Did the sentiment in this sub's comments make a U-turn the after the election was called?

Posted by ahk525@reddit | tulsi | View on Reddit | 22 comments

During the electoral campaign, sentiment on this sub's comments was strongly anti-Tulsi. After the election ended, suddenly this sub's comments are largely pro-Tulsi.

Do you agree with this observation? Why do you think such a change happened?

If you look at some pre-election threads on undelete.pullpush.io, you'll also notice that some staunchly anti-Tulsi accounts were deleted (alongside their posts) around election night.

You can see two of them by looking at the blue comments:

https://undelete.pullpush.io/r/tulsi/comments/1f1vm89/tulsi_endorses_president_trump/ https://undelete.pullpush.io/r/tulsi/comments/1gdkkd3/its_not_a_ploy_or_exaggeration_trump_will_do_what/

Do you believe this sub might have been a victim of astroturfing? Do you believe astroturfing even happen on reddit, or is there not enough evidence to believe so?

This article seems to contain very damning evidence for reddit content and vote manipulation by the Kamala Harris campaign. PLEASE NOTE though that although the evidence they present seems very compelling, many consider The Federalist to not be a credible source (but then again, who can we believe in 2024 when mainstream TV channels repeated for months that 2024 Biden was "sharp as a tack" and "the best version of Biden ever").