Move from place to place, consistently get kicked out of anywhere you stay because you can't stop doing weird shit
One day make friends with an altruistic millionaire who will have your back no matter what
Break into some random person's house, start squatting, anytime they try to get back in just start throwing shit and screaming at them
Altruistic millionaire is also jacked as shit and you can call him up whenever the homeowner brings friends and he'll just beat the shit out of all of them
Proclaim the house as being yours from the day it was built
Millionaire friend cuts you a check every month and doesn't give a fuck what you spend it on
I recently learned about the following named "Christian Identity". Which basically believes that the chosen people were actually Caucasians from Europe, and that every other race are goyim, even the big nose tribe.
Of course it's labeled as a white supremacist group by them, even though they believe the same shit but in reverse.
yeah but only one is based in reality lol. the Christians (Romans/Greeks/Byzantines) all coped because they killed their own savior, and theyre trying to peg it on the Jews. it's all cope.
even freud tried to cope: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moses_and_Monotheism
, that they subsequently killed the Egyptian Moses in rebellion, and still later joined with another monotheistic tribe in Midian who worshipped a volcano god called Yahweh.
he is revealing his own guilt of the Gentile killing Jesus. do you see. the christians are the ones coping.
bronze age people are "sthanam" -- "firm", "unmoving"
They literally just invaded Syria for no justifiable reason at its peak instability in the middle of a power transfer, and have seemingly annexed the land.
There are REASONS, not justifiable ones. Invading the sovereign territory of a foreign nation to create a buffer zone for your buffer zone is only happening because bibi needs to maintain his grip on power and can only do that through endless war.
We're going to preemptively attack the people who have not shown any intention to attack us and also take their land because there's a possibility they might kill us in the future
Imagine being the parents of the serviceman killed and all you get is some money and an “apology”. There are days where I fully understand why our adversaries hate us.
I wouldn't trust a 'country'/'ally' that would shoot an American flag on 'accident' because "Tee-hee we didn't see it; not after the after torpedo, napalm, and two Dassault Mirage III jets carrying out strafing runs with 30mm cannons. Oppsies"
The head of the CIA did privately muse that there was no way it was an accident when he thought the conversation was off the record, the investigation was absolutely bumrushed by the Navy, and the whole tone of the investigatory document is going "this is more than likely not an accident" until the end when they suddenly give a short conclusion that it was an accident. Then 30 years later one of the investigators comes out to Congress and says president Johnson personally intervened to tell them to cover up the incident and write it off as an accident.
There's 0 chance it was ever an accident and everybody in the military circles knows it. The only people I've seen come to the conclusion that it wasn't an accident are historians who don't usually dabble in semi-modern military matters.
I’d speculate on the possibility that people high up in the US government asked them to do it and lay the blame on Egypt. The goal being to draw the US into a war with Israel against Egypt. The US certainly has a history of false flag attacks on US warships to incite us to war.
Especially under LBJ in particular. Gulf of Tonkin was 1964. USS Liberty was 1967.
The US, which has the best deployed military technology in the world, shot down a civilian airliner killing everybody on board and gave the people who did it medals. I wouldn't trust a country that shoots at civilian targets.
It's wild to stand back a minute and wonder if their current state of politics is how their religious leaning has always guided them. Their current state of fanaticsm and bloodlust is diabolical.
Yeah, save for the fact the millionaire is not "allowing" the bum, but entirely controlled, psyopped and gamed by the bum, who runs everything the millionaire sees and hears and even chops his foreskin.
And? I hope you realize that there’s a reason no surrounding country wants to take in Palestinians.
I’m fact I’d double the budget to ensure Palestinian Muslims have no control over the holy land. Christian and historical artifacts would not survive a week.
I know what you mean but he's right. There is, (or perhaps at least was,) a humongous difference between the comment sections in this sub versus greentext. GT is reddit as fuuuuuuuuuck- circlejerk comments of a broad left leaning orientation, no remote challenging of the status quo, harsh moderation, lots of anathema subject matter. This sub had a bit of that but also a nice blend of schizos, antisemites and genuinely interesting discussion that was willing to dance around the edges of reddit's tyrannical moderation.
Ah, okay, thank goodness. It's ok to be redpilled about religion. I don't believe in anything either, but I don'tfight or diss christianity or the catholic church (although the current pope is a globalist puppet and a stickbundle) because I see it as a shield from other crap that's much worse. I prefer high IQ people to be atheists, but some inoffensive system of beliefs may be necessary for the mob. Hopefully one that's not about jihad, exploiting the goyim and so on. Today's catholicism is ok.
I'm not disagreeing with you, i mentioned that verse to debunk the whole issue with accountability within christianity, about how jesus somehow absolved every sins that his followers commited by having himself crucified, even if among those christians are the likes of leopold, churchill, cromwell, etc.
Personally i blame paul for making this stuff even much more of a mess
But that’s the thing most Christian sects have the doctrine of faith alone for salvation. I think Catholicism is the only one that emphases faith and works. Sola fide or whatever.
No my argument is pretty consistent. Christians ignore half of their own Bible except whenever it’s convenient.
Christians like to say there is personal accountability but then they say all you need to do is believe Jesus is God in human form and died brutally on a cross. Doing that ‘saves you’ even tho you could be a piece of garbage.
You can look up the Greek text for yourself and see this is not the case.
Catholics
The Roman Catholic Church is currently, and has been for hundreds of years, excommunicated. Not understanding only goes to show that your claim of knowledge surrounding church history is moot.
You shouldn't trust an interpretation
Which is not what protestants believe and what you just did.
Ignores Faith Without Works and the councils
If you would bother researching then you can stop making false assertions.
The Old Testament isn't Christian law. It is included in the Bible for historical context. The whole point of Christianity is the New Covenant between God and man which removes most of the purification rituals and laws as being requirements for salvation and replaced them with faith in God and Jesus.
I'm not even a Christian and I know this. You just hate Christians for some reason. 👃
The Old Testament isn’t Christian law. It is included in the Bible for historical context.
The point is Christians pick and choose what part of Old Testament to follow. Meanwhile they have no reason to believe in the NT
The whole point of Christianity is the New Covenant between God and man which removes most of the purification rituals and laws as being requirements for salvation and replaced them with faith in God and Jesus.
Which is pretty much bull shit because it removes personal accountability
I’m not even a Christian and I know this. You just hate Christians for some reason. 👃
"Col. 2:16 Therefore no one is to act as your judge in regard to food or drink or in respect to a festival or a new moon or a Sabbath day —
Col. 2:17 things which are a mere shadow of what is to come; but the substance belongs to Christ."
My heart is plenty soft. That’s why I’m not a Christian. The entire faith is built around the unjust and unfair torture of a figure. But that’s ok because humans were born inherently dirty because of something their forefathers have done.
I’m not against religion. But if any religion is true it’s definitely not Christianity
It's a massive coincidence that every culture from every time period that has come across them has independently had a problem with them, I don't know how you would explain that
Well if you want to be pedantic then surely you noticed that none of them were Muslims and that calling the Romans or Hellenes "Euro" makes little sense when they were Med / Eastern for the most part.
When it comes to non-Latin Emperors you have more from MENA than northern Europe (pre-fall), like parts of Africa have been Roman longer than parts of Northern Europe, it was very much a med empire , ergo "mare nostrum"
Europe consists of more than southern Europe ; if you are just looking at Graeco-Roman civ by itself then it makes no sense to call it European, it takes very little from it. You can say that European civ is modeled on Graeco-Roman civ but they are very different things , It makes no sense to call ancient countries by modern geographical designations because Rome took more from Africa and the Middle East than it did most of Europe and likewise settled Libya, Syria etc longer than England, Germany etc.
That's essentially why people call it a Mediterranean empire.
Well if you want a basic history lesson; the Yuan long persecuted Muslims and Jews because they found their customs at odds with Mongolians (particularly dietary and religious restrictions) , eventually things got so bad that both the Jews and Muslims joined the Chinese nationalist movement and helped overthrow the Yuan.
The outcome of this was that when the Ming dynasty banned foreign religions like Christianity they gave a free pass to both Judaism and Islam and considered them "traditional Chinese religions".
Also if you want to research it further just note that the Chinese name for Jew and Muslim in that era is essentially identical (Hui) , but the name for Jews will be something like "Hui who don't eat sciatic nerve" or something along those lines.
or maybe the christian elite picks the pocket of their peasants, and pins it on jews? the christian elite likes the jewish theory of economics until the peasants realize they're getting fucked. your elite doesnt care. you're the ones being sold out
thats not the point. i dont care about my internet points. im connecting it to the "act of downvoting" my point intrinsically makes you an NPC. its an internal thing. my points are irrelevant.
“The {{removed}} are an ignorant and barbarous people, who have long united the most sordid avarice with the most detestable superstition and the most invincible hatred for every people by whom they are tolerated and enriched.” - Voltaire
My religion is the true one. All others are lying.
this is how every religion works (sans like bahai or whatever)
Religion controls most of the worlds politics
demonstrably untrue
Many people in the upper echelons of society follow it
far more of these people are athiest/jewish
Manipulate world events and media through propaganda
see above
Responsible for the transatlantic slave trade and other genocides
the slavery and genocide are bad, but far from unique to christianity, or religion as a whole. nearly every group of people in the world have engaged in it
Most US Presidents have belonged to or have been associated with this religion in one way or another
this was true until recently, but also means nothing lol
3 members of the Forbes 400 are christian: Do Won Chang (forever 21), David Green (hobby lobby), and Dan Cathy (Chickfila). The rest are atheist or jewish
Yeah I forgot the time that Christians bombed a US research ship and also established an ethno-religious apartheid state that bases its entire identity on being a victim.
Lmfao dude. Nazis were about as Christian as they were socialist. The Catholic Church only signed an agreement to guarantee no persecution from Germany…which was swiftly broken.
Unless you didn’t mean Nazis. Then I’d just call you an idiot because slavery was more rooted in class and hierarchy than religion.
What was the main religion that pushed their ideals? Shintoism?
What religion was used as being chosen by God, thus essentially genociding the original inhabitants due to ancient scripture? Rastafarianism?
You are so busy licking Zionist boots that you fail to see that Americans and Canadians wanted to “normalize” and “assimilate” Natives into society. They cut their hair, changed their clothes, took away their native tongue. Of course they’d teach them religion on top of it.
Its not that simple because the Christians sent here, were sent here with the understanding that they'd all die horribly. Because it was a denomination that was pissing the king off.
And that's true of the French, Spanish, Dutch, and every crown empire that came to the America's. It wasn't until they started somehow surviving that they were like "fuck.. alright time to lane grab properly for the empire!" Forcing the natives to do anything barely worked and that's why every nation was more into fighting the natives instead of trying to convert them. The natives just wanted the fuckers to fuck off. And the peaceful natives got the most brutal of treatments because they'd have rather lived and suffered than died fighting.
The only religious empire that didn't try that was the jews, because they lacked proper organization. But there's more than one way to win a game of civilization 6.
this was true until recently, but also means nothing lol
Quite literally still true. We've never had a president who wasn't Christian. For that matter, we practically had riots the first time we got a non-Protestant president.
i dont believe that clinton, obama, or trump are christian, we just live in a christian majority country, and they want to appeal to voters. the bushes/biden maybe believed at some point, but certainly are no longer practicing
Are you retarded? Why are you having a pissing contest about what religion the people who did bad thing followed? At least 90% of all that has been mentioned was done for non-religious purpose. Unless you are a zealot you won't do or not do stuff beyond praying for a religious cause.
It’s so funny to see small hats blamed for everything. My favorite is “Israel owns the US”. Israel is a western construct that provides the US a foothold in the Middle East so they fuck over the cave dwellers easier.
So we agree then? Or are you saying anyone can lobby so jews aren’t special in this regard? I still wouldn’t be too surprised if all the major lobbies are jewish tho
There's tons of US bases in the middle east ; Israel is not strategically that important (main regional bases are in Jordan and Turkey) ; it's a domestic issue driven by Christian evangelical voters and massive groups like CUFI.
uhm actually it's wrong because someone is a jew 🥸👆
Got anything else?
Yes you smug retard, I do
"Nor were Jews prominent in the slave trade. Of the 40 slave merchants in South Carolina, only 1 minor trader was a Jew." [paragraph goes on to list similar breakdowns for other US states] – Marvin Perry, Frederick M. Schweitzer: Antisemitism: Myth and Hate from Antiquity to the Present, p. 245. Palgrave Macmillan, 2002; ISBN 0-312-16561-7
"In no period did Jews play a leading role as financiers, shipowners, or factors in the transatlantic or Caribbean slave trades. They possessed far fewer slaves than non-Jews in every British territory in North America and the Caribbean. Even when Jews in a handful of places owned slaves in proportions slightly above their representation among a town's families, such cases do not come close to corroborating the assertions of The Secret Relationship." – Wim Klooster (University of Southern Maine): Review of Jews, Slaves, and the Slave Trade: Setting the Record Straight by Eli Faber[permanent dead link] (2000). "Reappraisals in Jewish Social and Intellectual History", William and Mary Quarterly Review of Books. Volume LVII, Number 1. Omohundro Institute of Early American History and Culture[ISBN missing]
• "Medieval Christians greatly exaggerated the supposed Jewish control over trade and finance and also became obsessed with alleged Jewish plots to enslave, convert, or sell non-Jews... Most European Jews lived in poor communities on the margins of Christian society; they continued to suffer most of the legal disabilities associated with slavery. ... Whatever Jewish refugees from Brazil may have contributed to the northwestward expansion of sugar and slaves, it is clear that Jews had no major or continuing impact on the history of New World slavery." – Professor David Brion Davis of Yale University in Slavery and Human Progress (New York: Oxford University Press, 1984), p. 89 (cited in Shofar FTP Archive File: orgs/american/wiesenthal.center//web/historical-facts Archived 2018-10-01 at the Wayback Machine)
• "The Jews of Newport seem not to have pursued the [slave trading] business consistently ... [When] we compare the number of vessels employed in the traffic by all merchants with the number sent to the African coast by Jewish traders ... we can see that the Jewish participation was minimal. It may be safely assumed that over a period of years American Jewish businessmen were accountable for considerably less than two percent of the slave imports into the West Indies" – Professor Jacob R. Marcus of Hebrew Union College in The Colonial American Jew (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1970), Vol. 2, pp. 702-703 (cited in Shofar FTP Archive File: orgs/american/wiesenthal.center//web/historical-facts )
• "None of the major slave-traders was Jewish, nor did Jews constitute a large proportion in any particular community. ... probably all of the Jewish slave-traders in all of the Southern cities and towns combined did not buy and sell as many slaves as did the firm of Franklin and Armfield, the largest Negro traders in the South." – Bertram W. Korn, Jews and Negro Slavery in the Old South, 1789-1865, in The Jewish Experience in America, ed. Abraham J. Karp (Waltham, Massachusetts: American Jewish Historical Society, 1969), Vol 3, pp. 197-198 (cited in Shofar FTP Archive File: orgs/american/wiesenthal.center//web/historical-facts )
• "[There were] Jewish owners of plantations, but altogether they constituted only a tiny proportion of the Southerners whose habits, opinions, and status were to become decisive for the entire section, and eventually for the entire country. ... [Only one Jew] tried his hand as a plantation overseer even if only for a brief time." – Bertram W. Korn, "Jews and Negro Slavery in the Old South, 1789-1865", The Jewish Experience in America, ed. Abraham J. Karp (Waltham, Massachusetts: American Jewish Historical Society, 1969), Vol 3, p. 180 (cited in Shofar FTP Archive File: orgs/american/wiesenthal.center//web/historical-facts )
Unless you're going to respond with academic peer reviewed research that proves jews were responsible for the trans-atlantic slave trade and not european christians, then consider KILLING yourself. Thanks babe 🥰🥰
thats the point though, why are you denouncing it?? have you even read judges?
"In those days the Israelites did not have a king"
this Israelites STILL have no king. and they will bypass the need for a king by overthrowing the Ayatollah, finding a reincarnation of Cyrus (likely a zoroastrian or brahmin), and becoming an independent region under the NeoNeoPersian Empire,. The NeoCyrus will give a new "Edict" to build a new temple in Jerusalem.
It makes more sense when you realize they stole it all from Annunaki texts - written in STONE 3000 years before the Jews were a twinkle in the eye of Yahweh…
lol "stole". As much as the Greek stole their Mythos from the Egyptians, or the Romans stealing from the Greek. It's all interconnected and understandable similar.
Lol… keep perpetuating the lie that somehow copying texts written in stone is “interconnected and similar “…. Use that one when stealing a Sony song or copyright and tell the Jewish owners “the song is interconnected and understandably similar”…
To be fair, they worshipped other gods because the Y man didn't pay attention to them. New found documents suggest baal was the one who freed them from Egypt based on recent script findings. And they had to get on Yahwehs good side because baal can be a bit of a genocidal monster.
Boy, did they not know yahweh lol.
At the end of the day, the Jewish faith just kept eating and merging with other religions when they made their stories sound better. Once human story telling became global, that's when reading comprehension started to become the forefront of 'no, you are wrong and I'm right!'
Pretty sure every single religion has some kind of out or repentance in them or they wouldn't of lasted. The shit was added later when the people making it up realized it was impossible to follow. People probably just said fuck it, I'm going to hell no matter what, gonna go ham on all the sins.
They went chill dude, you can still go to heaven as long as you pay us money and come to this big building once in a while. Also this fella needs to bite the end of your son's dick off.
The only two religions we can look into that about are Islam and Christianity, what with them being the newest and biggest scisms. The other religions are so old that they existed becore writing. And yes, every 'denomination' has a 'get out of hell free card'.
Typically, it is something like die for your god vs the baddies. Or just pray harder but like you mean it this time. Or have a human who claims to be Divine pray with you because he's got connections with the guy upstairs. Even Jesus made it something like 10x easier to get in because all you had to do was believe in him and at least try to be decent, but he totally gets if you fail because God made you this way. i hear the catholics have been big for a while on buying your way in by giving to the church. They even used to LITERALLY sell get out of hell free cards like a damn game of monopoly. Just don't lose it!
Christianity: Follow God and be saved through grace
"Christian" denomination/sect/cult/heresy: You are saved as long as you "believe"/obtain esoteric understandings / pay money and do what we say / things that are obviously incongruent if you look into it
You can say Catholicism has a "get out of jail free" clause. Except their propositions are not substantiated by scripture or any oral traditions. It's dogma, created for reasons I'm too stupid to remember. Meaning it's not real.
You can say Gnostics have a "get out of jail free" clause. How exactly is obtaining some hidden mystic piece of information, which the original disciples taught by Jesus supposedly could barely or not even grasp, a "free pass"?
Further, even if all it takes is to be a "good boy". That would mean limiting your will, in a specific way, your entire life. How exactly is that "free"?
Seeing as how the original claim was "All religion seems to grant a free pass to salvation.". What I would ask is what about religions that include no salvation? What about the religions that exist solely to spread death seemingly for the sake of death?
Now let's read all of the religious texts and history books related to Abrahamic religions and try to discern who is an unreliable narrator, who is a propoganda spewer, who is the holiest and who is literally the spawn of Satan. Spoiler alert: it's all of them all at once.
Gotta give it to God, created straight up the funniest sitcom
Yeah. They'd pray to anything that would give them what they wanted. And the old testament wasn't shy about other gods existing.
The whole Moses trip was a deal god tried to make with them if they'd quit that shit and only worship him. And they couldn't hold that deal for even a month. So he made them go in circles for 40 years only to settle back like 1 days walk from where they started. That's about the time he got real smite-y, too. I can't imagine why.
I wouldn't say the old testament wasn't shy about other gods existing, I can't think of a single moment in the old testament where other gods actually did anything. All the mentions are of people worshipping them, and the gods not being able to do anything because they don't exist.
TypicalMootis@reddit
Utnemod@reddit
This is the harsh truth about it.
I recently learned about the following named "Christian Identity". Which basically believes that the chosen people were actually Caucasians from Europe, and that every other race are goyim, even the big nose tribe.
Of course it's labeled as a white supremacist group by them, even though they believe the same shit but in reverse.
Funny how that works, huh?
No-Aardvark-2004@reddit
Gods chosen people is most who live in cold places(except Slavs)re all the snow leaves them little time to be a cunt and god likes them for that.
WernerWindig@reddit
I wonder where you learn stuff like that.
DogScrotum16000@reddit
I seek out specialist Telegram channels with all the info
WernerWindig@reddit
Would have been my second guess after Twitter.
HonestlySyrup@reddit
yeah but only one is based in reality lol. the Christians (Romans/Greeks/Byzantines) all coped because they killed their own savior, and theyre trying to peg it on the Jews. it's all cope.
even freud tried to cope: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moses_and_Monotheism
he is revealing his own guilt of the Gentile killing Jesus. do you see. the christians are the ones coping.
bronze age people are "sthanam" -- "firm", "unmoving"
BenAfflecksBalls@reddit
You forgot:
stupidnicks@reddit
eh "expanding" ... 75 years and they barely moved away from the sea coast.
ADP_God@reddit
Sssssshhh don’t question the narrative that’s now what this sub is for
why43curls@reddit
They literally just invaded Syria for no justifiable reason at its peak instability in the middle of a power transfer, and have seemingly annexed the land.
ADP_God@reddit
I mean there are justifiable reasons but something tells me you just don’t know them or agree.
why43curls@reddit
There are REASONS, not justifiable ones. Invading the sovereign territory of a foreign nation to create a buffer zone for your buffer zone is only happening because bibi needs to maintain his grip on power and can only do that through endless war.
ADP_God@reddit
Definitely nothing to do with the risk of Islamists killing Jews, something that they’ve never historically committed themselves to.
why43curls@reddit
This is unironically what you're saying
ADP_God@reddit
Have not shown any indication? My guy what works do you live in they said they’d march on Jerusalem???
why43curls@reddit
Who said it, a schizo nobody?
ADP_God@reddit
https://www.memri.org/tv/hts-militants-damascus-jerusalem-al-aqsa-mecca-medina
BenAfflecksBalls@reddit
By that standard you might as well nuke the entire planet
ADP_God@reddit
Or perhaps create one single state where the Jews can self determine and protect themselves…?
MentokTehMindTaker@reddit
Lol @ your post history.
Cry more.
ADP_God@reddit
It’s hard to witness such ignorance and stay silent.
MentokTehMindTaker@reddit
you post in r / israel
ChillbroBaggins10@reddit
xxcali559xx@reddit
Lmao context? I'm a dumbass
ChillbroBaggins10@reddit
Indeed it’s the Liberty
xxcali559xx@reddit
They said it was an accident but we all know that was bs
ChillbroBaggins10@reddit
Imagine being the parents of the serviceman killed and all you get is some money and an “apology”. There are days where I fully understand why our adversaries hate us.
Nervous-Hair-2107@reddit
I wouldn't trust a 'country'/'ally' that would shoot an American flag on 'accident' because "Tee-hee we didn't see it; not after the after torpedo, napalm, and two Dassault Mirage III jets carrying out strafing runs with 30mm cannons. Oppsies"
why43curls@reddit
The head of the CIA did privately muse that there was no way it was an accident when he thought the conversation was off the record, the investigation was absolutely bumrushed by the Navy, and the whole tone of the investigatory document is going "this is more than likely not an accident" until the end when they suddenly give a short conclusion that it was an accident. Then 30 years later one of the investigators comes out to Congress and says president Johnson personally intervened to tell them to cover up the incident and write it off as an accident.
There's 0 chance it was ever an accident and everybody in the military circles knows it. The only people I've seen come to the conclusion that it wasn't an accident are historians who don't usually dabble in semi-modern military matters.
AuxiliarySimian@reddit
What would Israel have to gain from doing it?
AdPrior3722@reddit
I’d speculate on the possibility that people high up in the US government asked them to do it and lay the blame on Egypt. The goal being to draw the US into a war with Israel against Egypt. The US certainly has a history of false flag attacks on US warships to incite us to war.
Especially under LBJ in particular. Gulf of Tonkin was 1964. USS Liberty was 1967.
AuxiliarySimian@reddit
The US would never intentionally blow up their own ship to justify war! /s
why43curls@reddit
That is the most likely reason, but we will probably never know the real truth of why.
aliniazi@reddit
The US, which has the best deployed military technology in the world, shot down a civilian airliner killing everybody on board and gave the people who did it medals. I wouldn't trust a country that shoots at civilian targets.
why43curls@reddit
Tbf I can't think of a major power that hasn't accidentally done that. Maybe the Chinese?
BenAfflecksBalls@reddit
It's wild to stand back a minute and wonder if their current state of politics is how their religious leaning has always guided them. Their current state of fanaticsm and bloodlust is diabolical.
rootsoap@reddit
I think it's more fitting for AIPAC.
A_for_Anonymous@reddit
Yeah, save for the fact the millionaire is not "allowing" the bum, but entirely controlled, psyopped and gamed by the bum, who runs everything the millionaire sees and hears and even chops his foreskin.
deleted_by_reddit@reddit
[removed]
AutoModerator@reddit
Sorry, your post has been removed. You must have more than 25 karma to submit posts to /r/4chan.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
Expand770Enthusiast@reddit
At least, after the bum deliberately antagonises them and convinces you that paying those bums to settle them the fuck down is a bad idea.
MericuhFuckYeah@reddit
You are aware that 1948 predates US being Israel’s bestie yes? It was the frogs before.
LoveYourKitty@reddit
Dribble. It’s like 3% of our defense budget per year. Paltry sum to make leftists and Muslims seethe.
cope-seeethe-dilate@reddit
That's enough to fully fund like 20 small countries though
LoveYourKitty@reddit
And? I hope you realize that there’s a reason no surrounding country wants to take in Palestinians.
I’m fact I’d double the budget to ensure Palestinian Muslims have no control over the holy land. Christian and historical artifacts would not survive a week.
cope-seeethe-dilate@reddit
I agree with you. I'm just joking about the size of the US military budget.
lilithskriller@reddit
Dude doesn't even know both parties are pro-Israel. The right really are lost.
AegisT_@reddit
In fairness, democrats are as left as Republicans are moderate, not that that makes him any less of a mouth breather
LoveYourKitty@reddit
I hope she sees this bro! Free Palestine!!!!!
HonestlySyrup@reddit
what
zayoe4@reddit
God Bless America
cope-seeethe-dilate@reddit
Kino
ARaptorInAHat@reddit
christians dont even bother technically not breaking the rules. they just say that the rules they dont like dont count because reasons
LoveYourKitty@reddit
This sub turned extremely Reddit overnight.
Bobboy5@reddit
take a look at the address bar in your web browser. what you see may shock you!
Cumsocktornado@reddit
I know what you mean but he's right. There is, (or perhaps at least was,) a humongous difference between the comment sections in this sub versus greentext. GT is reddit as fuuuuuuuuuck- circlejerk comments of a broad left leaning orientation, no remote challenging of the status quo, harsh moderation, lots of anathema subject matter. This sub had a bit of that but also a nice blend of schizos, antisemites and genuinely interesting discussion that was willing to dance around the edges of reddit's tyrannical moderation.
ARaptorInAHat@reddit
dont worry, im extra racist, homophobic, antisemetic, and transphobic to make up for my atheism
A_for_Anonymous@reddit
Ah, okay, thank goodness. It's ok to be redpilled about religion. I don't believe in anything either, but I don'tfight or diss christianity or the catholic church (although the current pope is a globalist puppet and a stickbundle) because I see it as a shield from other crap that's much worse. I prefer high IQ people to be atheists, but some inoffensive system of beliefs may be necessary for the mob. Hopefully one that's not about jihad, exploiting the goyim and so on. Today's catholicism is ok.
LoveYourKitty@reddit
On Reddit, it’s a bannable offense to speak unfavorably about any religion that’s not Christianity.
cavendishandharvey@reddit
I've never related more with a comment in my life
JokerAndSkull159@reddit
It has been happening for a while.
Cumsocktornado@reddit
>post is critical of Judaism
>immediately criticizes Christianity
🤔
JasminTheManSlayer@reddit
Most Christians don’t like personal accountability
Liebermode@reddit
Ezekiel 18:20
JasminTheManSlayer@reddit
That’s a part of the Old Testament which Christians like to disregard when it suits them.
Other wise they wouldn’t be eating pork
Single-Bad-5951@reddit
Or it was the teachings of Jesus and the council of Jerusalem that superceded it?
JasminTheManSlayer@reddit
Maybe except we don’t know what Jesus taught because we cannot trust the NT.
Single-Bad-5951@reddit
It has more historical evidence than most documents of that time
JasminTheManSlayer@reddit
I never said we could. I specifically pointed out the NT because it literally claims to be written by humans.
Single-Bad-5951@reddit
Everything is written by humans?
JasminTheManSlayer@reddit
Doesn’t Torah claim to be divine scripture handed to Moses
Single-Bad-5951@reddit
That's a fair point, the ten commandments were claimed to be given to Moses on stone tablets
EvaUnit_03@reddit
"The council can kiss my ass!!"
Commander Sheppard
Liebermode@reddit
I'm not disagreeing with you, i mentioned that verse to debunk the whole issue with accountability within christianity, about how jesus somehow absolved every sins that his followers commited by having himself crucified, even if among those christians are the likes of leopold, churchill, cromwell, etc.
Personally i blame paul for making this stuff even much more of a mess
JasminTheManSlayer@reddit
But that’s the thing most Christian sects have the doctrine of faith alone for salvation. I think Catholicism is the only one that emphases faith and works. Sola fide or whatever.
Skull_kids@reddit
You're arguements are all over the place and make no sense.
Why is that? It's because you have very little understanding of both scripture and church history.
JasminTheManSlayer@reddit
No my argument is pretty consistent. Christians ignore half of their own Bible except whenever it’s convenient.
Christians like to say there is personal accountability but then they say all you need to do is believe Jesus is God in human form and died brutally on a cross. Doing that ‘saves you’ even tho you could be a piece of garbage.
Skull_kids@reddit
Give an example
This is a protestant misconception.
James 2:24 KJV [24] Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only.
It is talked about in the first few ecumenical councils.
1 John 5:7 KJV [7] For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.
JasminTheManSlayer@reddit
So about 37 percent of Christians.
https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2011/12/19/global-christianity-exec/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Also if you scroll up, I did say Catholics were the exception.
Early Christians Trinity
It is talked about in the first few ecumenical councils.
1 John 5:7 KJV [7] For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.
The irony is that King James was a Protestant.
That part is added later. The original Greek said “There are three that testify”
The Johannine Comma is a phrases added later.
This is the New Revised Standard Version Updated
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20John%205%3A7&version=NRSVUE
That chapter is referring to the three as the blood, water, and spirit
That verse high lights exactly why you shouldn’t trust the Bible because passages can be added and left for interpretation
Skull_kids@reddit
Fallacy
You can look up the Greek text for yourself and see this is not the case.
The Roman Catholic Church is currently, and has been for hundreds of years, excommunicated. Not understanding only goes to show that your claim of knowledge surrounding church history is moot.
Which is not what protestants believe and what you just did.
If you would bother researching then you can stop making false assertions.
Life_Grape_1408@reddit
The Old Testament isn't Christian law. It is included in the Bible for historical context. The whole point of Christianity is the New Covenant between God and man which removes most of the purification rituals and laws as being requirements for salvation and replaced them with faith in God and Jesus.
I'm not even a Christian and I know this. You just hate Christians for some reason. 👃
JasminTheManSlayer@reddit
The point is Christians pick and choose what part of Old Testament to follow. Meanwhile they have no reason to believe in the NT
Which is pretty much bull shit because it removes personal accountability
Because most are dishonest hypocrites
Keirndmo@reddit
"Col. 2:16 Therefore no one is to act as your judge in regard to food or drink or in respect to a festival or a new moon or a Sabbath day — Col. 2:17 things which are a mere shadow of what is to come; but the substance belongs to Christ."
JasminTheManSlayer@reddit
Like I said. Christian’s like to disregard the Old Testament whenever convenient.
Keirndmo@reddit
I'll pray for you that someday your heart will be softened and eager to seek the living God.
KeyboardSheikh@reddit
And I wish for more wishes!!
JasminTheManSlayer@reddit
My heart is plenty soft. That’s why I’m not a Christian. The entire faith is built around the unjust and unfair torture of a figure. But that’s ok because humans were born inherently dirty because of something their forefathers have done.
I’m not against religion. But if any religion is true it’s definitely not Christianity
xinorez1@reddit
Pray for long knives instead. That one might actually come true
jeron_gwendolen@reddit
Bro...
DonaldLucas@reddit
That's the government.
automatic_shark@reddit
Why does this make so much sense? This place is supposed to be a shithole
pemboo@reddit
I've said it once, and I'll say it again
It's a massive coincidence that every culture from every time period that has come across them has independently had a problem with them, I don't know how you would explain that
BittJan@reddit
It was literally just euros and muslims, and neither of them arrived at it independently.
Sleep-more-dude@reddit
Assyrians, Babylonians, Caananites, Egyptians, Edomites, Romans, Yuan, Greeks, Hellenists etc also took issue with them.
fiftyfourseventeen@reddit
So euros and muslims
Sleep-more-dude@reddit
The Yuan were known for their strong European features and love of halal food.
fiftyfourseventeen@reddit
That's the only one in your list that isn't in the north east Africa / Arabian peninsula or southern Europe area
Sleep-more-dude@reddit
Well if you want to be pedantic then surely you noticed that none of them were Muslims and that calling the Romans or Hellenes "Euro" makes little sense when they were Med / Eastern for the most part.
Zestyclose_Zone_9253@reddit
Northern mediterranian, famously not part of Europe, featuring countries like Greece and Italy
Sleep-more-dude@reddit
When it comes to non-Latin Emperors you have more from MENA than northern Europe (pre-fall), like parts of Africa have been Roman longer than parts of Northern Europe, it was very much a med empire , ergo "mare nostrum"
Zestyclose_Zone_9253@reddit
Why are you mentioning northern Europe? I said northern mediterranian. Which is part of Europe.
Sleep-more-dude@reddit
Europe consists of more than southern Europe ; if you are just looking at Graeco-Roman civ by itself then it makes no sense to call it European, it takes very little from it. You can say that European civ is modeled on Graeco-Roman civ but they are very different things , It makes no sense to call ancient countries by modern geographical designations because Rome took more from Africa and the Middle East than it did most of Europe and likewise settled Libya, Syria etc longer than England, Germany etc.
That's essentially why people call it a Mediterranean empire.
Atraidis_@reddit
This is like referring to native Americans as Canadians or Mexicans
BittJan@reddit
Literally couldn't find a single piece of evidence that the Yuan had an issue with jews.
Sleep-more-dude@reddit
Well if you want a basic history lesson; the Yuan long persecuted Muslims and Jews because they found their customs at odds with Mongolians (particularly dietary and religious restrictions) , eventually things got so bad that both the Jews and Muslims joined the Chinese nationalist movement and helped overthrow the Yuan.
The outcome of this was that when the Ming dynasty banned foreign religions like Christianity they gave a free pass to both Judaism and Islam and considered them "traditional Chinese religions".
Also if you want to research it further just note that the Chinese name for Jew and Muslim in that era is essentially identical (Hui) , but the name for Jews will be something like "Hui who don't eat sciatic nerve" or something along those lines.
The_Atlas_Broadcast@reddit
The first five on that list are neither European nor Muslim.
AnonymousZiZ@reddit
So every people they came in contact with.
Chadzuma@reddit
When exactly do you think Islam was founded?
LogoKidd@reddit
Do you know that people from different countries can talk, right?
nycapartmentnoob@reddit
literally not true at all
pemboo@reddit
Oh? Who tolerated them then?
Tempeoro@reddit
India too
violent_knife_crime@reddit
Persia?
cat-l0n@reddit
Under Cyrus the great, yeah
violent_knife_crime@reddit
Um, no I don't tolerate them
nycapartmentnoob@reddit
fuck off, "who didn't tolerate them?", it's not my burden of proof for random dumb shit that comes out of your mouth
darcenator411@reddit
I thought Jews were only safe in Israel? That’s what Netanyahu told me
nycapartmentnoob@reddit
youre a moron if u believe what top comment said
HonestlySyrup@reddit
or maybe the christian elite picks the pocket of their peasants, and pins it on jews? the christian elite likes the jewish theory of economics until the peasants realize they're getting fucked. your elite doesnt care. you're the ones being sold out
kanny_jiller@reddit
Oh no your reddit shekels!!!
ButtscootBigpoop@reddit
lmao this was hilarious
HonestlySyrup@reddit
thats not the point. i dont care about my internet points. im connecting it to the "act of downvoting" my point intrinsically makes you an NPC. its an internal thing. my points are irrelevant.
the point went over your NPC smooth brain
Sleep-more-dude@reddit
“The {{removed}} are an ignorant and barbarous people, who have long united the most sordid avarice with the most detestable superstition and the most invincible hatred for every people by whom they are tolerated and enriched.” - Voltaire
DiCePWNeD@reddit
They hate em cause they ain't em
unloadedcode@reddit
4chan trying not to be antisemitic conspiracy theorists challenge impossible.
DIAL8_LMAO@reddit (OP)
cope
Jack-of-Hearts-7@reddit
MFW It's actually Christianity
ChiefSitsOnCactus@reddit
this is how every religion works (sans like bahai or whatever)
demonstrably untrue
far more of these people are athiest/jewish
see above
the slavery and genocide are bad, but far from unique to christianity, or religion as a whole. nearly every group of people in the world have engaged in it
this was true until recently, but also means nothing lol
65/100 you can do better
Jack-of-Hearts-7@reddit
You didn't have to lie to me
ChiefSitsOnCactus@reddit
keep replying to everyone else but me pussy i btfoed you too hard
ChiefSitsOnCactus@reddit
3 members of the Forbes 400 are christian: Do Won Chang (forever 21), David Green (hobby lobby), and Dan Cathy (Chickfila). The rest are atheist or jewish
leastemployableman@reddit
In reality, they're all atheist and hide behind religion and religious based charities.
Jack-of-Hearts-7@reddit
Also, where did I say that only Christians did genocide? It's a known fact that most slave owners throughout the US were christians.
My point of this is that everything people accuse Jews of, Christians actually do.
ChillbroBaggins10@reddit
Yeah I forgot the time that Christians bombed a US research ship and also established an ethno-religious apartheid state that bases its entire identity on being a victim.
Jack-of-Hearts-7@reddit
Christians literally almost wiped out an entire race. They were also made Jim Crow. So...
ChillbroBaggins10@reddit
Lmfao dude. Nazis were about as Christian as they were socialist. The Catholic Church only signed an agreement to guarantee no persecution from Germany…which was swiftly broken.
Unless you didn’t mean Nazis. Then I’d just call you an idiot because slavery was more rooted in class and hierarchy than religion.
Jack-of-Hearts-7@reddit
Wasn't talking about Nazis dipshit. I was talking about Natives...
ChillbroBaggins10@reddit
Again, not Christians. European settlers and American expansionism.
Jack-of-Hearts-7@reddit
What was the main religion amongst them? Jainism?
What religion was taught to the ones forced into boarding schools? Judaism?
ChillbroBaggins10@reddit
What was the main religion that pushed their ideals? Shintoism?
What religion was used as being chosen by God, thus essentially genociding the original inhabitants due to ancient scripture? Rastafarianism?
You are so busy licking Zionist boots that you fail to see that Americans and Canadians wanted to “normalize” and “assimilate” Natives into society. They cut their hair, changed their clothes, took away their native tongue. Of course they’d teach them religion on top of it.
Jack-of-Hearts-7@reddit
What the fuck is your point even? The fact is they were forced to be Christians by Christians.
Zionists didn't do that.
EvaUnit_03@reddit
Its not that simple because the Christians sent here, were sent here with the understanding that they'd all die horribly. Because it was a denomination that was pissing the king off.
And that's true of the French, Spanish, Dutch, and every crown empire that came to the America's. It wasn't until they started somehow surviving that they were like "fuck.. alright time to lane grab properly for the empire!" Forcing the natives to do anything barely worked and that's why every nation was more into fighting the natives instead of trying to convert them. The natives just wanted the fuckers to fuck off. And the peaceful natives got the most brutal of treatments because they'd have rather lived and suffered than died fighting.
The only religious empire that didn't try that was the jews, because they lacked proper organization. But there's more than one way to win a game of civilization 6.
Skull_kids@reddit
I can go around robbing stores disguised as a black man. It doesn't make me black and can only fool people in the most superficial capacity.
ChiefSitsOnCactus@reddit
i see right through you dude lol
DaerBear69@reddit
Quite literally still true. We've never had a president who wasn't Christian. For that matter, we practically had riots the first time we got a non-Protestant president.
ChiefSitsOnCactus@reddit
i dont believe that clinton, obama, or trump are christian, we just live in a christian majority country, and they want to appeal to voters. the bushes/biden maybe believed at some point, but certainly are no longer practicing
DaerBear69@reddit
Obama was known to go to church every Sunday even after he won his second term.
DonaldLucas@reddit
Sionliar@reddit
IIRC the slave trade was done for profit, not religion.
Jack-of-Hearts-7@reddit
Who provided most of that profit? Who was the main buyer of slaves in America? Hindus?
Sionliar@reddit
It was plantation owners, simple as.
Jack-of-Hearts-7@reddit
What was the religion most of them followed? Sikhism?
KingofTheTorrentine@reddit
Protestants actually. At least the worst type.
Jack-of-Hearts-7@reddit
So Christians? Gotcha.
Zestyclose_Zone_9253@reddit
Are you retarded? Why are you having a pissing contest about what religion the people who did bad thing followed? At least 90% of all that has been mentioned was done for non-religious purpose. Unless you are a zealot you won't do or not do stuff beyond praying for a religious cause.
Circadianrivers@reddit
There was an interesting post I read that the Vatican/Jesuits were actually the evil deep state that people claim Jews to be. Makes sense to me ngl.
Outrageous-Rope-8707@reddit
It’s so funny to see small hats blamed for everything. My favorite is “Israel owns the US”. Israel is a western construct that provides the US a foothold in the Middle East so they fuck over the cave dwellers easier.
Nervous-Hair-2107@reddit
MFW I look at the Jewish lobby in the US. American Israel Public Affairs Committee
Outrageous-Rope-8707@reddit
AIPAC isn’t even the largest lobby, is it a surprise that Jews have more money to throw into lobbying?
Nervous-Hair-2107@reddit
I don’t know if you’re agreeing with me or not
Outrageous-Rope-8707@reddit
There’s nothing to agree to. Lobbying exists buddy.
Nervous-Hair-2107@reddit
So we agree then? Or are you saying anyone can lobby so jews aren’t special in this regard? I still wouldn’t be too surprised if all the major lobbies are jewish tho
Outrageous-Rope-8707@reddit
I mean, come on man. This comment shows that you’re ignorant (by its definition) and biased.
Sleep-more-dude@reddit
There's tons of US bases in the middle east ; Israel is not strategically that important (main regional bases are in Jordan and Turkey) ; it's a domestic issue driven by Christian evangelical voters and massive groups like CUFI.
NecessaryStrike6877@reddit
And which ethnicity holds disproportionate amounts of power over the United States...?
TheThalmorEmbassy@reddit
Irish Catholics
IILazarusLongII@reddit
WASPs.
Organic-Walk5873@reddit
The Irish
NecessaryStrike6877@reddit
Shamrocks! You weren't supposed to notice!
TheThalmorEmbassy@reddit
Israel owns America in the same way that South Vietnam and Francoist Spain owned America
Defective_Falafel@reddit
Who owned the ships?
-Herpderpwalrus-@reddit
Christians did you retard
Slavery and Human Progress (1984) and Inhuman Bondage: The Rise and Fall of Slavery in the New World (2006)
Econocide: British Slavery in the Era of Abolition (1977)
The Root article: "The Truth About Jews and the Slave Trade" (2010)
Defective_Falafel@reddit
author: David Brion Davis, converted jew
author: Seymour Drescher, jew
I can only find a podcast with this title by someone called Michael L. Brown, and you can already fucking guess.
Got anything else?
-Herpderpwalrus-@reddit
"Nor were Jews prominent in the slave trade. Of the 40 slave merchants in South Carolina, only 1 minor trader was a Jew." [paragraph goes on to list similar breakdowns for other US states] – Marvin Perry, Frederick M. Schweitzer: Antisemitism: Myth and Hate from Antiquity to the Present, p. 245. Palgrave Macmillan, 2002; ISBN 0-312-16561-7
"In no period did Jews play a leading role as financiers, shipowners, or factors in the transatlantic or Caribbean slave trades. They possessed far fewer slaves than non-Jews in every British territory in North America and the Caribbean. Even when Jews in a handful of places owned slaves in proportions slightly above their representation among a town's families, such cases do not come close to corroborating the assertions of The Secret Relationship." – Wim Klooster (University of Southern Maine): Review of Jews, Slaves, and the Slave Trade: Setting the Record Straight by Eli Faber[permanent dead link] (2000). "Reappraisals in Jewish Social and Intellectual History", William and Mary Quarterly Review of Books. Volume LVII, Number 1. Omohundro Institute of Early American History and Culture[ISBN missing]
• "Medieval Christians greatly exaggerated the supposed Jewish control over trade and finance and also became obsessed with alleged Jewish plots to enslave, convert, or sell non-Jews... Most European Jews lived in poor communities on the margins of Christian society; they continued to suffer most of the legal disabilities associated with slavery. ... Whatever Jewish refugees from Brazil may have contributed to the northwestward expansion of sugar and slaves, it is clear that Jews had no major or continuing impact on the history of New World slavery." – Professor David Brion Davis of Yale University in Slavery and Human Progress (New York: Oxford University Press, 1984), p. 89 (cited in Shofar FTP Archive File: orgs/american/wiesenthal.center//web/historical-facts Archived 2018-10-01 at the Wayback Machine)
• "The Jews of Newport seem not to have pursued the [slave trading] business consistently ... [When] we compare the number of vessels employed in the traffic by all merchants with the number sent to the African coast by Jewish traders ... we can see that the Jewish participation was minimal. It may be safely assumed that over a period of years American Jewish businessmen were accountable for considerably less than two percent of the slave imports into the West Indies" – Professor Jacob R. Marcus of Hebrew Union College in The Colonial American Jew (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1970), Vol. 2, pp. 702-703 (cited in Shofar FTP Archive File: orgs/american/wiesenthal.center//web/historical-facts )
• "None of the major slave-traders was Jewish, nor did Jews constitute a large proportion in any particular community. ... probably all of the Jewish slave-traders in all of the Southern cities and towns combined did not buy and sell as many slaves as did the firm of Franklin and Armfield, the largest Negro traders in the South." – Bertram W. Korn, Jews and Negro Slavery in the Old South, 1789-1865, in The Jewish Experience in America, ed. Abraham J. Karp (Waltham, Massachusetts: American Jewish Historical Society, 1969), Vol 3, pp. 197-198 (cited in Shofar FTP Archive File: orgs/american/wiesenthal.center//web/historical-facts )
• "[There were] Jewish owners of plantations, but altogether they constituted only a tiny proportion of the Southerners whose habits, opinions, and status were to become decisive for the entire section, and eventually for the entire country. ... [Only one Jew] tried his hand as a plantation overseer even if only for a brief time." – Bertram W. Korn, "Jews and Negro Slavery in the Old South, 1789-1865", The Jewish Experience in America, ed. Abraham J. Karp (Waltham, Massachusetts: American Jewish Historical Society, 1969), Vol 3, p. 180 (cited in Shofar FTP Archive File: orgs/american/wiesenthal.center//web/historical-facts )
●https://www.jstor.org/stable/1051402
●https://archive.org/details/jewsamericanslav0000frie
Unless you're going to respond with academic peer reviewed research that proves jews were responsible for the trans-atlantic slave trade and not european christians, then consider KILLING yourself. Thanks babe 🥰🥰
PM-ME-BOOBSANDBUTTS@reddit
only a fed would have this much pro-jew propaganda on speed dial. couldn't be more obvious
-Herpderpwalrus-@reddit
Literally wikipedia has them listed. It took one google search. Antisemitic morons like yourself just can't think hard enough to use tools though.
Jack-of-Hearts-7@reddit
Ah yes, the "middle passage" dog whistle.
Christians, mostly
the_count_of_carcosa@reddit
I mean the Muslims did a hell of a lot more slave trading than Christians,
And that was a religious state doing it rather than a company.
IILazarusLongII@reddit
Quite a lot of the people actually running the slave trade were not Christian.
HonestlySyrup@reddit
thats the point though, why are you denouncing it?? have you even read judges?
"In those days the Israelites did not have a king"
this Israelites STILL have no king. and they will bypass the need for a king by overthrowing the Ayatollah, finding a reincarnation of Cyrus (likely a zoroastrian or brahmin), and becoming an independent region under the NeoNeoPersian Empire,. The NeoCyrus will give a new "Edict" to build a new temple in Jerusalem.
what aren't you seeing??
MacaronWorth6618@reddit
You are neglecting the fact that Zoroaster was a Serb
mark2talyho@reddit
So still not real white. What’s the problem?
HonestlySyrup@reddit
white people are actually pink bro.
here's the people with "khvarenah" -- the "brilliance of the sun", like a gold sheen
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aryan
MacaronWorth6618@reddit
Serbs are the originators of society nordcuck
HonestlySyrup@reddit
iranian?
Ok_Medicine7534@reddit
It makes more sense when you realize they stole it all from Annunaki texts - written in STONE 3000 years before the Jews were a twinkle in the eye of Yahweh…
WernerWindig@reddit
lol "stole". As much as the Greek stole their Mythos from the Egyptians, or the Romans stealing from the Greek. It's all interconnected and understandable similar.
Ok_Medicine7534@reddit
Lol… keep perpetuating the lie that somehow copying texts written in stone is “interconnected and similar “…. Use that one when stealing a Sony song or copyright and tell the Jewish owners “the song is interconnected and understandably similar”…
“Werner”
WernerWindig@reddit
ok, just for the lulz, let's link those texts you're talking about.
InternationalFrend@reddit
3 Generationen sind genug Werner, wir können jetzt damit aufhören.
Axile28@reddit
More like inspiration. Human beings tend to polygamise their culture and religion for stability. Not sure why you're so cynical about it.
EvaUnit_03@reddit
To be fair, they worshipped other gods because the Y man didn't pay attention to them. New found documents suggest baal was the one who freed them from Egypt based on recent script findings. And they had to get on Yahwehs good side because baal can be a bit of a genocidal monster.
Boy, did they not know yahweh lol.
At the end of the day, the Jewish faith just kept eating and merging with other religions when they made their stories sound better. Once human story telling became global, that's when reading comprehension started to become the forefront of 'no, you are wrong and I'm right!'
LorgeMorg@reddit
Pretty sure every single religion has some kind of out or repentance in them or they wouldn't of lasted. The shit was added later when the people making it up realized it was impossible to follow. People probably just said fuck it, I'm going to hell no matter what, gonna go ham on all the sins.
They went chill dude, you can still go to heaven as long as you pay us money and come to this big building once in a while. Also this fella needs to bite the end of your son's dick off.
Skull_kids@reddit
EvaUnit_03@reddit
The only two religions we can look into that about are Islam and Christianity, what with them being the newest and biggest scisms. The other religions are so old that they existed becore writing. And yes, every 'denomination' has a 'get out of hell free card'.
Typically, it is something like die for your god vs the baddies. Or just pray harder but like you mean it this time. Or have a human who claims to be Divine pray with you because he's got connections with the guy upstairs. Even Jesus made it something like 10x easier to get in because all you had to do was believe in him and at least try to be decent, but he totally gets if you fail because God made you this way. i hear the catholics have been big for a while on buying your way in by giving to the church. They even used to LITERALLY sell get out of hell free cards like a damn game of monopoly. Just don't lose it!
Skull_kids@reddit
Islam: Go to hell, always, to be purified
Christianity: Follow God and be saved through grace
"Christian" denomination/sect/cult/heresy: You are saved as long as you "believe"/obtain esoteric understandings / pay money and do what we say / things that are obviously incongruent if you look into it
You can say Catholicism has a "get out of jail free" clause. Except their propositions are not substantiated by scripture or any oral traditions. It's dogma, created for reasons I'm too stupid to remember. Meaning it's not real.
You can say Gnostics have a "get out of jail free" clause. How exactly is obtaining some hidden mystic piece of information, which the original disciples taught by Jesus supposedly could barely or not even grasp, a "free pass"?
Further, even if all it takes is to be a "good boy". That would mean limiting your will, in a specific way, your entire life. How exactly is that "free"?
Seeing as how the original claim was "All religion seems to grant a free pass to salvation.". What I would ask is what about religions that include no salvation? What about the religions that exist solely to spread death seemingly for the sake of death?
_illuminati666@reddit
downvoted, blocked, and reported
darvinvolt@reddit
Now let's read all of the religious texts and history books related to Abrahamic religions and try to discern who is an unreliable narrator, who is a propoganda spewer, who is the holiest and who is literally the spawn of Satan. Spoiler alert: it's all of them all at once.
Gotta give it to God, created straight up the funniest sitcom
American_Crusader_15@reddit
My boy Moses turned his back for like 5 minutes and came back to bull worship.
Jan_Jinkle@reddit
The Old Testament is just that but replace “Moses” with “God” and “bull worship” with “fill-in-the-blank worship”
EvaUnit_03@reddit
Yeah. They'd pray to anything that would give them what they wanted. And the old testament wasn't shy about other gods existing.
The whole Moses trip was a deal god tried to make with them if they'd quit that shit and only worship him. And they couldn't hold that deal for even a month. So he made them go in circles for 40 years only to settle back like 1 days walk from where they started. That's about the time he got real smite-y, too. I can't imagine why.
callmekarlwithak@reddit
I wouldn't say the old testament wasn't shy about other gods existing, I can't think of a single moment in the old testament where other gods actually did anything. All the mentions are of people worshipping them, and the gods not being able to do anything because they don't exist.
Ok_Medicine7534@reddit
Moses had no GPS… 40 years for a 2 days walk…
That’s what happens when your tablet is linked to the cloud I guess…
xxcali559xx@reddit
Praise pepe
nikoll-toma@reddit
based
cosplay-degenerate@reddit
Ancient 4chan posters.
LemonPartyW0rldTour@reddit
Smiting in my Golden Calf Enthusiast forum?
H1-DEF@reddit
Jews are Israelites but Israelites are not Jews. One tribe was just like nah Jesus was just a guy, let’s keep charging interest
TwumpyWumpy@reddit
Wait until you find out what the term "Israel" actually means.
bestarmylol@reddit
it's a nickname for Jacob
AntDracula@reddit
And it means?
KindStranger1337@reddit
Wrestles with God
TwumpyWumpy@reddit
/\
I I I I I
John_Paul_J2@reddit
"Is real"?
IrregularrAF@reddit
ermuhgurd it means "liars e"
UhOhPoopedIt@reddit
This post is basically sums up the entirety of Kings and Chronicles.
LEDDITmodsARElosers@reddit
That's actually a very good point
gunt_hunter14@reddit
“God responding”
Lol