TheaterFire

Rafale in a nuclear strike config with an ASMP-A nuclear supersonic missile (300 Kt of diplomacy)

Posted by jedieric@reddit | aviation | View on Reddit | 121 comments

Rafale in a nuclear strike config with an ASMP-A nuclear supersonic missile (300 Kt of diplomacy)

Reply to Post

121 Comments

brganger@reddit

Beautiful machine with a touch of manmade horror lol
View on Reddit #50187996

EatSleepJeep@reddit

Birds of prey are always the most beautiful.
View on Reddit #50195463

Sacharon123@reddit

[Scary, nuclear-armed falcons.](https://what-if.xkcd.com/149/)
View on Reddit #50279625

fearofpandas@reddit

There’s always a relevant xkcd even after all this years
View on Reddit #75996760

bozoconnors@reddit

[Concur!](https://blog.trekcore.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/bop-st-iv.jpg)
View on Reddit #50198150

time_to_reset@reddit

Such a sexy plane. I'm a Gripen person myself, but there's no denying the Rafale is a great plane.
View on Reddit #50185872

Slovaak5070@reddit

Apparently not
View on Reddit #55834831

PaulMuadDib-Usul@reddit

r/aviationporn
View on Reddit #50221729

vonRyan_@reddit

I was kinda bummed when the Brazilian Air Force decided to go with the Gripen instead of the Rafale for their new fighters. The Swedes' technology transfer offer was too good to pass up, I guess.
View on Reddit #50194776

gorklesnort@reddit

Meant to be dropped right on Moscow. Perfection.
View on Reddit #50304890

CardinalOfNYC@reddit

There's talk right now of France forward deploying these to Germany, what with the United States on track to no longer be the guarantor of european security it has been since WWII Thank GOD France has always been *just a tiny bit* distrustful of American security guarantees over the decades and developed their own wholly independent nuclear capability.
View on Reddit #50193288

Xav_NZ@reddit

Mostly independent arms and defence industry also ! Most of the gear the French use is designed and made in France or alternatively in Europe there’s very little US made gear there compared to almost every other NATO member. When it comes to Aircraft the US tried to get them on board with the F-18 back in the day they also tried to market the F-35 to many European countries and France said no. With the current events that was probably the wise choices.
View on Reddit #50219116

CardinalOfNYC@reddit

The F-35 is one of the scariest parts of this whole nonsense. The plane is basically just a vehicle for software. And that software is made and maintained in the US. All these partners who bought in, who knows how long that support will last.... This was supposed to be a plane that helped to BIND the alliance (though you're right France was clearly wise to skip out) but now it can be used to break it apart.
View on Reddit #50228743

Xav_NZ@reddit

I always wondered that if any of the countries who purchased it end up doing something that the US does not like at all if they (The US) can somehow cut all support for not only the hardware but the software which would essentially "brick" the aircraft and render it useless. And unlike Iran and their F14's I doubt anyone would be able to reverse engineer any of the tech in the F35 especially on the software side to make it work without US support.
View on Reddit #50229152

MachKeinDramaLlama@reddit

Yeah, it's more complicated than people make it out to be. As far as we know, the US does not have a way to actually "brick" the aircraft itself, but the way ODIN etc. are set up, it would be fairly difficult to keep high availability figures up for any useful amount of time once the US has cut you off completely. And god forbid anything complicated breaks.
View on Reddit #50302018

CardinalOfNYC@reddit

Yep, I have also often wondered about that, long before this. I figure the US has the capability to more or less cause any f-35 to fall out of the sky or at least be rendered useless. And if they don't have such a capability, I bet fox news secdef will be trying to get on it. There is one country with indigenous F-35 software capacity besides the US.... But it's Israel and I trust the current leadership there as little as I trust the current leadership here.
View on Reddit #50229653

Stoney3K@reddit

That's because nobody ever considered the scenario of a NATO member nation going rogue. Let alone the primary provider of military R&D for the whole alliance.
View on Reddit #50234337

CardinalOfNYC@reddit

Yeah there was a significant failure of imagination wrt to the entire global right turn. I think people really thought liberalism (in the academic sense) would just keep making progress. That we had sufficiently strengthened our democracies.
View on Reddit #50235451

Rc72@reddit

> When it comes to Aircraft the US tried to get them on board with the F-18 back in the day Well, it's a little complicated. The French Navy did fly US-made F-8 Crusader fighters in the air-to-air role from their carriers during the Cold War. When the time came to replace them, French naval aviators very much would have liked to get F-18s, because making a naval variant of the Rafale would be time-consuming and expensive for the small number of aircraft that they'd be getting. Nevertheless, political lobbying by Dassault ultimately led to the government vetoing the F-18. Mind you, the French Navy does still fly a very valuable, very niche US-made aircraft from its sole carrier, namely the E-2 Hawkeye early airborne warning radar airplane. It would have been prohibitively expensive to build another dedicated CATOBAR AEW aircraft for a single carrier 
View on Reddit #50226299

Xav_NZ@reddit

I must say the E2 is such an unusual aircraft a carrier based turboprop AEW platform is such a niche thing. I assume that the replacement for such a niche machine will probably be a Drone (probably cheaper too)
View on Reddit #50226889

Rc72@reddit

Well, the Brits did build and operate another carrier based AEW turboprop, the [Fairey Gannet AEW.3](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairey_Gannet_AEW.3), and the French could have tried to build something similar out of their [Breguet Alizé](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Br%C3%A9guet_1050_Aliz%C3%A9), but common sense and/or aesthetic sensitivities prevailed.
View on Reddit #50232067

CardinalOfNYC@reddit

It's hard to replace what the E-2 can do with a drone. That equipment is quite heavy. Maybe a network of drones but then you have operability issues
View on Reddit #50228825

Bene_ent@reddit

Yeah and that distrust earned us so much shit talk. My ears are still ringing from the insults heard on TV when we refused to join the 2nd Iraq War back in the time, or our arrogance for not aligning automatically on atlantist policies, but rather case by case. I guess French pragmatism and having foreign armies on our territory two to three times per century shaped the mindset.
View on Reddit #50213299

canvanman69@reddit

Canada was in the same boat with you. Iraq just didn't make sense. Afghanistan, 100%.
View on Reddit #50278105

deleted_by_reddit@reddit

[removed]
View on Reddit #50214233

AutoModerator@reddit

To reduce political fighting this post or comment has been filtered for approval. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/aviation) if you have any questions or concerns.*
View on Reddit #50214234

deleted_by_reddit@reddit

[removed]
View on Reddit #50270679

AutoModerator@reddit

To reduce political fighting this post or comment has been filtered for approval. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/aviation) if you have any questions or concerns.*
View on Reddit #50270680

ESCocoolio@reddit

they’re the only other country other than the US and USSR to have done so talk a lot of shit on the french but it’s out of mad respect
View on Reddit #50242848

falkkiwiben@reddit

The fact that the UK didn't keep their distrust of the Americans after world war two was the biggest mistake. The UK should've followed the French example
View on Reddit #50219267

CardinalOfNYC@reddit

Yep. It really only occurred to me in the last day or so that their nuclear capability, while ostensibly independent, really is not. It's heavily reliant on our tech to be maintained.
View on Reddit #50228548

FastPatience1595@reddit

Yes. Long story short: imagine that in 1985 WWIII NATO, Germany and the USA failed to stop the Soviet juggernaut. Now it has a big bridgehead on the Rhine, and is ready to invade France. France conventional army can't reduce the bridgehead, nobody can except with tactical nuclear weapons. By some miracle until now WWIII hasn't gone nuclear. So now the question is: can France asks NATO, USA or Great Britain to nuke the Soviet bridgehead and stop the coming invasion of France ? Which means they will open nuclear fire... and the Soviet will retaliate, and escalation ensure the end of the world in a nuclear holocaust. Blowing the world just to save France from invasion ? honestly, I can see why they would refuse. That's the reason why De Gaulle, who had lived a somewhat similar situation in May 1940 (replace "Rhine" by "Meuse" and "USSR" by "nazi Germany) built the Force de Frappe, including AN-52 tactical nukes on Jaguars and Mirage IIIE, plus the Pluton ballistic missiles. IF they ever reached the Rhine and prepared a french invasion from there, the Soviets a) would know they would invade a nuclear country, and think about it or b) try to invade and get their bridgehead nuked, as a last warning.
View on Reddit #50196155

CardinalOfNYC@reddit

I really think France is America's greatest friend and ally. You're prepared to defend our values even as we are apparently not. Now I know the French would say, you came up with those values before we did. And that's true. But in 2024 I think of them mostly as simply shared values and the fact that France is still standing for freedom when my president is no, it gives me some sense of pride and hope
View on Reddit #50205157

deleted_by_reddit@reddit

[removed]
View on Reddit #50214225

AutoModerator@reddit

To reduce political fighting this post or comment has been filtered for approval. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/aviation) if you have any questions or concerns.*
View on Reddit #50214226

That-Makes-Sense@reddit

Giving these jets and nukes to Ukraine is the best decision France has ever made😜
View on Reddit #50232898

maxathier@reddit

France didn't give any of those to Ukraine but okay
View on Reddit #50279137

That-Makes-Sense@reddit

Are you sure?
View on Reddit #50287107

maxathier@reddit

We sent Mirage 2000-5 and conventionnal bombs
View on Reddit #50287366

That-Makes-Sense@reddit

I'm talking about the stuff that was unannounced.
View on Reddit #50287485

maxathier@reddit

I rely on open source material. The rest is speculation. I can't see France sending Rafale, if it was the case, we would have seen pictures of them in Ukraine. If anu countries sent nukes, Putin would be very vocal about it, even if it was unofficial
View on Reddit #50288909

Odd-Sage1@reddit

Yeah, we could do to give Ukraine a few of those 300kt bombs
View on Reddit #50287130

Callsign_Psycopath@reddit

French Nuclear Doctrine is Based as fuck. Shame about the Canards on the plane though.
View on Reddit #50189215

wanderer1999@reddit

Indeed. The French were right though, from nuclear energy to their triad of nukes to domestically produced aircrafts. Given recent event with Russia invasion and the US being an unreliable ally, they should arm themselves to the teeth.
View on Reddit #50189648

Az1234er@reddit

> The French were right More like "De Gaule". It's impressive how much one guy can influence decades of a country direction. Nuclear energy, own nuclear weapon, out of NATO council for so long etc ... All these because this one guy had his own world point of view and was popular enough to apply them.
View on Reddit #50199574

RudySanchez-G@reddit

From [this quotes website](https://libertas.co/wiki/Charles_de_Gaulle) >« La vérité, c’est que les Américains finiront par se faire détester par tout le monde**.** Même par leurs alliés les plus inconditionnels. \[...\] Tous les trucages qu’imaginent les Américains sont démentis par les événements. » Which would translate to : >Truth is, the Americans will end up being hated by everyone. Even by their most unconditional allies \[…\] Each trick the Americans made up are contradicted by facts.
View on Reddit #50280834

hectorgarabit@reddit

>the US being an unreliable ally At this point unreliable doesn't really capture the situation. two face traitors would be more appropriate.
View on Reddit #50228587

wanderer1999@reddit

Thing is the US flip between democrats and GOP every 2-4 years. There's still a lot of fight in us and we can still come back. You really can't count the US out yet.
View on Reddit #50231370

AutoModerator@reddit

To reduce political fighting this post or comment has been filtered for approval. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/aviation) if you have any questions or concerns.*
View on Reddit #50231484

Callsign_Psycopath@reddit

I'm looking to find a way to invest in Dasault, and Thales.
View on Reddit #50189689

CardinalOfNYC@reddit

Just be careful right now because those euro defense stocks are SOARING at this moment to levels that are clearly driven by speculation and not financials. As one reporter put it, the rise is so rapid that if we didn't know better we'd assume they just got a cash infusion from the mob. But no actual cash has traded hands yet, no european security deal is signed, so these companies are soaring on pure speculation at this moment. It's still a space to watch carefully, a space money can surely be made by shrewd investors, but it all depends precisely how you execute.
View on Reddit #50193637

Callsign_Psycopath@reddit

Yeah I've more than doubled on Rheinmetall since I bought last year. It's a little insane and I'm wondering if I should cash out or just let it ride.
View on Reddit #50194158

CardinalOfNYC@reddit

You also might want to look into ETFs I bought a broad based defense ETF a few weeks ago basically to involve myself in the events but without too much risk.
View on Reddit #50194394

MachKeinDramaLlama@reddit

Would you mind stating which one you chose?
View on Reddit #50221080

CardinalOfNYC@reddit

ITA
View on Reddit #50228454

Callsign_Psycopath@reddit

Interesting might want to look into that, my second best position was an ETF tracking Argentina of all places.
View on Reddit #50194452

CardinalOfNYC@reddit

ETFs are awesome, they constitute most of my best positiions.
View on Reddit #50194521

CardinalOfNYC@reddit

For you, you might wanna let it ride unless you want/need the cash. Or maybe cash out some if it'll make you feel better. I mostly think now (like right now, today, things are changing rapidly) is the wrong time to buy because things feel over-inflated, feels like these stocks will fall back down to an extent before beginning a steadier, more healthy rise - IF a strong european secutiy deal is signed
View on Reddit #50194314

Callsign_Psycopath@reddit

Yeah I'm not strapped, plus I think they're a good bet longterm. And my strategy is more long term focused anyway (I want to retire early.)
View on Reddit #50194393

CardinalOfNYC@reddit

Sounds like you're in a good spot. Cheers!
View on Reddit #50194466

Callsign_Psycopath@reddit

You too ami
View on Reddit #50194484

Fugedibobo@reddit

Both are publicly traded companies, you just go on T212 or Robinhood or whatever is your best local trading app and buy some.
View on Reddit #50190665

Flaxinator@reddit

>I'm sure they could have made a deal with EU to make their own Typhoons domestically The Eurofighter wasn't an EU project, it was a multilateral project between the UK, Germany, Italy and Spain. France was part of the programme initially but walked away because they wanted something carrier capable
View on Reddit #50193154

MachKeinDramaLlama@reddit

And they wanted a plane that is smaller and thus more affordable, which was seen as a better fit for the export market. That this allowed Dassault to go with a smaller and lighter, but also significantly less powerful, engine from France's domestic engine manufacturer Snecma (now Safran) was an added bonus. Britain and Germany really couldn't go along with a less ambitious concept, because they needed an intercetor that had the engine performance and climb rate required for the QRF mission.
View on Reddit #50220894

Rc72@reddit

In particular, Britain needed a **large** interceptor with long endurance for North Sea patrols. Also, in Tornado, Britain, Germany, and Italy had a then still-recent fighter-bomber that was particularly capable for the air-to-ground support, but...er...not so good in air combat. And Spain had just taken delivery of a bunch of F/A-18s, but didn't mind getting something more of an interceptor.
View on Reddit #50227728

cstross@reddit

Nope, the Rafale is fully navalized -- the naval variant of the Typhoon never got built, so they're not carrier-ready. (This is why the UK is stuck buying F-35s right now, which looks -- since January 20th -- like a distinctly bad political choice.)
View on Reddit #50192875

wanderer1999@reddit

Thing is, The F-35 is the only stealth platform the EU can buy right now. So until you guys have your own 6th gen stealth platform, it is a decent short term plan.
View on Reddit #50206701

cstross@reddit

It's the only *crewed* stealth platform: there are combat drones undergoing evaluation for procurement and deployment which may bridge the gap to some extent before a 6g fighter arrives.
View on Reddit #50207600

wanderer1999@reddit

Godspeed. Self-sufficient is the name of the game. It's time for the EU to be the superpower it's meant to be. It cannot be just the US forever, given how the Russian and the Chinese are surging as threats.
View on Reddit #50208202

jello_sweaters@reddit

What part of "that aircraft's definitely going to have a kill switch embedded in the firmware" do you not like? /s
View on Reddit #50196197

furism@reddit

Besides what others have pointed out, it might also have been a case of too many cooks in the kitchen. All of these countries, and the French not the last (I'm French myself), probably had very strong opinions on objectives and design choices, not to mention who gets to build which systems (all of them would want their nation's companies to build as many of them as possible). And this is probably why we haven't seen many co-developped military projects - besides the A400M, every tank, plane, helicopter, ship or artillery seems to come from national programs I believe.
View on Reddit #50197311

deleted_by_reddit@reddit

[removed]
View on Reddit #50205850

AutoModerator@reddit

To reduce political fighting this post or comment has been filtered for approval. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/aviation) if you have any questions or concerns.*
View on Reddit #50205851

Sparkys_Rocket@reddit

I've heard that the Rafale's development cost was lower than what it would have cost the French for their part of the Typhoon's development cost (I don't know how true this really is, but military development projects with the Germans seems to be very expensive and often unsuccessful). Developing the Rafale was the right choice, it is a very capable multirole fighter that is doing great on the export market.
View on Reddit #50193591

pr1ntscreen@reddit

>Shame about the Canards on the plane though. Is this what we're gonna do today? Fight?
View on Reddit #50197026

Callsign_Psycopath@reddit

Better get it before I crash into a West German field. /s though really my favorite Aircraft has a reputation.
View on Reddit #50200931

Joebeemer@reddit

One of Canada's top picks to replace US fighters.
View on Reddit #50279196

VerStannen@reddit

Extra spicy baguette
View on Reddit #50189581

maxathier@reddit

tactical baguette
View on Reddit #50278801

BriefCollar4@reddit

Quart a lot calories in that one.
View on Reddit #50276826

Stoney3K@reddit

Rad-guette.
View on Reddit #50234085

Old-Simple7848@reddit

"My baggette tastes like copper, weird"
View on Reddit #50223414

Playful_Two_7596@reddit

A little overcooked of you ask me. 10 millions degrees is a bit too much.
View on Reddit #50229649

Spatza@reddit

The warning baguette.
View on Reddit #50229370

FastPatience1595@reddit

The perfect complement to the M51 submarines. More visible, more flexible, and with a pilot in the loop. Plus it really doesn't cost much. As, unlike the Mirage IVA a while back, or the 2000N, it is not a specialized nuclear delivery system. But just a matter of "roll an ASMP-A below any Rafale, Armée de l'Air or Aéronavale" - all 192 of them are wired for it. So there are plenty of interesting combinations. \-AdA Rafale + ASMP-A + aerial refueling from an A330 tanker \-Aéronavale Rafale, out of CdG + ASMP-A + aerial refueling from a buddy-buddy Rafale \-Aéronavale Rafale, out of CdG + ASMP-A + aerial refueling from an A330 tanker
View on Reddit #50194975

Loud_Surround5112@reddit

I saw submarine and only thought of salvation.
View on Reddit #50268607

JoMercurio@reddit

And said submarine also happened to have a squadron of *Rafales*... at least until the damn bastard ruined it by walking over his crisp white sheets
View on Reddit #50273443

Loud_Surround5112@reddit

All he wanted to do was nuke a city, or watch his favorite hololive vtuber.
View on Reddit #50273805

JoMercurio@reddit

Marine-chan specifically\*
View on Reddit #50273990

Loud_Surround5112@reddit

And that scum just had to take his anime from him, if they’d just let him surrender he’d have surrendered his ship and crew to live the rest of his days watching his favorite old lady.
View on Reddit #50277454

MJP87@reddit

As a proud British aviation enthusiast, I have to say. God dam the Rafele is sexier than Euro fighter. It's those air intakes. Not the stupid cigarette packet they stuck on the bottom of EF
View on Reddit #50276385

JoMercurio@reddit

<< SALVATIO--- >> *The last words of a Rafale pilot after getting walked over by Three Strikes and his dirty boots*
View on Reddit #50273570

heisenberg070@reddit

It’s amazing (and scary) how far we have come in terms of nuclear weapon yield. It took a B-29 to drop <25kiloton weapons at start and now this little guy can carry 300kt. I know H-bomb took yield to another level, but still scared to process that this little guy could obliterate any city in the world in a blink.
View on Reddit #50232360

SlamClick@reddit

I'm not sure how the French bombs work but American bombs can literally be dialed to a specific yield on the go. Crazy stuff.
View on Reddit #50245964

juanmlm@reddit

This one is 100-300 kt iirc
View on Reddit #50254036

SlamClick@reddit

Do you know what altitudes/angles they would release such bombs?
View on Reddit #50254771

juanmlm@reddit

It’s a cruise missile so low
View on Reddit #50272207

vrTater@reddit

An obvious flex, well deserved, beautiful machine. Just be sure to follow through if needed. ; )
View on Reddit #50266947

Starchaser_WoF@reddit

ONE MILLION LIVES
View on Reddit #50266266

BigEnos24@reddit

That airplane is absolutely gorgeous!
View on Reddit #50253769

magus_vk@reddit

u/jedieric dude, i was banging your wife last night, she said it sure beats your *"300 Kt of diplomacy"*, whatever that means 🤷🏻. The world needs peace not the MIC selling us on finding Jesus through St. Javelin and other weapons. \#warisaracket #suckmytrucknuts #friendlyskies
View on Reddit #50248158

copingcabana@reddit

"Zis eees un warning shot, oui?"
View on Reddit #50237875

g1rdax@reddit

that’s fucking sexy machine
View on Reddit #50235457

Brilliant-Smile-8154@reddit

Extremely diplomatic.
View on Reddit #50231875

CarminSanDiego@reddit

Possibly the sexiest frontal for a fighter
View on Reddit #50230084

Tusan1222@reddit

It got the wine glass holder?
View on Reddit #50223672

Hadri1_Fr@reddit

I know
View on Reddit #50223497

ReceptionPure4744@reddit

DAMN
View on Reddit #50223107

Womgi@reddit

The front view of this airplane is wild. It's like it got the opposite of a buccal fat removal surgery. Like damn, that bird got them cheeks
View on Reddit #50222648

robertdobbsjr@reddit

I hate that kind of irony. That's not diplomacy. That's mutual suicide. That kind of irony minimizes the horror that shit would unleash on every living thing.
View on Reddit #50194904

LawsonTse@reddit

Except this really is the diplomatic nuke, a warning that that France is close to busting out the city enders in submarines
View on Reddit #50219746

JstnJ@reddit

Agreed. Appreciating aviation and engineering is one thing, but glorifying weapons designed for mass destruction is another. There’s nothing “cool” about the devastation these systems can unleash, and framing them as anything other than instruments of unimaginable violence minimizes their true horror.
View on Reddit #50207210

bozoconnors@reddit

Awwww, 300kt, widdo baby nuke! Ain't it cute!!
View on Reddit #50197989

Werkstadt@reddit

20 times hiroshima. nothing cute about hiroshima
View on Reddit #50217753

Mythrilfan@reddit

Psst, you should look up the yield of the mainstay of the US nuclear arsenal, the B61 bomb.
View on Reddit #50215054

footballenjoyer23@reddit

I know if this configuration was used in a real world scenario it would, more than likely, be because of a terrible World War. However, in my mind, this is humanity’s last ditch effort to destroy an Alien mothership determined to destroy us.
View on Reddit #50211996

star744jets@reddit

Nothing beats a Rafale in a multi-role mission! Absolutely Nothing!
View on Reddit #50208536

ency6171@reddit

I guess the one in the middle is the missile? Is it hanging out like this upon liftoff or stored in the body?
View on Reddit #50194232

FastPatience1595@reddit

Hanging out like this. Rafale doesn't have an internal weapon bay.
View on Reddit #50197599

quickblur@reddit

Damn that looks awesome
View on Reddit #50188309

BrewCityChaserV2@reddit

300 knots of diplomacy? Did an LLM write this title for you?
View on Reddit #50187230