I'm absolutely against Iran, but an Israeli strike on Iranian facilities would most probably trigger an Iran War. Now, even if this war was restricted to the skies and only saw the use of aircraft and projectiles, the intense aerial bombardment combined with sabotage would set back Iran's nuclear weapons program by roughly a decade, so the operation wouldn't even yield long-term success. The bonus? The Iranians are of the mindset that if they can't sell oil, no one else in the region will be able to, so although Israeli or US attacks targeting Iran's oil infrastructure would be necessary to strangle the Iranian military's revenues, the attacks would be met by massive Iranian retaliation targeting the Gulf Cooperation Council states, i.e. Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Bahrain and yes- even Qatar. There simply aren't enough missile batteries or fighters to intercept the thousands of Iranian missiles and drones. A single Houthi attack in 2019 on Saudi Arabia slashed 5% of daily global oil production. What do you think an Iran War would mean?

We all know Iran's navy and air force can't do shit, which is why all the talk about Iran always revolves around their missiles and drones, of which they have enough in their inventory to disrupt the Strait of Hormuz for at least two weeks. Keep in mind, the Houthi blockade on the Red Sea has already cost the global economy \~$1 trillion dollars. China, Japan, South Korea and India import about 70-90% of their oil from the Persian Gulf. Even if Iran disrupted the strait with missiles and drones for a week, most tankers aren't going to take the risky route, which means Asia isn't going to get the oil they need, which means factories come to a standstill because the fractions derived from crude oil are used in nearly everything that gets manufactured. This would lead to a collapse in the global supply chain and a recession that sees most developed economies retract by 4-8% (in GDP) in the following 2 years.

And the worst part is that this limited war wouldn't only fail to entirely dismantle Iran's nuclear program, but it would also fail to topple the regime not only because they'd easily reproduce from their own ashes like the fanatics they are, but because the inevitably high number of Iranian casualties, both military and civilian, would disillusion sections of the Iranian opposition and radicalize untold numbers of people who would have otherwise been neutral. You'd need US or a US-led coalition's boots on the ground to end Iran's regime and nuclear weapons program, but this decision is so ridiculous for a large number of reasons; it shouldn't even be on the table. But to put it short, any conflict with Iran is guaranteed to result in a US tactical victory and US strategic failure. An Iran War might have moral intent but the negative consequences far outweigh the positive ones.