Trump ‘just kind of down on Tulsi Gabbard in general,’ senior official says

[-]

watching_whatever@reddit

She is the Republicans best candidate for President on the next go around. Vance is a total bust.

However she has not made any big arrests and is perceived as doing not much of anything.

[-]

ComprehensiveCat9541@reddit

The intelligence community doesn't "make any big arrests." They're not a law-enforcement agency.

[-]

watching_whatever@reddit

Musk has found more corruption than she has found and reported in my estimation.

Tulsi needs to do something or accomplish something if she is planning on running for President. Hope so, because the other likely choices are very bad.

[-]

ComprehensiveCat9541@reddit

I don't think Musk has found any corruption; he has simply identified congressional authorized and appropriated activities that he personally disagrees with.

The DNI isn't a flashy position; she's there to provide impartial and unemotional intelligence assessments to the President.

[-]

watching_whatever@reddit

If she has no visible impact on improving anything whatsoever then she probably will not be a viable candidate for President. I still think she needs to do something important…

[-]

serpicowasright@reddit

She should be arrested for keeping an innocent man in jail that her prosecutors office hid exculpatory information on a defendant who was on death row.

[-]

Material-Style4019@reddit

It was a facetious joke.

Kamala being a former prosecutor having arrested people for nonviolent crimes...

Thanks for the downvotes anyway, irony is tough to convey online in text

[-]

I think you're confusing it with the FBI . Because intelligence, they don't make arrests. She organizes all of the agencies that gather intelligence. Conducts operations. And then interprets it. She reports to the president.

[-]

DNA98PercentChimp@reddit

Anyone got any insights into why? Anything more than conjecture is great, but even just conjecture might be interesting.

[-]

muttonwow@reddit

Tulsi being a Russian asset is okay for Trump's Ukraine agenda, but if he's after Iran then she's always going to oppose that.

[-]

serpicowasright@reddit

Oh look it's more dem-slop to throw at Tulsi. Disproven time and time again.

[-]

MalcolmSupleX@reddit

Disproven how? 😂

[-]

serpicowasright@reddit

Disproven in that none of the accusations made were ever proven valid.

[-]

Material-Style4019@reddit

Because bone spurs is threatened by a woman who is a thousand times more charismatic than he is... perhaps?

[-]

CalRipkenForCommish@reddit

Look at how he disparages women compared to men. Clinton had no charisma, but the insults he throws at women about being “dumb”are very different than when he insults men. It’s not irony that he’s dumber than all of these women he insults, it’s just a fact. These are all highly educated women, he knows it, but needs to compensate…and the only way he can do that is to insult. He lost every debate with a woman.

[-]

Material-Style4019@reddit

Agreed to a certain extent however Kamala was a poor choice for prez, and she does come across as dumb to me... Most especially when compared with Gabbard. I try not to judge. And I fail.

[-]

MalcolmSupleX@reddit

Kamala Harris is way more accomplished professionally than Tulsi Gabbard. Stop it. 😂

[-]

Material-Style4019@reddit

Professionally? When has she ever stepped foot in a hostile foreign country during wartime?

[-]

CJ4700@reddit

Prob because she told the truth about Iran not building any nukes

[-]

LactoceTheIntolerant@reddit

This administration has a LOT of problems with the truth

[-]

SeasonsGone@reddit

If only he had served a term previously that could’ve informed us about this behavior

[-]

LordXenu12@reddit

Also ethics

[-]

CJ4700@reddit

Bingo

[-]

SoundHearing@reddit

This kind of hearsay is likely untrue, why would someone risk leaking this tiny nugget unless it’s for manipulation

This is what I see A - US is not targeting Iran but is supporting isreal, which creates a difficult situation B - Israel sees an opportunity to ‘secure safety’ in the region, while also distracting from gaza attrocities C - US in recent weeks has been trying to cool the temperature and get a deal, downplaying Iran as a threat D - Israel went yolo - snaked US/Trump and probably bombed against Trump’s wishes, scuttled any deal E - there are ten million war hawks fanning the flames for maximum US involvement and as much escalation as possible F - Us/Trump has to pretend they are supporting the bombings while strategising next steps, hopefully to stay out of it as much as possible - probably rally other allies - hopefully get iran to surrender asap. At the end of the day Trump can’t tell Israel what to do G - Russia and China are shifting gears towards hot conflict H - this is way more complicated than it looks, corporate media will continue to lie and manipulate for the lobbiests from now onwards

[-]

NickDixon37@reddit

This is just a stir-the-pot anti-Tulsi hit piece. Overall it seems that there has been some significant progress in reigning in corrupt agencies, especially the CIA, and Tulsi has had, and will continue to play a significant role.

And if Tulsi isn't at the table for negotiations, it's likely just a strategic move - just like it was a strategic move for Donald Trump to include John Bolton when negotiating in his first term.

[-]

jefe4959@reddit

She should resign