Here are two facts you should be aware of. First of all the first Amendment doesn't apply even at all unless it is alleged that it is the government that is trying to shut down the communication. That's constitutional law 101, and even Thomas, Alito, and the rest on SCOTUS will laugh you out of the building if you try to argue otherwise. But you may be hinting at is common law or state statutory law that allows private individuals to say nasty things about public figures depending on their status as public figures. But it's not absolute, if you well know from the laws of libel and slander, such as when what's her name won that libel judgement against Trump.

When it comes to personal attacks, anyone that's read our conversation we'll see that it is only you who has have done that with your "idiot" and so on. Show me one instance in which I attempt to lure our vast audience, and you know plenty of people are reading this, by calling you some sort of a name or declare your character to be immoral and so on. You can't. It just didn't happen. So again it would be wise not to mischaracterize me.

Anyway it was Trump himself who said that he rules by fear in an interview with Bob Woodward and Robert Costa on March 31st 2016 at the Old Post office pavilion at the Trump international Hotel Washington DC. "Real power is and I don't even want to use the word, fear."

Liberals on the other hand constantly strive to implement solutions that the public requests, thereby showing the liberals to be the true public servants. And they're always willing to adapt and modify the legislation if there's anything remotely affecting the legislation by any primary purpose of creating fear. For that primary purpose is of course Donald Trump's primary purpose. For instance, he keeps harping on this fear that the liberals are going to take away all your weapons and guns and eviscerate 2A, when nothing could be further from the truth. Yet another one of his Big Lies not unlike the Stop the Steal nonsense that he whipped up like the biggest brattiest baby in human history, and when he initiates a permanent dictatorship on day one of his new administration (which he already promised to do explicitly) one of his first actions will be to require all Americans to hand in their weapons because an armed public cannot be trusted to not use their weapons against the dictatorship. All rational dictatorships absolutely need to have a monopoly on gun ownership to survive. Take Trump's admiration for Vladimir Putin for example. Notice how he never mentions that Putin was responsible for eliminating all private gun ownership in the Russian Federation, enabling only those in the established military and police forces, and some authorized deputies always authorized by the state to own any weapons of any kind other than say a pitchfork or knife. And the gun nuts here other are completely ignorant of that fact, or if they know about it they just pretend it doesn't exist as if it's some sort of a flaw in The Matrix that they can ignore. There is a cruel but irresistible logic to this. The dictator must have this level of comolete control, and cannot abide a public that can turn on it at any moment. Liberals on the other hand are willing to put up with this risk while they protect the Second Amendment and don't try to overturn it like Trump is most certainly bound to do as his authoritarian dictatorship turns into a dynastic monarchy, so that when he dies Don Jr takes over and so forth, and of course that will be the end of any national presidential elections, which his administration will abolish that the stroke of a Sharpie with a good laugh and a nice long golf game afterwards. And when you get upset about this state of affairs it will be too late because your weapons will have been taken from you by Guess Who the big Donald Trump and his shock troops. So good luck with all that.