The Polish JN-1 Żabuś II was a tailless glider. An all-wooden design of Jarosław Naleszkiewicz equipped with an egg-shaped cabin for its single pilot. First flown in the summer of 1932, it had only three months of active life followed before it was damaged beyond repair. Painting by Robert Firszt.
Posted by MyDogGoldi@reddit | WeirdWings | View on Reddit | 41 comments
particlegun@reddit
In the first image, it looks like something from Nausicaa of the Valley of the Wind.
ALWanders@reddit
Wow, that is fascinating, doesn't look like it should work, but then I know F all about aeronautical engineering.
ManaMagestic@reddit
It's basically a t-tail...which is about as much as I can contribute.
LigerSixOne@reddit
It’s actually basically as far from a T-tail as it can get. A T-tails tail looks like a T.
nugohs@reddit
More like a H-Tail, and a very early precursor to the TIE-Fighter.
TheLandOfConfusion@reddit
But all that took place a long time ago…
d_andy089@reddit
😂
itsmejak78_2@reddit
From all the weird wings I've seen I'm not surprised at all I'm not surprised this flew to be honest
Correct_Path5888@reddit
But are you surprised though?
Ramdak@reddit
How is a straight wing stable?
Atmks@reddit
I doubt it was that stable, but it looks like the center of gravity is pushed pretty far forward. Think of it like a throwing dart with all the weight in the front, and the airfoil trailing behind for stability.
Double-Birthday-6748@reddit
The centre of gravity is not really far forward, it's barely in front of the wing itself. I hate flying wings but this is especially bad for instability. They're almost as infuriatingly idiotic as hot air balloons.
MasterofLego@reddit
Yup that's why the B21 is still a flying wing
theArcticChiller@reddit
If there's one thing stealth aircraft hate it's balloons
cmperry51@reddit
Reflex curve airfoil? The Pioneer tailless glider had that, IIRC
gardenfella@reddit
You can see the reflex curve in the second picture, towards the trailing edge of the wing root.
Mike312@reddit
I don't think it's actually straight, the drawing just looks like it.
The second picture, you can see the far wing is perpendicular to the camera, but the close wing sweeps back pretty steeply.
Still, probably not enough angle, hence the issues they had with it.
James_TF2@reddit
I just bought a 1/72 scale model kit for this funny thing. Can’t wait to add it to my ceiling display.
diogenesNY@reddit
This fits into a personal favorite category of r/WeirdWings :
Specifically aircraft you look at and say "Woah! That thing actually flew...?"
ventus1b@reddit
This looks like the grandfather of the AK-X by Akaflieg Karlsruhe.
https://akaflieg-karlsruhe.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Dreiseitenansicht-768x473.png
https://akaflieg-karlsruhe.de/en/ak-x_en/
recitegod@reddit
This thing with a modern flying computer... Sign me in. Even more so if it is a bit forward or rear swept. It looks so good.
RadiantFuture25@reddit
this looks like it would be unstable in all 3 axis so you fall out of the sky in any of the 3 directions, nice. maybe the poor view forwards might be a good thing?
Cessnaporsche01@reddit
Idk, it looks reeeeeeal roll-stable. Just, like, frighteningly unstable in yaw and especially pitch.
BlacksmithNZ@reddit
So funny to read that after I already posted wondering how pitch was controlled.
I mean we look at a single picture and suspect it would be "hard to control, being oversensitive in pitch both via elevator control and centre of gravity position"
How do people building and worse still, climbing into this and flying, not think the same?
And .. what 'elevator control'? Don't the wings have ailerons and not elevators?
Syrdon@reddit
You've got 90 years of airplane development on them. They were building this in 1932. The Wright brothers were less than 20 years earlier than this thing was built (and crashed, and abandoned...). This thing is still in the era of people trying to understand how planes worked, and information distribution was not nearly as good as it is now.
BlacksmithNZ@reddit
I thought after WW1, aircraft design had advanced a lot. At the same time as this, Polish designers were producing the RWD-6 which was quite advanced.
Amateur designers would have read books and magazines, and built models to test theories - like the Horton Brothers.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horten_H.I
Vinyl-addict@reddit
Yeah fuck this thing, seems insanely sketchy. Real gliders are sketchy enough feeling as is.
tommygun1688@reddit
Naaa, gliders aren't that sketchy.
BlacksmithNZ@reddit
Yaw.. maybe the wing tip rudders work
But pitch?
Without a tail to provide leverage, this thing would just dive or stall depending on CoG, wouldn't it? Does the pilot just lean forward/back to change the angle of attack?
RadiantFuture25@reddit
really wouldnt recommend leaning back
RadiantFuture25@reddit
i dunno. roll this thing and get a stalled or partial stalled wing and i think your looking backwards pretty fast. cant see those rudders having any effect on yaw apart from making you pivot really nicely.
semper_audacia@reddit
Why is the pilot sitting in it Norm MacDonald?
JetScreamerBaby@reddit
You can see everything except where you're going.
LeatherRole2297@reddit
What caused the mishap? Either the pilot sneezed or leaned back to abruptly…
Mysterious-Hat-6343@reddit
Thanks for this cool find!
danit0ba94@reddit
Looks like something straight out of a studio Ghibli film. I love it. Regardless of it practicalness or lack thereof. :P
righthandofdog@reddit
Dodgy af, but MAAaaaan is it pretty.
zevonyumaxray@reddit
This looks like half of a Star Wars B-wing heavy fighter.
ThreeHandedSword@reddit
Not sure this one was a good idea
codesnik@reddit
means "froggie"
MyDogGoldi@reddit (OP)
Image one source
Image two source