Going Buildless - web development without a build step?
Posted by RoboticElfJedi@reddit | programming | View on Reddit | 12 comments
Posted by RoboticElfJedi@reddit | programming | View on Reddit | 12 comments
nsn@reddit
Build step? I've SSH'd into production servers since the late 90s...
amakai@reddit
My IDE had a live sync with production over FTP.
guest271314@reddit
Bellard's Home Page and online man pages demonstrate content is superior to gimmicks on over-engineered Web sites.
OctopodicPlatypi@reddit
Those always remind me of gopherholes, to an extent. The gopher protocol is still alive, but not very well supported.
guest271314@reddit
Those are ideal Web sites to me. Concerned with content, not gimmicks, or running scripts and splashing around CSS just because.
vincentofearth@reddit
If your site is big and complicated enough that you’re suffering from a build step, wouldn’t you benefit immensely from the tools & frameworks that have one?
lelarentaka@reddit
It's like opting to ride a bicycle from LA to New York because a flight ticket is too expensive.
guest271314@reddit
ProcessingInstruction
s anddata-*
attributes.coob@reddit
Watching the youth consistently reinvent the past is quite amusing.
Anth77@reddit
Well, yes and no, kinda. Back then there was no HTTP/2 multiplexing, so you would save a lot of time by having as fewer requests as possible. Nowadays, not so much.
elmuerte@reddit
If we'd stuck XHTML we could simply have used xinclude.
baconbrand@reddit
i have that, it’s a LA server