Tulsi’s Price
Posted by hui_bif@reddit | tulsi | View on Reddit | 43 comments
Tulsi just revealed her price to Dana Bash on CNN STOU…..
Secretary of State or Secretary of Defense.
Don’t tell Richard Grenell! I thought he had SOS locked up :-/
beavis617@reddit
Tulsi Gabbard comments on Trump visit to Arlington...Trump was there and it was a dignified and solemn moment...him giving his signature thumbs up while standing on the graves of fallen soldiers who he has distain for was a solemn moment? He used the video ad a campaign ad...😡
WashedMasses@reddit
Is that what MSNBC told you?
Ibo-Naw@reddit
Is this all you y'all resort to?
Everyone but Trump is lying CNN or MSNBC tells us everything and we're not capable of googling, checking multiple sources, or actually watching what happened.
Y'all do know we're not y'all? 😂
Ibo-Naw@reddit
awww, did I hurt u/Tiny_Definition6342 feelings? lol at blocking me.
Tiny_Definition6342@reddit
"Googling" isn't an infallible method of obtaining information. It's been proven that search engines have been displaying manipulated information since the early days of the internet. Google's own founders stated that search engines are susceptible to returning biased results; although Google wants us all to believe that its search engine is somehow "immune" to such deceptive, extremely lucrative practices.
Every single network presents the same scripted "news" stories, even FoxNews. The only difference with Fox is that they present the opposite side of the same coin. They're all guilty of broadcasting controlled information that's meant to deceive. Journalistic integrity hasn't been achieved in quite some time.
You claim to be above the manipulation because you're "watching" what's happening, but you're still being controlled because you're only seeing what is deemed necessary in order to keep you compliant. You really shouldn't be so arrogant. You're falling for a line of BS just like most people across the US.
Ibo-Naw@reddit
I agree that search engines can be biased, and it's important to approach all information critically. Could you clarify what specific manipulation you think I'm overlooking by 'watching' events and how it might affect my understanding? I ask because I get tired of people here throwing accusations at me without being specific. What am I factually wrong about? I know many of you don't watch MSNBC because you believe they lie to their audience, which they don't. They lean left, but that doesn't mean they go on air and blatantly lie and omit information like Fox News does.
Tiny_Definition6342@reddit
I watch what is presented by MSNBC and Fox, and I take their reporting with a grain of salt. I believe that they believe what they're reporting is factual, but they seem to have become content with rehashing stories that are centered around the attention-grabbers from both sides of the aisle. Day in and day out, these media outlets jam up the airwaves with out-of-context statements made by the big-name players in politics today.
They do this because the executives at these organizations care more about who has the best ratings amongst the common citizen than they care about truthfulness. The journalists seem to go along with it because they've been conditioned to accept that the copy being placed in front of them is factual. They no longer question the origin of this information. They only know that it's simple, and it fits neatly into the allotted time frame.
Due to the day-to-day issues and demands most people face, they aren't aware that they've become susceptible to the suggestions being broadcast. They just assume that they're receiving the unvarnished truth from a reliable source. Instead, most people are having their opinions manipulated by an industry that is centered around shock and awe reporting and deception.
For reporting that doesn't fall into the categories of left-leaning, right-leaning, or hardline, I've come to find that sources such as BBC News, NewsWeek, Reuters, MarketWatch, and The Hill are the way to go. I also trust the content provided by local news stations. Even though they may be affiliates of national media groups, the local stations retain integrity because their anchors and reporters relay current events without the embellishments that are echoed by their more famous, national network counterparts. When local reporters cover political issues, they approach those issues in a no-nonsense manner. Because of their refusal to be swayed by the platitudes of politicians from either side, they offer the viewer a clear and accurate picture of what is truly important.
Ibo-Naw@reddit
Oh, thanks for the in-depth analysis of media sensationalism—very enlightening. Too bad it didn't address the two questions that I asked you.
Sidenote, while you're doing this bothsides thing, I just want to give you some FACTS. MSNBC wasn't the news organization that settled a $787 million lawsuit with a company for lying about the 2020 election. :)
Tiny_Definition6342@reddit
Okay. The specific manipulation you're overlooking is that MSNBC, your sacred source for information, is lying to you. They're only telling you what the current administration wants you to hear because they know what side their bread is buttered on. As long as they continue to obediently pump out the disinformation, they reap the benefits of being dubbed the nation's "most trusted source for news." They've given up journalistic integrity in favor of becoming the sock puppet of corrupt political elitists. You are factually wrong that you're not being duped into ignorance by the masters of manipulation within the federal government.
You really should climb down off your high horse. While you're busy presenting one-sided "facts" to justify why you feel that MSNBC is above reproach, you're overlooking the true fact that their part in the biggest con job in history hasn't been exposed yet. Once the propaganda machine is destroyed, the corrupt politicians within the Democratic Party will lose their stranglehold on America, and all the detrimental BS they put into action will be overturned. That will make the $787 million lawsuit you so eagerly tout look like a drop in the bucket by comparison.
You really should consider not being so dismissive. You're just coming across like another obedient little buffoon.
beavis617@reddit
Did Trump have his picture taken with the thumb up while standing on the graves of fallen soldiers, yes or no? Was any of the video footage used for Trump's campaign? 🤔
WashedMasses@reddit
Taken at the request of the fallen soldiers parents. I think they deserve a modicum of respect for their sons having paid the ultimate price due to Biden Harris incompetence.
beavis617@reddit
The withdrawal was orchastrated by Trump including the release of 5,000 prisoners. https://www.whas11.com/article/news/verify/afghanistan-taliban-united-states-deal-5000-prisoners/536-202b0ae9-6251-44d3-a3d0-b9e7d029aed9
Neither-Cherry-6939@reddit
He didn't follow Trump's plan though. That's the whole problem.
Ibo-Naw@reddit
Is that what Fox News told you?
beavis617@reddit
I can understand why Tulsi who used to be a Democrat and I'm not sure if she was always a Trump supporter (has she flip-flopped on that) moved over to the Trump train...it's a lust for power. Tulsi crashed and burned as a Democrat so why not suck up to Trump, say a few nice things about him, kneel before him and pledge loyalty and bam....get a nice appointment in the Trump administration cabinet...Tulsi disappeared off the political scene until she started sucking up to Trump. She's an opportunist.
earthworm_fan@reddit
She was ostracized by the Democrat party for not falling in line
Tiny_Definition6342@reddit
That's true. That's also why the Democrats got so upset with Trump. He was okay as long as he was a registered Democrat who stuck to business and left politics to the corrupt. When he changed political affiliation and became more vocal about the inadequacies and corruption of the Democratic party, all of his former colleagues and admirers began manufacturing absurd accusations against and hurling insults like scolded children.
Ibo-Naw@reddit
She ran for President in 2020. Of course she wasn't always a Trump supporter 😂.
hui_bif@reddit (OP)
Correct, she has quite the history. If you assembled it all together, you'd almost have a full basket of deplorable. But in Trump's world, there's always room for just one more.
funkalunatic@reddit
Imagine trusting Trump to keep a promise.
earthworm_fan@reddit
As someone that votes for Hillary, I dont understand this narrative. He followed through with most of his campaign promises in 2016
Ibo-Naw@reddit
No he didn't. 😂
Infrastructure bill? Repeal and Replace ACA? Build a 2000 mile wall and make Mexico pay for it? Deportation force? Reduce tax brackets? 4% GDP Growth? Eliminate gun free zones? National right to carry? Impose term limits on congress? Never take a vacation? Eliminate National Debt? Revive US Manufacturing? Revive the coal industry? Narrow trade deficits?
nientoosevenjuan@reddit
You forgot getting tired of winning
Tiny_Definition6342@reddit
We're all tired of everybody's whining.
WashedMasses@reddit
If you're tired of warmongering neocons and neolibs, Trump is your only ticket to a more sane foreign policy.
GetThaBozack@reddit
Trump is a huge warmonger himself. Give it a rest with this nonsense
funkalunatic@reddit
Trump was already president. We all watched as he took Obama's already heinous drone strikes, and unleashed and expanded them even more. There is nothing sane about the man, and you are deluded if you think there is.
zombierapture@reddit
OP is Trump deranged and is watching CNN what a suprise
N0_IDEA5@reddit
What does it take these days to be Trump deranged anyway?
earthworm_fan@reddit
Read OPs post history for a crash coursw
N0_IDEA5@reddit
Knock knock, you got some democrat derangement syndrome you’re trying to hide?
earthworm_fan@reddit
Yes, my 2 posts per month about Democrats is unhinged. Ya got me
N0_IDEA5@reddit
So which on if this guys many posts or comments up it over the line? Did you even look at the post history?
Ibo-Naw@reddit
These people that love bragging about free speech sure love to block me.
beavis617@reddit
Tulsi Gabbard defending Trump's political stunt at Arlington shows us she's all in on the Trump campaign looking for a cabinet position in order to advance her political career. She's a hack! 😕
WotTheHellDamnGuy@reddit
While a lot of folks have realized who Tulsi Gabbard really is (you can take the girl out of the cult but not the cult out of the girl), too many are still far behind the plot.
Not enough have realized that this isn't about Gabbard any longer, nor Hillary, Trump, nor Harris but about all of us and how easily manipulated we are by a variety of forces around us. But sometimes, we are own worst enemy and censor. She is a symptom, nothing more; just like Donald Trump.
Ibo-Naw@reddit
lol speak for yourself about how easily manipulated.
WotTheHellDamnGuy@reddit
OK chief, you do your own research I take it? hahahahah, whoooosh.
Ibo-Naw@reddit
Actually I do. I also live in reality, not Earth 2.
rundabrun@reddit
Doesn't matter. Trump will lose.
Remy0507@reddit
Of course, lol. As if there was any doubt that she was a grifter already, this should just cement it.
Ibo-Naw@reddit
After all the slander she's been giving Kamala Harris for the past 4 years and her anti Ukraine stance, why would KH do that?
hui_bif@reddit (OP)
Ooops - She’s pitching to Trump. She wants to be a MAGA Secretary. That’s why she endorsed Trump.