And you base those numbers on what? Inflated net worth? Reduced net worth? His taxes? What reliable numbers could you possibly have? Or maybe you’re deducting the fines he’s had to pay for the crimes he didn’t slither out from under? Share the source of the numbers.
So when all the richest folks in the country are on your side. When life long politicians that have been manipulating the federal process in order to continue to place judges that have gotten a very select few very wealthy people out of trouble - even after conviction - is that not the establishment?
Just because you say the term doesn't mean you have the interest at heart. The voting record clearly has made the rich richer while the middle and below have gone further in the opposite direction.
Trump and the modern gop is the establishment disguised to those who have made their choice.
You used outdated data. Please see the final FEC counts on this graph attached here. Not only are 60+ of the top 100 donors Republican contributors, they also out donate the left's donors 4 to 1.
This data was gathered for the entire 24 election cycle and was collected in mid December. Your data was collected before the election even occurred.
So if you're saying it's not large donors, and we know it wasn't simply more grassroots support from small donors, because they lost, and there's no way you have that much of a grassroots energy advantage and then lose the popular vote, then what was it? Well, it's starting to look like it was secretly OUR TAX DOLLARS. And what do you call the people who have access to the government money laundering slush funds? The establishment!
The article says it specifically, the bulk of the difference for Harris came from the dnc and the campaign. That means that regular people donated in a much larger effort for Harris than for trump.
While the super PAC money was much higher for the Republican candidate, trump.
So the wealthy donate to super packs, which trump out earned Harris. And the dnc and campaign which rely on nickel and dime donations from middle and lower class individuals out earned the Republican rnc.
So yea, like I said, the rich continue to support the GOP and maga because they are and continue to be the "establishment" as you define it.
There is zero proof that billions were taken illegally to fund the Harris campaign.
It‘s an interaction. Real life influences pop culture and vice versa. You also have deeply embedded cultural tropes like the hero‘s journey and - if you follow Jung - psychological archetypes which will make themselves known in real life and pop culture. Pop culture also a very positive and democratic thing, as there are no gatekeepers. And very often, dealing with pop culture will in the long run lead to dealing with deeper, more sophisticated culture.
VyctoriYang@reddit
Yes. The thunderbolts comic has her with the same look in the 1960s.
rubistiko@reddit
Marvel is the democrat mouthpiece disguised as entertainment. Notice how the new captain America movie is fighting against the monster president.
KayosFN@reddit
The character existed before Tulsi was born dumbass. She’s always looked like that
Which-Supermarket-69@reddit
Also the president happens to be red
SeasonsGone@reddit
Lots of things are symbolically red—power, communism, blood, fascism. It doesn’t have to be about Trump, unless it seems like it is
Aurondarklord@reddit
As stupid as I think this movie is, they had no way of guessing who would win the election at the time they filmed it.
superfakesuperfake@reddit
Tulsi did it better.
... that plus authenticity.
KayosFN@reddit
Valentina existed before Tulsi was born…
magyk_over_science@reddit
Rogue was the OG
superfakesuperfake@reddit
you are unfamiliar with Caitlin Moran
Accurate_Athlete_182@reddit
Best to look at the timeline of when this movie came out and when she started sporting that grey streak.
Aurondarklord@reddit
That's her Establishment Destroyer suit. She wore it when she wrecked Kamala too.
splintersmaster@reddit
She's fucking working for the bloody definition of the establishment!
Aurondarklord@reddit
The establishment doesn't try to throw the establishment in prison. You may disagree with Trump, but arguing he's not a populist is just silly.
patdashuri@reddit
He’s not a populist, but he plays one on tv. He knows where the richest most corrupt game in town is…and he wants in.
Aurondarklord@reddit
Unlike establishment politicians, his net worth went DOWN while he was in office the last time.
patdashuri@reddit
And you base those numbers on what? Inflated net worth? Reduced net worth? His taxes? What reliable numbers could you possibly have? Or maybe you’re deducting the fines he’s had to pay for the crimes he didn’t slither out from under? Share the source of the numbers.
Aurondarklord@reddit
Just your typical celebrity net worth sites.
patdashuri@reddit
🤦♂️
splintersmaster@reddit
So when all the richest folks in the country are on your side. When life long politicians that have been manipulating the federal process in order to continue to place judges that have gotten a very select few very wealthy people out of trouble - even after conviction - is that not the establishment?
Just because you say the term doesn't mean you have the interest at heart. The voting record clearly has made the rich richer while the middle and below have gone further in the opposite direction.
Trump and the modern gop is the establishment disguised to those who have made their choice.
Aurondarklord@reddit
83 billionaires backed Kamala compared to 52 for Trump.
splintersmaster@reddit
You used outdated data. Please see the final FEC counts on this graph attached here. Not only are 60+ of the top 100 donors Republican contributors, they also out donate the left's donors 4 to 1.
This data was gathered for the entire 24 election cycle and was collected in mid December. Your data was collected before the election even occurred.
https://www.opensecrets.org/elections-overview/biggest-donors
Also there's at least a trillion dollars in wealth in this photo alone at the inauguration.
https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20250120-tech-billionaires-take-center-stage-at-trump-inauguration
Aurondarklord@reddit
And yet somehow Biden/Harris out-fundaised Trump by over a billion dollars.
So if you're saying it's not large donors, and we know it wasn't simply more grassroots support from small donors, because they lost, and there's no way you have that much of a grassroots energy advantage and then lose the popular vote, then what was it? Well, it's starting to look like it was secretly OUR TAX DOLLARS. And what do you call the people who have access to the government money laundering slush funds? The establishment!
splintersmaster@reddit
The article says it specifically, the bulk of the difference for Harris came from the dnc and the campaign. That means that regular people donated in a much larger effort for Harris than for trump.
While the super PAC money was much higher for the Republican candidate, trump.
So the wealthy donate to super packs, which trump out earned Harris. And the dnc and campaign which rely on nickel and dime donations from middle and lower class individuals out earned the Republican rnc.
So yea, like I said, the rich continue to support the GOP and maga because they are and continue to be the "establishment" as you define it.
There is zero proof that billions were taken illegally to fund the Harris campaign.
astroman1978@reddit
Guess he went to bed.
Typical_Morning_6723@reddit
I love Liberal Redditors when they have a meltdown, then get arrested 😂🖕
Material-Dirt-3033@reddit
Tulsi is a "likely russian asset" and half of the thunderbolts are the ex-russian assets lol that's fitting ahaha
Which-Supermarket-69@reddit
I’m am so there for Tulsi putting together her version of the thunderbolts
theemoofrog@reddit
Why does real life always have to be conflated with pop culture.
American_Streamer@reddit
It‘s an interaction. Real life influences pop culture and vice versa. You also have deeply embedded cultural tropes like the hero‘s journey and - if you follow Jung - psychological archetypes which will make themselves known in real life and pop culture. Pop culture also a very positive and democratic thing, as there are no gatekeepers. And very often, dealing with pop culture will in the long run lead to dealing with deeper, more sophisticated culture.
BarryLicious2588@reddit
You should google Jen Psaki red outfit 2021 until you find the one that looks like Alma Coin from Hunger Games
maverick1ba@reddit
My first thought, lol
maverick1ba@reddit
But she was already in black panther 2
beavis617@reddit
I think someone at the studio has someone on the inside… shhhhh
Triniculo@reddit
Probably not