There is a shame to be brainwashed to think that we, somehow, managed to live for so many centuries in a land full of other people. How can the language and its people survive? In mountains? Then please give me some sources about such settlements that could survive for centuries but unfortunately you cannot do that in Carpathian Mountains.

Again, how can Slavonic influence reach the north part of Romania when the influece came from south slaves and later known as bulgarian people (the slavic nation, not the nomads that were turk origin)? I ask because most people would just say we were always in north part of today's Romania and not actually just some sort of low cost székelys people put there just to protect the border of the Hungarian Kingdom and later a noble man to actually settle in today's Moldova region.

How can we not come from south of Danube if south of Danube were under Roman Empire influence for more than just the 165 years like how Dacia province was? And do not forget, at least half of Dacia weren't in Roman Empire.

"There is no shame, it's simply false. We don't come from the south. If we did we'd be Aromanians." - what if "aromanians" are actually the proto-romanians are we, the people that live in Romania, are just the the results of our ancestors that migrated north? How can then these people and languages (which are dialects) are so related, romanian language being heavily influenced by slavic languages and aromanian being by greek language? Greek language was the most spoken language in east part of Roman Empire and later the idea of Eastern Roman Empire would actually be a greek empire with Latin being used for diplomatic and administrative purposes, but the bulk would be greek. No shame in this, nor for greeks as they were proud to carry the name further.

Again, what is the shame if we actually came from south part of Danube where Eastern Romance languages could actually form as I doubt you can make up a language in just 165 years.

We do not even have early evidence of romanian language. The first text is this source and it is very late, implying that our people were not even that advanced in administrative matters and no shame when you have the Magyar people settling in Panonia and the Bulgarian empire south + other Slavic nations around us.

Again, there is no shame if we were settlers from south of Danube, we are still a latin nation and a romance speaking language. The history of this land is subject of several cultures and nations, thinking that the romans (and later proto-romanians and romanians) could have survived so much time north of Danube after the barbarian invasion without the aid of the Empire and their language to still be more than half based on latin is just... a joke.