Gabbard claims "there was no classified materials that was shared in that Signal chat." Senator Warner: "Then share them"

[-]

VorAtreides@reddit

God she is a massive disappointment :\

[-]

traeville@reddit

If there was Jeffry Goldberg would’ve already leaked them

[-]

rafajafar@reddit

The thing that bothers me is that of all the people to be included in that chat it was him...

You know what I'm saying? This almost feels like a mole hunt. Something is weird about this...... That's a little too convenient.

[-]

It’s far too fishy indeed. Check out the recent interview he did on why he didn’t “release the rest” — he is repeatedly trying to deflect and change the subject, then he finally lies that a cia field operative was named.

Another fishy detail is Judge Boasberg who is currently blocking the admin from deporting Vz gang members, the same guy who concealed HRC leaked emails until after 2016 election, he is the one coincidentally selected to preside over this new Signalgate case.

Waltz has to get axed NOW. That career neo-con is a liability seemingly more ways than one.

[-]

WhitePantherXP@reddit (OP)

Welp, guess you were wrong. They were exact times, weapon and aircraft types in what he just leaked.

[-]

traeville@reddit

Good point. I was wrong about that. Damn shame.

[-]

waterbuffalo69@reddit

She should be so embarrassed

[-]

pilgrimboy@reddit

Why can't the reporter just share them?

[-]

zzt0pp@reddit

Fear of getting charged with a crime. I know she is saying they aren't classified, but in this administration that statement means nothing

[-]

Which-Supermarket-69@reddit

Bad reporter then

[-]

aCellForCitters@reddit

He posted them, you gonna apologize to him, bro?

[-]

Which-Supermarket-69@reddit

I’m sorry reporter

[-]

FanValuable6657@reddit

A moral reporter.

[-]

Which-Supermarket-69@reddit

His reporting history would suggest otherwise

[-]

zzt0pp@reddit

It's been 24 hours give the guy a break

[-]

bailey25u@reddit

Yeah, snowden didnt do something wild like release all the files he had, he gave them to reporters so they could evaluate what should be released. Its a part of journalism. Not just wildly release documents as soon as you get them

[-]

RyanMaddi@reddit

Snowden never left!

[-]

Which-Supermarket-69@reddit

They publicly stated it’s not classified though

[-]

dogchasecat@reddit

There was the name of a CIA operative in the texts. Good for him for not publishing that.

[-]

ScoutsEatTheirYoung@reddit

Purposely sharing classified information is a crime. Guess where the IGs who protect the whisteblowers for stuff like this have gone? To the unemployment line.

[-]

arcticfox@reddit

This is all a chest-beating grand-standing show. Nothing classified was leaked. Figure out how it happened and make sure that it doesn't happen again. End of story.

[-]

WhitePantherXP@reddit (OP)

Welp, guess you were wrong. They were exact times of when the strikes were all going to occur, who we were striking (Houthi's), and both weapon and aircraft types in what he just leaked of that chat. It was brutal to watch her today in questioning.

[-]

arcticfox@reddit

It is chest beating. Mark Warner has had his own leaks that he attempted to mitigate: https://www.politico.com/story/2018/12/11/senate-intelligence-committee-leaking-james-wolfe-1059162

Mistakes do happen. When they do, figure out how it happened, fire people if necessary, put action in place to ensure that it doesn't happen again. At this point, we don't actually know how the reporter got added to the chat so drawing conclusions now is prejudicial.

[-]

WhitePantherXP@reddit (OP)

Welp, guess you were wrong. They were exact times of when the strikes were all going to occur, who we were striking (Houthi's), and both weapon and aircraft types in what he just leaked of that chat. It was brutal to watch her today in questioning.

[-]

WhitePantherXP@reddit (OP)

Welp, guess you were wrong. They were exact times of when the strikes were all going to occur, who we were striking (Houthi's), and both weapon and aircraft types in what he just leaked of that chat. It was brutal to watch her today in questioning.

[-]

Heavyspire@reddit

The questions should have been more general. That way she would have to answer how it should be handled and not specifically this incident where she can dodge and indirectly answer the questions.

"Should cabinet officials be using 'Signal' to discuss military tactical objectives?"

"If you were ever in a group chat that started talking about military objectives, how would you go about redirecting the cabinet members to use SCIF instead of 'Signal'?"

"You terminated members (employees) for using text chat to discuss personal medical situations, what rules were they violating and how does a cabinet level conversation not get treated the same way?"

[-]

BlondieTVJunkie@reddit

bingo! A lot of this has to do with the line of questioning.

[-]

WhitePantherXP@reddit (OP)

Agreed, establish what is a crime and what the punishment should be in those hypotheticals, and move to demonstrate how they did just that.

[-]

sayzitlikeitis@reddit

Criticisms of Tulsi's flipflops aside, this looks like a very obvious attempt by the deep state to make her look bad.

[-]

Plenty_Vegetable763@reddit

You're fucking crazy bro 😩😂

[-]

sayzitlikeitis@reddit

You think it's a total coincidence that a critic of the war machine gets arguably the biggest intelligence failure of the decade thrust on her within a month of taking office?

[-]

Plenty_Vegetable763@reddit

Listen man, it's good to be skeptical and to have an open mind. But not so open that your brains fall out.

"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity". Or lack of competence. Or both.

[-]

sayzitlikeitis@reddit

It's a little suspicious how I suddenly got so many replies all telling me I'm stupid when I made this comment. Normally this is a very low engagement sub where nothing happens. I think I might be on the right track.

[-]

Plenty_Vegetable763@reddit

Alright homie. Enjoy.

[-]

Nsfwacct1872564@reddit

She's a warmonger. Is anyone thrusted this on her, it's her best bud Petey Hegeegee. He's the deep state? What stopped her from saying "Bro, were not doing on signal wtf?"

[-]

sayzitlikeitis@reddit

What stopped her from saying "Bro, were not doing on signal wtf?"

She doesn't have more authority than SecDef or the VP

[-]

Nsfwacct1872564@reddit

To talk about the Director of National Intelligence's authority to act, rather than her ability, is a profound misapprehension of her role.

Was she rendered incapable of speech or action? The DNI's silence in the face of demonstrable INFOSEC breaches is not merely an oversight; it is a dereliction of duty.

Her position demands more than passive observation ffs. To suggest she has no authority is absurd and missing the point.

Her primary obligation, her literal commission, is the safeguarding of national security information. Did this obligation factor into her thoughts at any time? One must question....

The DNI's responsibility transcends acquiescence, she was duty-bound to raise these critical concerns within the very forum where the breaches occurred. If ignored, escalation to the Chief of Staff and the President was her imperative. If that still wasn't enough, direct communication with congressional oversight committees, triggering an immediate investigation, was her mandated course of action.

The President's public assertion of ignorance regarding these breaches, after the entire nation already knew, highlights the Tulsi's abject failure. Her independence, her oath, and the integrity of national security demanded more than this. This is not a matter of 'authority,' but of fundamental responsibility. To advocate for anything less is to advocate for incompetence.

[-]

PackAttacks@reddit

She is the deep state you dumbass

[-]

paultheschmoop@reddit

Lmao

[-]

watching_whatever@reddit

Leave Tulsi alone. She just started and has a big mess to clean up.

[-]

JackMiHoff113@reddit

I’ve literally watched this sub go from Tulsi supporters in 2020, Tulsi haters in 2022, back to Tulsi supporters in 2024, and then back to haters in 2025.

I don’t think Ive ever seen a politician have their base consistently flip on them like Tulsi’s. Really shouldn’t burn bridges when there’s only two islands to make your stand on.

[-]

jstohler@reddit

It’s not her followers that have been flip flopping like a dying fish, friend.

[-]

JackMiHoff113@reddit

No shit, but i swear the last time this sub really was popping on my feed was when it was anti tulsi. I was genuinely surprised to see it switch back to pro tulsi

[-]

leenis@reddit

it's not supporters, it's bots. the anti-tulsi posts are from humans

[-]

BoniceMarquiFace@reddit

I’ve literally watched this sub go from Tulsi supporters in 2020, Tulsi haters in 2022, back to Tulsi supporters in 2024, and then back to haters in 2025.

That's merely the perception. A lot of times the negative reactions are from people who aren't supporters at all and either brigade, or come to the sub as negative coverage brings them

Yes I get anyone can claim that and discredit criticism as "muh russian bots" or something, but I'm talking about the people themselves you can view. I've clicked on three profiles (only two) here with top comments going through their postings out of curiosity

They've posted virtually nothing here in the past, they seem to only post in places that fanatically hate Elon, Tulsi, support people like Kyle Kulinski, etc. Lots of participation in groups like "Cyberstuck", "enough_sanders_spam", "seculartalk" (which now obsessively focuses on hating Trump), etc

[-]

Evilrake@reddit

Allow me to lib out for a second while I hold your hand here… but which of those years do you think foreign entities had the most keen interest in swaying? Which candidate(s) would they be supporting and why?

Do you see the connection?

[-]

QuaziBlack@reddit

I didnt have this on my BINGO card...

[-]

BeautyThornton@reddit

Actually I had Tulsi absolutely bungling her new role on mine

[-]

BoniceMarquiFace@reddit

I'm kinda confused. Was there?

These weren't even secret strikes. We talked about them with foreign governments including not just those of Europe, Israel, the MENA world, and even Russia.

https://www.firstpost.com/world/us-says-russia-was-informed-about-houthi-strikes-as-white-house-shares-photo-of-trump-watching-it-unfold-13871779.html

AFAIK the chat only mentioned the strikes proceeding like 2 hours before, without many specifics.

People are trying to compare this to SOS Hillary Clinton operating a burner email server the way drug deals keep burner phones around.

[-]

MalcolmSupleX@reddit

Glad to see people here aren't defending her lying to Congress.

[-]

SirGingerBeard@reddit

Wow, what?? Who could’ve seen this coming!

[-]

CoachBensTendon@reddit

Any of y’all predicted in 2020 that Tulsi would be a Trump administration official getting chewed out for a data breach in front of a Senate hearing?

[-]

splintersmaster@reddit

As soon as she voted "present"...

[-]

Evilrake@reddit

By 2019? That Tulsi would become a Trump administration official had better odds on than odds off.

[-]

DNA98PercentChimp@reddit

Whelp. This has been a fantastic lesson in not-trusting politicians and that my judge of character is imperfect. I’ll always keep my Tulsi2020 sticker to remind me.

[-]

Evilrake@reddit

With love, Tulsi was very clearly terrible in 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, and 2016 at least

[-]

TrevinoDuende@reddit

I was skeptical but I liked using her as an avatar for anti regime change war messaging during the primaries. I was wrong to assume the person who stepped down as DNC chair to back Bernie was one of strong moral conviction.

She very quickly turned on her base.

[-]

WhitePantherXP@reddit (OP)

I hear ya. She is why I held out some kind of hope there might be some decency in this administration.

The actual criminal element to this story is NOT that the data was classified but that they were having national security discussions on an illegal platform. This should raise some eyebrows and some heads should roll, but I'm not certain Tulsi is who I thought she was.

[-]

juan_samuel@reddit

Yep. I've got a Tulsi 2020 sweatshirt in the back of the closet as a similar reminder.

[-]

evvnevvn@reddit

She’s so good looking it’s crazy

[-]

PackAttacks@reddit

It she’s rotten inside

[-]

cosmental15@reddit

Traitorous you know wunnt

[-]

QuaziBlack@reddit

Her political career is over after this Trump appointment is over.

[-]

MSK165@reddit

This entire hearing should have been in a secure room. Senator was grandstanding for the media, and Tulsi was playing “that depends on what your definition of is is” games.

[-]

astroman1978@reddit

Why the fuck would she share more than what’s been shared with a committee?

Was it bad? Yes. Does she have some responsibility here? Who knows? The senator is grandstanding because that’s all they know how to do.

[-]

h989@reddit

Tulsi is a shame

[-]

dgcoleman@reddit

Deny, you're such a liar
You won't know the truth if it hit you in the eye
Deny, you're such a liar
You won't know the truth if it hit you in the eye

The truth is something you just can't handle
Face facts, face the facts
The truth is something you just can't handle
Face facts, face the facts

Deny, you're such a liar
You won't know the truth if it hit you in the eye
Deny, you're such a liar
You won't know the truth if it hit you in the eye

The truth is something you just can't handle
Face facts, face the facts
The truth is something you just can't handle
Face facts, face the facts

[-]

WhitePantherXP@reddit (OP)

That's a fair summary

[-]