Tulsi: Reddit may hate you now but we still love you.
Posted by therin_88@reddit | tulsi | View on Reddit | 54 comments

Posted by therin_88@reddit | tulsi | View on Reddit | 54 comments
CleverNombre@reddit
This person's comment in r/conservative today:
"I hope he lets them watch a livestream of Fordo getting leveled.
Then we can continue negotiating once they've seen what we can do.
This is Iran, not France or Germany. They don't deserve to have a choice about whether they give away their nukes or not."
You can't make this neo-con shit up from these new Tulsi fans...
therin_88@reddit (OP)
I've been a Tulsi fan since she nuked Kamala in 2016.
But yes, you're absolutely right that I posted that. And I stand by it.
I am the farthest thing from neo-con as you can get. I abhor Dick Cheney, George W Bush, Mitt Romney. But it's obvious to anyone with 2 brain cells that we must stop Iran. They've been instigating or taking part in every major ME conflict since 1979.
DNA98PercentChimp@reddit
Ah yes. The ‘legalize weed and decriminalize all substances’, ‘Medicare for all’, ‘protect federal lands from greedy corporations’, ‘green new deal’ supporting version of Tulsi from 2019?
So… do you still support those policies?
therin_88@reddit (OP)
Tulsi never supported the Green New Deal.
Everything else, yes.
DNA98PercentChimp@reddit
You’re 100% right about universal healthcare/medicare for all. My bad. Used to be so careful about conflating those two, but I went and did it… oops.
And… green new deal… really? Perhaps I’m misremembering. At the least, addressing climate change and environmental consciousness/protections were a cornerstone of hers.
DareMe603@reddit
Let's dissect Iran:
Escalation Risk: The conflict could spiral into a broader regional war, involving allies like Saudi Arabia, Turkey, or even Russia and China, who have ties with Iran. This could destabilize the Middle East further, disrupting global energy markets and trade routes.
Economic Impact: Iran is a major oil producer, and conflict could spike oil prices, hitting the U.S. economy with higher fuel costs and inflation. Sanctions or blockades could also disrupt global supply chains.
Military Overstretch: U.S. involvement would strain military resources, already spread thin by commitments elsewhere (e.g., Ukraine, Indo-Pacific). A prolonged conflict could lead to significant casualties and financial costs, with estimates of past Middle East wars costing trillions.
Domestic Political Division: Intervention could deepen U.S. internal polarization, with public opinion split on foreign wars. Recent polls (e.g., Pew Research, 2023) show growing wariness of overseas military engagements.
Terrorism Threat: Involvement could provoke Iran-backed groups like Hezbollah to target U.S. interests or allies, increasing terrorism risks at home and abroad.
Diplomatic Fallout: Aligning too closely with Israel could alienate other regional partners and complicate relations with countries like Qatar or Turkey, who maintain ties with Iran. It could also undermine efforts to re-engage diplomatically with Iran on nuclear issues.
Non-intervention avoids these risks, preserves strategic flexibility, and allows focus on domestic priorities and other global challenges.
Buckshot1@reddit
You've been brainwashed by the pro-war propagandists. Iran doesn't want to start a war. Their primary motivation is self-defebse, not aggression. They're trying to protect their country from the warmongers in Israel and the US.
The Iran deal served the interests of both the US and Iran but Trump had to ruin everything by foolishly withdrawing, and now we're in this situation.
CleverNombre@reddit
You're absolutely a war-hawk neo-con. How aren't you?
kline6666@reddit
Same with a large portion of trump fans. When trump was anti war they were anti war. When trump wants to start wars they now want to start wars. They are just "fans", after all.
therin_88@reddit (OP)
Trump doesn't want to start a war. Pay attention. Trump is the reason why we aren't already at war.
plsobeytrafficlights@reddit
uh huh.....so, about that war situation.
CleverNombre@reddit
As of 9pm ET, we are at war. You folks can't stop self-owning
NickDixon37@reddit
Tulsi deserves a lot of credit as well - probably more than we'll ever know.
And Trump dissing Tulsi is just how he rolls when he's "negotiating". (with lots of bluster and scary warnings). While Tulsi is unique - preparing for war, while standing strong for Aloha. (and survival)
kline6666@reddit
I really hope you are right.
Buckshot1@reddit
Most Trump suppoters were never anti-war. Even back in 2016 Trump was fearmongering about Venezuela, iran, etc.
DNA98PercentChimp@reddit
Ah yes. The ‘legalize weed and decriminalize all substances’, ‘Medicare for all’, ‘protect federal lands from greedy corporations’, ‘green new deal’ supporting version of Tulsi from 2019?
So… do you still support those policies?
plsobeytrafficlights@reddit
tragic failure turned russian asset.
IVcrushonYou@reddit
We support you, Tulsi regardless of party. 💙
plsobeytrafficlights@reddit
well thats seriously deranged.
Ironram31@reddit
Blood on your hands
974080@reddit
Still a patriot and a lady. She is honest and transparent, as well as very intelligent. I support this lady as a leader.
Ironram31@reddit
Will you volunteer to take place in the war since you support it so much?
974080@reddit
I hope that we don't have to go to war and that Trump can make a deal with the Iranian government so that they don't have nuclear weapons capabilities. However, Iran is burning the American flag and chanting "Death to America", if they have nuclear weapons, do you think they will hesitate to use them? Yes, I will fight to protect my country, my family and friends, and my freedoms.
Buckshot1@reddit
We already had the Iran deal but Trump had to ruin everything.
As for Iran using nukes, the regine hasnt started a war yet. It's in their self-interest to protect themselves against warmongers in the US
974080@reddit
The Iranian deal was a disaster, it didn't prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons or being able to develop them. The Abraham Accord was a much improved agreement, but the Biden administration didn't have the brains to continue with the better deal.
Buckshot1@reddit
If Trump hadn't abandoned the Iran deal, we wouldn't be in this situation.
The Iran deal is arguably the most significant US diplomatic achievement of the past 20 years. Trump didn't think Obama could get it done, but when it was completed, Republicans started coping about how it was a terrible deal.
It's in Israel, America, and Iran's best interest to avoid WW3.
974080@reddit
I agree that we need to avoid WW3 as well. It will be impossible to do that if Iran gets nuclear weapons. The Iranian deal was a disaster and was a bandaid solution at best. We need a lasting agreement that gives specific rules and penalties for all parties involved. Iranians are taught to hate Israelis and Americans and won't hesitate to attack America. I don't want WW3, but I also don't want another 9/11 either.
Buckshot1@reddit
Iran hasn't started a war yet. They don't want to fight one either but Netanyahu forced their hand because he's desperate to stay in power.
Even if Iran gets nukes, which wouldn't have happened if Trump hadn't abandoned the Iran deal, they aren't going to start a war with America. North Korea doesn't want tonwage war against America, nor does Russia. North Korea uses nukes as a defense mechanism against potential US action.
Obama understood that it was the perfect time to improve relations with Iran. Unfortunately, Trump's policies have only emboldened the neocons.
974080@reddit
Obama was anti Isreal. Any deal benefitted Iran, Obama provided financial aid and support for Iran, and let them go unchecked. Obama's policies destabilize the region, and has emboldened the terrorist. Biden should have continued with the Abraham Accord.
Buckshot1@reddit
Any deal now would also benefit Iran. It also benefits the US. Obama, just like virtually every president, is pro-Israel. He just isn't a zionist sycophant like Trump.
If the US implements regime change in Iran, it would result in the deaths of countless US soldiers. It would very a disaster for everyone.
When Obama was Predident, we had improved relations with several countries (Cuba, Iran, etc).
Ironram31@reddit
Why are you avoiding my question?
walkinthedog97@reddit
She's a warhawk
974080@reddit
She will do whatever is necessary to keep our soldiers out of harms way, having served herself. She will also protect America from any and all threats, both foriegn and domestic as the head of intelligence.
Dbro92@reddit
She's doing a pretty shit job at that so far
974080@reddit
What are you basing that accessment on? Are you looking at the same data that she has? It has been 6 months since this administration has been in office, and I can see a great improvement over this country so far. In part the improvements is because of the intelligence that Tulsi has overseen.
DopeAsDaPope@reddit
Yeah I think she'd be a great President. Especially as the first female President.
gatsby_101@reddit
Traitor.
zombierapture@reddit
I don't blind support any politician. Tulsi talked about previous administrations waging thier regime change wars and how she wanted to end that but now she is on board to a regime change war. We have been lied into war before and this is no different I will not support her if her stance changes this is not a marriage I will not stand by a politician in sickness and health I will vote them out and oppose them if they change.
GeorgiaOKeefinItReal@reddit
Yeah this post just reminded me that i need to unsub
KyleButtersy2k@reddit
I'd say that she supports a hard line of zero nuke weapons in Iran hands.
You are making leaps to think she is all in for a regime change war like Iraq.
If Iraq has had any benefits it is that countries like Iran face consequences if they defy non proliferation treaties.
This will likely end before a skirmish is even possible.
Buckshot1@reddit
Tulsi's main policy objective has consistently been to end regime change wars. So it makes no sense why she'd support Trump considering his stance on Iran, it's inconsistent with her ideology. Biden and Harris had a far more measured and diplomatic foreign policy
QuaggaSwagger@reddit
Tbf, if my spouse was supporting/orchestrating a regime change war, might be grounds for divorce.
buttputt@reddit
3 months ago she said Iran was years away from a nuclear bomb, now she says they're months away. It's the Colin Powell playbook and you should not fall for it
Ironram31@reddit
Literally no one likes Tulsi anymore 🤣
Dblcut3@reddit
Exactly. Her grift is so weird too. She’s not even MAGA, if anything she’s become a weird Bush-era neocon
Ironram31@reddit
Shes selfish, that’s the one common theme in everything she does.
Dblcut3@reddit
Remember when Tulsi was “anti-war?” Now she’s clapping like a seal working for the pro-war with Iran administration…. absolutely no principles
LordXenu12@reddit
Why? Because she sold out to an incompetent conman that doesn’t take her seriously?
DareMe603@reddit
People hate anyone who might take their free ride away or associate with someone who does.
DocRyan88@reddit
Tulsi is against the forever wars... Now part of the Bush 3.0 regime
They are manufacturing consent in the same ways Condoleezza Rice, Colin Powell, and Bush did
Lol what a joke
tuepm@reddit
lol. maga dipshits are pathetic. you guys have no principles. 6 months ago it was the democrats submitting to israel and now that trump and tulsi are bending the knee you are too. you've made me lose faith in democracy because people like you are allowed to vote.
TorchKing101@reddit
Trump will sack her in the next couple of weeks. You don't contradict agent orange
walkinthedog97@reddit
Nah. As someone who dislikes the mainstream politicians and status quo, and who liked what tulsi had to say at one point, it's become very obvious to anyone who isn't sticking their head in the sand, and the bots on this subreddit, that she's just as much a grifter and opportunist as the rest of these losers.
CleverNombre@reddit
LOL Fucking cringe, Trumper