Hezbollah says its response to potential war will cause ‘large losses’ on Israeli side
Posted by n0ahbody@reddit | EndlessWar | View on Reddit | 21 comments
Ok-Sell4786@reddit
One lesson we learnt from russia is.. if ur saying ur gonna do something for many times.. its empty threats..
so yeah israel wont attack lebanon soon.. theyr making empty threats in an attempt to scare hezbollah.
barbara800000@reddit
I don't understand what Russia has to do with this? What did Russia say they would do but they didn't, don't tell me it's the "3 days war to take Kiev" again, what nobody from Russia ever said but the CIA pushed so you would get brainwashed?
Ok-Sell4786@reddit
Well i was just using russia as an example .. cuz threatening too much without action gives the opposite result.. it makes u look weak.
If the cia pushed me why would i be commenting on one of the smallest communities out there... Please lets not use such language.. i come to this community cuz i can enjoy the little freedom it offers to let out opinions without getting banned.
And abt wt russia didnt do.. russia didnt do shit.. all of their red lines were broken.. they keep saying we will nuke this and nuke that.. but when they simply let out such threats that they cant do.. they become a laughing stock..
Not that i want anyone to use nukes.. but they shouldnt have used nukes as a threat when they know they wont(or cant) use them.. and when such the biggest nuclear country gets its capital bombed and part of it gets invaded.. ur literally making nukes lose its deterence value.
barbara800000@reddit
I didn't say you are from the CIA I said the narrative about "Russia failing to execute a 3 day plan to take Kiev", is complete bullshit, and pushed by the CIA, as propaganda.
Russia also neve said "we will nuke this and that"???? Is this what you got from the propaganda by the media? They also don't give a shit if "they look weak" or "become a laughing stock" to whom the side they are winning against?
Ok-Sell4786@reddit
Russian officials say the nuke threats all the time... Am not the one coming up with this.. i never mentioned the (kiev will be taken in 3 days thing)
U should care when u look weak or be ome laughing stock cuz ur the biggest nuclear power.. if u end up looking weak then losing then this means nukes are useless and cant be used.. they will lose their deterence value.. which will drive the world closer to nuclear war since everyone who has it now have to use it to achieve their deterence.
barbara800000@reddit
The equivalent of those "Russian officials" is Lindsey Graham saying they should nuke Gaza and Iran... Like in this case you could distort it like you do, and call the US "looking weak" and a "laughing stock" because "US officials" have threatened to nuke Gaza and they didn't.
They have not directly suggested it like Lindsey did anyway, the media often makes jokes about "Britain threatening Russia at the same time Russia could destroy the entire country", or the officials merely say "we should change our nuclear deterence policy".
You are almost "gauding" Russia to use nukes, in fact many of those neocons act like that as well. Maybe they have some stupid plan where both sides only use them once, but then with the media etc. they will get Russians to "regime change Putin because he is dangerous"
Ok-Sell4786@reddit
The only difference here is that russia IS at war.. the usa isnt.. and the threats come from minister in the russian gov.
This war at the beginning indeed was a gauge to russia using nukes.. and they didnt.. but they also didnt achieve their goals with conventional means.. and thats the main reason why the west keep escalating the war.. cuz russia lost its deterrence.. and thats the reason why they get their capital bombed and part of their land invaded.
barbara800000@reddit
What do you mean they didn't achieve their goals? What are the goals? To take Kiev in 3 days again? That Russia lost a deterrence and they get their capital bomb is some serious ISW intern level bullshit propaganda.
Ok-Sell4786@reddit
Russia declared its goals is freeing donbass and russian speaking territories withen ukraine (and ukraine not joining nato and other stuff but thats wt i see as the main objective).. and they didnt.. The west trapped them inside ukraine and now russia is stuck..
The way i see it from the start, is that russia got confident.. the west outsmarted them and trapped them inside ukraine in a forever war.. now the west just needs to keep throwing some money and they will keep weakening russia day by day.. even if ukraine doesnt have any more soldiers.. the polish or the finnish will probably be the next in line for the west to use in the meat grinder.
Now let me hear ur explanation abt how russia can get out of this trap?? How will russia perform after lets say.. 3 years from now.. the west got 50+ trillion of economy and millions of europeans to throw as fodser cannon at russia.. wt does russia have to assure deterence and that they wont collapse in 3 year or 5 years or 10 years of war?
barbara800000@reddit
Wow what a warmonger plan. Are you sure you are not a 23 year old intern at the ISW with a degree in some stuff about genders? No the goals were demilitarization (and after that denazification). When Ukraine has to keep asking for weapons again and again, it means they do achieve them, it's just that Ukraine keeps getting weapons.
The rest is all bs it's not a trap, we are being trapped, the Europe in particular, didn't you see how the economy of Germany goes to recession? If they keep at it at some point the BRICS and Iran will attack the dollar, while Europeans also won't just go and all die as cannon fodder because it fits your narrative. The economy is also about resources and industries, the BRICS have both, they won't get economically destroyed by some financial trick where some bank just tells they are poor when they aren't.
Ok-Sell4786@reddit
This is not my plan lol.. this is the reality of things.. the usa got europe in war with russia .. from one side all the factories and industries in europe will re allocate to the usa cuz the cheap energy russia gave to europe was cut (nord stream bombing/usa selling europe natural gas at 6x price) .. and from the other side russia is getting weaker and eventually will collapse and after that the usa can come in and sweep all the resources..
as someone whos neither from europe or russia.. i say this is a fucking genius plan to take our ur enemy while making ur own economy stronger.
Brics and de dollarization will take decades to affect the dollar statues... u wont find anyone wanting the us dollar to collapse more than me but am sry thats the reality of it.
barbara800000@reddit
Dude the dollar "scheme" actually relies on the US military might and them controlling the oil producing regions (Saudi Arabia). If they don't have any of those it will just collapse... If Russia can take out the aircraft carriers that were supposedly projecting power etc., which it can, how will they keep it? You have just bought the dumbest propaganda, probably because you actually want to believe it...
Ok-Sell4786@reddit
The us dollar is much bigger than this.. the era of petrol is already over..check how much of global trade is done using us dollar and how much reserve is used then u will understand the magnitude of it.. Yes its decreasing.. but for it to become obselete it will yake decades.
And stop using these childish insults alrdy.. theyr not effective and they make u sound dumb.
barbara800000@reddit
Where are the childish insults in the above comment? You act like I called you some kind of neocon propagandized dumdum, who thinks the entire Europe will go to WW3 as cannon fodder from some platitudes about how much big the dollar is, but where did I do that?
Alpha1stOne@reddit
Dang you spew the dumbest shit possible.
Ok-Sell4786@reddit
Grow the fuck up and stop harassing me on every comment...
foreverTV@reddit
Not scare, goad hezbollah into an attack.
So they can claim "self defense".
Ok-Sell4786@reddit
Hezbollah is alrdy attacking.. they bomb northern israel.
foreverTV@reddit
They've been doing that for almlst a year, but Israel is looking for another Oct. 7
Ok-Sell4786@reddit
Theyr not looking for it.. they have the context to attack hezbollah.. but they simply cant.. they cant even defeat hamas which has been blockaded .. hezbollah is hamas times 100.. they even have missles to target american ships if the usa tried to join israel in bombing lebanon.
Listen2Wolff@reddit
Russia is meeting its Ukraine objectives on its timeline on its schedule. Russia has many "more important" things to deal with than Ukraine. The success of the BRICS summit next month is the absolute highest priority. I would not be at all surprised to see the Russians stop their advance in Ukraine until after the summit completes.
Maybe you can list those "empty Russian threats" for us rather than repeat the MSM propaganda.
In 2008 Russia said, if Ukraine or Georgia join NATO there will be war. Burns "Neyt means Neyt" memo. Everything Burns said would happen has happened.
Not so empty.
Victoria Nuland is a liar. Ritter goes on to talk about how Georgia was negotiating with Russia in 2008 for the return of South Ossetia and Abkhazia, Condoleezza Rice told Saakashvili, he had to attack the Russians. Georgia got its ass kicked.
Not so empty.
The "empty threat" the MSM is always talking about is often the use of Nuclear Weapons. Are you sure you want to "find out" how empty the threat is. Let's be real here, the MSM is always talking about "Russian empty threats" to give you some assurance that the tiger in the cage with you isn't going to eat you.
Stop listening to the MSM.