Testing so far. i know its an old thread but here is my two cents.
For consumers in general market.
1. Good for trying to explain easy concepts, it grasp well the knowledge of most basic pathologies.
2. Good for understanding why you need to use your medications and what they are for.

1. Review lab results and findings: It correctly finds anemia, lack of vitamins, and inferences correctly about what to search for rheumathology exams, basic endocrine exams, specially diabetes.

Where it lacks
1. Treatment, i've seen it almost get it right just enough to convince a person who is not on the field about the correct medication, but enough that if the person took it it would cause harm. So i would strongly advise against to follow its instructions on treatments.
1.1. Tested on treatment on diabetes, pneumonia, rheymatology and immunology, it only advise correctly the easiest ones, but posology, the correct way, the correct medication sometimes it gets right, sometimes it gets wrong, so its very crude in these aspects.
2. Lab images: It finds easy to mid difficulty images in perplexity, can lack depth in harder images, ultrassound, ct, mri. As most people don't know when something should be there or shouldnt, i would not advise so much as reliable for this.

How i made it work, for me at least.
As a rag agent, i embedded my own database for medications, posologies, and treatments and it consults mostly to check if it matches with current guidelines.