Yeah.. male prison rape being so predominant in pooculture that little boys in primary school are already joking about not dropping the soap. I was In post grad before I ever conceived a thought about women raping each other in prison

Anyways IPV was originally defined as intimate partner violence in the study and aforementioned statistics, not inter-personal violence which would be way too broad. 

I don’t think he’s pretending anything by stating objective nih statistics, which not only spotlights the issue to the forefront- he even says not to minimize lesbian ipv as it’s not any less damaging. 

All he’s saying is that despite popular programming, women are capable of violence, too. And by the statistics, the sample of women seemingly committed more IPV than the male sample during the time period studied. The study could be a true representation or possibly skewed by several unknown causes that require additional studies. 

Anything drawn beyond that is your own subjective conclusions. My subjective conclusion is that the Trevor project is a joke and human nature includes violence. Further that maybe women feel more comfortable committing IPV since they know they are weak little girls who can’t inflict any real physical damage. Thus manipulation and coercion are included, too. 

Alas, the study only covered what has happened with certain people over a certain time - not why or definitively true in any sense.   Imagine thinking gays and lesbians have special unique causes for being violent beyond being a shitty person. They’re just like the rest of us except they’re horny triggers are inverted.  

Anyways we are wasting time and breath here… it’s an nih.gov resource and our Supreme Court justices can’t even identify what a woman is, so it’s just as likely every single straight, gay, lesbian, tri-queer participant sampled was born with a penis