I have never used 1440p before. Is it worth twice the cost?
Posted by Livid-Cheek7846@reddit | buildapc | View on Reddit | 809 comments
So i am talking about the monitor. 24 inch 1080p vs 27 inch 1440p monitor (both 165hz lg ultragear). Where the 1440p monitor costs two times the 1080p one where i live. Its still affordable but the 1080p one is super affordable.
Planning on building a pc with the 4070 super or 7900 gre which people have told me is overkill for 1080p.
People who game in 1440p, how much of a difference is it to play in 2k vs just a single k? Aspect ratio is 16:9 for both monitors.
No-Thanks-8822@reddit
yes
taketheRedPill7@reddit
I saw the biggest jump from 1080p to 1440p than 1440p to 4k. 4k is overrated for games, IMO.
Zorian_Vale@reddit
It is! It costs so much to run but will one day be the 1080p of its day.
kNIGHTSFALLN@reddit
It already is… 4k60 is standard on console. With upscaling and rendering tricks of course.
But if that’s where consoles are… your PC should be atleast… better than that
Techno-Diktator@reddit
Bahaha, yeah sure, on absolute lowest settings at 30 fps maybe on current gen high demand games
kNIGHTSFALLN@reddit
Maybe you need to look it up…. PS5 has 20 titles in 4k60 and that number will increase when the Pro releases.
Sad how many people don’t even release where the market is right now.
Been playing side scrolling indies too long.
The high end PCs are pushing 4K 144FPS in Natjve with Ray tracing.
The limitations in gaming for those rigs are actually game optimization.
Techno-Diktator@reddit
Yeah sure, that's because people with consoles play on TVs and lots of TVs are pushing 4k resolution now.
In the PC gaming space though, 4K is pretty irrelevant, it's overkill when you are close to the screen
Lonely_Baby7264@reddit
4K is irrelevant under 27”. Point is a current gen console will run @ 4K 120fps settings without breaking the bank as you would running those same specs on a PC.
I was just in this boat. I was about to build a PC a few months ago but decided not to because of diminished returns.
Techno-Diktator@reddit
Could you send me any examples of a console pushing 4k max settings at 120 fps on any actual modern game? Because if so that console is literally stronger than a 4090
Lonely_Baby7264@reddit
Can you send me an example of the cheapest pc you can build that will run 4k 120hz? If so that build is literally cheaper than ps5/XSX and I’d be wrong.
Lonely_Baby7264@reddit
There’s plenty of 4k 120FPS games too on both XSX and PS5. Nobody is building a pc that runs those setting for less than $1K.
kNIGHTSFALLN@reddit
Oh yea 100%… I’m not arguing for console over PC. Or even a cost/ balance
The original comment suggested that 4k is over rated and too expensive to run.
I just reminded them that console is pushing those resolutions already in every new game. So if you are gaming on 1080p or even 1440p you are behind the tech curve because console is supposed to set the industries minimal specs.
Lonely_Baby7264@reddit
I know I was just adding. 4K 60fps has been available on consoles since previous generation consoles.
I’m in the school of thought that anything less than 4K 120fps is a compromise.
It does cost too much to run those settings on a PC. A console will do it for much cheaper.
LinearJ4@reddit
Lol, you are dreaming
kNIGHTSFALLN@reddit
What are you even talking about…?
4k60 is not the standard on Quality Mode PS5…?
Performance mode is not 1440p 120 variable frame rate…?
Or have you been stuck on Reddit so long you didn’t see the world pass you by…?
kenddalll@reddit
4k60 is NOT the standard on quality modes for the base ps5, and neither is 2k120 for performance modes. i don’t know where you got those numbers from
kNIGHTSFALLN@reddit
If it’s a resolution option for all new games released that makes it standard by definition.
Zerowed@reddit
Games with Native 4K at 60 FPS on PS5:
Anything else is a dynamic resolution…
bmdc@reddit
Games in 4k look amazing but the display technology for anything higher than 60hz is lacking and for most new games, even with a higher end GPU, you're rarely going to be pushing enough frames to take advantage of a 120hz+ display. 1440p is the sweet spot for sure.
Drago1490@reddit
I have yet to have frame drop issues on pretty much anything. I was lucky enough that my parents bought me a 4k monitor when I only had a school laptop to go with it, so I built a pc to take full advantage of that and its been going pretty smooth. Only thing I can really comment on is cooling, but I solved that too.
Sladds@reddit
Even a 4090 isn’t pushing 300 frames at 4k on any sort of AAA game.
Drago1490@reddit
Because AAA can only shit out unoptomized buggy nightmares of code. The only AAA games I play anymore are Fortnite and Overwatch because all my online friends are broke, and I get 300 frames in both those. Stopped playing MW3 a couple months back, but I was capped out at 140 in game and a whole 16 in menus. Now I play games like Deep Rock, Satisfactory, Helldivers 2, Mindustry, Astroneer, good games made with love, not for profit. AAA games the last couple years have ruined my trust, and I dont understand why people can complain so much and still play them. Let it die.
veedubfreek@reddit
Ultrawide 1440 > 4k. I love my 5120x1440 240hz G9.
kingethjames@reddit
For me, 4k is a go big or go home thing. Like you literally have to go all out to make 4k worth it. Huge monitors, insane specs depending on what you play so you get good fps, whereas 1440 is the perfect sweet spot for a screen you're that close to.
whoswipedmyname@reddit
My 4k makes games look great, but my 6800xt can't go full out in some newer titles unless I use FSR or drop resolution. And honestly, 1440p looks good to me. I'd even trade my 4k60hz for a 1440p with a higher refresh
kytheon@reddit
4K is nice on a big TV but kinda pointless on any monitor (even up to 32").
Dr_Disrespects@reddit
It is super overrated.
I’m a pc tv player and I have a lovely 4k oled, but I even play at 1080p as I’m like 12 foot away from the TV. Once in game I cannot even tell the difference between 1080p and 4K.
That extra performance over resolution is a no brainer for me.
MechaStarmer@reddit
That’s great for you. But don’t try and pretend like 4K isn’t a huge upgrade over 1440p for a monitor that’s 1 ft away from you.
BabyBuster70@reddit
1ft from a monitor is crazy close and I can't imagine many people are playing like that. I sit about 2ft from my monitor, which seems about average. With a 27" monitor the difference between 1440 and 4k is not a huge upgrade. For non gaming productivity usage, sure it is very noticeable, but once you are playing a game, not so much.
Dr_Disrespects@reddit
Fair point. And if I sat closer to the tv of course I’d notice the extra clarity, but I personally wouldn’t sacrifice performance for it.
It’d be nice if I could buy a 4090 but the price is just silly imo.
Scolias@reddit
Agreed. I'd rather have the extra FPS.
veedubfreek@reddit
I ran triple 1440 27" monitors for the last 10 years. Upgrading to a single 5120x1440 240hz monitor is the best purchase I've made in the last decade.
sunqiller@reddit
4k is really only a serious boon if you wanna game on a large screen. 42" and to some degree 32" gets a nice clarity bump but below that you're just pissing away money imo.
AdComfortable5355@reddit
Yeah I agree, I use a 31.5 inch monitor which is 1440 and I use all 180hz and it is beautiful. Technically it has the same “pixel density” as a smaller monitor with worse resolution but it’s way more immersive.
BackgroundFish304@reddit
The only way I could see 4k gaming actually being good for games would be when it's attainable with mid tier PCs and you get high frames
I can game at 4k but it has to stay locked at 60fps
Raginglendi@reddit
I agree
Heinz_Legend@reddit
I agree with your agreement with him.
LordChaos73@reddit
I concur
Coco_Deez_Nuts@reddit
I confirm your concur
Douchy_McDouchbag@reddit
I am concurrently confirming your concur
bmdc@reddit
I am concurring with all the others that concur. 1440p and 1080p are night and day in terms of fidelity imo and with the specs your rig has, go 1440p.
Sufficient_One1708@reddit
My thoughts coincide with your concurrence
Reasonable_Motor5970@reddit
I truly believe in your assessment
Unfair_Commission733@reddit
I concur with your assessment of the others redditor‘s agreements
Reasonable_Motor5970@reddit
I concur with your assessment of my assessment of others assessments
IntelligentLaw2284@reddit
I have come to the same conclusion.
Reasonable_Motor5970@reddit
I agree with your similar conclusion
bmdc@reddit
These conclusions of concurrence seem quite conclusive. If I was OP, 1440p it is.
Reasonable_Motor5970@reddit
The greatness of your assessments is quite remarkable
justlikevik@reddit
My conclusion is similar to the concurrent agreement on the conclusion
Reasonable_Motor5970@reddit
My conclusion is similar to your conclusion which is similar to the current consensus
royale_with_sheesh@reddit
I find myself agreeable with the above comments.
Reasonable_Motor5970@reddit
In standing agreement
Remote_Scholar6857@reddit
I could not agree more with your assesments gentlemen
No_Sleep_7200@reddit
Me three. Or thirty. I lost count.
AncientDetective3231@reddit
I concur with everyone's assessments Assessment....
ImpressionDouble2860@reddit
I am also concurrently confirming your concurrence with his concurrence of the other agreement to agree.
justa-Possibility@reddit
I confirm the concurrining of all your concurs.
Level_Gur_9184@reddit
I concur with the long list of concurers
Better_Leg4390@reddit
yes
ufgvn_@reddit
indeed yes
ILostMyMain123@reddit
What this guy said
tarhees0514@reddit
This is the way
haaaaru@reddit
I never pwrsonally tried 1430p, but I must agree
WitnessAllHeavens@reddit
Only answer needed
HolzLaim15@reddit
Gotta say you're right
Brave-Image8409@reddit
agreed.
seishun_heiki@reddit
absolutely
MLucian@reddit
Yes. This.
yldf@reddit
I am not always on the same page with this subs regarding displays, but this answer seems very sensible…
Kornikus@reddit
Best answer !
japspre@reddit
I concur
0krizia@reddit
👍 agree
Kathryn_Cadbury@reddit
This is the way.
sumatkn@reddit
Agreed.
R_Dixey@reddit
Completely agree
BringNewRevolution@reddit
This is the answer
pandadai00@reddit
Yes. 2 years on 1440p now with my 3080. My second monitor is still 1080p and I can never go back to that for gaming and media consumption.
ch3ch3ni0@reddit
100% > next
goldmineIneeddigger@reddit
I had 1080p and now 1440p I would rather go back to 1080p. Reasons why: Lower power consumption, More fps, Less taxing on vram, Future proof, you can play newer games with old gpu at high fps.
RevolutionaryCow7603@reddit
Not only 1440p, playing in 27" is a whole new world
And if you buy a 27" IT HAS TO BE 1440P
Do it, you only live once, why not?
DavePlays10@reddit
1440p is a great sweetspot. But personally it’s only a big deal for me for 32 inch monitors
mk6pinnock@reddit
I never thought I'd notice the jump when I went from 1080 to 1440 but it's like night and day. The extra clarity is super noticeable, my second monitor is my old 1080 one and you can really tell the difference between the two of them. Would recommend
Livid-Cheek7846@reddit (OP)
Are both of them the same size?
mk6pinnock@reddit
Yeah, both 27". On a 24" I'd imagine it's a tiny bit less noticeable but on 27 I could never go back to 1080 for my main monitor
papageek@reddit
I’m at an age where my vision isn’t as sharp anymore. I love my 32” 8k monitor. It was very expensive but my employer provided.
Livid-Cheek7846@reddit (OP)
Ya at 27 its definitely more noticeable. Thanks for answering
LumpyOctopus007@reddit
Yes
acj21@reddit
3x
Ajols@reddit
1440p is overrated, I made the jump last month and I noticed almost no difference compared to 1080p@1440p with DLDSR
Don't fall for the marketing man
ImpressionDouble2860@reddit
Absolutely worth the money. The difference between 1440 and 1080 is HUGE, and worth every penny. The difference between 1440 (2k) and 4k is not so noticeable. I specifically bought a 4080 super so I could game at 4k with no issues ever…. Then I actually played at 4k….. and I could have saved 1k. Gaming at 1440 with a higher frame rate like 90-120 is better looking than 4k at 60. I can hardly even tell the difference i in quality from 4 feet away. I can only tell the difference when I get way up close to the TV. I’d rather game at 1440 120fps than 4k 60fps all day. And I for damn sure would rather be at 1440 than 1080
dfm503@reddit
It’s definitely worth it, I’d really say a GPU as powerful as the 7900 GRE is wasted on 1080p.
reverends3rvo@reddit
Absofuckinglutely
echosierra419@reddit
It's an absolute game changer, I have a dual 2k ultra wide, I've given up the ultra wide formfactor to stay at 2k
starocean2@reddit
Its definitely worth it. I have a 27in Dell 1440p with HDR.
Sushiki@reddit
One thing it makes a huge difference on is TAA. TAA on 1080p looks ass. If I were to make a new build right now i'd factor that into everything.
Gold-Judgment-6712@reddit
For me it was.
EVIL_MEMNOCH@reddit
Once you go 1440p, you can't go back.
xRyozuo@reddit
That’s kind of my issue. I won’t miss it until I’ve had it so it doesn’t seem worth it
GrundleSnatcher@reddit
Yea I can't go back and I'm still debating if it was worth it 5 years later.
kytheon@reddit
"Can't divorce if you never fall in love. Doesn't seem worth it"
Duckbitwo@reddit
Then you don't know what you're missing. Stupid and clever at the same time.
xRyozuo@reddit
Lmao I’m still amazed at 1080p because a lot of the old school tv I watch is 360p/480p
FreeVoldemort@reddit
Stick with 1080p. I went 1440, then 4k. Lots of cost little visual difference when in motion.
Westy920@reddit
Yeah, 1080p to 1440p is not worth it. Barely a difference. I’d rather have crazy FPS on 1080p
FreeVoldemort@reddit
I play 4K ultra with Ray Tracing at 90-120 FPS. Ideally I should lower the settings and max out my monitor's 4k 144hz, but I don't. Or even more ideally, sell my rig and downgrade to high FPS 1080p and use the money for something more important.
Westy920@reddit
Yeah, I play a lot of FPS games. I tried playing in 4K 144 and the latency was rough and understandably. So I got a 360hz 1080p my rig usually gets 330-345 FPS! I just feel like 1440p is not that noticeable. 4K is something actually worth it and looks good. I just can’t run FPS in that.
kNIGHTSFALLN@reddit
My eyes hurt when my YouTube starts a video in 480
ColsonIRL@reddit
To be fair, YouTube's bitrates at 480p are hilariously low. A proper 480p video isn't bad, and nice 480i 60i video can look very good.
xRyozuo@reddit
My younger cousins feel the same lol. For me it’s what I grew up with so there’s a certain charm to the squares
DarkestXStorm@reddit
The picture quality on an old box TV isn't actually as bad as you might think. Lowkey I feel like 720p flat monitors look a bit worse.
HandMeATallOne@reddit
It’s bad quality, however it’s blurred so you don’t see the pixels
Chest_Positive@reddit
Im just so afraid of the bad optimization in games, i dont want to try 1440p yet, maybe ill wait for a gpu upgrade.
calhooner3@reddit
I have a 3060 ti and have no issues running whatever games I want at 1440. Not always max settings but generally get good fps.
Chest_Positive@reddit
Cmon man, dont drag me to another round of extremely necessary and vital spending on hardware again, lol.
Palafin84@reddit
I personally was able to run Forza Horizon 5 at extreme settings with High RTX at 1440p getting 120+ fps on my 4070. No problems at all. Now horizon may not be brand new but it it is only a couple years old, and I was playing at extreme settings which are above Ultra. I played RE4 Remake earlier in the year pretty much max settings with RTX was getting above 60fps at 1440p.
Honestly the biggest problem I have seen online is there are a small but vocal group who seemingly want every game to be able to be played at 1440p with Ultra/Extreme Graphics at above 120fps, if it doesn't do that the screech bad optimization, blame upscaling tech, blame honestly anything but their unreal expectations.
LeprosyLeopard@reddit
I faced this over a decade ago when plugging in an xbox360s to a crt tv. The grainy low (360p) resolution was difficult and near painful for my eyes to adjust to. At that point(2013) flat screen 1080 was easily the standard. The playability was non existent, I just let the little kids play halo.
TheRealHarrypm@reddit
They sadly with black bias macroblock compression crush everything at 1080p and it just gets worse going lower, so to properly push SD content on YouTube you have to upscale it into the 4K bracket it's so stupid.
YouTube also never implemented any auto deinterlacing lol so much broadcast and camcorder footage looks like shit and the interlaced in progressive video artefact is still a thing in the 2020s thanks to people not checking and deinterlacing files before uploading..
BRS3577@reddit
Which is crazy, cause I remember when videos in 720p were a rare luxury
nevernowhy2@reddit
Our brain fills in the missing details. I still can't believe how far we've come.
AJ_BORDERCHUNT@reddit
In a similar vein, I get a headache if I try and play a shooter on a 60hz screen
High refresh rates and resolutions are amazing, but it completely ruins what came before it lol
kNIGHTSFALLN@reddit
I should also add… I’ve had 3 LG ultragears 2-27’s and a 32
And the color spectrum sucks compared to something like a Samsung. (Obviously it’s half the price)
I still use them in my wife’s setup. But I can say with full confidence that I actually hate them. Within 6 months of buying them I was already looking to replace them.
Dr_Disrespects@reddit
1080p is still superb
Pokemon_Trainer_May@reddit
Ignorance is bliss
Yebi@reddit
Did the same thing with high refresh rate for years, until it became cheap to run. Zero regrets.
deadlybydsgn@reddit
Some say I'm still doing it to this day.
BoltaVS@reddit
He ain't missing anything, maybe why so many of you are seeing difference is because you used 27" 1080p monitors that were bad. 24" 1080p is as sharp as 27" 1440p. And to be honest, I would still prefer good 24" 1080p over 1440p lg ultragear (which I'm currently using).
veedubfreek@reddit
This is why I still have no OLED panels. Cause once I get one I'll have to upgrade everything else.
Allucation@reddit
Don't get it. Reminder that most people here are more likely to have an extra $1600 to throw on a GPU than most other places. It's not necessary. I enjoy my 1440p monitor, but I have a small 1080p monitor to the side that works just as well for me.
Nathan_hale53@reddit
Yeah but what do you do on the 1080p monitor? Work? Multitasking? Or do you strictly use your 1440p for gaming?? I wouldn't go back and I'm still using a 1070.
Allucation@reddit
I use my 1440p strictly for gaming. But that's because my 1080p monitor is laptop sized, so I mainly use it for multitasking.
I have a 3090, so of course I'm mainly going to use my 1440p screen, but I don't see a huge issue with using my 1080p screen on games if the screen were a little less to the ground.
iiAmWilsonn@reddit
You will see things in games you never know existed the clarity is so much better than 1080p, 1080p is so blurry even icons/text is blurry
Madness_Reigns@reddit
That's because you're running too big a monitor. 24" is perfect for the distance I view it from.
CharlestonChewbacca@reddit
It really depends on the size of the screen and your distance to it.
Personally, when I'm about a foot from my 35" monitor, 1440 makes a big difference over 1080.
But when I'm 8ft away from my 65" TV? 1080 is just fine.
Lyftttt@reddit
Eh, if you have a GPU that can support it, it really is the new standard. 4k is overkill for me right now, but I'm sure that will change given some time.
Skeither@reddit
You know... I feel like this is a pretty healthy outlook for a lot of things XD
TransientBandit@reddit
You’re just artificially lowering the ceiling of the enjoyment you could have gaming though. “Ignorance is bliss” isn’t really the full story.
xRyozuo@reddit
Yea, I’m broke is the full story
so_fucking_jaded@reddit
oh i know that story
TransientBandit@reddit
Now I’m sad
TacticalReader7@reddit
I don't know man, I have a 27'' 1440 and a 24.5'' 1080 and they honestly look more or less the same to me, as long as you stay below 27'' 1440 won't be needed imo.
trmo@reddit
Remember to set scaling to 100% instead of 150-300%. Youll notice the difference.
voxpixels@reddit
Scaling in what? Curious.
trmo@reddit
Windows scaling. Right click on desktop - display settings - choose display - set scaling to 100%. 1080p should be 100% by default but 1440p can be anywhere from 100 to 300% and 4k defaults to 300%
voxpixels@reddit
Thanks, wanted to double check and it's set to 100% (Recommended)
kytheon@reddit
So you're probably on 1080p
voxpixels@reddit
No, I have 1440p
kytheon@reddit
Ok then the UI can get pretty small.
Kiriima@reddit
Because windows interface in 100% becomes increasingly tiny with resolution growth. It doesn't do anything for media content.
calnamu@reddit
Exactly. You should set it to whatever is comfortable to you, not just always 100%. Depending on screen size, resolution and viewing distance this might be way too small.
TheRealKitsune_@reddit
Isn't this only for desktop, cuz yes I can see the difference then, but I don't like it so I put it back to 125-150%, I don't think it changes anything in game if I choose 1440p?
Sarisae@reddit
No, it doesn't. It's just for the UI and text size of Windows alone.
TacticalReader7@reddit
I have it at 125% because 100 is just uncomfortable to look at, still this doesn't alter applications at all which is the main part of my comparsion.
veedubfreek@reddit
That's because the pixel pitch is roughly the same on 1080 24" as it is 27" 1440. 27" 1080 looks like anus.
damien24101982@reddit
27" 1440p looks like paradise compared to even 24" 1080p
jlreyess@reddit
Saying that is like saying 480 and 1080 look the same. There’s no way you can’t see it unless you’re playing 4 meters away from the monitor while having myopia and not wearing lenses.
TacticalReader7@reddit
Well that's your opinion and my opinion is that your reading comprehension is terrible.
jlreyess@reddit
Sure o
FreeVoldemort@reddit
Strong agree.
ModernCinematics@reddit
Amen, looked at my buddies 1080p the other day hurt my face.
1440p minomal for life
HANAEMILK@reddit
I'm going back lol, don't like 27" for fps games
TallPain9230@reddit
I said this a few years ago and sent it back. Recently tried a G2427D and I love it.
BaQstein_@reddit
Then go 24" at 1440p
Negative-Pangolin866@reddit
It's pretty troll to play fps games at 1440p
BaQstein_@reddit
Because?
MKultraman1231@reddit
I heard that years ago, FPS pros prefer smaller monitors because you don't have to glance as far to look at the radar and ammo and such, that 0.2 second sideways look can cost you in game.
Samtheslayer1999@reddit
Why?
HANAEMILK@reddit
I play 4:3 stretched res, on a 27" screen it looks way worse. Also I just find it easier to focus on 24". I play a lot of AAA games too though, so ideally I would have two setups.
TangledRock@reddit
I went to 1440p, icons were too small, screen was too bright, went back to 1080
CauchyDog@reddit
4k oled... It's ruined me. My buddy's 21:9 1440p is really nice but it's just not the same.
I say you should look for a 42 or 48 inch c3 or c4 TV --they're still rated in top 10 gaming monitors, let alone tvs.
So you can use for both.
People have been finding killer deals on em lately, like $600. But you've been warned, there is no going back and nothing short of it will ever look as good.
trmo@reddit
But once you go 4k.... workplace has 1080p monitors and i game and work at home with 4k. It hurts to go back 1080p, even for work.
Inevitable-Study502@reddit
on 4k display, you can play four 1080p games with single screen :)
FreeVoldemort@reddit
Funny enough I go back and forth and hardly notice. But if I set my 4k monitor to 1080p I can see the difference and am like ewww looking at the desktop. I don't know if it's just not running at the native resolution that does it or the sudden change. Perhaps the commute in between is long enough to not notice.
ost99@reddit
Are they paying you below 50 cent an hour? That's the only instance where it makes financial sense to use 1080p in the workplace.
Snoo_24324@reddit
I agree, I have been gaming in 4k since it's inception, I can't do 1080p, I'm too spoiled!
Ragingpoo@reddit
Same... So I brought my 4k to work after getting a massive upgrade at home, worth it considering over a week, I'm probably spending equal amount of time in front of work pc and my personal one
QuackGoesDinosaur@reddit
I have a 1600p it's great. Sometimes annoying cause certain games will do weird stuff with it but that fov for shooters is great
greggm2000@reddit
1600p is awesome, I ran at that for a decade until my monitor died. unfortunately, I don’t think there are modern replacements anymore, and certainly not with gaming specs.
greggm2000@reddit
So true, 1440p is good, I’ve been using that res and similar for like 15 years now.
EirHc@reddit
laughs in 4k
BanjoSpaceMan@reddit
I’ll go further, and I know I know people disagree….
But my god 4K gaming is wild, especially for a bit bigger of a screen imo
EccentricFox@reddit
Ehhhh, I still find 1080p to be the real point of diminishing returns and don't feel a huge downgrade when I play like that on my TV, though sitting a across the room vs a foot away with a desk my factor into that. It's noticeable for sure, but not a not a huge distraction. Like, I setup a cheap home theater and couldn't afford a 4K projector and even at 120", movies at 1080p still looks pretty good.
LINKinlogzz@reddit
This is the exact reason I won’t upgrade. Don’t want to corrupt my eyes. lol
Muted_Classic3474@reddit
As someone who has both a 1440p and 1080p monitor that i use both of for gaming, I don't agree. 1440p is better, but 1080p is not unplayable now or anything. I think the difference between something like 60hz and 144hz is a much bigger difference and fits what you're saying a lot more
Elprogoodbg@reddit
Isn't it so that the pixel density on a bigger screen with 1440p can be less then a smaller version 1080p?
GrzybDominator@reddit
I went back and still using 1080p.
AsianBoy175@reddit
Literally just got my lg ultragear today after years of playing on 1080p 60hz lol and oh boy it’s amazing
FriendlyAlcholoic@reddit
I used three 1080p monitors at the same time so I kinda got 3k. Thats my recommendation
MountainAmbianc@reddit
Yes
Zerlaz@reddit
Yes, going from 1080p to 1440p is basicly the biggest visual upgrade one could get. And resolution aside 27inch 16:9 is simply optimal for humans.
Withinmyrange@reddit
Oled is a bigger jump tbh. 1440p, Oled, 240 hz is the sweet spot if you want to splurge on monitors.
mduell@reddit
Unless you're a competitive player at like 4 games, it's hard to imagine any meaningful difference between 144 and 240.
Withinmyrange@reddit
That’s true. Ig for the general public, 1440p, OLED, 144hz will be the biggest jump
Fragrant-Listen-5933@reddit
Problem is every oled monitor is 200+hz. Still waiting for a 27 inch 1440p 144hz oled
sunqiller@reddit
It's noticeable, but a fool's errand to keep the FPS that high in most games and the stutters from the lows are that much more in your face.
sdk5P4RK4@reddit
its mostly because oled can just do this no problem compared to other panels, so they also get high refresh.
Early-Bathroom-4395@reddit
What are some good recommendations that are on the cheaper end?
Withinmyrange@reddit
1440p ips 240 hz or 1440p minimum 144hz
ImpossibleClassic2@reddit
Just got my first 4k oled monitor yesterday after primarily gaming on a 4k roku tv and even that was night and day
No-Manufacturer-8015@reddit
I see so many people say you don't need an expensive monitor or tv like an oled until I show them.
ImpossibleClassic2@reddit
Tbh I really had to convince myself it was alright to drop the $1000 on what I thought was only going to be a marginal difference - but goddamn am I glad I was wrong. Its so good that after seeing my new monitor it convinced my family to buy oled tvs lmao.
No-Manufacturer-8015@reddit
No kidding it was a month long battle of convincing myself to spend $1000+ on a tv.
CJdaELF@reddit
I spent a month looking for a used/refurbished version of a 55" OLED TV because I didn't want to spend $1,200 and I found one for under $700. It was so worth it.
No-Manufacturer-8015@reddit
That's an amazing price for that size.
djentlemetal@reddit
It was years for me. It was my birthday recently, and one of my gaming buddies was gushing about his OLED screen, so I said fuck it and got the Aorus 32" 4k oled. Even coming from a Samsung Neo G7 32" 4K screen, the first thing I said when I started a game on the new oled was, "…holy shit". My eyes took some time to adjust, coming from a curved screen to a flat one, but the colors were so vibrant it was almost disorienting at first. Everything else looks so flat and colorless in comparison.
dustersixsix@reddit
I almost got the FO32U2P a few months ago comparing to the Alienware AW3225QF.
Two things sold me on the AW. One was e-arc. My setup is weird so the e-arc to my av receiver. It saved me some headaches attaching a PS5 to e-arc and PC to DP. Second, was a price drop at Best Buy to $999 and I had some gift cards to burn on it.
The OLED is amazing to game on. Make my 27 VA panel next to it seem very dull.
djentlemetal@reddit
Oh yeah, I can totally see why you'd go for the Alienware w/ e-arc for your use case. $999 is a "bargain" compared to the $1,200 I paid for mine. Worth every penny, though.
AJ_BORDERCHUNT@reddit
I've been eying a lot of very expensive monitors lately and this comment isn't helping lmao
ImpossibleClassic2@reddit
If you currently have the money for it, just go for it. It's worth it, life is short, and who the fuck knows when you'll be able to afford it again.
GoatInMotion@reddit
For real they say what's the big deal it's just colors... I have 2 monitors and a folder of game screenshots at the ready. I show them both screenshots side by side one on a non OLED andrhe other on an oped and watch as they say "oh wow"
RagingStallion@reddit
Can you post some of those pics? I've been looking at getting an OLED but when I go to bestbuy and look at an LCD and OLED monitor right next to eachother it doesn't seem like a massive difference. The colors are a bit more vivid and the blacks are blacker but that doesn't seem like its worth x2 the cost. Like OLED is clearly better but it seems like a ~15% enjoyment upgrade rather than a night and day difference like OLED bros claim.
ThrowawayObserver@reddit
I always wanted a OLED monitor but it's hard to convince myself that burn in won't be a problem especially since I use my desktop for a lot of work so theres tons of static excel sheets that would be up on my OLED monitor a lot if I did get it
tokeytime@reddit
Because you say 'need'. You specifically don't 'need' it.
elpadreHC@reddit
noone ever "needs" luxury. its more like "are you willing and able to afford it" kind of thing.
you could say the same thing about a high end pair of headphones, or anything really.
proscreations1993@reddit
Its like all those people who spend thousands on a guitar and amp head but then get a cheapo pos speaker and cab lol
illallowit101@reddit
My 4k u8g doesn't even compare to my 2k oled monitor, I want a 4k one so bad now lol
Buttsmearington@reddit
100% agree. Oled is a life changer. it's like seeing things for the first time all over again
thedarklord187@reddit
id be too worried about burn in to get oled for a monitor vs regular tv since a monitor will have lots of stationary items like toolbars icons
MechaStarmer@reddit
I’m tempted to treat myself to a 4K 240hz OLED monitor. I’ve had my 1440p 144hz TN panel for a decade and it’s time for an upgrade!!
SjettepetJR@reddit
If anything. Please don't get one of those VA panels. IPS is so much better and can often cost the same.
Renatop569@reddit
Not really a splurge in this day and age. You can get a pretty good 1440p, 240hz oled for 600 bucks
calnamu@reddit
600 bucks is way more than most people spend on monitors
Renatop569@reddit
Sure. But I wouldn't call it a splurge
oligubaa@reddit
3-6x the cost of average is definitely a splurge.
Drakengard@reddit
Eh, that's still a splurge given that a really good GPU is still in the 600-800 range.
Wake me up when it gets to sub $400 pricing for a mid-range 1440p OLED.
so_fucking_jaded@reddit
get comfy in bed
TransientBandit@reddit
Yep, that’s exactly how much mine was, and I LOVE IT.
zenKeyrito@reddit
I concur. I play mostly immersive games so I don’t see myself ever needing more than 240hz. I had a 1440p ips that has now been relegated to side monitor for the oled. I love it
Nice_promotion_111@reddit
Currently eyeing the Msi mag, hopefully it goes low on Black Friday
B0ba_funk@reddit
I have the MSI MAG, but I wish I went 4k Oled. My main tv is a LG oled and like others said once you go poked you don’t go back
madskee@reddit
27 LG Ultragear 27GP850-B LED Nano IPS HDR400 165hz GSYNC 2K 2560 x 1440p, HDMI DP, pivot adj ergo stand 17,799.00
That one is much better
ImpossibleClassic2@reddit
I just got the Msi MPG, absolutely love it
Seiq@reddit
"Optimal for humans"
Laughs in 21:9.
Seriously though, widescreen is incredible and there is a noticeable difference between 1440P and 4K on a 34" UW even using DLDSR.
Humans have almost 180 degrees of vision, VR would probably be the most 'optimal' in that case.
16:9 is just kind of a stop gap like 4:3 was.
Regular_Strategy_501@reddit
While humans have a wide naturel FOV, you can only focus on a small area of that. Generally it is agreed that your screen should take up about 30 degrees of your horizontal FOV to be comfortable. This is why 24-27 inch monitors work well for desktop use, since the optimal viewing distance with those is \~3 or \~4 feet respectably. Of course, if you are further away a bigger display makes sense. This applies to gaming or other content consumption. Of course for productivity one bigger or multiple smaller displays make a lot of sense.
VR works fundamentally differently from a desktop montor for immersion of course.
yonderTheGreat@reddit
You sit three feet away from a 24" monitor?
le0325@reddit
Ik, thats crazy far. Had to convert it to meters and its almost 1m (91cm).
Secure_Sir_1043@reddit
I have an UW and it's correct you spend most of your time focusing on the centre but the extra peripheral is very nice on FPS games for noticing foes
Seiq@reddit
I agree for things like multi-player fps. You're correct in that we can only focus on a small part of our total vision at once, but we still process extraneous data getting fed to our brains. Hence why ultrawide is bad for competitive multi-player since it reduces our ability to focus, among other reasons.
For immersion, however? You can't beat UW. I might not be able to focus on everything, but regardless of the game (Darktide, Diablo 4, Frostpunk 2, Horizon: Forbidden West, Elden Ring, etc.) it adds so much to the experience I woukd never willingly play them in 16:9 given the choice.
xRyozuo@reddit
I feel like y’all have never seen a 144p video or when everything was 360p
vimbaer@reddit
1024x768 used to be soo crisp :D I am old..
laffer1@reddit
640x480 to 800x600 was big, but 1024x768 was a whole new world, especially for web design tasks.
DeeJudanne@reddit
are you old enough where you still call monitors flat screens? i came to that scary realization a lil while ago that I still do
Emotional-Yak-3578@reddit
I remember watching “pardon the interruption” on espn just after we got our first 720p “HD” tv in like 2007. Seeing the Host’s wrinkles and makeup had me so excited about the level of detail 😂
xRyozuo@reddit
Exactly! Background posters could suddenly be read!
binhpac@reddit
I would be cautious with such statement.
Like 30 years ago scientists told us, the human eye cant differentiate higher than 30fps, because humans in the past couldnt see the difference.
I personally think, we havent reach the optimal aspect ratio yet. Im sure in the future widescreens become much more popular. Cinema uses 1.85:1 to 2.39:1. There are a couple of widescreen resolutions inbetween.
There is something more immersive with wider aspect ratios. Of course it will take maybe another 30 years to get there.
sdk5P4RK4@reddit
no scientists said this
Phreec@reddit
Not sure where you got your 30 FPS lore from but it's wrong. It's rather the threshold for when motion would no longer be deemed "smooth" to the human eye, nothing to do with an inability to see higher FPS.
Hijakkr@reddit
I only ever heard 60fps, not 30fps. Which makes sense, because CRT screens from the mid-to-late 90s were capable of 60-70 Hz, and I'd expect similar for screens even before that since gaming consoles from the 80s ran at 60Hz.
greenscarfliver@reddit
Depends on what's being displayed but we can definitely detect changes at higher frequencies than 70hz. There are diminishing returns until you get to around 200 hz at which point people start not being able to detect changes.
The way they often test this is by showing a white screen, then flashing the screen a different color at different frequencies. Sensitivity to being able to see the change depends on the color.
Personally anything at 120+ I'm happy with as it gives me the screen smoothness I like.
Hijakkr@reddit
Yeah. I wasn't trying to say that the "science" was correct, just that I'd only ever heard 60, not 30. It's pretty obvious that the actual limit is a lot higher than 60, and like you said it probably depends on a number of different factors.
Drakengard@reddit
People were definitely saying what he said, but it wasn't the scientists so much as people twisting their words (as usual) to say something they did not intend.
yonderTheGreat@reddit
There's always stupid people.
Saying that people 30 years ago thought you couldn't see more than 30 fps is like saying people thought you only used 10% of your brain.
No one with any knowledge thought either
Regular_Strategy_501@reddit
!this. The human eye not being able to see more that 30fps was always at bs and no serious scientist working in the field would claim such a thing because the eye does not work in fps. The only context I have seen this be used unironically are advertisements for pieces of hardware not able to push more than 30 (looking at you console peasants of the past).
nuscly@reddit
We might not have reached the optimal aspect ratio but 16:9 is here to stay. It was designed as the geometric mean of 1.33 and 2.39 aspect ratios so that both look fine on the same screen with letter/pillarboxing. Film standards are long established and I don't see them changing.
For online media like YouTube, people upload videos with different aspect ratios in a 16:9 container a lot of the time for compatibility. So if we start using wider screens there won't be any benefit.
Finally Blu-Rays essentially max out at 16:9. What I mean is anything letterboxed is cropped rather than expanded from a 16:9 format. So even on a wider screen there's no increase in resolution. Your monitor might be 2560x1080 but your standard blu ray is 1920x800 (approx)
binhpac@reddit
If 16:9 is the golden standard, why does everyone in my office run 2 monitors next to each other?
This is imho a hint that humans might prefer much wider resolutions in the future.
DangerPencil@reddit
People run two monitors to prevent switching windows to quickly reference content. Nobody keeps the main focus of their work spread across two monitors.
Not_Bill_Hicks@reddit
30 years ago, they were probably talking about 30fps video with native motion blur, in which case this is true. In video games where there is no motion blur, or horrible fake motion blur, 30FPS looks horrible and janky, and only at 60FPS does it look smooth
yonderTheGreat@reddit
That's lcd talk, we were still using CRTs 30 years ago dude Everything scaled up just fine
yonderTheGreat@reddit
30 years ago it was the mid 90s and I was at University.
NO ONE said humans can only see 30 fps (okay no one with any credibility)
extortioncontortion@reddit
What scientists was saying that? That is the sort of thing that only idiots repeated because it was so easy to disprove.
InclinationCompass@reddit
This makes me feel old. Cause the visual difference from an old CRT monitor to 1080 is actually much more noticeable than going from 1080 to 1440.
onFilm@reddit
Laughs in 4k.
greggm2000@reddit
30 inch 16:10 might be optimal, I’d get that again, if only I could. I “make do” with a 34 inch 1440p ultrawide, but I still really miss the extra vertical inches I used to have on my old display.
Mountain-Day-6697@reddit
Is 31.5 inch bad guys
mountaingoatgod@reddit
1080p to 4k is bigger though
Zerlaz@reddit
1080p already full HD. full -> containing or holding as much or as many as possible
mountaingoatgod@reddit
???
RabidWok@reddit
4K was the biggest visual upgrade for me. The amount of detail you can see is astounding - I played a visually modded Fallout 4 on it (including 8K skin textures) and I could see fine detail that I couldn't see on a 1440p monitor.
4K is also amazing for general use and productivity. I always use it when I work from home since I can see so much on it - I don't need to shrink side-windows on my IDE like I do at the office.
itsapotatosalad@reddit
4k is a much more noticeable jump than 1080 to 1440 especially when the 1440 screen is bigger.
toomcooleforschool@reddit
Downvoted for speaking the truth. The people who don't like your comment are just coping because they can't afford 4K.
itsapotatosalad@reddit
Yeah man. My main screen has been a 4k screen of some sort now since my 980ti so 10 years or so? Ive been chasing that 4k quality gaming since it became a viable option. I’ve had 27, 28, 32 and 43” all at 144hz, as well as 1440p 16:9 with higher refresh and a couple of 1440 ultrawides. Of course 1080p along the way. Had multiple configurations on my desk for months at a time for comparison. Getting downvoted by people who have read some Reddit comments about 4k not being that noticeable and “1440p is the sweet spot”
Kilo_Juliett@reddit
Disagree. 1080p to 4K is a bigger upgrade.
I used to be all about 27" monitors but lately I've been thinking 32" might be better. Viewing distance it probably the main factor. I like a deep desk and have my monitor pushed all the way back. My 27" is starting to feel a bit small.
abrahamlincoln20@reddit
Naw, it's behind the jump from 60hz to 144hz and 1440p to 4K. Still big, though.
Torgoe@reddit
Yes. But be warned, you will never go back to 1080p because it’s so noticeably awesome. Also, by going to 1440p, you’ve committed yourself to higher-end GPUs if you want to maintain decent FPS. No more budget GPUs.
PurpleFilth@reddit
Absolutely.
maora34@reddit
Go for 1440p ultrawide IMO. It's way better even.
_captain_tenneal_@reddit
It's definitely worth it imo
Significant_Apple904@reddit
1440p or 3440x1440 is the best spot for both visual quality and performance, even for a 4090, unless you're gaming on a 60"+ TV
hc0033@reddit
You can get a decent 1440p monitor for like 250 Canadian. If that’s not affordable then I don’t know what is.
bulutkirkavak@reddit
2K 144hz rules. As long as you can have stable 144fps in games, you are golden.
Illustrious-Party120@reddit
1440
reapsvstheworld@reddit
Thank you for asking this question because I have been wondering the same thing. I have been playing games in 1080p forever. I wanted to upgrade but I didn't know if it was worth it.
jaBroniest@reddit
Iil give you 1440 reasons to upgrade
merkmerc@reddit
Yes definitely worth but if you start using 1440p that will make 1080p obsolete and it will look like shit
grTheHellblazer@reddit
Totally worth your money trust me
green_meme@reddit
Yes
Budget-Cucumber-1750@reddit
The jump from 1080 p to 1440 p is very evident and noticeable once you do take the leap. You won’t regret it.
ImportanceOutside416@reddit
I have a 27 inch 1440p monitor but I still play 1080p. The graphics ARE nice but on a small monitor the details are lost for me personally. You need a nice big one to really feel the details.
shrieknsibi@reddit
Made the change myself 6 months ago. My only regret was not doing it earlier. It's really worth it.
CPT_BEEMO@reddit
If I am playing something competitive where I want extremely high FPS, say like MW3 Ranked Play or OW2 competitive (Don't say it, I know I hate my life), then I don't really see the difference in the resolution because everything is set to low or medium.
When I am playing graphics intensive games like Tomb Raider, Jedi Survivor, CP2077, games where Its not so fast paced and I can appreciate the map and atmosphere, its incredible. I would highly suggest getting a high frame rate 1440p monitor if you're going to be going with a GPU of that caliber.
Awesomeguy215@reddit
i have been on 1440p the whole time when build my pc on console it was 1080p ofc the difference is big because of console to pc but also the visual aspect 1080p to 1440p. 2k is really the sweet spot between performance and quality it will become the normal as years continue for sure
Intelligent_Big_750@reddit
1440p is the sweet spot
itamar8484@reddit
Going back to 1080p is kinda like not wearing glasess rn the lg ultra gear is 180$ also highly reccomend a 27inch if its within ur budget of course only if u can afford never borrow money or take from ur saving funds but if u are gonna get a 7900 gre/4070 super just get a 1440p else just get a 6700xt or something and a 1440p
NoRiver32@reddit
Once you get 1440p screen, you’re locked in. Changing it to 1080p in case the new game you bought is too demanding for 1440p won’t look good. You will have to upgrade your gpu more often, and it will have to be a higher tier of gpu. If for example you want to play Mh wilds at 1440p be prepared to shell out at least $900 for a card that can handle that
Livid-Cheek7846@reddit (OP)
Would changing the resolution to 1080p on a 27 inch look that bad?
BabyBuster70@reddit
It's not great, but a lot of newer games have the option of rendering the resolution lower than native, which looks better than changing the actual resolution. Also I have a 1440 ultrawide and only have a $600 GPU which is fine. The "at least $900" is a pretty big exaggeration.
Rabadazh@reddit
Yeah, it looks horrible compared to 1080p on 24 inch
darkthewyvern@reddit
Answer: It depends.
A 32" 1440p monitor has the same resolution as a smaller 1080p monitor.
24" 1080p is already really good 24" 1440p is 100% worth it 27" 1440p Meh? You probably won't actually notice 32" 1440p It's basically the same resolution as the small 1080p which, is good if you're looking for a bigger monitor but not good if you're looking for a higher pixel density.
4k: Pixel density on monitors is so high it's almost always an improvement all the way up to 40"
Mental_Swimmer_8300@reddit
32" curved wide-screen with 4070 from a 24" flat 1080p. I couldn't go back.
luffy435@reddit
The jump from 1080p to 1440p is only worth it if you’re going to keep the smaller 24 inch screen size. Otherwise it’s not that big of an improvement.
BabyBuster70@reddit
Going from a 24" 1080 to 27" 1440 is nearly a 20% increase in PPI. Even ignoring the extra 3" of screen size, the increase in pixel density alone is a significant upgrade.
Mysterious_Lab1634@reddit
Not true, 32 inch 1440p has same density of pixels like 24 inch 1440p.
So using 27inch 1440p is visible improvement
Rabadazh@reddit
Visible improvement highly depends on how far you sit away from your monitor. I sit around 27 inches away and noticing any difference is difficult. But obviously still prefer my 1440p display since 27 inch is just more immersive.
oblivic90@reddit
You mean same as 24 1080p?
Mysterious_Lab1634@reddit
Yea, a typo :/
jolness1@reddit
1440p is way better. I think the jump from 1080 P to 1440 P is more meaningful than going from 1440 P to 4K and I say that as someone who loves my 4K monitors.
DBFN_Omega@reddit
I went from a 24" 1080p monitor to a 32" 1440p monitor. I thought the difference in clarity even at the desktop was worth the switch. no ragrets
candaianzan@reddit
1920x1080 is ~2,070,000 pixels 2560x1440 is ~ 3, 686,000 pixels
78% more pixels is a huge difference in quality.
SaltedRouge@reddit
Me on my 1440p monitor watching YouTube video
“Gross it’s kinda blurry”
Clicks to change quality settings
1080p -> 1440p
“Way better”
trophicmist0@reddit
I actually got a 24 inch 1440p monitor, it's sharper than a 27 inch one would be as it's over a smaller area
ClosetLVL140@reddit
Yes. It’ll be more noticeable if you go back to 1080p you’ll feel disgusted
almndmlc@reddit
depends on the gamer. as someone that only plays tactical fps games, i couldn’t really care less about 1440p
MouthBreatherGaming@reddit
1440 is the perfect spot. 1080 works if you need a lot of fps or have an old system, and 4K is just throwing money away just to lose fps.
jerryonjets@reddit
What's the point of a 4070 GRAPHICS card if you're not gonna use the graphics...
BrokenDots@reddit
Not really much of a difference when moving from 1080p 24inch to 1440p 27inch.
I actually did that because everyone kept saying "1440p is so good you can never go back" etc. But no, in terms of purely gaming purposes, i can barely notice any difference except that now my gpu is struggling to keep up.
If you use your monitor for work etc, then yeah, text looks slightly sharper
jhaluska@reddit
A lot of people just trying to justify their purchases. Like you can look at the numbers, and it's better from a pixel density perspective. Can you tell the difference when they're side by side, sure. Is it life changing? Nope.
How much are you willing to pay for it? I don't know, personally it's not worth twice as much for 10-20% improvement for me. With a lot of the cost being in needing higher end GPUs.
If you're building a new higher end system, definitely go for it. But I'm not in a rush to replace my 1080p monitors.
Oconell@reddit
I suppose it depends on the person. To me it was night and day. Perhaps you had a better 1080 monitor, than your 1440? Or perhaps my 1080 wasn't that great, because my 1440p was a big investment and it shows.
Rabadazh@reddit
1080p 24' to 1440p 27' is only an 18% improvement in ppi. So unless you sit around 20 inches away from your screen the difference in clarity isn't that noticeable.
Oconell@reddit
We can disagree, but almost 20% is a big improvement, and also it's not only PPI, but the fact that the screen is bigger, so the details are also more clearly viewable.
tokeytime@reddit
This is exactly what I found.
FOO_duke2k4@reddit
Its a 'you never go back' thing, once you have it
Erbatta@reddit
I have that exact monitor if you have a Nvidia card you can use it to boost your Hz to 200. It's absolutely worth it and the colours are fantastic.
JonnyRay82@reddit
100% worth the extra resolution. I only use 4K monitors.
DaddySanctus@reddit
Yes, going from a 1080p 24” to a 1440p 27” was like a “holy shit” type upgrade.
Dr_Krogshoj@reddit
For me, it comes down to pixel density.
24-inch 1080p monitor: \~91.79 PPI
27-inch 1440p monitor: \~108.78 PPI
The second option will be better, but not a game changer. I'm glad to have found a rare 24-inch 1440p monitor (122.38 PPI), which I consider to be the best option, although still worse than than pixel density I got used to when I used a laptop exclusively (with 15-inch 1080p display at 146.86 PPI). Unfortunately, they don't really make 24-inch 1440p monitors any more.
In any case, you'll be better off at 1440p, although I would recommend to stick with 27 inches max, above that, you need 4K for decent pixel density.
Majin-Booch@reddit
I just bought one and yeah it looks so much cleaner and gave a dual setup with the 1080p and yeah it’s so much nicer
Anon176_@reddit
I have that same monitor, it’s worth it. Jumped from 1080 to 1440 and it’s not really a night and day difference, but it’s more of a “putting glasses on” type of clarity. Also, both of those GPUs are overkill for 1080, go with 1440.
Scolias@reddit
1440p is the sweet spot for anything under 32" IMO.
shakybonez306@reddit
YES you will Never return
Jayy_R7@reddit
Easily the best decision I’ve made
veedubfreek@reddit
1080p feels like 20 year old technology at this point.
Spankermeister@reddit
Gaming in 1440p is a huge improvement over 1080p. You get a much wider field of view which can give you a significant advantage in competitive games. IMO, 21:9 / 1440p is the ideal resolution and aspect ratio to play games in. I wish more games would also add 32:9 ultrawide support, but that’s still a bit niche at the moment.
TL:DR - 1440p > 4K > 1080p.
copiumxd@reddit
Yes indeed
guzzygongaming@reddit
I promise, once you go 1440p you'll hate 1080p. Lol 1440p is so nice!
frodan2348@reddit
Building a pc with a 4070S or 7900GRE and then getting a 1080p monitor is like getting a Ferrari that has a special gas pedal that only allows you to give 10% throttle.
What’s the point of all that performance just to have the exact same experience you’d have with a 6700xt?
Buttsmearington@reddit
both cards definitely OP for 1080. if you're fine with 1080p, by all means save yourself the cash and go down a couple notches on the GPU. could literally save you hundreds. that being said, I have a 32" 1440p 165hz lg ultragear and I love this damn monitor
onebit@reddit
you can sometimes disable anti-aliasing due to the high resolution
Lofi_Joe@reddit
1440p is next gen compared to 1080p
TheLyoshenka@reddit
No reason to spend that cash on a 4070 Super if you’re 1080p gaming. That GPU is an absolute 2K killer and performs extremely well at that level. If you’ve already bought the GPU, get the 2K monitor.
epicpersonvery@reddit
i can't go back to 1080p after upgrading. it's definitely worth it, but there are a few things to consider -- you will have moderate performance losses with the switch due to more pixels. considering your upgrades though, you'll definitely be fine (I also have a 4070. runs games great at 165hz). and, like I mentioned, it'll be very difficult to go down again if the situation ever presents itself. the difference between the two is pretty vast
Rahahahahahaaa@reddit
Do you know what’s funny? Back in the day, 480p used to look super clear, but now even 1080p feels like potato quality, so yes!
Solanum_Lord@reddit
4k is 3840x2160, the 4k representing ~4000 horizontal pixels (true 4k is 4096x2160).
2k is 1920x1080 (true 2k is 2048x1080)
1440p is 2560x1440, so 2.5k.
capy_the_blapie@reddit
Spent 5 years gaming on 1080p. Bought a 1440p display last month, during a Far Cry 5 gameplay. I can't go back, i really can't. 1440p 32 inch screen, it's amazing.
H3U6A9@reddit
1440p is a minimum imo for 27in anything smaller you just see pixels and I personally can’t stand it 😭
CaptainWafflessss@reddit
If I could have found an OLED monitor at 1080p, I would have taken it to be honest.
Don't focus so much on resolution, go OLED before you go anything else.
That's the biggest upgrade you can do in terms of visuals.
Armed_Accountant@reddit
Oh yes, never going back. I don't care about high refresh rate (Samsung G7 with 240Hz but I can't even achieve that outside of load screens)
My next monitor will be OLED (or similar tech) but will still be 1440p. I don't see the value in 4K monitors. 27" is a nice spot.
GrassyDaytime@reddit
I bought a new 4070 Super a couple weeks ago. Before that, I was playing on a 1650 at 1080p. I would always say how I could always save money because 1080p is all I really want or need to play at. It looked great.
After getting my 4070 Super, I played Final Fantasy 7 Remake and put it on 1440p and was amazed at how much clearer the picture was. Now I play everything on 1440p and a 60hz 42" 4k TV. I won't go back to 1080p.
I wish glasses and playing on 1440p from 1080p is very similar to putting on your glasses and before having them on. Just clears things up. Makes it much sharper.
I would highly recommend 1440p. Probably don't even realize how much your eyes would strain less as well.
Same thing as before, I've played around with playing at 4k here and there just to see how it looks but honestly I don't get the same upgrade clarity as I noticed from 1080 to 1440. So I just play at 1440. lol. Definitely the sweet spot for resolution in my opinion.
Low-Blackberry-9065@reddit
You buy a gpu to accommodate a screen not the other way around.
You buy a screen because you want to change the experience.
If you're happy with the 24" 1080p then get a cheaper GPU and save money.
If you want more workspace and/or better immersion and/or sharper image then get a 27" 1440p or better/larger.
Deto@reddit
Is this true, though, still? With DLSS can't you go from 1080p to 1440p for not that much performance overhead?
Low-Blackberry-9065@reddit
You can increase fps with DLSS or smoothness with frame gen but you don't get the same quality as running a game natively at the higher resolution, especially when upscaling from lower resolutions like 1080p.
SefranH@reddit
Underrated comment. This is the way. A 4070 or 7900 is likely overkill for a 1080 display.
Personally I would buy a nicer screen than my current GPU can handle if I could only afford one, as the screen will likely last longer than the GPU will.
Basimi@reddit
Way overkill for 1080, my 7900xt will regularly be locked at 144 fps (max for my monitor) at 1440p.
AJ_BORDERCHUNT@reddit
Cannot stress this enough
I had a 144hz 2k monitor from pre-covid, but it was a TN panel
Swapped it out for a 120hz 2k monitor which is a "downgrade" in a sense but this monitor has an IPS panel and DCI-P3 color gamut, and the upgrade in image quality is unreal. I have the TN panel set up as my secondary monitor now and being able to compare the two shows how much of a difference it makes
Subiedude240@reddit
Yep, got my 34” oled ultrawide and I’ll never use anything else
Mytre-@reddit
After reading all these comments. I'm thinking if it's worth it for me too. I have a 4080 super currently , but I have 2 old 144hz 1080 screens . Part of my issue is my real state currently, I barely fit both screens (one in front and one like almost 70 degrees on the side). 27 sounds nice but it would be so big it would not fit in my space comfortably at all. Wish there were some 24 inch 1440p screens somewhere lol.
NightGojiProductions@reddit
First of all, what country? Why are you only looking at the Ultragear? I’m sure models of 1440p 165hz can be cheaper. How much is the 1440p model?
paaavann@reddit
I use Samsung "Samsung 27-Inch(68.5Cm) Odyssey G5 Gaming, Qhd 2K, 165Hz, 1Ms, 1000R Curved LCD Monitor, AMD Freesync Premium, Hdr10" and 1440p is sweet spot for media and gaming. Also it not as stressful for gpu as 4k is so you will get performance and a decent quality for a good price. So in my opinion 1440p is good for gamers in mid range.
GobblesGibbles@reddit
4070 super whilst not paying for the 1440p is absolutely crazy relatively speaking in terms of cost. Don’t do that op.
Alphablack32@reddit
1440p is the sweetspot for gaming.
-Eastwood-@reddit
Yesssss. 1440p is great especially if you're building a PC like that. A lot of the power in your build would go unused at 1080p.
If you can, get a gsync monitor too. I think it was also a complete game changer and stutters are practically non-existent now.
Me-no-Weeb@reddit
I just recently upgraded to 1440p and now my 1080p is my second monitor and every time I look to the side the resolution just feels so unsharp and less qualitative
Rabadazh@reddit
24inch is idle for 1080p, no wonder the difference felt massive to you
Me-no-Weeb@reddit
Yea I went from one 27“ 1080p and one 24“ 1080p to one 27“ 1440p and one 27“ 1080p
Livid-Cheek7846@reddit (OP)
Damn really? Are both monitors the same size?
Me-no-Weeb@reddit
Yep both are 27“, the only difference is the new one is 300hz instead of 144 and it’s has HDR, but honestly games are much clearer, for example in rainbow six I often had problems even making out other players‘ heads when they were holding a long distance angle and now I don’t anymore
Wonderful_Mistake414@reddit
So, today i just bought my first 1440p qd/oled. After playing on 1080p. Yes buddy, its worth it.. This is amazing...
sebmojo99@reddit
that gfx is insane overkill for 1080p, but i'd save the money now and buy a 1440 or 4k later if you see a cheap one if the money is important to you. it's a nice upgrade, but everything will still look great in 1080p.
Cronus41@reddit
Yep absolutely worth while. I recently built a pc with the 7900gre and I thought I’d use it with my existing 1080p monitor. Games ran well but seemed a bit muddy looking. I broke down shortly after and got myself a 27” asus tuf monitor and between the blazing fast refresh and 2k res games look amazing. The jump from 1080p to 1440p was at least as significant as upgrading to a current gen gpu
AwesomeFly96@reddit
1440p to 1080p feels about the same as going from 480p to 720p. It's just the crispness in picture and text that 1080p just doesn't have. 1440p is 100% worth it. But I do prefer a great 1080p over a budget 1440p.
se7en_7@reddit
I’m running a 2k ultrawide with 180 refresh and it’s amazing.
Frescarosa@reddit
If it's only for gaming, especially FPS, no.
If you value framerate over everything else, no.
For productivity, go 4k.
TheTruePatches@reddit
1000% get the 1440p. It's the new standard for gaming, 1080p is for your secondary monitors until you can replace those too
GloomyPassion2754@reddit
Once you go 1440P, you can’t go back. It really is so much clearer, i went from 24” 1080P 240HZ to 27” 1440P 170HZ last year. It’s totally worth it. 240HZ to 170HZ drop was barely noticeable for me, even in FPS games but 1080P to 1440P is a huge jump in clarity and detail. Also i like the 27” size much better.
beansnchicken@reddit
I went from 240Hz back to 144Hz and I realized 240 really doesn't matter for anyone but the top pros. 144 is a necessity but anything above that, I never notice it unless I'm intentionally trying to notice it by shaking my camera back and forth to try to detect imperfections in how smoothly it moves.
Higher resolution makes more of an impact, but I think it's pretty minimal above 1440p in the same way. Just like with 240Hz, I have to actively try to notice the benefits of 4K over 1440p.
I just hope OLED becomes affordable sooner rather than later, that's going to be a significant improvement in quality. After that there isn't much room for noticeable improvement anymore, it'll just be up to software developers to make their games look better.
Buuhhu@reddit
From what i've heard all the super high fps advantages are less about smoothness/clarity but more about the responsiveness of the screen to any action you take. Some call it much more of a "feel" than a visual thing.
I wouldn't know myself as i'm on 144 so i'm just saying what i've heard from people.
Fluffysquishia@reddit
240hz is for double door on dust2 situations where you literally only have about 4 frames to react to someone running across. It's been verifiably proven that higher refresh rate significantly improves the amount of time you have to react due to the lower refresh rates creating a "popping out" peekaboo effect where they suddenly appear a few inches past the door due to the refresh happening after they started to cross.
coolbrys@reddit
Honestly 240 is legit noticeable on desktop compared to 120, but it’s not like it’s a needed change whatsoever.
HANAEMILK@reddit
I'm the opposite, much prefer 24" for fps games vs 27"
L4rcs@reddit
I have a 1440p monitor as my main and a 1080p on the left side in portrait. Difference is night and day, especially the vibrancy(idk the right term) of the colors. Also, once you experience a 1440p monitor, 1080p will be so blurry in your eyes.
av1rus@reddit
No, not worth double the price. Go for 4k instead.
gblawlz@reddit
1440 is the best balance of visuals and framerate. Imo 4k isn't worth it unless you have a big budget for GPU. 1080 is only the right choice if you are very big into competitive shooters like cs or valorant, where you don't want a screen area over 24". If they made a 24" 1440 oled , that would be amazing for shooters.
datfatbloke@reddit
It is in my opinion but only you can decide if it is for you.
lol_camis@reddit
I gotta be honest with you. When I got my first 1440, I set it up next to my old 1080 and......I dunno man it's definitely not a game changer or anything.
No_Future5696@reddit
I have the lg ultragear. It’s alright for the price.
Keeneye7172@reddit
1440 is the perfect resolution. If you can absolutely do it every time
Sousvide_Dingus@reddit
yes
TallPain9230@reddit
I had a 24” BenQ 1080p 120hz for nearly a decade. Mostly because the frame rate kept it competitive for so long. Recently switched to 1440p 165hz and I’m very happy. More real estate in everything and it looks quite noticeably better. I’m still using the BenQ as a 2nd and it’s not bad or anything, but I already wouldn’t want to go back. I’d go for it.
LayceLSV@reddit
Yeah 100%. Had no idea what I was missing until I jumped from 1080 to 1440, and then again from lcd to oled.
teknotonppa@reddit
100%. More pixels, games without AA looks like having AA on ultra setting. Once you try 1080p -> 1440p, there is no turning back again.
Neraxis@reddit
No
gonegitem@reddit
1440p is the best upgrade ever, you'll never go back to crusty 1080p ever haha
Rabadazh@reddit
1080p 24 inch still looks great, 1440p 27 "only" has 18% better ppi
Ok_Emotion9841@reddit
It's worth it, and those GPU will be a bit overkill for 1080p but nothing 'wrong' with that, will last you longer before needing to upgrade.
Also you are mixing up the 'k'. 1080p = 2k, 1440p = 2.5k, 2160p = 4k
memelord_dot_exe@reddit
i got a used monitor. 240hz 1440p. only 150. look on ebay you can find some great deals
grabbin__dragon@reddit
27" 1440p is Hella nice for gaming and productivity.
Kryssner@reddit
Yes!!! Went from 1080p to 1440p few months back, and it’s a huge difference.
Totally worth!!‘
gemengelage@reddit
Think of it this way: 27" is way worth it over 24". But 27" doesn't look great with 1080p.
Thormynd@reddit
It's not just 1080p vs 2K, it's also 24" vs 27". At the "usual" distance a monitor is set to, that greatly enhance the gaming experience imo. I would definitively go for the 27" 2k monitor.
ChinoSenpai@reddit
Just fyi I bought a LG ultragear 2 years ago and it stopped working like one month ago. The model I got it's 27gl83a Panel it's fine it just turn off but the monitor stay on, no more warranty so it's just there sitting below my desk 😔
Answering, yes totally worth 1440p I won't go back to 1080p I do work and games and it's just better the whole experience :)
NoConsideration6934@reddit
The difference between 1440p and 1080p is massive on most monitors. It totally ruined 1080p for me.
When I moved from 1440 to 4k, it was better but much less of a change compared to 1080 vs 1440.
100% worth it IMO
Renton-82@reddit
For 5 years I had a 1440p 144hz HDR 800 curved monitor and yes. It worth it. Not just for gaming, for daily work also.
Serberou5@reddit
To me going from 1080p to 1440p was light night and day. It was worth it for me but I got a decent deal on a 1440p 95 hz monitor off brand with a Samsung panel in it that had failed its 144hz quality test. It was very cheap and 95 hz is fine for me.
mken816@reddit
yes
7Shinigami@reddit
I strongly disliked 1440p. Try before you buy is what I say
Competitive-Bench848@reddit
100%
Ok-Pay-8393@reddit
Have two 1080p and use span setting from nvidia control panel to make it 4k.
BobtheArcher2018@reddit
It depends on what you need. Is your monitor doubling as a TV so you need it to be bigger? What games will you play.
Those cards are NOT overkill for 1080P at all, depending on how much FPS you want and what games you are in. I kinda like the GRE at 1080P as the AMD issues are less relevant at that rez since wont need to upscale or frame gen that much with strong card. Ray tracing won't add as much, etc.
Personally, so long as you are good at 24", or 27" if you have a deep desk and sit further away, I like 1080P until I get into 4070 Ti Super, 4080, or 4080 Super territory--and I wouldn't use a AMD at 1440P, unless maybe had a super deal on a 7900XTX and just used raw raster power to overcome the crappier features suite.
But 7900 GRE could also be a great value GPU for 1440P if you are only playing certain games and you know what they will be.
I love the upgrade to 1440P, but only because I paid enough to have the power to run it fairly well. But even my 7800x3D + OCed (moderately) 4070 Ti Super struggle in some of the newest AAA titles at 1440P because I want path tracing in them, even if I have used optimizations and mods to lessen the fps hit. Still \~ 60 FPS in Cyberpunk and Wukong, for example.
At 1080P, cpu matters more, though. A 7600x3D + 7900 GRE + 240 HZ 1080P IPS monitor is actually what I would do so long as 7800x3D prices are nuts. OFC 7600x3D can be hard to get as well. And also OFC this is my preference for top settings at high FPS. I'd rather have that than go to the next resolution.
EnlargedChonk@reddit
*laughs in 6700xt for 1440p* though I also don't play AAA much, usually without RT when I do, and almost never at launch. It all depends on how/what you play, but high refresh rates with RT on a smaller/further display is quite the outlier. Most people use the recommended "arms length" viewing distance, where 27" 1440p provides a nice picture that is quite a bit larger than a 24" or 21" 1080p panel. most people aren't pushing for high frames 1080p with RT, so the general advice is that those cards are "overkill" for 1080p. You do you brother but it's a bit silly to make a claim against the general advice because of an outlier use case. Though you do bring valuable discourse in that yes those high end cards can be a good fit for lower res, not enough people recognize that it may be a possible use case for OP in these kind of threads.
BobtheArcher2018@reddit
Fair enough. I tried to explain as best I could, but my post was already long. And these new RT games keep coming. Wukong, Cyberpunk, Alan Wake, soon more. So hard to say how much of an outlier these games are.
In the end, one needs to do research and see what they like. People are telling me I lie about my performance in these games, but the thing is just that they are happy with lower settings.
EnlargedChonk@reddit
see and I'm the opposite I'd much rather run a game at higher res with medium settings than max out a lower res. Personally I can see the difference in between the medium/high/ultra settings in a lot of these games, but I can look past reduced fidelity if it gives me a sharper image as long as the game is still a good experience, but I also tend to replay games, so when I have the GPU power to max out a game I previously played at medium I enjoy taking the opportunity to re-experience it with increased fidelity, which helps to not feel like I'm "missing out" on fidelity because I will get it later
Hot-Interest-3968@reddit
I’m actually more wondering why you’d get a 4070 to exclusively run 1080p. Feels like a waste to get a 4070 if you’re not going to use its performance. Definitely go 1440 or 4k depending on use case.
Fe_ketsu@reddit
Depends on the size of your monitor, I went from a 24" 1080p IPS to a 27" 2k IPS monitor, while it is nicer with a larger screen with a slight increase in pixel density, it wasn't anything mind-blowing. I would imagine switching panel type to something like OLED or QLED would feel like a bigger upgrade for me. If you have a larger 1080p monitor and switch to a similar size 2k monitor it might feel like a big upgrade for you though.
There's also a downside with having higher resolution being more demanding, so you can't expect same FPS with 2k as you got with 1080p.
Ghost1eToast1es@reddit
It's quite a jump. See your eyes can only blend together pixels so far so if you want the sharpest image, you want to reach that point but any more than that I'd a waste. The bigger the display, the bigger the pixels are which means you need to stand further away to realize that point where pixels blend completely. Of course lower resolutions require you to stand further and further away as well. At 1080p on a 24" monitor, you reaching that point until something like over 6 ft which isn't really feasible on that size screen so you never end up getting the best image possible. On a 1440p 27" monitor though, that point is like 3ft 8 in which is a doable distance and slightly closer won't be much worse. At 4k, that distance is only like 2 ft but when are you going to need to stare at a screen from that close anyways so it doesn't really make sense at this time. Maybe when tech improves to the point where it just becomes standard but not now.
weirdbearduk@reddit
Yes
laffer1@reddit
Yes. The jump to 4k is much less worth it, but 1440p is huge.
Islaytomuch1@reddit
It's noticeable. Just upgraded to a 180hrz 34 inch 1440p screen, it's much nicer than my 42 in 1080p TV.
myskiniswhack@reddit
IMO 1440p monitor is one of the most low effort, high efficacy improvements to a pc build. Super worth it especially with the gpu’s you listed
Redbone1441@reddit
24in 1080p and 27in 1440p aren’t that different. What really matters here is:
How close or far from your monitor do you sit. Does the increased screen size benefit you? If you sit close to your monitor, maybe not.
Pixel Density: 24inch 1080p pixel density is 92ppi (pixels per inch) vs 27in 1440p at 108ppi. Its a difference that is noticeable in small details, of course, but if you move that 27in monitor further back to match the perspective of the 24in 1080p, its a lot harder to make out a difference.
My thoughts: If you are building a system with a 7900GRE, then you might as well go with the 1440p Monitor, the 7900GRE is WAY overkill for 1080p. Personally, I think even a 1440p 165hz monitor is still too low. I wouldn’t go for anything less than 1440p and 240Hz with that GPU, because you’re going to be leaving a lot of performance on the table for no real benefit, lol. It’s like dropping a V8 into a stock Mazda. The engine is just way too strong for the rest of the car, which will hold you back.
If thats the case, Monitor technology every year is getting better and better, driving prices lower and lower. Maybe its worth it to settle for a 24in 1080p Monitor now, and then in 1 or 2 years, check out a better 1440p 240Hz Monitor, or something else even.
mplxzx@reddit
Right now mid range GPUs can handle 1440p and is a very viable option. I switched from 24” 1080p to 27” 1440p and can’t be happier. If you find a nice offer go for it.
VirtuaLarz@reddit
If you're looking at youtube videos there's a lot of compression that doesn't do 1440p justice. You won't really notice it until you have it in front of you.
I thought it was sort of a gimmick until I found a Dell 34 Inch Gaming Monitor S3422DWG for super cheap. Sure it's ultrawide, but I was definitely happy.
CuriousMost9971@reddit
I got a 32 LG ultragear a few years ago. 1440 is really the sweet spot.
I have a 32in 4k set next to it i use for my side monitor.
You have to think of it like the 1440 monitors are now the cost when 1080p monitors got mainstream.
ResolutionVisual1422@reddit
Yes, idk when you can get a solid 1440p 165hz monitor rn for like, 200 euro, it's incredibly hard to justify 1080p unless ur some esports pro that need perfect response times.
EnlargedChonk@reddit
The thing with monitors, people fail to realize is that it is the single most important piece in the chain for graphical fidelity. After all it is the last step where all the work your computer does making an image comes to life. Now I'm not gonna lie to your face that the rest is unimportant, you still need a good GPU to draw a good image in newer games. But the point is that the even best examples of the latest and greatest VFX will look like ass on a bad monitor but on a good monitor you can see what VFX new and old have to offer in their best light. Now that's not to say that a lower res is automatically "bad" but rather to elevate the importance of the monitor in your setup. Don't think of it as an afterthought "oh I'm building a PC with these specs, I should get x monitor" make your build around the image you want. How large do you want the image, how sharp, how fast, is color accuracy important, is color vibrancy important, is HDR important, etc... pick a monitor that meets your demands, then pick a GPU that can fulfill those demands in the games you play and plan to play. A good monitor will usually outlast several builds, so it's a worthwhile investment to get a good one.
Personally I value a moderate size sharp image with very accurate colors in a variety of color spaces, and I want it to be capable of fast frame rates for multiplayer games, with variable refresh. I also want to be able to drive this display using a midrange build with infrequent upgrades. That eventually led me to QD-OLED at 27" 1440p 240hz. Now I would've loved to have 32" 4k 240hz, but that last bit stops me, I don't want to run a super expensive tower that puts out a lot of heat. 1440p for me strikes a good balance of large sharp image, with moderate hardware requirements. when I built my system I was always planning to play 1440p with at least 60fps on single player games, and 100+fps on multiplayer, so at the time I got a 6700xt (mostly because it was impossible to find 6800(xt) local). it's served well and still fulfills my goals in the games I play.
Talking specifically about resolution difference, on my desktop I cannot go back to my previous 21" 1080p, it's just not big enough for my gaming taste in that setting. when I switched to 27" 1440p I wouldn't say I was "astonished" or it "changed my life", but the extra size was a definite boost in immersion. Beyond the initial "wow it's bigger", it wasn't something I noticed daily, the extra screen space for non games is extremely valuable, probably the most "noticeable" improvement. But in games the extra immersion from a larger display taking up more of your IRL FOV is a "silent gamechanger" at least for me. It's not a "wow I'm so much more immersed" it's just, being more immersed, less distracted, ~~really makes you~~ ~~feel~~ ~~like batman.~~ Of course this is all subjective and you might find that it's a complete waste for you. Kinda like how some people don't care for movie theaters because a huge IMAX screen with crazy high end sound system subjectively changes nothing about the movie watching experience to them compared to their 55" TCL with soundbar.
thebendystraww@reddit
Yes
BlueshineKB@reddit
Its a night and day difference. I still use 1080p bc i mainly play shooters but man 1440p is much nicer. Can literally count the pixels on my screen after switching back
KypAstar@reddit
Yes. 1440p to 4k isn't particularly worth it imo, but 1080p to 1440p is something you cannot go back from.
PlutoJones42@reddit
Yes
Gmenasco@reddit
Don't get a 24 for the love of god
DoubleShot027@reddit
If you have the hardware yes it’s worth it. I can’t go back to gaming on 1080p now :(
defidigs@reddit
100%
StConvolute@reddit
Man, go higher again (if you can!). I feel so restricted by 1080 these days (at work). And that's just for coding!
DifficultMovie7169@reddit
you shouldnt stick with lg ultragear, either get a top monitor manufacturer otherwise offbrand monitors on amazon uses even more updated screen tech at half the price of LG for the same HZ-RES-size
SkyMasterARC@reddit
Lol, 1080p will be your bottleneck with that GPU /s
Seriously though yes. I have a 1440p laptop and have trouble grinding games for my little brother because his is 1080p. World of differences and gaming performance, especially in war thunder where spotting and identifying enemies is crucial.
D33GS@reddit
I would definitely go 1440p at this point especially with those GPUs.
lyons4231@reddit
yes
BaQstein_@reddit
I went from 24" 1080p to 24" 1440p and the difference is insane.
sdk5P4RK4@reddit
there are tons of really good 1440p monitors significantly cheaper than an ultragear. yes its worth it. yes a 4070 super is extreme overkill for 1080p.
LeprosyLeopard@reddit
1440p is the sweet spot for resolution in everything but art or cinematography use.
Nazoku@reddit
I can definitely feel it
RAButcher@reddit
1080p sucks
villalacho12@reddit
Yes.
MewKazami@reddit
Everyone basically telling you their feelings I'll try to use some logic here.
I've been on 1080p since it was basically released before that I was on 1280x1024 LCD and before that 19" CRT from Samsung.
I recently 2 year ago upgraded to 1440p I still use my old 1080p as secondary monitor. I have a 7900 XTX and 7800X3D.
So first let me explain something simple. PPI. Pixel per Inch this is the actual metric you need to take into account.
Your 27" will be 108.79 PPI and your 24" will be 91.79 PPI
Now I want to compare this to a 4K TV at 40" this is going to have a PPI of 110.15.
What this essentially means is in terms of picture quality. Your 1440p 27" monitor is going to look identical to a 4K TV at 40". No matter the view distance. Obviously account for same technology OLED is going to look better then IPS LCD no matter what.
Now a lot of TV today are sold in 55" and way above a 55", a 4K TV of 55" only has a PPI of 80.11 meaning if you watch it from a close distance it's going to look REAL BAD, so that means if you sit in front of it like you would a 1080p screen the image while being very close up is going to look worse then a 1080p 24" screen. While being 4K. You'll see more detail but it will be muddy and blurred.
You'll see this effect when you play your Nintendo Switch on 720p handled and then 1080p on a big TV. It's going to look worse on your TV then it does in your hands. This is the best showcase for PPI I know. Especially a good OLED showcase if you have the OLED switch.
Now when I have my two monitors side by side it's clear that 1440p is the winner it has 20 more PPIs and is bigger, the benefits are two fold. More detail in the imagine in terms of pixels, more workspace on the desktop, and clearer image because it has more PPI. Win Win Win. It's simply superior in all ways.
Is 1440 worth it? If you never seen it and don't have anywhere or anyone to compare it to. Not really no. Nothing has changed since I got 1440p in terms of gaming. In terms of how much stuff in my day to day life I can have on my screen that is bigger yes. But gaming just looks a bit more sharper and crisper. Using non native resolutions on LCDs is always bad so there no way to compare unless you change panels so basically monitors.
A much bigger change is 60 Hz vs 120/140/165/250 etc... Thats something you can feel and see. Fluditiy is incredibly hard to display since it depends on the display you have. But seeing it in real life it becomes very obvious if you're used to 60 or 144.
You eyes get very used to it and 1440p vs 1080p is not something you're really aware of in most day to day situations.
I'd get the 1440p since it's a straight upgrade in all ways, but if you don't have money you'll literally have no comparison and no way to know if there is a difference because functionally it is 100% the same.
Zoeylz@reddit
yes
ScornedSloth@reddit
I picked up my 1440p 240hz 27in 1ms response ips display for $100 on offer up. There are tons of good monitors available for a good price used, so if you can tolerate a tiny amount of risk, I think that's the way to go.
fiittzzyy@reddit
Yeah, if you're buying a new monitor in 2024 esp. with those cards then 1440p is the way to go.
I recently upgraded my monitor from a 1080p/165hz to 1440p/165hz and the difference is very noticeable. I'm driving with an RX 6750 XT too.
1440p monitors are very affordable these days. I paid £170 for my Dell G2724D which is around the same price I paid for the FHD monitor about 18 months ago.
JuLMi_OP@reddit
Yes it is recently upgraded from a 1080 p monitor
nzmvisesta@reddit
I renctly bought ultragear 27gr83b, 240hz 1440p. I found it for 300 euros, it is an amazing monitor. Big upgrade over my 1080p 75 aoc
Brokenbonesjunior@reddit
1440 is great because it’s not nearly as demanding as 4K yet you can still appreciate the larger screens.
If you can do 32” 1440 even better. Some people argue pixel density suffers here, but I personally like pushing my screen far back in the table so it never affects me.
Standard-Pen4307@reddit
1440p is really cheap nowadays, you can grab a new monitor for 200 bucks if you don't need an OLED or high end one. Go for it
damien24101982@reddit
i couldnt/wouldnt go back to 1080p, take from that what u will
tht1guy63@reddit
1080p to 1440p is a larger visual leap to me than 1440p to 4k. 4k is not worth it over 1440p to me but 1440p is for sure worth over 1080p.
greyfox19@reddit
It’s a nice upgrade from 1080p
TheMoui21@reddit
24inch ouch... yeah 1440p is a good improvement, also 32inches is alqo great
nikerbacher@reddit
Yes. Looks amazingly smoother and more crisp.
Knarz97@reddit
I can’t imagine 1080p in 2024. I’ve been on a 1440p monitor for at least 10 years now.
I also think 4k is a waste.
BackgroundFish304@reddit
Your build can literally run most games at 1440p at high frames with ease
Why not sink that extra into a monitor
My LG Ultra gear 1440 is so pretty
Talmudo@reddit
I had to switch from 1440p to 1080p again because I have too small a desk for monitor :/ So make sure you have enough space for a 27 inch monitor. I had a desk that was 60cm deep and that wasn't enough for me and my eyes cried :D
LenoVW_Nut@reddit
At 24" it depends on your eyesight and how close you sit. I wouldn't care personally and would use 1080p.
At 27" same distance from the screen I would start to care. Also buy a used, returned or refurbished, don't spend extra on a Monitor.
xBaxinix@reddit
Go for 1440p only advantages
kjeldorans@reddit
As others have said: it is totally worth it to upgrade to 27" 1440p monitor.
However I want to give you another thought: once you upgrade to 1440p you'll start to notice how heavy and badly optimized are the latest games. The 4070 is a good card for 1440p but even that will run short of fps with some recent games... So I would also suggest you not to cheap on your 1440p monitor and get a good one with g-sync compatibility (with a good g-sync range) and good response times when fps can freely float from low 60 to high 140... Because they'll do that and once you cheap it on your monitor you'll get a bad experience
shch00r@reddit
I'm currently on 4k/144Hz display that's currently below $400 - Gigabyte M28U. It's really great price/performance ratio, with even KVM built in. You can get something decent in a reasonable price.
rodinj@reddit
I went from 1080p to 4k and I honestly barely noticed it. I notice it when you go back to a worse screen but that's it.
Mysterious_Lab1634@reddit
How many inches?
rodinj@reddit
27 inch
Mysterious_Lab1634@reddit
Yea, thats huge difference... wondering why its not noticable to you... what is monitor brand/model?
EnlargedChonk@reddit
viewing distance is an important variable. The key number we want is pixels per degree of your FOV or PPD. even a large 1080p display can look indistinguishable in sharpness from a 4k display with enough viewing distance.
rodinj@reddit
I had Philips monitors initially, currently use an expensive LG one
rygaroo@reddit
Interesting, your experience sounds just like my thoughts on 60Hz -> 120Hz, but w/ pixels, I'm the exact opposite. The doubling of pixels from 1600p@60Hz -> 4k@60Hz was like night and day. I could see so much more of the map in Civ. I could shrink text and see more than double the amount of code per display. The first thing I did at my new job was find a way to get rid of the 1080p garbage display that they setup for me, lol.
billy-_-Pilgrim@reddit
Yap
NextInstruction9938@reddit
It's kinda like OLED, whether you die using 1080p or live long enough to only use 1440p and above.
Shayes_@reddit
I used to be unsure as well, but it's really way nicer than 1080p. This is particularly true at 27in, if you get a 27in 1080p monitor it'll be noticably pixelated.
4k is notably better than 2k also, at 27in you can barely see pixels. But it takes way more processing power so you usually get lower frames, plus the cost is far more, especially if you want above 60Hz. 2k is the best middle ground imo, and if you have a 4070 you definitely want to take advantage of it with a nice monitor.
tonallyawkword@reddit
definitely worth 2x $100 IMO.
more about personal preference for MP. Pretty drastic diff. for SP and vid-viewing.
Putrid-Flan-1289@reddit
Definitely worth it. Theres lots of good 1440p monitors that are way less than double the cost. The picture clarity and color detail, at least to my eyes, is astronomically better than 1080p. I will NEVER go back. And for reference i have a FE 4070 Super on a 34" curved ultrawide ASUS TUF monitor.
Syn2108@reddit
I just upgraded last month from 1080p to 1440p Ultra wide with the 34inch curved Dell monitor and the ONLY thing I regret is not doing it sooner.
All of my games look 100x better. It's insane.
Dyryth@reddit
I changed from 2060 and 24" 1080p to 4070 Super and 27" 1440p monitor and the difference is like night and day.
Cursed_Teardrop@reddit
You will notice so many more fine details in games at 1440p, everything just looks better.
Grizzled--Kinda@reddit
Yes
alinzalau@reddit
Its the sweet spot for fps and fidelity my opinion. I play sp games i crank everything up. Competitive games dial the settings for best fps/ visuals. And i have a 4090. I tried the 4k before i went to 1440p and mostly due to me not seeing that big of a difference and losing a lot of FPS
wilmer007@reddit
1440 monitors could almost the same as 1080 monitors or 50-100% more so your getting twice the pixels for twice the price at worse.
I have a 10 year old PC that runs the same game at 4k/30, 1440/60, and 1080/90 and I dont really notice a difference between all 3 but if I do the difference would he more noticeable going from 1080 to 1440.
I also built a pc a few years back for my neighbor where that PC can only do 1440/60 and I still got her 1440/144 monitors for the same price as 1080/144 monitors so it doesn't make sense to be stuck in 1080 unless your pc cant do 1440 and/or you get the 1080 monitors for alot less money than 1440 monitors.
Seeforaychten@reddit
I just made the jump from 1080 to 1440 with a 4070 Super. And it's amazing. I can't imagine going back. If 4k at high frames was affordable I'd just send it
SloppyLetterhead@reddit
1000%. I have a 1440p monitor and recently got a 4k one.
I still use the 1440p as my primary monitor because of the high refresh rate. 4k is nice for multitasking with lots of windows open.
1440p looks good, has more space, and isn’t prohibitively expensive for above 60hz.
peres9551@reddit
It is, for real. If they say its not - they lie
Own-Story8907@reddit
Yes I can never do 1080p again.
-wurrZag-@reddit
Twice the cost? No.
ishsreddit@reddit
its not just the resolution. Its the color accuracy, refresh, latency, viewing angles, brightness, contrast, ghosting etc etc. 1440p monitors tend to have higher quality parts/specs nowadays. Rtings and techspot/hardware unboxed (youtube) are excellent resources for recommendations. You can also reddit user review posts of the model you are interested in.
Of course you will need a better GPU at 1440p then 1080p. I would say you would need a rtx 3080 or rx 6800 or higher to run 1440p comfortably. On 27 inches, FSR isn't too bad but DLSS is noticeably better. 12GB mem bus should be fine for the most part so the 4070 is valid. I guess i would be somewhat concern at higher textures with RT and frame gen since RT and frame gen actually use a lot of Vram but i suppose actual 4070 users can comment on that.
senxor@reddit
There's a good reason why people went crazy over the Switch and Steam Deck OLEDs. A good screen upgrade can be far more meaningful than a hardware upgrade.
While there's a lot of talk right now over whether targeting 4K for gaming is worth the extra power/cost I think 1440p is absolutely a worthwhile upgrade over 1080p. If you're sitting at a desk more or less arm's length from it then 27" is about the perfect size imo.
skellyhuesos@reddit
I recently made the switch from a 24" 1080p monitor to a 27" 1440p monitor. Both IPS with 180HZ refresh rate. Well worth the switch.
BladedAbyss2551@reddit
Do it. You won't look back. 1440p should be the new standard at this point. Most modern titles look like blurry shit on 1080p with how developers are using so many post-processing effects that can't be turned off without making the game look horrid. I've seen titles come with forced TAA that helps mask lazy special effects, shadow implementation and stuff like hair/fur (that's all rendered at lower resolution) that TAA helps smooth back into one ugly piece. At least playing on higher resolutions will help with perceived clarity in that aspect.
RU_Pickman@reddit
Get the 1440p monitor. Game with it for an hour. Set the resolution back to 1080p. Then you'll see how big of a difference it makes.
Inevitable-Study502@reddit
you can play 2k or 4k already and 1080p monitor with DSR
you will notice that you dont need antialiasing that much
but if you want bigger display, they you do need higher resolution, because of pixel density
MellowAmoeba@reddit
Yes. 1440p and 180Hz. Not going back.
kandysteelheart@reddit
2k isnt worth it if you dont have the money to build a stable pc for it, it's so much more demanding for a visual upgrade that, even if I haven't seen yet, i doubt that it would improve much other than making things a bit clearer
But yeah if 1440p is affordable go for it
whatsyanamejack@reddit
I just upgraded from 1080 to 1440p and got a 4070 super. The answer is yes. It's worth it. I was skeptical too. But you won't be disappointed in the difference.
vaccumshoes@reddit
1080p looks like absolute shyt to me now I wouldn't be able to play games on one anymore. Honestly in 2024 your doing yourself a disservice if your playing games at 1080p consistently
equilibrium57@reddit
As many other people in this thread, once you go to 1440p, you will NEVER want to go back.
I went from 24" 1080p 240hz to double 27" 1440p 175hz main and 75hz secondary (both IPS) and I'll never ever go back to 1080p.
The difference is truly insane. I can only imagine something like 32" 4k. Thats probably my next upgrade, 32" 4k OLED
Strange_Bed_4803@reddit
definitely
DeeJudanne@reddit
its night and day difference
Nemehadi@reddit
It is a noticable visual and immersion upgrade which comes at a cost, if you ever want to play games at high quality settings then hardware requirements go up significantly
Also for some games a bigger screen can lower your efficiency as you cant focus your sight on whole screen, if your DPI mouse settings are relatively low you may need to increase them a bit
Human-Bookkeeper-866@reddit
Yes. Bye.
con_cck@reddit
i believe it’s worth it love my 1440
Hungry_Reception_724@reddit
100% worth it. 27" 1440p is a 10x better gaming experience than a 24" 1080p
KC2Lucky@reddit
Depends on the size of the monitors. 24” 1080p is fine. If you’re using 27” I wouldn’t even bother with 1080p…
For me it depends on desk space, I have a 27” 1440p monitor and tbh, over a 24” monitor I don’t really notice much difference apart from the workspace or “immersion”.
It’s up to you on which one you want. You’ll always get more frames at 1080p
trojangod@reddit
At 24” won’t be a dramatic difference. Specially if you’re using ultra gear. Pretty low end monitors. If you went from a 1080p ultra gear to a 1440p hdr 1000 certified monitor. That is a worthy upgrade.
MisterGrimes@reddit
I haven't gone below 1440 in like 10 years now.
And now I think ultrawides are becoming much more accessible in terms of affordability and availability.
I literally just got a Sceptre 34" 165hz curved ultrawide for the office and it was only like $250 on amazon.
Functionally it feels similar to my dual LG Ultragear 1440 32" 165hz which, in retrospect, cost more in total.
TeamChaosenjoyer@reddit
It shouldn’t be too much more expensive but holidays are approaching you can probably get a very good monitor soon for cheap but buying a 1080p monitor with those graphics cards is legit stupid lol
Such_Bat3374@reddit
Once you will go 1440p you won't be able to go back. The same with Oled displays. Also 4070s or 7900gre are overkills for 1080p. Buy the 1440p monitor and join the 2k train
carnasaur@reddit
On a side note, if you ever work with spreadsheets, 1440p is so much better.
HeyGuysKennanjkHere@reddit
If your 1440p monitor costs twice as much 1080p one and your worried about the cost your either paid way to much for your 1080p monitor or should really get a job. I got a 1440p 144hz acre for like 200 a couple years ago.
takuarc@reddit
Night and day.
Isurvived2014bears@reddit
Once you go 1440p you never go back
Sea-Parsnip1516@reddit
It's worth it from a graphics card perspective because why waste that performance?
But in a general sense not really.
After like a month your eyes will adjust and it will become a baseline, similar to how now that 1080 is the standard 720 looks like garbage.
snktiger@reddit
2K is worth it. and I think you might want to go for 32"? I started with 27" 2k and found things scaled down too small in 2K so I ended up getting a 32".
Enigma_User@reddit
Get a used 1440p one.
Altruistic-Gap-7877@reddit
Idk what people are talking about. I have an 1080p old monitor 28 inch and it looks just like my 1440p native 27 inch monitor. So i would choose 1080p for competitive. And if you want to do survival games and competitive get an ips ultrawide
GARGEAN@reddit
Just a reminder: 1440p with upscaler on Quality looks better and performs on average slightly FASTER than native 1080p.
Livid-Cheek7846@reddit (OP)
Upsalers are that good these days eh?
Ermastic@reddit
DLSS is basically magic at high resolution, it is the only reason to shell out extra for Nvidia at this point. I play on a 4k 28" with a 4080 and DLSS quality is essentially a free +20% fps. It works less and less well as you decrease resolutions though because you're starting with less overall data for the algorithm to work with. 1080p output upscaled from 720p or lower looks pretty bad.
GARGEAN@reddit
Just as an example:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wPeC7QiG6Ig
Official FSR implementation in here is ABSOLUTE dogwater. Modded (!!!) DLSS (game doesn't have it by default) provides insanely better image quality than FSR. And FSR, to my knowledge, was never updated in that title and can't be as easily patched by hand as DLSS can be.
GARGEAN@reddit
It a little bit depends) I use DLSS since 2020 and not once I've found example where DLSS Quality on 1440p was not worth it.
FSR on the other hand is much more hit or miss. In some games it is quite adequate and usable, but in many others it is just bad even at Quality. And biggest problem - those examples are 99% won't be updated to better FSR version, and I am sure some new bad FSR once m implementations are yet to come.
So if you will go with Nvidia - upscaling is that good indeed. OTOH AMD will give you somewhat to noticeably more raster per $, so it will handle native 1440p a bit better.
virtbo@reddit
Recently I had sunken so many hours into GTA (with loads of visual mods) before I upgraded monitors from 1080p to 1440p. It was certainly worth it for me. 1440p is like cleaning your dirty glasses.
wulfstein@reddit
Absolutely worth it, yes.
If you’re already eyeing a 4070 Super or 7900 GRE then double the cost shouldn’t be a problem to you?
Even if you’re going for a budget build I’d get the 1440P monitor and a cheaper graphics card instead of cheaping out on the monitor.
bustsheedi@reddit
Absolutely worth it, I would say also go to 32inches!
Zorian_Vale@reddit
A thousand times yes. The jump from 1080p to 1440p on a mice gaming monitor and GPI changed my entire gaming experience for the better. It was la fame changer.
mangyrat@reddit
yes you will notice a big difference right away.
now going form 1440p to 4k is not that much of a big difference and not really worth it.
WhoIsEnvy@reddit
1440p, worth. 4k, not worth...
greenreaper__@reddit
I have the 27inch LG and am insanely happy with it if that helps. I would 100% buy it if I had your choices.
qzwxecrvtbyn111@reddit
1080p to 1440p is a way more noticeable jump than 1440p to 4k
entilza05@reddit
1440p new standard for a while I imagine, can't go back.
Ermastic@reddit
Ok look at it like this. Imagine the 1080p monitor cost $1, and the 1440p monitor cost $2. It would still be twice the cost to upgrade, but it's worth spending a single dollar extra. Monitors aren't at that price obviously, but the as overall prices decrease, the percentage increase between the two models becomes less and less relevant. Right now I see the Ultragear 165hz 1440p at $209 and the 1080p model at $104. I would say that increased quality in resolution and screen size is well worth $105 extra, especially when you're building a system with a $600 GPU.
Immediate_Cut_6672@reddit
I have the exact monitor and a 4070 + r5 7600x, it’s great. Go for 1440p
Nervous_Hospital_571@reddit
got to utilize that gpu. I tried 1080p with a 7800xt and my gpu just wasn't doing much and my cpu was taking on most of the load.
also depending where you live you can get a $150 1440p monitor opposed to the $100 1080p monitor so keep an eye out for those deals. Acer does it all the time with their nitro monitors
MuppetRob@reddit
1440p at 144hz or better is the best gaming experience I've had yet.
West_Concert_8800@reddit
Worth
The_Internal_@reddit
Went 27" 1440p over a decade ago. Now at 49" 4k (though would suggest 42" 4k to most). If you have a midrange GPU or better, 1440p should be the targeted minimum for desktop PC gaming, and increasingly the standard for laptops.
Delicious-Disaster@reddit
Yes. 2k is a big difference compared to 1k. Mostly because the PPI is much higher. Costs are much better and GPUs are made for 1440p+ these days. This is a good video on the topic:
https://youtu.be/S10NnAhknt0?si=aT91wwS2I4vKJ7HE
CupZealous@reddit
At 1440p you will need to lower your graphics settings on some games unless you want to upgrade GPU but yeah it's worth it if you want better visual fidelity.
Xaniss@reddit
For those GPUs you need 1440p imo... and yes it is noticeable as fuck.
1080p -> 1440p is more obvious than 1440p -> 4k honestly.
XcG9PJf6@reddit
It's worth 77.8% more.
Diamondinthetough@reddit
Yes, but a O led 1440p…I have a 256hz and it’s worth
Worried-Risk-5886@reddit
1080p at 24" and 1440p at 27" is kind of similar because of ppi, if you ever used a 1080p 27" or 32" monitor then you would notice a huge difference.
nwsmith90@reddit
My gut reaction was no, and then I remembered how terrible my monitor looks when I plug in my laptop and it sets itself to 1080 for some reason.
It really is a huge upgrade.
Errettfitchett03@reddit
If you have a 4070 super or 7900, 1440p is the way to go. Those cards are great high refresh rate 1440p cards. If in the future games get more demanding, you can also make good use of upscaling tech that you can't use well when playing at 1080p
theclawl1ves@reddit
It's really nice, but my monitor is 32" so I kinda need the higher resolution. I'd say go for it
ZoidVII@reddit
The difference is definitely noticeable. I would say for 27-32 inches, you definitely want 1440p, if you end up going for a monitor below 27, 1080p is still great.
InterestinglyTedious@reddit
I'll be controversial and say no. My friend had a 1080p monitor next to a 1440p monitor and I genuinely couldn't tell the difference.
anabolicslav@reddit
Depends on your ox and what games you are playing. If FPS where refresh rate and fps is imprtsnt then I would chose an option with higher and stable FPS I.e if you are able to achieve constant 165 fps at 1440p the. It’s fine, if not then probably 1080 is better.
I went from 1080 to 1440p on 4080 super and 5800x3d and it’s much harder to get stable fps in FPS games and I kind of want to go back to 1080p.
If you don’t play fps games much or don’t play competitive games then 1440p should be fine
KirillNek0@reddit
It is not about resolution - it's about you having shorter time line on upgrading PC.
For 1080p, you will upgrade GPU over 4-6 years. For 2k - 3-4 years. CPU: 5-6 years vs 3-5 years.
You would also have to step up the GPU tier, from RTX __60 (Ti/Super)/__70 (Ti/Super) and RX _600(XT/ _700(XT) to __80/ __80 Ti and _800/ _800 XT.
Same for CPU, from i5 to i7, or R5 to R7.
Hour_Gur3452@reddit
And what happens when i switch from 1440p to 1080p on 1444p monitor? For example, I don't have too much FPS on game X, so I changed the resolution from 1440 to 1080
bluzrok46@reddit
Yes
Motorboatasaurus@reddit
Very much so. 4k isn't worth it over 2k is my opinion unless you are on something over like 40" screen size. But at 16-30" 2k is such a good resolution looking much better than 1080p.
AMv8-1day@reddit
Yes.
It's 2024. 1440p Monitors are cheap.
PapaJohick@reddit
Yes. 1440 is basically the standard now if you’re either into competitive gaming or if you’re playing RPG style games and can’t justify going to 4k
Illustrious-Limit160@reddit
Forget video games; just browsing the web you'll realize after switching to 1440 that your eyes don't get as tired.
Actually reading text is the main reason to go higher resolution, and for that I recommend 4k.
Global-Woodpecker582@reddit
Yes
Fluffy_Confusion_654@reddit
I have a 1440p 180hz monitor and I love it. Wouldn’t go back. I also have a 7900 gre and it runs games, mainly Overwatch, on high settings at 2k pegged at 180fps 90%+ of the time.
setdownsyndrome@reddit
Look into ppi(pixels per inch) i believe theres only a 10 pixel difference between 1440 on 27in and 1080 on 24in. So the resolution will look the same but itll be bigger.
Rabid_Penguin666@reddit
I went 1440P 144Hz years ago and I have no ragregts.
uncanny_mac@reddit
I don’t want to overhype it, but it’s a night and day difference visually.
oblivic90@reddit
Depends what you do on it the sweet spot for me:
1080p - 24 inch 1440p - 27 inch
I prefer 24 inch for fps, it’s also fine for rts but 27 would probably be better for rts, haven’t tried.
For working (programming)
Ultra wide > dual 24 > 27 > dual 27 > 24
_DarkKnight___@reddit
That 4070 super is quite capable of 1440p ultra settings, so there is no point in using a 1080p monitor here. Just go for a 27 inch 1440p monitor to fully utilize/experience the magic of that GPU
OneMonthWilly@reddit
I switched this summer, had to buy 7900gre so i dont use those fsr or dlss technologies, would do it again 100% any day, well worth it and 7900GRE is awesome 2k card that performs exceptionally well for the money you pay
R4b@reddit
1080 is around 2 million pixels. 1440 is around 3.6m. Almost double and it looks great!
sweatoncrack@reddit
the difference between 1440p and 1080p is very big, while from 2k to 4k isnt really that noticeable
Wonderful-Poetry860@reddit
It is absolutely worth it at that screen size. The clarity cannot be overemphasized. I moved from a 1080p LG 27GL650F-B to a 27" 1440p LG 27GL83A-B a few months back and cannot imagine going back. Less aliasing in games is nice, but the biggest QOL improvement is just how much clearer everything is with non-gaming tasks and web browsing. Text is so much clearer.
No-Hedgehog9995@reddit
Depends what you play. For games like cod, siege, valorant etc that require high fps and low detail, probably go 1080p. Everything else? 1440p all the way.
FrankIsLoww@reddit
Samsung Oddesy G5. It’s the shit. Also way cheaper now then when I bought it almost 5 years ago.
OkZion@reddit
Went from 60 fps to 120fps on ps5, couldn't go back. Started playing warzone on my laptop at 144hz, I sold my ps5 and bought a PC And just got a 1440p monitor and it's all been worth it. It just sucks when you play your friends console at thier place and you gotta endure 60 fps 1080p again
Michu_x7@reddit
If you can get 1440p monitor cheap, sure try it. I'd say it looks sharper compared to full hd (1080p) Duh,... more pixels) And if you buy one, look that you'll get one with a decent amount hz. A.e. 144hz, 165hz or even over 200. If you go from 60hz to 144hz, it's kind of a gamechanger. Just how fluent everything feels, expected that you get a good base framrate. The resolution of full hd is more than enough, hz wins you more fights than the resolution.. if you play fps games or such. But yes, once you get 1440p you wouldn't want to go back, at least for me.
mikemike44@reddit
Get a best buy credit card and buy both and see the difference for yourself. Then just return them.
chrisrobweeks@reddit
It may seem like overkill now but you're future-proofed for the next 5+ years. 10 if you're good to it.
midnytemyst40@reddit
Sounds literally like my situation. I was gifted a 4070 super/i7-14700kf PC and only had the 1080p 24" ultra gear monitor cause it was cheap, then when I got the oc I decided to go 1440p 27" and it's been amazing. Elden ring looks way better, the backgrounds really shine at higher resolutions. Might be dumb but I can see batarangs in Gotham knights way further than my girlfriend who's at 1080p, it literally just doesn't have the resolution to display the glow that signifies them past a certain distance. Look, the 4070s is a 1440p card. Yes it's twice the price where I live too, but I don't regret it. It's not just higher resolutions for things nearby it's the fact you can now see enemies further away. Trust me, you'll enjoy it.
bzzbzzitstime@reddit
27" 1440p is MILES better than a 1080p. It is really worth it if you care about visuals at all. Where do you live? There's a ton of deals going around for monitors, could get a 1440p pretty cheap most likely.
Vegetable-Squirrel98@reddit
1440 at like 120hz is my set up, I wish I had 4k, but wouldn't go 4k unless I had a gpu that could do 120hz
RR3XXYYY@reddit
Huge difference, and I cannot stress that enough
1440 to 4k was nice too but not as big as 1080 to 1440
pipea@reddit
I would say yes. It's got more usable screen space than 1080, but doesn't require you to use display scaling (which some annoying apps don't support correctly) or kill your eyeballs, as in 4k.
FeelingDegree8@reddit
If you buy 1440p you'll justify the cost to yourself. If you stay 1080p you'll question if the jump is worth it.
If you want to save money, no. If you want the ultimate gaming experience, yes
jforjuicy@reddit
Depends, are you ready to never want to play 1080p again?
wgaca2@reddit
I went from 27" 1080p VA to 27" 1440p QDOLED and while the QDOLED has better colors and 3x the refresh rate I don't think the jump is as big as just going from 1080 60 to 1080 144.
And yes, I know that 1440p has more pixels it just doesn't look that much different..
elfeyesseetoomuch@reddit
Yes, but also its 2024
Naulty85@reddit
I just upgraded to a 27” 1440/240/OLED. Coming from 24” 1080/140/IPS.
The resolution alone was a massive welcome alone. Then the OLED, holy hell. It’s like playing a different game.
7950x3d with 7900GRE.
mohammedafify1@reddit
Yes, and 4K even better.
fuzzynyanko@reddit
27-28" is a great sweet spot. I have a 32" monitor and it's just a little large to where I push it back. For a work PC, I had a 28" and it was much more comfortable, and easier to see video game HUDs.
MKultraman1231@reddit
Get an Aoc q27g3xmn, when your enemy flashbangs you you go blind IRL such immersion!
GamingKink@reddit
Yes. There is MSI 27inch 1440p 240hz for 400euro or less, i purchased it 2 years ago, brand new. Its worth it.
No-Answer4609@reddit
No not rlly
FreeVoldemort@reddit
Not worth the cost. I went from 1080p to 1440p when I got a 6800XT. Then I went from 1440p to 4k when I got a 4080. Bunch of GPUs in between and since.
The only reason I upgraded my monitors was because my GPU wasn't being fully utilized. The visual difference was always pretty subtle especially in motion.
So no, not worth the cost. But I'm using a 4090 now. Nothing I do is worth the cost. But I went down the unnecessary upgrade rabbit hole and don't recommend it to others.
no6969el@reddit
Absolutely!, I have a 4K TV now so I hooked my PC up to it and I try to play every game at 4K with dlss (3090) but every once in awhile a game doesn't work too well so I drop it to 1440p barely notice the darn thing except more FPS.
Muted_Classic3474@reddit
The order that I would personally go in for monitor quality is 1080p 60hz 1080 144hz 1440p 144hz 1400p 240hz 4k 240hz
That being, i believe much of anything past 1440p 144hz is overkill and not nearly as noticeable as previous upgrades.
Tri343@reddit
1440p is the sweet spot for gaming. 4k equals unnecessary performance for marginal gains while 1440p is actual blurry compared to 1440p. the difference is night and day between 1440p.
the issue with 4k is that you only receive a benefit when the screen is massive and youre sitting further away. if youre just gaming at your desk 2-3 feet from your monistor youll be hard pressed to notice any difference from 1440p and 4k. why waste performance on pixels that you wont even notice 2 feet from you?
1440p has 56% more pixels than 1080p. it makes the image so much sharper and crisp. going to 1080 is blurry.
4k for living room TV gaming, 1440p for at desk gaming.
Lrivard@reddit
Went 1440p and will never go back.
I went from a 27inch 1080p to a 32inch 1440p. The difference was night and day for clarity
Roderto@reddit
I recently moved from a 23.5” 1080p monitor (60Hz) to a 27” 1440p monitor (170Hz). The pixel density of a 27” 1440p will only be slightly higher than a ~24” 1080p, but it’s still sharper. And you have way more screen space to work with. 3” may not sound like much but when you remember that’s a diagonal measurement, it results in a material increase in space.
The higher refresh rate makes a big difference too.
HeroBartender@reddit
As someone who just went from 1080p to 1440p, yes. It is far more different than you think. Especially if you compare them side by side
Mazgazine1@reddit
1080p feels low res now :( 4k is too expensive, 1440p is just right.
SwAAn01@reddit
Yes. Imo the jump from 1080p to 1440p is way bigger than 1440p to 4k. If you have the hardware to support it, getting a 1440p 144hz monitor is a game changer.
Mockpit@reddit
I have been absolutely blown away by 1440p after using 1080p for years. Well worth the price especially if you going for a 4070 or 7900 to begin with.
R3tr0spect@reddit
1440p is honestly the new standard for resolution.
KaygoBubs@reddit
Yes
tokeytime@reddit
Honestly man? People will swear up and down it matters, you can totally tell bro, etc. I have a 1440p 165hz monitor and a 1080p 240hz monitor, same manu. They look identical. In fact, the 1080p has slightly better colors. But that's just the panel. The real difference is the size. The 1440p looks the same as the 1080p at a larger screen size. If you can deal with 24" rather than 27 or 32", get the 1080p and save yourself some money.
kNIGHTSFALLN@reddit
I should also add… I’ve had 3 LG ultragears 2-27’s and a 32
And the color spectrum sucks compared to something like a Samsung. (Obviously it’s half the price)
I still use them in my wife’s setup. But I can say with full confidence that I actually hate them. Within 6 months of buying them I was already looking to replace them.
Redemptions@reddit
I think you may want to look at shifting how you view the situation.
27" used to cost more. 1080p used to cost more. IPS used to cost more. >60Hz used to cost more. Those features 5 years ago were over $200 (probably more recently, but COVID makes all hardware numbers in that time frame funky).
Your question remains 'valid', but the question is really "Is the second tier of this accessory worth an extra $100 over the entry tier" and the generally yes, ESPECIALLY with that hardware you're looking to buy.
Traditional-Paper883@reddit
As a guy who moved to 1440P last year i can confidently say once you go, you will never come back from it
OldMattReddit@reddit
Personally for me for 16:9 1440p is the sweet spot for games and other stuff in balance. But if we're 100% honest for games specifically, before you go there and have the higher res as a baseline, if you're happy with 1080p then that's all that matters. Enjoy every single game in ultra >D
MYSTNightclawx@reddit
Idk the nvidia version of this but amd gpus have an option of “super resolution” which you can up your resolution higher than your monitor actually is
Funnelino@reddit
Not worth it. If you have a change try 1440p somewhere and see if there is some relevant difference.
Idraxus@reddit
Buy istead a 4060ti 16gb with some sale , is very good.
pshyong@reddit
Why spend all the money on a good gpu only to game in 1080???
Hell, I'd say get UW 34" OLED.
Rakuzenn@reddit
Yes is the short answer.
I swapped from my 1080p to 2k and the difference was clear as day, everything looked way better, more defined, and single player games primarily were so much more immersive.
Also you have double the space on the monitor while browsing and multitasking in case you don’t have your old monitor as a secondary.
I use it to play ps5 and ps3 as well and ps5 looks awesome and the ps3 still fills the monitor on a lower Rez but still looks as good.
If you can definitely do the upgrade!
The only downside for some are competitive games like cs and val could make you want to stay on the 1080p 24 inch for the bigger and easier heads to tap
hollands22@reddit
2k is really the sweet spot in my opinion. You’re less cpu bound and it looks great with good performance still. Your 4070 should do well
FunFact5000@reddit
Yes. I was on 1080 until just recently. The fps hit was slight, but the resolution was worth it.
_Lollerics_@reddit
If you can afford it, going from 1080 to 1440 is one of the biggest visual jumps you can do. Just remember once you go 1440p you're not going back. The next jump is either 4K (which isn't as big of a jump) or an oled monitor.
Hazzke@reddit
1440p is perfect for the 4070 super, I've been looking at upgrading to it just for that
Random_Guy_47@reddit
I upgraded from 22 inch 1080p to 27 inch 1440p years ago.
Absolutely worth it.
penywinkle@reddit
It's twice the pixels...
Traditional_Land1636@reddit
short answer: yes
long answer: also yes
CommunistRingworld@reddit
I did 1440p before I went to 4k. It's almost like the jump felt bugger from 1080 to 1440p
Bust3r14@reddit
Define "twice the cost"; you said they're both affordable, so I would recommend the 1440p. I have a 27" 1440p and love it. Also, 2K is 1080p; 2.5K is 1440p.
FrndlyNebrhoodRdrMan@reddit
Depending on your eyes and distance from your desk I'd consider getting a 32" 1440x60 panel which is kind of the sweet spot for that card on ultra settings these days.
Marco_OPolo@reddit
144hz at 1440p is the sweet spot for budget gaming right now. 60hz at any resolution is just awful
GerWeistta@reddit
It's only like a quarter/third increase in resulation compared to 1080p (from ~2k to ~2,5k), but the visual upgrade is unbelievable
grammar_mattras@reddit
Your pc is worth like 1500 euros. Getting a 1440 panel isn't "twice as much", it's 10% more.
You're pc is good enough to run out, you gotta do it.
FantaSHOW@reddit
Build PC, then check performance on the games you play, after that buy the monitor based on results
Palafin84@reddit
I do think 1440p is worth it. I think something that isn't being mentioned, is 27 inch your limit on screen size. In that have you tried anything bigger and would you potentially like anything bigger. This sub has a hard on for saying 1440p on anything past 27 inch is not really worth it because PPI and thus you have to move to 4k when I really think it is more at 32/34 inch where it becomes more of an issue. And then there is the question of have you tried or would like to try a curved monitor, at those higher screen sizes it starts becoming more of thing and imo fits better with bigger screens.
From my experience I have a 32 inch 1440p curved MSI monitor that I love, If I go bigger I will be going Curved 4K OLED, but I have looked at some 27 inch monitors in some stores and honestly while yes the PPI might be higher on those monitors I much prefer the bigger screen size.
I say all this because monitors tend to be something you keep for awhile and thus something you might want to find your sweet spot before dropping money on something you might not actually like as much.
No_Resolution_9252@reddit
Its not even close, go to 1440p
iccreek@reddit
You know that feeling when you look far away and can't make out the city name on the traffic sign? What I mean is that 1440p is like getting eye operation. After you get it, your first question to yourself will be "why would I ever use 1080p again?".
ShermansNecktie1864@reddit
You’re waisting your money on a 4070 super if you don’t buy a 1440. Just do it, it may hurt a little at first but you won’t regret it. You will regret a 1080.
debirdiev@reddit
I'm not gonna even read the post.
Yes.
ab47-@reddit
Completely worth it bro. you will never regret it . i switched to 1440p last year now i can't even look at 1080p 🥲
dulun18@reddit
a 27in 1440p 1ms 165hz IPS monitor is around $150 now a day..
Marco_OPolo@reddit
This is the way to go 1000% if you are budget-minded. If you’re buying a 4070 you’re honestly wasting your $$ if you’re not also going with 1440p
Acc_4_stream_only@reddit
I bought a 27" 1440p this year replacing my 24" 1080p
From my limited experience, if you had a 24" 1080p, going to a 27" 1440p feels underwhelming.. Overrated even. At least that's how I felt.
Anyway, the main reason it felt underwhelming is that the ppi difference is not huge. 24" 1080p 92ppi and a 27" 1440p 108 ppi
If you want, there are 1440p monitors at 24" size with higher pixel density. That probably looks stunning.
LIFO-to-FIFO@reddit
Is your PC powerful enough to run 1080p at above 60fps very comfortably? Then get 1440p.
If not? Stick to 1080p.
Marrked@reddit
You don't have to spend double on a 1440p monitor.
Take the Dell G2724D for example. An excellent 1440p 165hz IPS monitor. Can be had for less than $200 US.
Ill_Argument1442@reddit
İts hard for me to game in 1080 after i made the switch to 1440p
Amneesiak@reddit
Yes. It’s absolutely with it. It’s a massive improvement in quality and detail. Like night and day. You’ll never go back to 1080p.
Elc1247@reddit
This is a question that is brought up multiple times a day on this sub.
Yes. 1440p is a MASSIVE upgrade from 1080p. You likely have also never seen how good newer monitors look, with better motion clarity, color accuracy, contrast, and brightness.
1080p will feel claustrophobic to you once you start using a 1440p screen regularly.
BobtheArcher2018@reddit
Purely for gaming, though, I'd rather crush it at 1080P than be mid at 1440P.
Elc1247@reddit
if we are talking about competitive FPS games, 1440p is superior, and if you can play at 4k, its even better. higher pixel count = more detailed picture = easier to see enemies and keep track of them in the heat of the moment.
As an example, I play Overwatch 2 at 1440p 240FPS locked. Its far better than back in the old days at OW1 launch, 1080p 60fps...
you learn after being serious about fast paced competitive games, there are many parts to bringing out your full skill potential. Motion clarity is a massive one (framerate and pixel response times), visual fidelity is another (resolution and PPI), along with input response time, audio fidelity is another massive one that is often ignored (quality audio accuracy is like having x-ray vision, you can hear and determine exactly where things are, like footsteps and gunfire). The more you can bring out your maximum skill potential, the easier it is to improve your skills (no more blaming your gear, you need to start blaming yourself).
BobtheArcher2018@reddit
Sure. More FPS at higher res is great. But when it comes to tradeoffs, it gets complicated if you can't afford say 4070 Ti Super to 4080 Super for your 1440P system.
TheLostExpedition@reddit
I have never used 1440p but if its double the cost I would get 4 screens 1080p instead of 2 screens at 1440p. But I'm old and my eyesight isn't what it used to be .
aragon_1399@reddit
I have the 1440p ultragear and it’s hella amazing! Definitely worth the price imo (I’m even debating getting another one for a dual monitor)
Livid-Cheek7846@reddit (OP)
Damn. My wallet does not like this post.
drt0@reddit
There's great 1440p gaming monitors at prices very close to 1080p monitors. Check out Monitors Unboxed on YouTube for recommendations, he recently did a video on the subject of 2080p vs 1440p.
superchronicc@reddit
look at it this way. How long do you plan to use this monitor, and what is your budget? It you feel you'll get value out of it, then its justified.
Verme@reddit
It's so worth it ... it's not even close. I think at this point the only grandparents are still using 1080p monitors.
uceenk@reddit
i prefer graphic fidelity than FPS
going from 1080 p to 1440 p is like night and day
going from 60 to 120 fps, i couldn't notice the difference
BurntYams@reddit
I thought I didn’t need it.
But going from 1080p to 4k honestly was like experiencing a whole other world. games become more of an experience again rather than something to complete. I can’t even begin to describe to you the feeling of being able to see pores on the character’s skin because it was so high def (in the games that had that much graphical achievement btw)
My dad used it once to pay bills and he said he was blown away, and all he did was read text.
1080p is no longer even the standard, it’s a minimum. It’s time to upgrade bro.
iMaReDdiTaDmInDurrr@reddit
It is a massive visual upgrade, especially on a nice ips panel.
Any-Kaleidoscope7681@reddit
1440p 144hz is beautiful.
ValuableEmergency442@reddit
If you've never played at 1440 then you won't know what you're missing at 1080. If you continue like this then you could put yourself in a good spot as with a 4070 or 7900, you'd have an emormous amount of headroom for raytracing or other mad stuff at 1080. It is kinda overkill though. But then if you've never seen 1440, you won't miss 1440, and you've got loads of extra power to do stuff with.
HeroDanny@reddit
Am I missing something here. Why is 1440p so widely used? I have a triple 4k monitor setup that wasn't all that expensive.
Brometheous17@reddit
Absolutely best upgrade I ever did.
DaDivineLatte@reddit
It's significantly crisper. 100% if you can afford it
DontKnowHowToEnglish@reddit
Op, watch this video https://youtu.be/S10NnAhknt0
MINIPRO27YT@reddit
Everything looks so real on 1440p
dbrauto@reddit
1440 is so much better. Pull the trigger
CtrlAltDesolate@reddit
Yes.
Livid-Cheek7846@reddit (OP)
I was locked in on the 7900 gre until ive heard of driver issues. Im still unable to decide. Really like the gre.
https://np.reddit.com/r/IndianGaming/comments/1etip3u/comment/liij5v0/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button
Dtoodlez@reddit
There’s always some issue posted somewhere. If most things day it’s a good gpu then you’ll be fine.
klaasgermany@reddit
Yes
Kuski45@reddit
Cheapest 2k monitors are like 200 bucks
Dtoodlez@reddit
Yeah but colours, contract, and brightness can look pretty bad tbh, it’s more then just resolution
Postal_Monkey@reddit
For me the jump from 1080p to 1440p was significant. I literally had my wife and kids gasp at the difference.
BigFatBallsInMyMouth@reddit
What games? I find it extremely helpful in shooters.
timetobeanon@reddit
4k is better now.
Dtoodlez@reddit
4k still requires too much of a super high end gpu. 1440p is super affordable
ZebraOtoko42@reddit
I disagree. I have dual 27" 1440p monitors at home, and dual 27" 4k monitors at work. The 1440p monitors are clearly much better than 1080p, but the increase in resolution from 1440p -> 4k really isn't that noticeable, and just not worth the price.
Livid-Cheek7846@reddit (OP)
Not enough money for that 😅
Hondaaa95@reddit
No
-haven@reddit
If you need to save on some budget you can look into slightly lower Hz monitors that hit 120/144, unless that one is just the best 1440p value where you live. Any of these refresh rates will do you good in the 1440p screen size space.
The extra Hz bit aside I think the extra screen space itself is the best feature in and outside of gaming.
Dtoodlez@reddit
1440 is a legit upgrade and one you’ll be happy with for yours. Especially with that gpu. I’ve been at 1440 since 2010, so you are behind the times by quite a bit of time my friend.
Derael1@reddit
You will absolutely get more from a 1440p monitor than you will get from a more expensive graphic card, so it should definitely be a higher priority. There is literally no point buying anything above 3060 Ti for 1080p gaming.
InstanceLoose4243@reddit
Honestly I think 1440P is the new 1080P. You can get a 1440 monitor for pretty cheap now around 150-250$
k8blwe@reddit
Absolutely. I first play GoW 2018 on a standard ps4 on an old 4k tv that was meh. The game was obviously 1080p, but it looked amazing imo.
Then, just a couple days ago, I decided to replay it on my new 4k tv on ps5. The colours and detail is absolutely amazing. It felt like a new game. The entire time I was stunned how good the colours popped and the overall level of detail was insane compared to my previous experience.
It's well worth it in today's gaming world in my opinion. More and more games are being made with 4k in mind and have the graphics to back it up. By that I mean, playing very old games can look weird at 1440p but today's game look so crisp with 1440p.
1440p is a nice sweet spot. You're games look better while not being too demanding you're sacrificing performance. As nice as 4k is, it's not as good as running 1440p at 120 fps
Mr_IZobot@reddit
Night and day difference.
TrungusMcTungus@reddit
Lots of people are saying it’s a huge jump, personally I don’t see it. It really depends on you.
NutShellShock@reddit
Yes. I switched to a 27" 1440p over 11 years ago and never looked back. Better still, go with a 34" 1440p ultrawide and the experience is even more amazing.
joeysamy@reddit
Agree👍
joeysamy@reddit
.
rdldr1@reddit
Yes but screen refresh rate is as important.
YuccaBaccata@reddit
1080p gave me headaches, higher resolution personally reduced my eye strain. Worth it
deeznots17224@reddit
Its a must for games like battlefield
ConversationJolly661@reddit
From someone who had a 27in 1080p monitor I made the jump to a 24in 1440p monitor, my life changed. The amount of detail it has is mind boggling, the text is super crisp and I can’t go back to 1080p ever again. I wanted a smaller monitor so I’m grateful I found this one.
schneensch@reddit
If you're using a 4070S or 7900 GRE with 1080p, you got your priorities very very wrong.
Get a 1440p display, they aren't that much more expensive.
mamoneis@reddit
Is worth 35-40% added cost. Like 200 vs 280 bucks. Getting good frametime and consistent 90-100 fps is normally downplayed, but quite important (I'd rather have that at 1080 than 60@1440). Plus you'll get a 'wow' effect the first weekend, then get accustomed to it.
Its-Smithy-M9@reddit
Do it.
emptydemclips@reddit
I thinking on getting 1440p 180hz 0.5ms worth?
Nordhaug98@reddit
Yes. I don’t care about the refresh rate I usually cap mine at 144. But the 1440p looks so good especially when a game is optimized for it.
postvolta@reddit
Controversial opinion:
1440p is an easy yes
144hz is entirely dependent upon your own perception of high frame rate. I can't tell the difference once it gets above around 80 so it's not worth it for me. That said, black smearing is way worse at lower frame rates on my VGA panel than it is at higher frame rates, so if you're getting VGA consider a high frame rate to avoid that.
k_elo@reddit
Its great easy enough to drive for max fps games but also can maximize graphical detail and still not hit your gpus limits @60fps.
Technical-Swimmer-70@reddit
all the difference in the world
gaslighterhavoc@reddit
So it depends.
Are you on track with your financial goals? Is your savings rate at the right level? Are your finances stable and improving? If any of these answers are no, then it absolutely is NOT worth it, even as a hobby the diminishing returns are not worth it. 1080p is sufficient.
But suppose you have the money to pursue certain luxuries (I assume so with your GPU choices).
Yes, it is worth it then. 27 inches makes all the difference vs 24 inches and the 1440p gives you higher pixel density. The 27 inch 1440p LG 165 Ghz ultra gear is the exact one I have, it is a good monitor, I have no complaints. Either GPU you picked will pair nicely with this monitor.
The one advice I would give you is to wait a bit and buy during Black Friday sales. Even if they don't apply in your country, the increased supply of hardware could temporarily reduce prices.
Inevitable_Flow_7911@reddit
I just switched from 1080p. Its actually a pretty nice jump in quality. With your 4070, itll be fine.
Diligent_Mastodon105@reddit
Once you use 1440p 1080p ceases to be HD imo
TabularConferta@reddit
Absolutely worth the switch. Your machine is a beast and imo you won't be taking as much of an advantage of it without a half decent monitor. 1440 on a 27" is just a joy to play and I find myself a lot more productive for work.
Monitors tend to last as well. My old 1080 is over 10 years old and still operational. My 1440 is 4+ years old and still works as well as the day I bought it.
CarlSPC1@reddit
Once 2k no going back to 1080p, clean and crispy resolution and not has taxing as 4k. I rather play most games with 2k crisp resolution with slight drop in FPS than slightly blurred resolution with high FPS 1080p res. This is my opinion and take on this. Has been gaming for 1440p for 6 to 8 years now since the first 2k 60hz fell monitor. Again I am not a competitive gamer.
ayunatsume@reddit
I'm running 1440p for 32in and its more or less similar per dot to 1080p 25-27in.
The screen space is just wow. Also you get to sit way farther for movies and for some games with a controller.
My work is print layout design, being able to lay out in 100% A3 without zooming out is very good as well.
xl129@reddit
What is the point of having amazing hardware when your output is meh? I’m using an even bigger curved screen and it’s wonderful
RedDevils0204@reddit
I went from 720p to 1440 and it was mind blowing.
Scrudge1@reddit
Is it the Lg Ultragear GP850 by any chance? If so it's ace!
ItsThanosNotThenos@reddit
Google and see count how many "I'm never going back" you find.
Drakengard@reddit
Is it worth it? Yes. I upgraded this year and love the bigger screen and better resolution.
It is worth it for you in your particular situation and your particular budget? I don't know.
IranianOyibo@reddit
If you can afford to make the jump, do it brother. Treat yourself.
mahanddeem@reddit
Big difference. Worth it
EvilDan69@reddit
Just the size difference alone is worth it. I use 2 Dell monitors that are almost the same at work. One is 27" on the left, the right one is a 24". As far as colour goes I use the Dell Display Manager to sync the 2 together.
I use reading glasses. The 27" is much more preferable.
Of course I'm biased and use a 34" at home with 1440p. I know this is not the affordable option but would personally choose this every time.
RadioAdam@reddit
You're going to look back on this post and delete it like pics of that really toxic x.
Your video card deserves better.
YOU, deserve better.
battlepig95@reddit
Straight up sold my 1440p 240hz to a buddy who needed an upgrade, and that moneys going towards the new 1440p 480hz, which I am excited for. Well now that I’m on 1080p 165hz I want to die lmao.
Didn’t notice the jump that much going up, but boy let me tell you going back down and my eyes Fuckin hurt
Not_Bill_Hicks@reddit
If you can afford the 1440, yes, it's much nicer. Also with DLSS (if you have an Nvidia card) 1440P games are not much harder on your system than 1080p games either
rabbi_glitter@reddit
1440p is the sweet spot. Great performance doesn’t require a high-end more expensive than god PC, will consume less power, and dump less heat into your room than 4K. Go for it.
Ketts@reddit
I was hesitant at first to upgrade from 1080p to 1440p. Was a refresh rate person over resolution, I found a nice 1440p 240hz monitor, it's been the best thing I've brought for my pc. Things are just crisper, My 4070ti runs everything I throw at it smoothly at that resolution and I use my old 1080p monitor as a second monitor. Both are 27Inches. is it worth it. Yes!.
TurbulentBarracuda83@reddit
It isn't worth staying at 1080p with a 4070 GPU. That's for sure. If you are playing 1080p a cheaper GPU would do the job
teh1337penguin@reddit
1440 ultra wide is where it is really at!
Wh00psieeh@reddit
Absolutely does. I upgraded from a 1080p 23.8 inch to a 1440p 27 inch.
I never would have thought that the difference is so noticable.
Macoroni_water88@reddit
I know everyone here is saying 1440p is a huge upgrade from 1080p but I upgraded from a 1080p 144hz 24inch monitor to a ultrawide 1440p 160hz monitor over a year ago and ngl I don’t really see a big difference in resolution or clarity like everyone is saying, it’s like barely noticeable to me. I even have my 1080p monitor as a second monitor and side by side my 1440p monitor looks slightly sharper with text and stuff I guess but it’s not that noticeable when I’m gaming honestly.
vedomedo@reddit
Yes.
And then the same thing happens when you either try 1440p ultrawide or when you go 4k. There's no going back.
Forward-Buffalo-8219@reddit
Go to a store to see the diference for yourself, noone on the internet can tell you what is fhe best for you to buy.
Kilo_Juliett@reddit
1080p is 2k. 1440p is like 2.5k. The "#k" refers to the amount of horizontal pixels.
1080p is 1920x1080. 1920 is about 2000 pixels.
1440p is 2560x1440. Which is more than 2000 pixels so 2.5K.
2160p is 3840x2160 or 4K. These are for 16:9 aspect ratios. The film industry uses a different aspect ratio that comes out to 4096x2160 which is closer to actual 4000 horizontal pixels aka 4k.
Having said all that you will still see 1440p monitors marketed as 2K. It drives me nuts.
And to answer your question yes its worth it. 1440p is like the bare minimum resolution I would go today. 4K is really where it's at though. 1440p is like a stepping stone. Eventually 4K will be standard and there really won't be a need to go any higher unless you want a really big monitor that you sit really close to.
There is an argument for 8k because it can scale perfectly with all the other resolutions but once there are actual 8k monitors with high refresh rates I think most gpus would be able to run 4k really well so there would be no need to scale to anything below that.
lordofblack23@reddit
Don’t believe the hype. Meh at best.
menthx@reddit
Those specs are overkill for 1080p but 1440p plus the size difference is a big upgrade both in pixel density, work area and gaming immersion. It is honestly a no brainer.
ImpossibleChemical42@reddit
if you choose the 1080p pls dont buy a 4070 super or a 7900 thats overkill.
AncientPCGuy@reddit
Assuming you can afford the monitor and additional GPU power to get full impact, yes.
zacke0825@reddit
Now most people praise 1440p a lot and it does look good but honestly it depends on the games you play. I played at 60hz 1680p for 2-3 years then to 1080p 120hz and that was massive. But when I got a 144hz 1440p screen it wasn't a massive difference since I play fps shooters like r6s and csgo. If you can go to a store and se if you can tell a difference and if you consider that difference worth 2x the cost. But if you're manly playing singleplayer games then yeah its probably worth it
unused_candles@reddit
I have a dual monitor setup. Both were 1080p. I just upgraded my main ultrawide monitor from 1080p to 1440p. Now it hurts me to look at my secondary monitor. I used to think I didn't need two 1440p monitors, but now I am counting the days to when I can replace my secondary.
jomsjoms@reddit
a big yes!
RowdyB666@reddit
Yes. Even go ultra wide screen for the extra WOW factor
Asgardianking@reddit
1440p is roughly 70% more pixels than 1080p and is instantly noticeable. Once I went 1440p I never looked back. I have had a 1440p monitor since 2015.
CTurpin1@reddit
1080p was cool like 20 years ago, bro.
Livid-Cheek7846@reddit (OP)
well i am using a 1050 laptop currently so...
Kittelsen@reddit
With that hardware it would be silly to go for 1080p. Choose 1440p, and don't call it 2k please.
dias_xilourhs@reddit
It's totally worth it my brother has a 1080p one I can't even look at it. I would eve. Say it's a steal for how good it is
futurafrlx@reddit
1440p is worth it. I don’t regret switching to it. It will result in you having to buy more powerful hardware though, because while it’s not as power hungry as 4K, it’s still not as easy to run as 1080p. I have 3060 Ti and yeah you can say it is a 1080p card now, but it absolutely wasn’t at launch. Only now I find myself struggling to hit desired frames on high settings in some titles. If you’re okay with spending more on GPU (or upgrade it more often), then go for 1440p.
HeartDPad@reddit
Depends entirely what you use it for. What some people don't talk about is not all games or programs support a 2k display. Something I had to adjust to was stuff like discord suddenly looking a lot smaller font wise, for example.
Another example: most youtubers export videos in 1080p, so if you watch a lot of YouTube at your pc then that's gonna change your viewing experience too as most videos won't fully fit your screen. Not a bad thing, I find the space not filled minimal. But it's something to think about.
Most modern games look great in 2k and the extra screen space makes any productivity work much easier to manage. For that alone it's worth it if you can afford it.
But if you play a lot of older games you're not really going to get much out of them in 2k.
TL;DR what is the pc being used for? It always boils down to that.
Livid-Cheek7846@reddit (OP)
It will be used for mostly gaming and maybe content creation as a hobbyist.
bobsim1@reddit
If you spend that much on the gpu dont cheap out on the one part youre looking at all the time.
Soccermad23@reddit
Like you mentioned, if you go with a 4070 Super (or similar) spec PC, then you will want to play at 1440p. If you’re aiming to play at 1080p, you might as well save money on your PC too and go for a lower spec PC as you will hit your max framerate either way.
Livid-Cheek7846@reddit (OP)
Decisions decisions
Oddman76@reddit
It's so nice I just upgraded from 23" 1080p to 27" 1440p it's night and day difference I can't believe I didn't do it sooner I was a stubborn 1080p is all I need believer but after a GPU upgrade I thought I don't want any bottle necks Best decision ever!
kNIGHTSFALLN@reddit
The standard for gaming is 4k now.
Obviously I know you do what you can afford but consoles are 1440 performance mode and 4k quality mode.
Tango1777@reddit
It depends what you play. If you play competitive games like CS, Warzone then full HD is all you need, but you can of course set it on 1440p display
If you play various games, triple A titles, action RPGs and all those games that rely on beautiful graphics a lot then 2K is a very noticeable upgrade with still relatively manageable hardware requirements to keep decent fps
27 inches is already a good upgrade, the size makes the difference, I have 27 + 24 one next to another and 27 is just better size, it's the best size for a table + office chair setup (regarding eye - display distance), in my opinion.
If you do anything else than gaming like 2D apps, maybe work, 1440p is far superior, lots of workspace and things are not too tiny (like with 4K res).
I am planning to change my second monitor, which is 24'' FullHD to 27'' 2K, speaks for itself...
MerQrial@reddit
I had a 1080p 27 inch for my new rig. Image quality is bad. The ppi is not enough. Would recommend 1440 for that inch
24 inch 1080p is ok.
RecalcitrantBeagle@reddit
If it's just the monitor for the cost? Yeah, for sure. Where it gets a lot more subjective is when you factor in the cost of building a machine to run games at 1440p vs 1080p.
Just for an example, maybe you want to run a given selection of games at ultra settings. Using something like this as an approximate measure, a 4070 Super might give ~110fps at 1440p, whereas a 7700XT will give ~115fps at 1080p, an equivalent experience other than the resolution, but for $250 less. So, even though the price difference in monitors is pretty small nowadays, you could be looking at a $300 difference.
To some people, that's still totally worth it for the better image quality. For me, I honestly don't think it's a particularly life-changing improvement - I have 1440p for my main machine, but also have a different one with a 1080p panel, and while I can tell a difference, I don't think it really impacts my enjoyment of the games that much. I certainly don't mind it, but if I was a bit more budget sensitive? 1080p is still just fine, and you can get a lot of enjoyment other ways with $300.
TheProject2501@reddit
Yes, and if you can stretch the budget , go for 240 Hz.
asyuuu@reddit
If you have to push your budget alot then NO, but if it's already the amount you are willing to pay then YES.
Benana@reddit
Buying a 4070 for 1080p gaming is like buying a Formula 1 engine for a Mini Cooper.
parka@reddit
It is a substantial and visible upgrade.
Look_Ma_N0_Handz@reddit
1080p is a toyota corolla base. 1440p is a fully loaded camry. 1440p oled is a Lexus gs
koboldasylum@reddit
It's worth the cost just to have more usable workspace on your screen if you are using the computer for anything more than gaming, streaming, and web browsers.
MoistCock4U@reddit
Everything looks weird with 1080p
The amount of GUI in games vs game, is stupid.
1440p is perfect
beansnchicken@reddit
It's definitely a noticeable visual improvement. I personally don't value it that much because running a game at 1440p means having a lower framerate than 1080p and I place a lot of value on having a high framerate, but if you're building a PC with a high end video card that maintain high framerates at 1440p then that issue doesn't exist for you.
Is it worth the extra money? Only you can answer that. It depends on how much extra it costs, and how much that amount means to you (a millionaire should unquestionably get a higher res display, someone who has to scrimp and save every extra dollar might not think it's worth it).
Charon711@reddit
I don't think they're twice the price, at least where I am. Anyway, yes 1440p is worth it. Having the extra detail is very handy especially in fps games for example. Aiming at smaller (distant) targets becomes much easier.
MeatballsMadeOfPoo@reddit
1440p is the solution to today's problems.
These days, devs prefer to leverage upscaling to increase performance rather than optimization of the game itself.
This means rendering at 4k is harder than it should be, so using 1440 is a good compromise.
thisispannkaka@reddit
1440p is worth it. I bought one for like usd300 and I am very happy with it.
xDLurtz@reddit
If I buy a new 1440p monitor, will I be able to use my old 1080p as a second screen ? Will my pc handle the 2 resolutions ?
im_just_thinking@reddit
Totally worth it, if you PC doesn't have a problem with it
SaberHaven@reddit
I'm using 1440p and 1080p looks so old to me now. I can't believe I used it for so long
Livid-Cheek7846@reddit (OP)
Same size monitors?
SaberHaven@reddit
Yes. I usually turn on DLDSR also, which makes the apparent sharpness an even bigger gap above 1080p
reefun@reddit
Yes. And the 4070 will be able to run it brilliantly.
000extra@reddit
A 1080p monitor, even if cheaper, would be a waste of your money. 1440p is truly worth it. Even the big expensive ultrawide OLEDs these days are 1440p still. Its the minimum resolution anyone should consider tbh
grantking2256@reddit
If ur okay with any monitor there is a KTC 1440p 27 inch on sale for 99 bucks. Check buildapcsales it's a few scrolls down.
grantking2256@reddit
If ur okay with any monitor there is a KTC 1440p 27 inch on sale for 99 bucks. Check buildapcsales it's a few scrolls down.
RecceNorth@reddit
Personally, yes, even if I have to lower my settings to medium to avoid overheating my system. Best decision I could have ever made.
I used to be in your situation going from 1080 to 1440 (24” to 27”) and if you play FPS games, you’ll start seeing things your normally would’ve missed on a smaller and lower resolution screen.
My personal 2 cents:
1080p High Graphics < 1440p Medium-high Graphics.
rcalhau@reddit
I went from 2k to 1080p and i totally regret it
MrAldersonElliot@reddit
Yes, night and day is, especially for text / any PC work.
Games are much better when playing long range say a long Dust2
GrapplerSeat@reddit
Yes, for every part of computer life. A girl at a party on the weekend was telling me how she’s miserable because she’s doing her thesis and bought a 27 inch for productivity but knew nothing about resolution and bought 1080 and she sees horrid pixelly everything everywhere. 1080 looks pretty good on my old MacBook Air…
qu1kslvr@reddit
I just got my first 1440p 27" 180hz monitor yesterday and I think it's quite hard to describe the difference to someone who hasn't experienced gaming with one before.
The whole time I had my 1080p next to the 1440p with the same games, so I could test the differences I noticed.
First of all, I mostly noticed being able to see objects/ background as clear and crisp as a 1080p but from 2x the distance away. This could include items of clothing when zoomed out, strands of hair, grass and flowers or even text. When looking at objects close to the camera their details were far clearer as well.
Everything just feels clearer and more crisp, especially small details, if you have the money for a GPU good enough to run it, go for it.
devilishTL@reddit
I definitely agree on 1440p being mich better than 1080p but you have to take the pixel density into account because of the size difference i think the pixel density isn't that much higher on the 1440p monitor with 27inch
devilishTL@reddit
Just googled and the pixel density is 92ppi (pixel per square inch) for the 1080p at 24 inch and 108ppi for 1440p at 27inch
Oleleplop@reddit
I used 1080 p and really its good enough. But if you Can get a 1440p monitor its a massive increase in quality . Highly recommand
Own_Bullfrog_4859@reddit
1440p is the sweet spot for me. Great for gaming and good for productivity, can fit lots of stuff I need on the screen.
Hammham@reddit
I came from 1080p for years to 1440p a couple of months ago, and I would say it's definitely worth the upgrade.
dannz0rs@reddit
Why bother with a 4070super if you're trying to go for ultra affordable? If it's for your day job or you're somehow making money from it you could save Pennies by getting a lower quality monitor. Maybe if it was super high refresh rate it'd use the 4070
vulcanxnoob@reddit
Yes. I moved from 1080p 144hz to 2k 165hz. Holy moly the improvement is insane!
Livid-Cheek7846@reddit (OP)
Wow. What size monitor were you using for 1080? And what is the size of your 1440p monitor?
vulcanxnoob@reddit
1080p was 24 inch and the 2k monitor is 27 inch.
Livid-Cheek7846@reddit (OP)
Something to consider then. Thanks for answering.
-Joel-and-Ellie-@reddit
I play on a 1440p 165hz samsung g5 monitor with a 6750xt gpu. No problems yet except on the evil within 1 thru epic games. Had to play on my secondary 1080p secondary monitor.
Ok_Law2190@reddit
If you’re on 1080p and haven’t experienced 1440p and not upgrading your pc then I’d say it isn’t worth, but since you’re going with a 4070 super or a 7900 you should definitely go for 1440p
iothomas@reddit
1440p is great I've been using the resolution since 2012.
I would say it is a bit late for switching to 1440p better go directly to 4k as you already missed the 1440p bandwagon like 10 years ago
uznemirex@reddit
for me 1080 to 1440 is bigger difference than 1440-4k
R_Dixey@reddit
I have a 1440p 144hz 27 inch monitor, while my sibling have a 1080p 240hz 27 inch monitor.
Mine is MUCH clearer and sharper, 1080p looks blurry to me after experiencing 1440p
MiniSiets@reddit
If you're getting a 4070 then you should definitely go for the 1440p monitor. You're under-utilizing that card at 1080p. The difference isn't as significant as the jump from 480p to 1080p back in 2008, but it is still notable.
MFAD94@reddit
Depends on the game, 1440p ultra just barely gets 60fps on the 7900GRE with FSR3. I’d say the GRE is a very nice sweet spot in value
SpecialistAd8221@reddit
Recently upgraded from 1080p 60hz to 1440p 165hz. Besides from the smoothness, I couldn't tell any difference resolution wise.
birdman829@reddit
Big difference in pixel density plus a larger display. It's a huge improvement
NeedleworkerUsual758@reddit
Yes, the GPUs you mentioned are overkill for 1080p.
At least, you should consider playing your games at 1440p with upscaling in the future (native is always better and crisper). I used a 27GN650 before, which isn't the top-tier monitor,
but it was a significant upgrade from my previous 24-inch 75Hz LG-MPVQ.
you'll never go back ,but in my case farsightedness started to affect me,
I switched back to my LG 24-inch monitor (I have a 4060ti 8GB).
HyruleanKnight37@reddit
No it is not. Because once you go 1440p, there is no going back. Like high refresh rates, once you get a taste of 120Hz or higher, 60Hz will feel really bad.
ScreenwritingJourney@reddit
In games it doesn’t look all that different to me, but I also do work on my machine and text is much clearer at 1440p. And generally games have less aliasing at higher resolutions too iirc
Sibbo121@reddit
1440p with dsldr game changer
attentionseeker2020@reddit
I can't go back to 1080p from 1440p at all. I just doesn't look good anymore to me. I also went ultrawide and I am wrecked because of that too..... Loving every min of it though
Livid-Cheek7846@reddit (OP)
Damn one after the other lol
Koko210@reddit
Only if it's a higher refresh rate imho. Otherwise it's still great, but I wouldn't waste money on a 1440p60 monitor.
Arke-shan@reddit
Man I use both 768p 60Hz (18.5 inch) and 1600p 16inch 240 Hz, for me I can use both, only the refresh rate sometimes bothers me. Test it out and you can decide
rabbitsrcruel@reddit
Based on the gpu choices get a high refresh 1440p
nikeron2517@reddit
27 1440p 144hz, its must have , no other variants
ian_wolter02@reddit
Yess, a 1440p monitor is much better, pair it with the 4070 super!
tmchn@reddit
24'' 1080p to 27'' 1440p isn't an amazing jump imho
If you have a small desk and you're happy with the screen size, i'd stay with the 1080p monitor
The real jump is 27'' 4k
itsapotatosalad@reddit
When you increase size at the same time as resolution you’re minimising your quality upgrade. 1080p 24” to 1440p 27” is an increase in pixel density from 91 to 108, which isn’t a massive increase and one I personally can’t see a massive difference. It is better image quality, but only barely and the bigger screen is the main improvement between the 2 monitors in question. I’d choose the 27” 1440 out of those 2, but don’t expect it to look massively better in terms of resolution quality. I currently have a couple of 4k screens but have had multiple 1440 and 1080p screens at varying sizes and refresh rates over the last few years, multiple at once side by side specifically to compare the differences.
gus_11pro@reddit
there’s a new 1440p ultragear monitor that’s 240hz and oled. i haven’t checked for a 360hz. i know alienware has an oled 1440p360hz monitor
quapa1994@reddit
1440p. This is the way.
CeaseNY@reddit
The answer is really just yes. If you can afford it and have the hardware to run it, then absolutely
SkullCristi@reddit
I have upgraded from 1080p to 4k, it's an insane upgrade I gonna say to u, tho.. if u are a competitive games I would suggest buying one with atleast 144hz, I have bought my first monitor with 60hz and the games were un-playable ( had before a 1080p 240hz) 😅
Short story - buy one, it's much easier for us eyes, the graphics in every fukking game is insane doesn't matter if it's 2k or 4k.
One tip, if u are into games go for 2k, u will have 75% fps that u have with the 1080p, I went for 4k cuz I am a programer and I play mostly story games.
SkullCristi@reddit
Btw forgot to mention, if u are playing stretch, from 2k to 1080p, u don't even see the difference, "shroud" plays like this, take a look at his streams and u can't even tell is stretch.
Agreeable_Honeydew76@reddit
Yes! For gaming, reading, programming and studying.
Even better when paired with a 1600x1200 for old consoles. And a 1920x1200 for everything else.
Some say that a 28” 4k with 150% zoom is also good and cheaper.
prql@reddit
1080p is roughly 2K which is 2000/2048 pixels wide. 1440p is more like 2.5K. One is approx. 1.78 more pixels than the other.
Unless you play competitive strictly, if your goal is only for the look, you might be better off with a 4K screen at this time. 4070 Super won't get you 1440p 165 fps in demanding games and won't be different than 4k60. With upscaling, lower resolutions don't make much sense anymore, unless you have a 4060 Ti or worse.
AndrewFrozzen30@reddit
I could never go back to 1080p.
I also love 21:9 more too in 1440p.
You won't catch me with a 1080p 16:9 monitor, unless I want to add a 2nd monitor or something.
It's definitely worth it, especially in games that support it.
Enough_Standard921@reddit
Yes. And going 3440x1440 curved ultrawide is even better
Low_Yam_9157@reddit
Short answer: yes
Long answer: I use two 24 in 1080p 240hz monitors. I briefly had one 1440p 27in 160hz. It was better. I should have stuck with it and saved up for another one later instead of going for 2 higher refresh rate 1080p.
definitlyitsbutter@reddit
For your planned hardware it is worth it.
Ickhart@reddit
I was like you in how I didn’t think it would change much but honestly, its a nice upgrade. Text feels clearer and it feels like there’s more space to work with in terms of browing and depth. Videos and Games def look sharper as well.