This is also more correct. The case is the opposite of what OP suggests. Even if women are choosing better men, they're having less kids overall, and they're often so busy working that they give their kids a switch or a phone to play with while they do something else and the kid grows up to be a nervous, incompetent wreck anyway.
Men with high (120+ IQ) tend to be virgins longer than mentally deficient men (80- IQ)
If we are talking about the West, women emancipation also increased miscegenation rates. And white women mostly miscegenate with men from populations where the average IQ is lower than that of Europeans. East Asians (the only big population that has higher average IQ than Europeans) are not more popular with European (incl. White American) women than European men despite their slightly higher average IQ.
more neurotypical
Emancipated women do not select for neurotypical. They don't select for autists, that's for sure, but they select for psycopaths, sociopaths and those with ADHD.
Strange, all the girls I knew married ne'er'-do-wells, philanderers, or high school/college/military drop outs....
Most of them are having their parents help raise their kids and all of the didn't stop living with mom and dad, in spite of having a "man" in their life, until they found their beta bucks to play Captain Save-a-hoe...
He’s right about how the loosening of sexual mores has greatly changed how sexual selection works and how the act of sex has taken on a new purpose in modern, post-industrial & post-internet society. This is a massive change that will have massive downstream effects, mostly in the form of very large amounts of people (in comparison to the past) not having any children at all.
Most of the sex people have nowadays doesn’t result in pregnancy & childbirth and many women have sex with many partners and won’t have nearly as many children as their predecessors. Much like how our understanding of gender, which used to be considered something that was directly influenced by and controlled by our sex, was greatly changed due to industrialization and the internet our notions of sex and child-bearing have also changed.
Now, the only ppl in modern societies who are having kids are people who really want them. There are exceptions, but men and women now no longer live under the social and economic pressures to have children that they did before. Only people who put those pressures upon themselves (mainly talking about ppl who are bent towards social conservatism which is pro-natalist) to have kids are the ones doing it. This trend will absolutely persist and continue into the future. Birth rates have collapsed in nearly all countries and this decline tracks with how developed these countries become. Women no longer need to marry and have kids in order to be settled economically and the social pressure to marry has been consistently whittled down. Men are becoming increasingly sexless with less than half of the men 18-24 regularly having sex. While, having sex ≠having kids anymore sex is a necessary condition to having children and if less than half of young men are having sex, how few of them are going to have kids?
For the first time in human history, or the history of any species, survival is no longer tied to one’s biological traits but is actually tied to memetics. Memes! Memes being their cultural values, norms, and ideas of what a good life entails. It stands to reason that only pro-natalist Westerners and modern women (who can safely be assumed to be at least slightly more socially conservative than their non-child bearing counterparts) will have kids for the most part (there will always be gold-digging women who breed in order to secure resources from their baby daddy).
We’re looking at a new stage in human evolution which is being driven not my environmental change or biology but by social change and ideology. Arguably, you could say that this is still at its root a biological matter (perhaps our push towards infertility and anti-natalism is a psychological action designed to reduce population so as to reduce resource consumption) but on its face it is clear that the vast majority of ppl who do not have children today do it out of a non-biological desire to simply not have kids.
mischling2543@reddit
But liberated females don't have kids
deleted_by_reddit@reddit
[removed]
AutoModerator@reddit
Sorry, your post has been removed. You must have more than 25 karma to submit posts to /r/4chan.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
Feynmanprinciple@reddit
This is also more correct. The case is the opposite of what OP suggests. Even if women are choosing better men, they're having less kids overall, and they're often so busy working that they give their kids a switch or a phone to play with while they do something else and the kid grows up to be a nervous, incompetent wreck anyway.
canacata@reddit
Except all the stupid assholes they love for some reason
deleted_by_reddit@reddit
[removed]
AutoModerator@reddit
Sorry, your post has been removed. You must have more than 25 karma to submit posts to /r/4chan.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
Efficient_Rise_4140@reddit
Mad cause bad
Osipovark@reddit
Men with high (120+ IQ) tend to be virgins longer than mentally deficient men (80- IQ)
If we are talking about the West, women emancipation also increased miscegenation rates. And white women mostly miscegenate with men from populations where the average IQ is lower than that of Europeans. East Asians (the only big population that has higher average IQ than Europeans) are not more popular with European (incl. White American) women than European men despite their slightly higher average IQ.
Emancipated women do not select for neurotypical. They don't select for autists, that's for sure, but they select for psycopaths, sociopaths and those with ADHD.
cosplay-degenerate@reddit
Every time I wake up there is another psyslop.
lewd-boy-o@reddit
Someone's on the last stage of grief
Longjumping_Visit718@reddit
Strange, all the girls I knew married ne'er'-do-wells, philanderers, or high school/college/military drop outs....
Most of them are having their parents help raise their kids and all of the didn't stop living with mom and dad, in spite of having a "man" in their life, until they found their beta bucks to play Captain Save-a-hoe...
Taller, stronger, smarter?
Can't happen when you see who the mom is!😂
StopCallinMePastries@reddit
Anon gives away his bias by implying that every woman who is capable of carrying a child can make a great one.
StopCallinMePastries@reddit
This line of argumentation is based on many assumptions which in and of themselves are entirely false.
arealbigsecond@reddit
He’s right about how the loosening of sexual mores has greatly changed how sexual selection works and how the act of sex has taken on a new purpose in modern, post-industrial & post-internet society. This is a massive change that will have massive downstream effects, mostly in the form of very large amounts of people (in comparison to the past) not having any children at all.
Most of the sex people have nowadays doesn’t result in pregnancy & childbirth and many women have sex with many partners and won’t have nearly as many children as their predecessors. Much like how our understanding of gender, which used to be considered something that was directly influenced by and controlled by our sex, was greatly changed due to industrialization and the internet our notions of sex and child-bearing have also changed.
Now, the only ppl in modern societies who are having kids are people who really want them. There are exceptions, but men and women now no longer live under the social and economic pressures to have children that they did before. Only people who put those pressures upon themselves (mainly talking about ppl who are bent towards social conservatism which is pro-natalist) to have kids are the ones doing it. This trend will absolutely persist and continue into the future. Birth rates have collapsed in nearly all countries and this decline tracks with how developed these countries become. Women no longer need to marry and have kids in order to be settled economically and the social pressure to marry has been consistently whittled down. Men are becoming increasingly sexless with less than half of the men 18-24 regularly having sex. While, having sex ≠having kids anymore sex is a necessary condition to having children and if less than half of young men are having sex, how few of them are going to have kids?
For the first time in human history, or the history of any species, survival is no longer tied to one’s biological traits but is actually tied to memetics. Memes! Memes being their cultural values, norms, and ideas of what a good life entails. It stands to reason that only pro-natalist Westerners and modern women (who can safely be assumed to be at least slightly more socially conservative than their non-child bearing counterparts) will have kids for the most part (there will always be gold-digging women who breed in order to secure resources from their baby daddy).
We’re looking at a new stage in human evolution which is being driven not my environmental change or biology but by social change and ideology. Arguably, you could say that this is still at its root a biological matter (perhaps our push towards infertility and anti-natalism is a psychological action designed to reduce population so as to reduce resource consumption) but on its face it is clear that the vast majority of ppl who do not have children today do it out of a non-biological desire to simply not have kids.
reditorsareimbeciles@reddit
Lots of serial killers in the next few generations
Frequent_Beat4527@reddit
Anon likes to vacuum a lot, take the dust bag, and empty that dusty dust inside his asshole
gravitydood@reddit
qpalzm76@reddit
Anon gets his information from the internet rather than interacting with real people
Efficient_Rise_4140@reddit
By this logic, French people would be the übermensch, but we all know that's not true.
ojasgadekar@reddit
I should have been born in the next generation
Treshimek@reddit
Anon has a point, but they won’t be able to contribute to the new generation anyway.