Yep, they always say the people wouldn't stand a chance but I'd like to counter that a country would be much more careful if people like musk and bezos had a fleet of f16s and navel fleets. How do the independent military contractors get away with it?
Because taxpayers are forced to pay for it. The government would be far less adventurous if it had to raise a new military every time it wanted to poke its nose in foreign affairs. As it did before WWI. The whole point of the 2nd amendment is to obviate the need for a standing military.
Doesn’t congress technically decide what we can and cannot own, then the ATF enforces that?
I’m no ATF fan, but we can’t just yeet the ATF without first changing laws. Abolishing the ATF would effectively ban NFA items since there wouldn’t be anyone around to process the paperwork.
Doesn’t congress technically decide what we can and cannot own, then the ATF enforces that?
Ish.
The ATF has broad rule making power. For example any new open-bolt firearm design is banned because the ATF says it's too easy to convert them to full auto. Congress never said that, but the ATF made a rule that did.
Fair point, I’d still rather see laws change before eliminating the ATF. Even if you merge/move the ATF into the FBI, for example, we’ll still have the same problem of a government agency killing dogs because your barrel is too short or shutting down FFL’s over a simple typo
That also needs to include draconian alcohol restrictions; ridiculous classifications on recreational drugs; and the government’s weird decision to regulate lotteries.
Not even that. It's a restriction to the government.
You see, rights are unalienable. Every human is born with them, so the US Bill of Rights is a list of those rights that the government cannot take away.
The bill of rights was essentially supposed to be a save game file irl. So that people wouldn't have to waste time and energy to keep repeating the same fights of the early levels.
I feel like people are downplaying how important that ‘explosives’ part is.
Even if we assume that people who aren’t smart enough to use fireworks and stuff without hurting themselves probably also won’t hurt a bystander, ATF also that facilitates storing explosives are in compliance with safety laws.
Here’s an article of a recent incident where some idiot was producing illegal fireworks in his house. They had resort to do a controlled burn and it exploded. Article
Are you ok with alcohol that makes you go blind or has heavy metals? Ok with pesticides in your tobacco? This is the enforcement arm against counterfeiters
Include literally every federal agency. They all make rules that get treated as laws, and nowhere in the constitution does it say congress can delegate that power.
SoggyGrayDuck@reddit
Yep, they always say the people wouldn't stand a chance but I'd like to counter that a country would be much more careful if people like musk and bezos had a fleet of f16s and navel fleets. How do the independent military contractors get away with it?
SpareSimian@reddit
Because taxpayers are forced to pay for it. The government would be far less adventurous if it had to raise a new military every time it wanted to poke its nose in foreign affairs. As it did before WWI. The whole point of the 2nd amendment is to obviate the need for a standing military.
python33000@reddit
Imagine what real innovation and creativity could accomplish for our national defense instead of corruption and insider deals.
SpareBeat1548@reddit
Doesn’t congress technically decide what we can and cannot own, then the ATF enforces that?
I’m no ATF fan, but we can’t just yeet the ATF without first changing laws. Abolishing the ATF would effectively ban NFA items since there wouldn’t be anyone around to process the paperwork.
AlphaTangoFoxtrt@reddit
Ish.
The ATF has broad rule making power. For example any new open-bolt firearm design is banned because the ATF says it's too easy to convert them to full auto. Congress never said that, but the ATF made a rule that did.
SpareBeat1548@reddit
Fair point, I’d still rather see laws change before eliminating the ATF. Even if you merge/move the ATF into the FBI, for example, we’ll still have the same problem of a government agency killing dogs because your barrel is too short or shutting down FFL’s over a simple typo
RedactedEvil476@reddit
Im not a true libertarian but I’m anti ATF. The states can and should regulate those things as they see fit (not the federal government).
Batman53090@reddit
Burning it down would be more appropriate since they seemed to enjoy burning 86 people to death in Waco, TX back in 1993.
Fundementalquark@reddit
👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾
That also needs to include draconian alcohol restrictions; ridiculous classifications on recreational drugs; and the government’s weird decision to regulate lotteries.
Zoltarr777@reddit
Throw in gambling while we're at it
dontmakepeople@reddit
2A is the permission slip, no? 🤔
RailLife365@reddit
Not even that. It's a restriction to the government.
You see, rights are unalienable. Every human is born with them, so the US Bill of Rights is a list of those rights that the government cannot take away.
Existing is your permission slip.
Significant-Push-232@reddit
Recognition* not permission.
The bill of rights was essentially supposed to be a save game file irl. So that people wouldn't have to waste time and energy to keep repeating the same fights of the early levels.
saggywitchtits@reddit
No, keep the ATF open, but turn it into a store where I can buy my alcohol, tobacco, and firearms in one convenient location!
cyclorphan@reddit
Don't forget the Explosives!
python33000@reddit
Now we're talking liberty! We got some real sheep who just don't belong on this sub.
VomitOnYourDogsNuts@reddit
2A Literally says "well-regulated militia"
pm_me_your_deadlift@reddit
Well regulated as in well organized. The 2A also literally says “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
python33000@reddit
Very clear to me. "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” We got some real sheep who just don't belong on this sub.
Bird_law_esq@reddit
Ya but libertarians educated by memes do not care about the constitution...
Ariksenih@reddit
I feel like people are downplaying how important that ‘explosives’ part is.
Even if we assume that people who aren’t smart enough to use fireworks and stuff without hurting themselves probably also won’t hurt a bystander, ATF also that facilitates storing explosives are in compliance with safety laws.
Here’s an article of a recent incident where some idiot was producing illegal fireworks in his house. They had resort to do a controlled burn and it exploded. Article
python33000@reddit
Ok, a small sliver can be rolled into another dept. Now shut it down!
IMThorazine@reddit
The Government has no business deciding what law-abiding Americans can own
There, fixed it
Sus_Frontal_Lobe6119@reddit
Honestly I would say the ATF is the worst part of the government (though almost all of it sucks)
notabaddude@reddit
Turn it into a department store.
ronpotx@reddit
Agreed. What’s the point of this redundant agency?
colenolangus@reddit
Are you ok with alcohol that makes you go blind or has heavy metals? Ok with pesticides in your tobacco? This is the enforcement arm against counterfeiters
TheNaiveSkeptic@reddit
Ah yes, cigarette users are notorious for sticking to only government-approved brands, that way they can avoid poor health outcomes
ARCreef@reddit
The ATF has entered the chat. Yeah sure buddy, you need 6,000 employees to stop the huge problem of counterfeit cigarettes.
AlphaTangoFoxtrt@reddit
The FDA can handle Alcohol and Tobacco. We don't need an entirely separate government agency for this. It's bloat and waste.
deleted_by_reddit@reddit
[removed]
AlphaTangoFoxtrt@reddit
I don't need a reason to exercise my rights. That's why they're called rights.
Bird_law_esq@reddit
I want a FGM-148 Javelin, get out of my way ATF! I saw a Libertarian meme - I know everything I need to know!
heimeyer72@reddit
Are you all aware that *non-law-abiding Americans have access to alcohol, tobacco and firearms, too?
AccomplishedLimit3@reddit
that sounds like a job for local law enforcement
heimeyer72@reddit
Very much. I just mentioned it because "law-abiding" was mentioned in the top post.
Inevitable-Cell-1227@reddit
Amen
MrOrt@reddit
Make it so.
Sensitive_Mousse_445@reddit
PLLLLLLEEEAASSSE BEGONE WITH THE ATF
chuckycastle@reddit
Evidence yard sale when?
volpcas@reddit
ATF should have been shut down after Waco
Angelicsunshine@reddit
Should have been shut down after Ruby Ridge. Never should have even made it to Waco
Fundementalquark@reddit
Sorry to hijack your comment, but please don’t forget the EPA has a law enforcement arm that goes to the stick just as capably and often as the ATF.
Include them.
DixieNormas011@reddit
Include literally every federal agency. They all make rules that get treated as laws, and nowhere in the constitution does it say congress can delegate that power.
runningvicuna@reddit
Shut it down
Electronic_Ad9570@reddit
They're not even a regulatory agency, so they really REALLY shouldn't be essentially making policy.