing as a Fish, which is a podcast by the QI researchers.
Honestly, my favourite pod.
Pier-Head@reddit
The Sandi Toksvig iteration is funnier. Stephen’s had more of a cerebral feel
thebuttonmonkey@reddit
It went from genial headmaster to chaotic substitute teacher, and works well for it.
HopefulCry3145@reddit
I find it a bit cringy and smug. I know its no big thing but it's also very annoying when they get things wrong when attempting to correct other wrong assumptions. Eg when they said the Earth has loads of moons and that the Jesus story was a copy of Mithras
tunaman808@reddit
Not Brit or German, but while I like Sandi generally, I think she lets the panelists go on and on too much. I wanna watch QI, not The Alan Davies Anecdote Hour.
Jazzlike-Basil1355@reddit
Sandi T is a bore. Never mentions she is a small, gay Dane 🥱
Mundane-Security-454@reddit
Sandi T is great. I've always found the people who don't like her are dumb, obnoxious, right-wing cunts. Funny that!
Jazzlike-Basil1355@reddit
Who are you calling dumb 😂
PaintballProofMonk@reddit
I really don't care that she's gay, but she is very boring. Really ruined the show.
Jazzlike-Basil1355@reddit
I don’t care her being gay, small or Danish. But the same joke over and over
No_Election_1123@reddit
For some reason I drifted off during the Covid year and didn’t come back
It’s one of those things I could put on while doing something else, never needs my full attention
Inevitable_Muscle_48@reddit
I love it, hoping to see one of the Z shows live.
Princes_Slayer@reddit
My husband saw one of the earlier episodes live in London. He said the whole thing lasted a couple of hours.
ConfusedGrundstuck@reddit
Yeah, of course. What's put onto TV is the refined and snappily-edited version. The idea of experiencing a 2+ hours live episode of QI sounds like heaven.
b3tarded@reddit
I went to one in 2016. Totally free and they record 2 episodes a week I believe. You don't know who the guests are until they walk out. As the other post says; lot's of tangents, out-takes, resets, talking to the audience etc. It goes on for quite a while, but not in a bad way.
Great time all around. Highly recommend if you're in, or plan to visit London.
Inevitable_Muscle_48@reddit
My parents went to see it, they loved it.
Indigo-Waterfall@reddit
I loved it for years. Will still watch on occasion but I’m not a big TV watcher in general now. I do love the spin off podcast from the researchers of the show called No Such Thing As A Fish.
Lost-Droids@reddit
It's a really great show and you learn so much watching it .
Select_Scarcity2132@reddit
You do learn a lot from the show, but they did an episode all about correcting the facts that they got wrong in the past and tbh there was quite alot they got wrong of had been disproved since it was broadcast. Netherless, I still love watching it.
StonedMason85@reddit
A lot of the “facts” aren’t actually being corrected though, they’re being updated. Like if we know the largest of something but someone discovers a larger one, we normally talk about largest to actually mean “largest known” so it wasn’t technically wrong the first time.
ConfusedGrundstuck@reddit
That's one of the best things about it, that they admit fault or misrepresentation, and also acknowledge that science and discovery continue to expand, thus changing earlier notions.
Lost-Droids@reddit
Yep the half life of facts. Great episode. But kind of proves the point that even in that I learnt something
ThaiFoodThaiFood@reddit
I haven't watched it since Stephen Fry stopped presenting because I absolutely cannot stand Sandi Toksvig
PaintballProofMonk@reddit
Amen. She's insufferable.
ThaiFoodThaiFood@reddit
blink blink blink blink blink blink blink "Scandiwegian".
I even used to skip the episodes she was on. Worst downgrade in television history.
Spindelhalla_xb@reddit
Darth
Leenesss@reddit
Used to like it. Now however I can see the "facts" are not always really facts and that it's just another vehicle for left wing politics.
mr-dirtybassist@reddit
I've never been bored enough to watch it honestly
Mundane-Security-454@reddit
Love Island is more your thing, eh? Guess we all have to go camp from time to time, honey. Xx
mr-dirtybassist@reddit
Certainly not! I also like to keep my remaining brain cells
Hyperbolicalpaca@reddit
Love it, got to see an episode filmed, allows me to always have some kind of obscure fact to use in conversations
sbaldrick33@reddit
I don't watch it regularly at all anymore, which is a shame.
I think it's nice that a show could be commissioned the purpose of which is just to broaden people's general knowledge in an amusing way.
Hot_College_6538@reddit
I prefer the ‘No such thing as a fish’ podcast. I find QI tedious with the stupid buzzer noises being so unfunny now.
Drewski811@reddit
The early years were very good, some fantastic TV, but it feels like they used up a lot of the good facts quite early on and the stuff they have now isn't quite the same tier.
qualityvote2@reddit
Hello u/Ok-Fondant2536! Welcome to r/AskABrit!
For other users, does this post fit the subreddit?
If so, upvote this comment!
Otherwise, downvote this comment!
And if it does break the rules, downvote this comment and report this post!