Meta planning to develop closed source models like Anthropic and openAI - NYT
Posted by JP_525@reddit | LocalLLaMA | View on Reddit | 23 comments

Posted by JP_525@reddit | LocalLLaMA | View on Reddit | 23 comments
kindtdp1@reddit
Paywall
DungeonMasterSupreme@reddit
Title's just plain wrong. This literally says they were considering just using other closed-source models for Meta AI.
This is why it's important to actually still know how to read, instead of letting AI summarize everything for you.
bene_42069@reddit
"Apply cold water to burned area"
slayyou2@reddit
That wasn't an AI summarization issue. The title was was created to generate extra engagement
DungeonMasterSupreme@reddit
I wasn't implying they used AI to summarize the article. I'm implying their reading comprehension is shit.
But if the goal was to create engagement, then great. Now everyone here thinks they can't read, and the post has 0 karma. Pro social media player move.
JP_525@reddit (OP)
wrong. i don't think that is what embracing means
dampflokfreund@reddit
See, this is what all your whining and complaining has lead to. Great job, guys.
Only-Letterhead-3411@reddit
If they do good job, we praise their work, utilize it and thank them. If they do bad job, we criticize, discuss and ignore. We have right to. We don't owe these corpos anything. I don't know why you are acting passive-aggressive about it.
dampflokfreund@reddit
There's a difference between constructive criticism and "loool model x y pisses on Llama 4, meta suckksss"
Ravenpest@reddit
lool meta sucks Lllama4 dead on arrival
night0x63@reddit
I personally use llama3.2, llama3.3, and even llama3.1:405b a little. All really great! Especially llama3.3.
Ok_Cow1976@reddit
Time to praise llama4. Laaaammmaaasssstroooongggggg
Ravenpest@reddit
It is inevitable. Even though it may not be true right now, it will be. I am thankful for every new release, no matter its source. Eventually the well will dry out and we'll look back with fondness at this period of abundance.
FitItem2633@reddit
Why did OP leave out the next paragraph?
A Meta spokeswoman said company officials “remain fully committed to developing Llama and plan to have multiple additional releases this year alone.”
JP_525@reddit (OP)
they will continue the llama series but will not be the main focus. kinda like Google does with the gemma and gemini series
swagonflyyyy@reddit
Well make sure to include that next part next time.
Tomi97_origin@reddit
Companies are always fully committed until the moment they suddenly aren't.
Spokesperson is the last person informed about changes in direction.
po_stulate@reddit
If keep working on open source llama makes them to lose the battle, it will be over for us too. Maybe the best for both is for them to still be able to profit from it so that they can put more resources into it and keep llama going.
shyam667@reddit
So, it's over for us? inserts chudjak_crying.jpg
sunshinecheung@reddit
The rapid growth led to infighting and management squabbles. And with Mr. Zuckerberg’s round-the-clock, hard-charging management style — his attention on a project is often compared to the “Eye of Sauron” internally, a reference to the “Lord of the Rings” villain — some engineers burned out and left. Executives hunkered down to brainstorm next steps, including potentially ratcheting back investment in Llama.
In May, Mr. Zuckerberg sidelined Mr. Al-Dahle and ramped up recruitment of top A.I. researchers to lead a superintelligence lab. Armed with his checkbook, Mr. Zuckerberg sent more emails and text messages to prospective candidates, asking them to meet at Meta’s headquarters in Menlo Park, Calif. Mr. Zuckerberg often takes recruitment meetings in an enclosed glass conference room, informally known as “the aquarium.”
The outreach included talking to Perplexity about an acquisition, two people familiar with the talks said. No deal has materialized. Mr. Zuckerberg also spoke with Ilya Sutskever, OpenAI’s former chief scientist and a renowned A.I. researcher, about potentially joining Meta, two people familiar with the approach said. Dr. Sutskever, who runs the start-up Safe Superintelligence, declined the overture. He did not respond to a request for comment.
kiralighyt@reddit
This is why zuck is total assh*el and always will be. Never trust that guy. Deepseek should win the Open source AI race
Secure_Reflection409@reddit
Oh no, that's terrible news.
Ambitious_Subject108@reddit
Boooooooooooo