I guess in some ways it could be considered somewhat simple as in it has a single engine with no special equipment like superchargers and its throttle was essentially just a “go” lever
But flightwise, it had stability issues and Lippisch was against new pilots flying the design. The type also had to contend with unreliable engines, poor gliding characteristics, and structural glue failures
Jet engines without FADEC can actually be damaged rather easily if you don’t know what you are doing. Once had a pilot add a lot more fuel when he had a hung start. That was expensive…
It was to show the direction of the jet intake and mark it clearly for ground staff to see.
In the early days people were not as used to jet engines as we are now, and there were a lot of issues with people getting too close and items/people getting sucked into the intake. Because they didn't have any obvious external moving parts, in the early days many who were inexperienced/untrained with the engines would accidentally wander too close.
It was even more of an issue with the He162 as the engine was mounted on the top above the fuselage which was pretty unconventional and also made it less likely you'd subconsciously notice it as it wouldn't necessarily be in your eyeline or at body height like the engines on the 262.
I am sorry I do not mean to be overly confrontational. If it were true that the arrow was a safety/hazard warning of some sort we might expect it to be on other Luftwaffe jet aircraft. Like the Me 262. Yet it is only on the He 162.
I do not think your theory is true. Can you supply evidence or a source to support your ideas?
I have read an explanation for the arrow and other markings of the nose of the He 162. But I really want to hear your source please.
I'm with ya. Thats ridiculous. Maybe the pitot as someone else as suggested, but that felt like bs. I was expecting it to end with in "1998 when Mankind something something hell in the cell"
but the arrow is on the nose, the jet intake is above and behind the canopy.
Its probably more about the pitot tube sticking out of the nose of the plane, so somebody does not walk into it.
Yeah its engine may love to overheat, and the glue may have been next to worthless, and it may have been top heavy and hard to fly for the 15 year old conscripts it was designed for, but it has a certain elegant beauty to me that even beats out the 262. I blame Blazing Angels 2.
Prison sabotage was a big issue with concentration camp labor. I worked with a fellow who was a Polish slave labor on the JU-52 assembly line. The stories he told me about their methods of sabotage would fill a book.
Makes sense - as small as you can get away with, for a short-range interceptor, means using a minimum of materials, many of which were in short supply.
Yeah, I'm not really sure why, but this is one of my favorite ww2 fighters. I'd love to see a modern recreation at some point (with better manufacturing and a more reliable engine design).
G8M8N8@reddit
The only “weird” thing in my mind is that they wanted everyday civilians to fly them
Zebidee@reddit
This is just like a smaller Cirrus SF50.
Compared to the piston planes of the same era, it was probably easier to fly.
MaJ0Mi@reddit
It had a reputation to be hard to fly, didn't it?
LightningFerret04@reddit
I guess in some ways it could be considered somewhat simple as in it has a single engine with no special equipment like superchargers and its throttle was essentially just a “go” lever
But flightwise, it had stability issues and Lippisch was against new pilots flying the design. The type also had to contend with unreliable engines, poor gliding characteristics, and structural glue failures
Flyingtower2@reddit
Jet engines without FADEC can actually be damaged rather easily if you don’t know what you are doing. Once had a pilot add a lot more fuel when he had a hung start. That was expensive…
Termsandconditionsch@reddit
A jet fighter mostly made of wood and at least initially terrible glue is also a bit weird.
speedyundeadhittite@reddit
It worked for Mosquito..
Termsandconditionsch@reddit
Sure, but the Mosquito was not designed for 800km/h.
Though the main issue was that the plywood/adhesive factory got bombed.
AceArchangel@reddit
And it ended up being more complicated than they intended haha
speedyundeadhittite@reddit
Well, the arrow should have simplified things, jusdt point that towards the bomber and you're done.
RandoDude124@reddit
Kids for that matter too.
incidel@reddit
It's landing characteristics were awfully close to the F-104...
PerfectionOfaMistake@reddit
Its Volksjäger its Jagt Volks.
Quowe_50mg@reddit
Volkskäger is a craazy name for a german ww2 plane
Wulfrank@reddit
Thank goodness there's a big red arrow to let us know which direction it's supposed to fly in. Otherwise, I'd have no clue.
BriocheTressee@reddit
But for real what is the purpose of the arrow ?
Furaskjoldr@reddit
It was to show the direction of the jet intake and mark it clearly for ground staff to see.
In the early days people were not as used to jet engines as we are now, and there were a lot of issues with people getting too close and items/people getting sucked into the intake. Because they didn't have any obvious external moving parts, in the early days many who were inexperienced/untrained with the engines would accidentally wander too close.
It was even more of an issue with the He162 as the engine was mounted on the top above the fuselage which was pretty unconventional and also made it less likely you'd subconsciously notice it as it wouldn't necessarily be in your eyeline or at body height like the engines on the 262.
waldo--pepper@reddit
I am sorry I do not mean to be overly confrontational. If it were true that the arrow was a safety/hazard warning of some sort we might expect it to be on other Luftwaffe jet aircraft. Like the Me 262. Yet it is only on the He 162.
I do not think your theory is true. Can you supply evidence or a source to support your ideas?
I have read an explanation for the arrow and other markings of the nose of the He 162. But I really want to hear your source please.
waytosoon@reddit
I'm with ya. Thats ridiculous. Maybe the pitot as someone else as suggested, but that felt like bs. I was expecting it to end with in "1998 when Mankind something something hell in the cell"
lavardera@reddit
but the arrow is on the nose, the jet intake is above and behind the canopy.
Its probably more about the pitot tube sticking out of the nose of the plane, so somebody does not walk into it.
RLoret@reddit (OP)
Yeah, I definitely think it’s that pitot tube.
BriocheTressee@reddit
Thank you for your explanation :p
lavardera@reddit
but the arrow is on the nose, the jet intake is above and behind the canopy. Its probably more about the pitot tube sticking out of the nose of the plane, so somebody does not walk into it.
BriocheTressee@reddit
Makes sense too. Dual purpose arrow !
Phosphorus444@reddit
To be fair, I'm not sure anyone involved knew either.
DerekWylde1996@reddit
I love this last ditch piece of shit.
Yeah its engine may love to overheat, and the glue may have been next to worthless, and it may have been top heavy and hard to fly for the 15 year old conscripts it was designed for, but it has a certain elegant beauty to me that even beats out the 262. I blame Blazing Angels 2.
Henning-the-great@reddit
I love the design of this lil fellow. I also love the D variant with the forward swept wings and the V tail.
Rich_Razzmatazz_112@reddit
It would have been fiiiiiiiiine
9999AWC@reddit
Eric Brown really loved flying it. It seemed to be a perfectly sound design, as long as you trusted its manufacturing and glue holding it together.
Foreign_Athlete_7693@reddit
Particularly considering the concentration camp prisoners being forced to make it would sometimes piss on the glue to stop it from drying properly😅
55pilot@reddit
Prison sabotage was a big issue with concentration camp labor. I worked with a fellow who was a Polish slave labor on the JU-52 assembly line. The stories he told me about their methods of sabotage would fill a book.
chromatophoreskin@reddit
Something about this picture looks tilt-shifted, like the plane is a toy.
SubcommanderMarcos@reddit
I think the way it's painted too, makes it really look like a die-cast
horace_bagpole@reddit
It really is a very small plane. They have one under restoration at Duxford, and it looks tiny alongside even other contemporary aircraft.
theWunderknabe@reddit
Not that small - only slightly smaller than a Bf 109 and about as heavy.
CarlRJ@reddit
Makes sense - as small as you can get away with, for a short-range interceptor, means using a minimum of materials, many of which were in short supply.
buddyinjapan@reddit
I hate to say it but I love this plane.
Fwort@reddit
Yeah, I'm not really sure why, but this is one of my favorite ww2 fighters. I'd love to see a modern recreation at some point (with better manufacturing and a more reliable engine design).
murphsmodels@reddit
The Cirrus SF50 is about the closest we'll get.
MadjLuftwaffe@reddit
It's a really good looking design.
zevonyumaxray@reddit
That's the prototype for the Cirrus Vision Jet.