Uh... So the entire argument is that the development of better fuels and electricity saved the whales...which were at risk because of the massive increase in hunting and consumption caused by technological development (large-scale harvesting) and capitalistic ventures?
It's like a self-aggrandizing speech about how your immense willpower saved your children from being beaten when you were the one previously beating them and finally decided to stop.
ArbitraryUsernames@reddit
Uh... So the entire argument is that the development of better fuels and electricity saved the whales...which were at risk because of the massive increase in hunting and consumption caused by technological development (large-scale harvesting) and capitalistic ventures?
It's like a self-aggrandizing speech about how your immense willpower saved your children from being beaten when you were the one previously beating them and finally decided to stop.
paperrug12@reddit
an absurd article that does nothing to prove its point.
ENVYisEVIL@reddit
Provide an actual intelligent rebuttal instead of being vague and dismissive. What is the author saying, specifically, that is absurd?