Four former Democrats at UFC 309

[-]

PackAttacks@reddit

“Four conspiracy theorists at UFC 309” FTFY

[-]

WarmHeart@reddit

Which conspiracies are they theorizing?

[-]

ikefalcon@reddit

RFK believes in the chemtrails conspiracy theory.

Musk is constantly sharing conspiracy theories on X. Most recently the one about FEMA.

Trump believes that he won the 2020 election.

[-]

WarmHeart@reddit

Do you consider these to be conspiracies because the system told you so or is your area of expertise in one of these topics?

[-]

ikefalcon@reddit

It’s funny that you are invoking “the system,” whatever that is in your mind, because there are clever people who use your mistrust in “the system” to control you. They are in the picture.

[-]

WarmHeart@reddit

I find their evidence and arguments much more compelling than the system. Current controllers have brought terrible results, so change is needed regardless.

[-]

TheFuzzLlama2@reddit

So many troll bots on Reddit now, it gets tiring seeing it all.

[-]

Thiis is the sort of thing people say when they refuseto to acknowledge or don't have the capacity to understand the changing cultural and political landscape of America. I'm guessing you've some mental gymanastics that prevent you from referring to Republicans like Cheney's as grifters... I'm guessing.

[-]

EventuallyScratch54@reddit

Liz Chaney has kept her views she only supported Harris because of election denial being a huge issue.

[-]

noposlow@reddit

Like I said... mental gymanastics.

[-]

EventuallyScratch54@reddit

Americas " changing political culture" is changing for the worse. Tulsi used to have the same positions as Bernie are you saying Tulsi hasn't changed at all since then and Bernie should also become MAGA!

[-]

noposlow@reddit

Is it for the worse? A voter mandate says just the opposite. Or does Democracy only matter to the new Democratic party when they get the votes... but somehow, a free and fair election landslide for Trump is "a threat to Democracy."? No, what they mean to say is... it's a threat to Democrats. If the DNC cared about Democracy they'd actually allow their constituents to vote for the candidates they wanted rather than insert their people. Had the machine not turned on Gabbard, she would possibly be entering her second term as a Democrat president. But no, the DNC was so against her they pushed Harris into the VP role despite her clear ineptitude. Was Tulsi just supposed to roll over and accept the fate chosen for her by the DNC. The party of Democracy that's behaves like anything but...? No, her allegiance is to our constitution, not the party of hypocracy. I know that puts many leftists panties in a bunch, but hey.. keep pouting and keep losing... or figure out how to be better and go back to being the party of the working class. America just elected a robber baron as their next president because they felt he was a better option for their future than the Dems. Holy fuck Dems! Stop whining and figure it out! 1. Where did you lose your way? 2. Who are the cancers that need to go? Hint hint a couple examples rhyme with minton and stelosi.

[-]

CLUB770@reddit

Having a majority of the votes doesn't wipe away the rot of the GOP.

[-]

noposlow@reddit

I know a lot of Republicans who said, essentially, the same thing about Democrats in 2020. I thought they sounded ridiculous then... I think you sound ridiculous now.

[-]

CLUB770@reddit

Republicans like Tulsi? lol.

[-]

noposlow@reddit

I see you're one of those people who believe beliefs never evolve and change. Riiight... unless, of course, it's the beliefs of say... Biden, the once blatant racist "racial jungle" guy whose policies led to the incarceration of 10's of thousands of black people. Who was against school integration in hos state. Who clearly stated whe. Vice President that he did not support gay marriage. Then, of course, because well Democrat, then it's so different. No grifting there, just am honest change of beliefs. GTF outta here.

[-]

CLUB770@reddit

I'd love it if Tulsi apologized for her homophobia and Anti-trans views... that would be awesome.

[-]

VrindavanNidhivan@reddit (OP)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eLb3KVBErig

[-]

noposlow@reddit

Well, in fact

https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/rep-tulsi-gabbard-apologizes-past-anti-lgbtq-views-n959941

As for "Anti-trans" views. She is right. Biological males have no place on an athletic field with biological females. That's not anti trans it's pro women... and the majority of Americans agree with this. Calling that stance anti-trans is what is referred to as a red herring.

[-]

EventuallyScratch54@reddit

I suppose Dave Rubin hasn't changed his positions either.

[-]

No_Profit_415@reddit

Minor correction. I think you meant to say “Liz Cheney has kept her views. She’s still a chickenhawk. But she got butthurt over someone insulting daddy and noting her push for endless wars. So after manipulating witnesses failed, she supported someone who also hates her daddy because she hoped she would get some new friends. Now everyone hates her.”

[-]

PubliclyDisturbed@reddit

Tulsi is a grifter. Her career as a Democrat was over after she helped them defeat Bernie in the primary and after Hillary attacked her for calling out Kamala, so she left to join the Republicans where she thought she’d have better career options.

Grifters do what they do to help their career, not hurt it. Liz Cheney’s career has been hurt by standing up to Trump. She lost her senate seat. She may have called out Trump, but she isn’t flipping parties unlike Tulsi. Big difference between the two.

[-]

noposlow@reddit

Ahhhh. I understand. So because Liz and Harris lost... can't be grifters. Because Tulsi won... grifter. Had Trump lost, well then, of course, Tulsi was standing up to the DNC . Ya, absolutely makes perfect sense. Stop. Just stop.

[-]

EventuallyScratch54@reddit

r/AlohaCult someone make that sub lol. Lots of downvotes from Russian bots

[-]

No_Profit_415@reddit

Ok where to start. First, Gabbard was opposed to the DNC’s steamrolling Sanders. Hillary attacked her because she saw her as a threat…to Hillary. She became an independent several years later then a Republican about a month ago. Liz Cheney was in the House, not the Senate. She lost her House seat by 35% because she was spending all her time sucking up to the MSNBC crowd and manipulating witnesses during the fake Jan 6 “hearings” (which she is gonna need to answer for). She spent almost no time in her district and the people there figured out what she really wanted was fawning PR in DC. Anyone arguing that Liz Cheney is some beacon of credibility vs Tulsi Gabbard is smoking ditch weed.

[-]

catchingtherosemary@reddit

no grifting going on here.... that is unless you are using the word in a way the word doesn't mean. Tulsi has stood for the exact same principles since she first came to Congress. Nothing has changed aside from her party and political friends.

[-]

EventuallyScratch54@reddit

Where was Tulsi when biden pulled out of afganistan? You're literally in the Aloha cult. If Tulsi thinks Trump is Saudi Arabia's bitch why is she working for him now?

[-]

wenxuan27@reddit

wait trump pulled out of afghanistan lol. what are you even saying

[-]

SeasonsGone@reddit

The formal withdrawal from Afghanistan occurred under Biden it’s one of his most known scandals lmao

[-]

Elli7000@reddit

Still, it was grassroot Democrats that volunteered and elected her a half dozen times. If not for Democrats in her hometown, nobody’d have heard of her.

[-]

catchingtherosemary@reddit

Principles / Party..... sounds like she is good at politics.

[-]

Elli7000@reddit

She’s disloyal to the people who got her there in the first place. I liked her and defended her against the dumbass Hillary and View remarks about her. And this is what she gave us. She sold out the very ppl who got her to Congress 5 straight elections.

[-]

ItsKrakenmeuptoo@reddit

She is 100% a democrat in red clothing. Dems should be happy she is there. In 2020, she endorsed Biden too over Trump.

I’m surprised republicans aren’t upset lol.

[-]