everything the other guy said and also availability. Wikipedia says the soviets built somewhere in the ballpark of 140,000 of these things, and that's not including all of the license ones. A lot of middle eastern and african powers in particular imported a shitton of these things because they're cheap as hell and do terrible terrible things to infantry, which is most of what you're fighting in that kind of environment. Sticking it on a vehicle (any vehicle) solves the thing's biggest issue, that being an inability to move.
it's a 23mm, with twin barrels, hence the 23-2 in the name. Most soviet-era guns have a similar naming scheme like GSh-6-30 which is a six-barrel 30mm rotary cannon.
The ZU apparently stands for Zenitnaya Ustanovka, which apparently translates to anti-aircraft installation.
As for the damage it's a late 50's era weapon designed as a counter to helicopters and low-flying airplanes. The ammo varies from High-explosive frag to armor piercing rounds, and the polish also developed subcaliber APDS rounds but I'm not sure exactly how many of those you'd find in a place like this.
As far as the damage, the individual shots aren't the scariest by Anti-aircraft standards, but a 23mm frag shell is still going to cut down a person and the guys standing next to him, especially at a 2000 rpm cyclic rate (burst fire is necessary in practice otherwise the gun would melt.) Good for dealing with other soft targets like cars and trucks as well.
Sorry if that's a bit too much detail but I can't help it, I love old soviet garbage like this thing.
Substantial-Tone-576@reddit
Why so many ZU-23 technical?
Kpmh20011@reddit
everything the other guy said and also availability. Wikipedia says the soviets built somewhere in the ballpark of 140,000 of these things, and that's not including all of the license ones. A lot of middle eastern and african powers in particular imported a shitton of these things because they're cheap as hell and do terrible terrible things to infantry, which is most of what you're fighting in that kind of environment. Sticking it on a vehicle (any vehicle) solves the thing's biggest issue, that being an inability to move.
Substantial-Tone-576@reddit
I was wondering the numbers produced because it’s everywhere. I’m sure a 30mm? AA round does serious damage to soft targets.
Kpmh20011@reddit
it's a 23mm, with twin barrels, hence the 23-2 in the name. Most soviet-era guns have a similar naming scheme like GSh-6-30 which is a six-barrel 30mm rotary cannon.
The ZU apparently stands for Zenitnaya Ustanovka, which apparently translates to anti-aircraft installation.
As for the damage it's a late 50's era weapon designed as a counter to helicopters and low-flying airplanes. The ammo varies from High-explosive frag to armor piercing rounds, and the polish also developed subcaliber APDS rounds but I'm not sure exactly how many of those you'd find in a place like this.
As far as the damage, the individual shots aren't the scariest by Anti-aircraft standards, but a 23mm frag shell is still going to cut down a person and the guys standing next to him, especially at a 2000 rpm cyclic rate (burst fire is necessary in practice otherwise the gun would melt.) Good for dealing with other soft targets like cars and trucks as well.
Sorry if that's a bit too much detail but I can't help it, I love old soviet garbage like this thing.
Substantial-Tone-576@reddit
I love context and background knowledge.
Kpmh20011@reddit
happy to share!
Tastetheload@reddit
Cuz it’s a light weight, high rpm, high reliability system that takes readily available ammo.
Mountain_Frog_@reddit
Dat ass is thicc
__qwertz__n@reddit
RIP the rear suspension
OceansCarraway@reddit
As long as they're having fun, it's ok.
my__second__account@reddit
Real monstrosity
crazy_forcer@reddit
oh lawd he squattin'