Needs to be said

Posted by Aggravating-Reason77@reddit | preppers | View on Reddit | 258 comments

I’ve been in and around these “Prepper”groups since I learned how to navigate the internet and I feel as though the issue of firearm ownership for self defense is skipped over far too quickly or easily dismissed.

Typically I can keep my thoughts to myself on issues relating to self defense and an individuals personal belief that a firearm is not readily necessary in a situation other than the Apocalypse itself. Earlier today (10-12-24) I witnessed a thread with many comments proclaiming their opinion that a firearm & firearm training shouldn’t be on a preppers mind at all; though I don’t understand how this can be justified (as long as they are legal in your area).

The fact is no matter how many supplies you have they’re immaterial if you cannot defend them and yourself. In our current political climate firearms are a touchy subject perhaps even rightly so, but with proper training they can quite literally be the difference of life or death. I understand the stigma of “money doesn’t grow on trees and could be used elsewhere”. My question to you is how can you ignore a reliable lifeline for $300 or less? The truth is a reliable and effective handgun made by Ruger for example (ruger max 9) is around $220, I personally know people who use this and have sent hundreds of rounds down range without failure.

Naturally you shouldn’t believe a handgun or and firearm is the only definitive answer to the question of “how can I be best prepared”, every situation is different and you should plan accordingly. It’s correct to point out that many things such as food, water, and shelter are equally or probably more important, but what good will any of that do if you can’t protect yourself and it?

Finally, I would like to clarify that I am NOT some gun nut or a political advocate for either (or any) side rather a conscientious observer hoping to hear from other perspectives.