Modern tanks already have aim bot enabled in basically every model. It’s one of the things computers are the very best at. Go fly a dji drone and tell me again how computers can’t shoot straight.
Modern tanks are on a much heavier platform. I'd like to see it actually hold a fully loaded live firearm and pull the maneuvers it's doing. I think it would tilt over fairly easily.
That gimble is putting in work, I’d honestly imagine aiming wouldn’t be terribly hard it’s going to do most of the work holding steady for you. Have you ever used one with a camera, shits a game changer.
I agree but I do get wheat they mean. With a camera or a nerf gun it's fine, those don't produce recoil. Mount a firearm on there and it's likely to roll if the recoil is stronger than the frame is heavy.
Though from the way it handled the jump I think that base has some serious weight to it. It'd probably be fine.
Russia has fielded recoilless shotgun drones in the last week. Creating a recoilless rifle for one of these isn’t going to be a problem for the monsters who want to use these against people.
ukraine has used both aerial and ground drones with mgs and rockets, rockets work way better than MG's but it is a grounbreaking concept that still needs a lot of work / perfectioning, but i doubt it would work with a firerate this high.
Ukraine has fielded some that are close to this, it would never work with a GAU/minigun of any calibre, fire rate is wayyyyy too high, they struggle keeping the drone's front on the ground due to the recoil with a pkm.
A mini gun also takes a shit load of ammo so this would start of incredibly heavy and end up super light, fucking up the recoil controll even more. interesting concept tho
They had very complex robotic fire control systems on WW2 warships, and aircraft bomb sights that could adjust for your course and speed, the enemy coarse and speed, wind, air pressure, etc. Nobody fires a 16" naval rifle at a target 10 miles away by eyeballing it.
I don’t know man I’m not on the dev team. This looks to me like a platform they put a gun on. Are you arguing semantics with a stranger online? Who gives a fuck? I’m asking to see results and you’re telling me like you helped design it.
Not, I was pointing out that if a helicopter is a stable enough platform for a 30mm cannon, then this small drone is a stable enough platform for a rifle calibre machine gun
Good job being intentionally obtuse, but you’ll also find that modern wheeled armoured vehicles like the Centauro can fire with relative accuracy going 20mph+ if you want a more accurate comparison
These look like RC camera dollys, especially with that Ronin gimbal. Here's a pair we had working at Victoria Secret fashion show. These ones were equipped to follow a magnetic tape we laid on the ground.
2) if redesigned to support a real weapon (see point 1) without capsizing , then yes. But the vehicle mass would be much larger than the toy one in the video, to begin with.
3) Yes, that's the easy part
4) not really an issue.
It doesn't need to be fully electric . This is a UCGV, not a flying drone with weight limitations.
5) See fiber optic links, extensively used in Ukraine .
6) lol no.
But military equipment doesn't require perfection to be useful. UCGVs only need to be "good enough" in a large enough range of situations, then armies will find a use.
Right now, this thing is obviously just a toy, with that fake gun. But small UCGVs already exist, and are being tested by several countries with real weapons in real conflicts, Ukraine being the most important.
Give them a few years , and UCGVs will become commonplace in wars. There are obvious advantages for their adoption, and the required technology is not really sci-fi. Just incremental evolution of what we have already .
Generally it seems the gun-carrier ground drone is not worth it. But we're seeing lots of mine laying, med-evac, supply runs and barbed wire construction done by ground drones in Ukraine.
You’d be surprised how little effect wax slugs would have on a properly militarized version of this. Gotta remember that before implementation on a battlefield, that gimbal would be beefier, and it operates largely passively. You’d probably have a setup more akin to a smaller US DPV with a thick AR500 steel gimbal, sensors with thick plexiglass covering, and a gun, so you’d need something with a bit more power to disable it.
Robot dogs are more of a recon tool than anything, but yeah wax slugs would probably render one inoperable. As for birdshot for drones, it can work, depending on the drone. If it’s a drone that drops munitions (mortar, grenade, etc.), then yes, that works. If its one of the FPV drones with an RPG stuck to the front, realistically you wouldn’t have the time to ready a shotgun before you end up a statistic, and even if you get the first one, they always come with friends.
The real defense to both is electronic warfare, but that requires more equipment. If a drone, robot, or anything else can’t get close to you without losing signal, you’re in a lot better of a position than carrying an extra shotgun with different loads for different threats.
Plexiglass I can see, but a meaningful amount of armor that can defeat even 9mm doesn't seem too feasible right now because more weight means more power which means more weight on top of any ammo anything like this would carry (depending of course how scaled up something like this would get). So I still say wax slugs imo. As for drones, those in Ukraine seem to be doing the best they can with birdshot. Yes, it does depend on a lot of factors, but success has been made there.
Well something to consider for weight is that more weight for something like this isn’t a big issue. I don’t work in manufacturing of autonomous combat implements, but I am active duty in an extremely niche engineering field in the military, with some commonalities. Basically, vehicle weight is no longer a considerable factor. Even if it was 800lb, the cost wouldn’t be too high for NATO budgets. Consider the following:
EV r&d has resulted in comically strong electric motors and mass produced high capacity batteries
Even if range is a concern, batteries are largely hot-swappable, furthering the weight mitigation
AR500 steel is very cheap to make today, theres tons of alloys that can hold back 30-06 that won’t be too heavy
This is assuming direct hit on the gimbal itself, it would likely be enclosed, so accuracy would be an issue
Now, do I think, even with those mitigating factors, that a small autonomous machine like this would be at all practical? Absolutely not. The biggest issue with this sort of thing isn’t protection per se, but rather firepower. Like, say an M134 gets taped to the top, it’s gonna be out of ammo extremely fast, even if it’s stuffed to the brim. Same with any sort of 40mm launcher. It could have something like a modified M249, but then it’s not really needed. Why have a machine fire a SAW when you could just send a soldier who can take cover.
As for Ukraine, you’re right that people are using what they got, but Ukraine is an interesting case study on unique war adaptations. When the war started, neither side could use EW because they’d be jamming themselves (both using Soviet equipment). Now that Ukraine has western radios and such, it would be possible, if not for the fact that by jamming Ukrainian drones, the Russians would be jamming their commercial drones, and both sides require them for their doctrine.
Even without EW though, I had the same thought process regarding shotguns at first, but theres very important considerations based on how they can field them.
Dedicated anti-drone guy embedded in fireteams who mainly holds a shotgun. This would be incredibly easy for Russia to do, given the amount of Saiga-12s they have, but it makes that soldier much less effective for engaging infantry (significantly less capacity, gets stopped by armor, and has a shorter range. This is what Ukraine was experimenting with.
Same dedicated drone guy, but instead using a full shotgun, he is issued a breaching shotgun. This would be incredibly easy for Ukraine to do, given the volume of western military aid, and allows the soldier to carry a rifle as well. Problem is that skeet shooting with an M26 is nearly impossible, and you have even less shells to work with.
Combo. Dude is carrying a full size shotgun and a rifle. Now he has to carry two guns. Kinda impractical.
So like, has birdshot been used sometimes to good effect? Absolutely, but it’s a huge tradeoff.
Ok lots of good points. The only counter I got is that when I was in the Marines, Corpsmen would often carry a shotgun and a sidearm. I wasn't infantry, so I didn't see all the TTPs they'd use, so my milage varied greatly. And masterkeys are still kind of a thing (I got out in 08 so who knows) tho their use was mainly for door breaching. And with all that said I concede to your knowledge
Now make it an actual firearm with heavy ammunition, and enjoy this thing rolling the second it moves anywhere, due to the high-ass centre of mass on that weapon mount.
if they added some stabilizing "braces" on it they could drive the bot around with the gun lower down, go into a location, employ the braces and then raise the gun higher and shoot, that way they could have made it as a potential flanking bot for combat in cities but even then it would have an issue of being only use-able for a short while when the cities are still mostly intact, try to send that into Syria and it would be destroyed in a matter of minutes because of rubble.
not to talk about the fact that the bot would be extremely vulnerable toward civilians or soldiers since the machine would need to get employed before it could fire, it would probably be more useful to train up a few extra guys as LMG gunners and then have a bot as an ammo carrier to supply them but that would still entail issues with rubble
I think the bigger reality is unmanned ground vehicles like this have very specific purposes. They are not the drones we see in Ukraine. And yes, very tricky to deploy effectively.
These would be more for the likes of covering advances/flanks. A place you don’t want bodies getting isolated. Have an LMG with a long link. Moves to that position and holds. It wouldn’t be accurate or sneaky.
And now easily jammed with EW unless fibre optic which is another issue.
These would be more for the likes of covering advances/flanks. A place you don’t want bodies getting isolated. Have an LMG with a long link. Moves to that position and holds. It wouldn’t be accurate or sneaky.
I would argue that bots like this would be a lot more useful as a defensive tool in the event of a frontline collapsing instead of working in locations that are already under threat from opfor, the bots we can see might seem awesome but most of the clips we can see are already in places that are "busy" but not busy busy, places like offices or gyms are hardly busy compared to a warzone and I feel as if the bots would be put in place and then cease up because the code running on them are running 3000 calculations a second when it really need to run 30,000 or 300,000 calculations per second, building defenses at a relatively calmer location like a defense stronghold behind the lines would be a lot more feasible task for the bots to do and then when the bots have finished building up the base you send in new soldiers + an extraction team (the soldiers do the necessary task that the bot cannot do while the extract team extract the bots) and when the soldiers have set up the team close to the frontline get a message to return to the new location where they get returned to base for resting while the new soldiers work with the defense of the new location and then if the base becomes overrun the same process is happening further back, advancing on the other hand would require a lot of processing power for the bots to be useful so I expect the bots to primarily be used defensively, sure you might see larger semi-autonomously bots that are closer to APC like the UGV Stomper from Arma 3 in that you have a guy that control it (and can drive it in cases of organizing the fleet in the bases) that is acting as mobile firepower or is carrying ammo and medical supplies, having bots that can do actual combat autonomously is likely a few years away(, not that we would want that for a few reasons like faulty IFF systems making everything register as hostile), it is kind of annoying as both the sides of the AI combat side is kind of wrong, some say that autonomous bots would do everything for us in the future and other say that the bots would do nothing when the reality is that most bots would be used in the warzone but mostly for construction of defense and then only away from the frontlines and out of the reach of artillery
I’m sorry but this is an absolutely lunatic ramble of warfare. Bots building defences? Extraction teams for bots? AI and faulty IFF? Defensive strongholds?
Go back to COD or whatever RTS game you put down for the 45 minutes it took you to write this.
I’m not even warranting you with a genuine response.
We have a video of an RC car with a nerf gun on it, a comment about the practicality of human operated RC cars with guns and you’ve taken it to COD infinite warfare. What?
TrolleyDilemma@reddit
Now lets see it shoot and stay on target
ifunnywasaninsidejob@reddit
Modern tanks already have aim bot enabled in basically every model. It’s one of the things computers are the very best at. Go fly a dji drone and tell me again how computers can’t shoot straight.
CallMe_Immortal@reddit
Modern tanks are on a much heavier platform. I'd like to see it actually hold a fully loaded live firearm and pull the maneuvers it's doing. I think it would tilt over fairly easily.
slow_RSO@reddit
That gimble is putting in work, I’d honestly imagine aiming wouldn’t be terribly hard it’s going to do most of the work holding steady for you. Have you ever used one with a camera, shits a game changer.
theBeardedHermit@reddit
I agree but I do get wheat they mean. With a camera or a nerf gun it's fine, those don't produce recoil. Mount a firearm on there and it's likely to roll if the recoil is stronger than the frame is heavy.
Though from the way it handled the jump I think that base has some serious weight to it. It'd probably be fine.
manic_andthe_apostle@reddit
Russia has fielded recoilless shotgun drones in the last week. Creating a recoilless rifle for one of these isn’t going to be a problem for the monsters who want to use these against people.
No-Might31@reddit
ukraine has used both aerial and ground drones with mgs and rockets, rockets work way better than MG's but it is a grounbreaking concept that still needs a lot of work / perfectioning, but i doubt it would work with a firerate this high.
No-Might31@reddit
Ukraine has fielded some that are close to this, it would never work with a GAU/minigun of any calibre, fire rate is wayyyyy too high, they struggle keeping the drone's front on the ground due to the recoil with a pkm.
A mini gun also takes a shit load of ammo so this would start of incredibly heavy and end up super light, fucking up the recoil controll even more. interesting concept tho
posidon99999@reddit
A directed energy weapon however…
thrashmetaloctopus@reddit
I’d actually argue having a full real weapon system and payload would help with stability
WhoRoger@reddit
So it needs a railgun then.
InsurmountableLosses@reddit
I propose we add 50% to its size to increase stability.
Or have the gun be retractable into a "down" and locked position for movement and have it move up when at the combat site.
earthforce_1@reddit
They had very complex robotic fire control systems on WW2 warships, and aircraft bomb sights that could adjust for your course and speed, the enemy coarse and speed, wind, air pressure, etc. Nobody fires a 16" naval rifle at a target 10 miles away by eyeballing it.
TrolleyDilemma@reddit
Tanks are platforms built around a main gun. This is four wheels with a gun (really) high up on top. The two are not the same.
ifunnywasaninsidejob@reddit
Is this not a platform built around a gun?
TrolleyDilemma@reddit
I don’t know man I’m not on the dev team. This looks to me like a platform they put a gun on. Are you arguing semantics with a stranger online? Who gives a fuck? I’m asking to see results and you’re telling me like you helped design it.
ifunnywasaninsidejob@reddit
Sounds like you got caught talking out of your ass and are too proud to admit it.
Nomekop777@reddit
Aimbot has been used in video games for years. If it hasn't been implemented in modern battle strategy, it would be very easy to do so
Silvadream@reddit
this is correct. Same with wall hacks
One_Adhesiveness_317@reddit
An Apache can already aim its 30mm cannon with surprising accuracy whilst moving at 100 knots
TrolleyDilemma@reddit
This look like a helicopter to you, Copernicus?
One_Adhesiveness_317@reddit
Not, I was pointing out that if a helicopter is a stable enough platform for a 30mm cannon, then this small drone is a stable enough platform for a rifle calibre machine gun
TrolleyDilemma@reddit
And yet, believe it or not, a car and a helicopter are different things!
One_Adhesiveness_317@reddit
Good job being intentionally obtuse, but you’ll also find that modern wheeled armoured vehicles like the Centauro can fire with relative accuracy going 20mph+ if you want a more accurate comparison
-C0RV1N-@reddit
You know that's not hard, right?
UtgaardLoki@reddit
But can it carry ammo? Lol
lessgooooo000@reddit
Educational_Copy_140@reddit (OP)
Absolutely correct. I was busy watching the bot and didn't see
C4n0fju1c3@reddit
These look like RC camera dollys, especially with that Ronin gimbal. Here's a pair we had working at Victoria Secret fashion show. These ones were equipped to follow a magnetic tape we laid on the ground.
personguy4@reddit
I was gonna say, that looks like a camera gimbal
Baloo99@reddit
I believe the company is called Ronin, they make camera carts and stabilizers for moviemakers
lessgooooo000@reddit
All good g 🙏🏻
GeostratusX95@reddit
"mandarin text"
lessgooooo000@reddit
my bad gang, “中文”
HerbNeedsFire@reddit
Pretty sure these can be stopped with Spiderwire fishing line or similar
Other_Answer@reddit
stop before they steal the design and use it to kill civilians and children
Muddycarpenter@reddit
can it handle a full weight gun?
can it handle the recoil?
can it be completely remotely operated?
what's the battery range on it?
can it be jammed?
does it work on really shitty terrain?
until it can do all of these things, then no battle bots yet.
KarvanCevitamAardbei@reddit
This version probably not, but wait a few years.
aronnax512@reddit
They've had upscaled concept vehicles for a while now, like the M-5 ripsaw.
InsurmountableLosses@reddit
And now we have a Goliath tracked mine again. It's like crabs but for land based drones.
Level9disaster@reddit
1) lol no
2) if redesigned to support a real weapon (see point 1) without capsizing , then yes. But the vehicle mass would be much larger than the toy one in the video, to begin with.
3) Yes, that's the easy part
4) not really an issue. It doesn't need to be fully electric . This is a UCGV, not a flying drone with weight limitations.
5) See fiber optic links, extensively used in Ukraine .
6) lol no.
But military equipment doesn't require perfection to be useful. UCGVs only need to be "good enough" in a large enough range of situations, then armies will find a use.
Right now, this thing is obviously just a toy, with that fake gun. But small UCGVs already exist, and are being tested by several countries with real weapons in real conflicts, Ukraine being the most important.
Give them a few years , and UCGVs will become commonplace in wars. There are obvious advantages for their adoption, and the required technology is not really sci-fi. Just incremental evolution of what we have already .
h_adl_ss@reddit
Generally it seems the gun-carrier ground drone is not worth it. But we're seeing lots of mine laying, med-evac, supply runs and barbed wire construction done by ground drones in Ukraine.
WXHIII@reddit
That arm looks super weak, i dont think itd going to take an real recoil
nannerpuss74@reddit
Now let's see recoil handling characteristics with a spinning multi barrel weapon system. And over actual terrain. Not a rc car rally straight.
New_Refrigerator_895@reddit
My idea for defense against robots, robot dogs and this shit right here are wax slugs. Drones should be regular birdshot
eternalmortal@reddit
Skeet shooting went from sport to applicable training real fast when the drones started going up
lessgooooo000@reddit
You’d be surprised how little effect wax slugs would have on a properly militarized version of this. Gotta remember that before implementation on a battlefield, that gimbal would be beefier, and it operates largely passively. You’d probably have a setup more akin to a smaller US DPV with a thick AR500 steel gimbal, sensors with thick plexiglass covering, and a gun, so you’d need something with a bit more power to disable it.
Robot dogs are more of a recon tool than anything, but yeah wax slugs would probably render one inoperable. As for birdshot for drones, it can work, depending on the drone. If it’s a drone that drops munitions (mortar, grenade, etc.), then yes, that works. If its one of the FPV drones with an RPG stuck to the front, realistically you wouldn’t have the time to ready a shotgun before you end up a statistic, and even if you get the first one, they always come with friends.
The real defense to both is electronic warfare, but that requires more equipment. If a drone, robot, or anything else can’t get close to you without losing signal, you’re in a lot better of a position than carrying an extra shotgun with different loads for different threats.
New_Refrigerator_895@reddit
Plexiglass I can see, but a meaningful amount of armor that can defeat even 9mm doesn't seem too feasible right now because more weight means more power which means more weight on top of any ammo anything like this would carry (depending of course how scaled up something like this would get). So I still say wax slugs imo. As for drones, those in Ukraine seem to be doing the best they can with birdshot. Yes, it does depend on a lot of factors, but success has been made there.
lessgooooo000@reddit
Well something to consider for weight is that more weight for something like this isn’t a big issue. I don’t work in manufacturing of autonomous combat implements, but I am active duty in an extremely niche engineering field in the military, with some commonalities. Basically, vehicle weight is no longer a considerable factor. Even if it was 800lb, the cost wouldn’t be too high for NATO budgets. Consider the following:
EV r&d has resulted in comically strong electric motors and mass produced high capacity batteries
Even if range is a concern, batteries are largely hot-swappable, furthering the weight mitigation
AR500 steel is very cheap to make today, theres tons of alloys that can hold back 30-06 that won’t be too heavy
This is assuming direct hit on the gimbal itself, it would likely be enclosed, so accuracy would be an issue
Now, do I think, even with those mitigating factors, that a small autonomous machine like this would be at all practical? Absolutely not. The biggest issue with this sort of thing isn’t protection per se, but rather firepower. Like, say an M134 gets taped to the top, it’s gonna be out of ammo extremely fast, even if it’s stuffed to the brim. Same with any sort of 40mm launcher. It could have something like a modified M249, but then it’s not really needed. Why have a machine fire a SAW when you could just send a soldier who can take cover.
As for Ukraine, you’re right that people are using what they got, but Ukraine is an interesting case study on unique war adaptations. When the war started, neither side could use EW because they’d be jamming themselves (both using Soviet equipment). Now that Ukraine has western radios and such, it would be possible, if not for the fact that by jamming Ukrainian drones, the Russians would be jamming their commercial drones, and both sides require them for their doctrine.
Even without EW though, I had the same thought process regarding shotguns at first, but theres very important considerations based on how they can field them.
Dedicated anti-drone guy embedded in fireteams who mainly holds a shotgun. This would be incredibly easy for Russia to do, given the amount of Saiga-12s they have, but it makes that soldier much less effective for engaging infantry (significantly less capacity, gets stopped by armor, and has a shorter range. This is what Ukraine was experimenting with.
Same dedicated drone guy, but instead using a full shotgun, he is issued a breaching shotgun. This would be incredibly easy for Ukraine to do, given the volume of western military aid, and allows the soldier to carry a rifle as well. Problem is that skeet shooting with an M26 is nearly impossible, and you have even less shells to work with.
Combo. Dude is carrying a full size shotgun and a rifle. Now he has to carry two guns. Kinda impractical.
So like, has birdshot been used sometimes to good effect? Absolutely, but it’s a huge tradeoff.
New_Refrigerator_895@reddit
Ok lots of good points. The only counter I got is that when I was in the Marines, Corpsmen would often carry a shotgun and a sidearm. I wasn't infantry, so I didn't see all the TTPs they'd use, so my milage varied greatly. And masterkeys are still kind of a thing (I got out in 08 so who knows) tho their use was mainly for door breaching. And with all that said I concede to your knowledge
plunderdrone@reddit
Its adorable when I'm not terrified.
MelonJelly@reddit
GitS Tachikoma vibes, it just needs the ability to speak.
Atholthedestroyer@reddit
They're adorable little murderbots.
Epoch-09@reddit
Literally said that immediately when I saw the post.
koalacolapolo@reddit
Real have probably already been tested on Palestinian children
ArgonWilde@reddit
Now make it an actual firearm with heavy ammunition, and enjoy this thing rolling the second it moves anywhere, due to the high-ass centre of mass on that weapon mount.
Dramatic-Resident-64@reddit
Very very good proof of concept none the less.
Sevsix1@reddit
if they added some stabilizing "braces" on it they could drive the bot around with the gun lower down, go into a location, employ the braces and then raise the gun higher and shoot, that way they could have made it as a potential flanking bot for combat in cities but even then it would have an issue of being only use-able for a short while when the cities are still mostly intact, try to send that into Syria and it would be destroyed in a matter of minutes because of rubble.
not to talk about the fact that the bot would be extremely vulnerable toward civilians or soldiers since the machine would need to get employed before it could fire, it would probably be more useful to train up a few extra guys as LMG gunners and then have a bot as an ammo carrier to supply them but that would still entail issues with rubble
Dramatic-Resident-64@reddit
I think the bigger reality is unmanned ground vehicles like this have very specific purposes. They are not the drones we see in Ukraine. And yes, very tricky to deploy effectively.
These would be more for the likes of covering advances/flanks. A place you don’t want bodies getting isolated. Have an LMG with a long link. Moves to that position and holds. It wouldn’t be accurate or sneaky.
And now easily jammed with EW unless fibre optic which is another issue.
Sevsix1@reddit
I would argue that bots like this would be a lot more useful as a defensive tool in the event of a frontline collapsing instead of working in locations that are already under threat from opfor, the bots we can see might seem awesome but most of the clips we can see are already in places that are "busy" but not busy busy, places like offices or gyms are hardly busy compared to a warzone and I feel as if the bots would be put in place and then cease up because the code running on them are running 3000 calculations a second when it really need to run 30,000 or 300,000 calculations per second, building defenses at a relatively calmer location like a defense stronghold behind the lines would be a lot more feasible task for the bots to do and then when the bots have finished building up the base you send in new soldiers + an extraction team (the soldiers do the necessary task that the bot cannot do while the extract team extract the bots) and when the soldiers have set up the team close to the frontline get a message to return to the new location where they get returned to base for resting while the new soldiers work with the defense of the new location and then if the base becomes overrun the same process is happening further back, advancing on the other hand would require a lot of processing power for the bots to be useful so I expect the bots to primarily be used defensively, sure you might see larger semi-autonomously bots that are closer to APC like the UGV Stomper from Arma 3 in that you have a guy that control it (and can drive it in cases of organizing the fleet in the bases) that is acting as mobile firepower or is carrying ammo and medical supplies, having bots that can do actual combat autonomously is likely a few years away(, not that we would want that for a few reasons like faulty IFF systems making everything register as hostile), it is kind of annoying as both the sides of the AI combat side is kind of wrong, some say that autonomous bots would do everything for us in the future and other say that the bots would do nothing when the reality is that most bots would be used in the warzone but mostly for construction of defense and then only away from the frontlines and out of the reach of artillery
Dramatic-Resident-64@reddit
I’m sorry but this is an absolutely lunatic ramble of warfare. Bots building defences? Extraction teams for bots? AI and faulty IFF? Defensive strongholds?
Go back to COD or whatever RTS game you put down for the 45 minutes it took you to write this.
I’m not even warranting you with a genuine response.
We have a video of an RC car with a nerf gun on it, a comment about the practicality of human operated RC cars with guns and you’ve taken it to COD infinite warfare. What?
Sevsix1@reddit
cod is not my forte (I only liked it to around early MW2) I'm more into sci-fi/future military fiction.
wildo-bagins@reddit
Not the DJI Ronin 😭
Green-Collection-968@reddit
Ppl keep saying we're gonna get UBI, I'm thinking we're going to get terminators instead.
Sweet-Tomatillo-9010@reddit
Neat toy.
Seriously though. A plastic nerf gun is a whole different thing compared to an actual, steel, and plastic machinengun.
Je_me_rends@reddit
Enemy A.G.R inbound.
Rightfullsharkattack@reddit
Yeah this is terrifying. Even without a heavy firearm
An AK or IED is enough Unlike drones, this thing won't easily get knocked down with a single shot
fusillade762@reddit
Man we are so fuxked...
I17eed2change@reddit
Looks like it could hold zero while going down a trail at 50 mph
Embarrassed-Town-293@reddit
I fixed the music for you
-Bunny-@reddit
This shit is coming your way kids.
-C0RV1N-@reddit
Yeah, anyone that signs up to be an infantryman these days is a fking retard.
Starchaser_WoF@reddit
Wheelson?
sentinelthesalty@reddit
I see that dod money is paying dividends.
ninguem1122@reddit
Ah shit, first drones and now these.