Has Elastic just allowed their comunity to ignore their SSO tax on self hosted instances?
Posted by Cooleb09@reddit | sysadmin | View on Reddit | 4 comments
Obligatory IANAL
But with Elastic [Announcing going source under AGPL](https://www.elastic.co/blog/elasticsearch-is-open-source-again).
And the wording of the [AGPLvv3](https://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0.txt):
3. Protecting Users' Legal Rights From Anti-Circumvention Law.
No covered work shall be deemed part of an effective technological
measure under any applicable law fulfilling obligations under article
11 of the WIPO copyright treaty adopted on 20 December 1996, or
similar laws prohibiting or restricting circumvention of such
measures.
When you convey a covered work, you waive any legal power to forbid
circumvention of technological measures to the extent such circumvention
is effected by exercising rights under this License with respect to
the covered work, and you disclaim any intention to limit operation or
modification of the work as a means of enforcing, against the work's
users, your or third parties' legal rights to forbid circumvention of
technological measures.
Where
A "covered work" means either the unmodified Program or a work based
on the Program
Theoreticaly there is nothing stopping someone from flipping a few flags, say [here](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/main/x-pack/plugins/security/common/licensing/license_service.ts) and turning off the unnecesary SSO tax.
If so this would be a huge boon for having a free and compliance-friendly logging solution without a $$$ 'platinum' per node license.
4 Comments
gamebrigada@reddit
okyenp@reddit
draeath@reddit
thrownawaymane@reddit