I think it's worth mentioning that Tulsi Gabbard DIDN'T resign her Commission to run for office
Posted by Potential-Most-3581@reddit | tulsi | View on Reddit | 97 comments
And she actually did carry a rifle in war
CJ4700@reddit
Didn’t dodge any deployments either, went twice like a real leader should.
cyberfx1024@reddit
She went and earned her Combat Medic badge.
9liners@reddit
She was never in a MOS that rated a CMB, how she earned it is a mystery to us all.
cyberfx1024@reddit
I don't know but when she first enlisted she was in a medical unit so maybe that's why.
9liners@reddit
How does someone in a ‘field medical unit’ earn the badge given the criteria as written then?
socom62b@reddit
The CMB may be awarded to medical personnel assigned or attached to, or under operational control of any ground combat arms or combat aviation units of brigade or smaller size, who satisfactorily perform medical duties while the unit is engaged in active ground combat, provided they are personally present
9liners@reddit
And you personally feel it wasn’t a blanket award, that she was in the proper MOS, and treated patients in active ground combat huh? Sure buddy!
socom62b@reddit
Never said it wasn’t a blanket award. All I posted was the “Criteria” for the award
9liners@reddit
And where does she fit, since you’re just filling space here?
socom62b@reddit
You sound like one of those democratic cry babies shown on tik tok this morning. Idk if you served. If you did Kuddos. If not shut up about it. Just because she’s been in units you couldn’t get into. Who tf cares about her receiving a CMB. I know people who received a CAB flying over a firefight. But they met the criteria for a CAB. You want change? Then go write doctrine. Change the regulations. Why are you so bitter about this woman and her career? How does it affect your everyday life?
9liners@reddit
Not a Democrat and I did serve, but you should use your tissues for your tears. Instead of all of the seed you are spilling watching lady boys.
cyberfx1024@reddit
I don't know. Maybe someone should pull her CMB paperwork then to see how she rated it. Do you know her MOS when she first enlisted?
9liners@reddit
I’ve looked and it’s always been sketchy, never outright says she was a medic. Just that she was in a field medical unit as a specialist. To be fair, I don’t care, I don’t gatekeep awards but have been curious as I’ve never seen it patched together as a whole story. I’ve heard of units getting blanket awards but am curious if she was ever in the fire herself.
Potential-Most-3581@reddit (OP)
According to what I saw she was a 91 echo which is a medical equipment repair specialist. Not a combat medic.
cyberfx1024@reddit
True that. But to be honest with you I wouldn't be surprised if it was one of those blanket awards that some units did early on in OIF.
Potential-Most-3581@reddit (OP)
What was her MOS?
Ibo-Naw@reddit
Ooooooooooooooooh shootin shots at Donnie Bone Spurs?
cyberfx1024@reddit
Actually Walz who dodged his deployment to Iraq.
Ibo-Naw@reddit
FACTS matter. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/fact-checking-attacks-on-walzs-military-record-by-vance-and-other-republicans
CJ4700@reddit
Walz bailed on his unit to run for Congress after stating vague things like he “carried a rifle for this country in a time of war”. I don’t know anyone from the GWOT era, let alone a sergeant major, who would dodge a deployment like he did. He’s a fucking coward and a creep.
Ibo-Naw@reddit
You’re entitled to your opinion, but FACTS matter, vibes don't. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/fact-checking-attacks-on-walzs-military-record-by-vance-and-other-republicans
CJ4700@reddit
Everyone who served with Walz disagrees. He didn’t go to war with his unit and got out two years early, those are the facts. Not a single vet I know is going to vote for him or Harris and we all despise cowards who pretended to serve in combat like he did.
Marshallkobe@reddit
“Everyone” who served with Walz is false. The two guys who spoke out are heavy trumpers. He served 24 years is he obligated to serve 10 more if a war is going on? Any reason why the national guard was deployed overseas?
If they needed him he would have been stop/loss. At his rank he was never going to see battle. This makes zero sense.
Ibo-Naw@reddit
I see in your universe personal anecdotes always trump verified facts—clearly, your 'vibes' have more credibility.
cyberfx1024@reddit
Yeah facts matter. The unit got word that they were heading for a deployment to OIF and he dropped his papers to retire after telling his guys that he would be there on deployment with them
Ibo-Naw@reddit
Did you read the article. Yes or no?
cyberfx1024@reddit
Yes, I read that article when it first came out. When the CO and Walzs replacement both contradict what he says then I believe it.
Have you ever served?
Ibo-Naw@reddit
no.
“Walz who dodged his deployment to Iraq.”
FACT: Walz’s battalion received an alert order for mobilization to Iraq on July 14, 2005, and the official deployment order on August 14, 2005. Walz had retired from the Minnesota National Guard on May 16, 2005, before these official orders were issued.
“The unit got word that they were heading for a deployment to OIF and he dropped his papers to retire after telling his guys that he would be there on deployment with them.”
FACT: Walz submitted his retirement paperwork between October 2004 and December 2004. The battalion was notified of a potential deployment to Iraq in March 2005, but the official orders did not come until after his retirement on May 16, 2005.
“When the CO and Walz’s replacement both contradict what he says then I believe it.”
FACT: The CO and Walz’s replacement both indicate that Walz’s retirement came before the official mobilization order for Iraq. Walz’s retirement was finalized on May 16, 2005, while the unit received the official deployment order on August 14, 2005. His decision to retire was made prior to the official deployment orders and was linked to his congressional candidacy.
I thought you read the article bruh?
Here's an easier read. https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2024/aug/09/jd-vance/jd-vance-attacked-tim-walz-on-military-record-his/
cyberfx1024@reddit
Yet in March 2005 he said that given rumors of a upcoming deployment that he would still be going to Iraq with them
Ibo-Naw@reddit
Where in the article does it state that in March 2005, Walz said he would still be going to Iraq with his unit despite rumors of an upcoming deployment?
Potential-Most-3581@reddit (OP)
So here's the thing. You didn't serve. You never wore the uniform. You'll never understand.
Ibo-Naw@reddit
So, here's another thing. I guess if I’m not a math professor, I’ll never grasp that 1+1=2. It’s such a profound mystery that only those who’ve worn the lab coat can understand. Similarly, I suppose if you haven’t lived through every experience, you can’t possibly grasp the nuances of someone else’s life.
Potential-Most-3581@reddit (OP)
There is nothing I'm going to say that's going to make you understand
Ibo-Naw@reddit
Try something... Like giving facts. I understand that quite clearly.
cyberfx1024@reddit
If you do some reading beyond a basic skin through of the articles you will see this:
"The two retired Minnesota National Guard command sergeant majors who wrote the 2018 letter said the battalion received a "warning order" in early 2005 "to prepare to be mobilized for active duty for a deployment to Iraq." They did not specify the warning letter's date. Augé of the Minnesota National Guard told PolitiFact the agency doesn't have information about any unofficial orders that might have been sent to the battalion.
An archived March 20, 2005, press release from Walz's congressional campaign website said the National Guard Public Affairs Office announced March 17, 2005, "a possible partial mobilization of roughly 2,000 troops from the Minnesota National Guard." The announcement said a portion of Walz's battalion could be mobilized to serve in Iraq within the next two years.
Walz said in his campaign's press release, "As Command Sergeant Major I have a responsibility not only to ready my battalion for Iraq, but also to serve if called on. I am dedicated to serving my country to the best of my ability, whether that is in Washington, D.C., or in Iraq. I don't want to speculate on what shape my campaign will take if I am deployed, but I have no plans to drop out of the race."
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/fact-checking-attacks-on-walzs-military-record-by-vance-and-other-republicans
So there were rumors of an upcoming deployment in March but nothing concrete yet. So a little over a month after he gave that statement he retired and left his men while they went to combat in OIF
Ibo-Naw@reddit
You’ve cited a passage that talks about a "warning order" and a press release from March 2005, confirming there were rumors and potential mobilization on the horizon. And you highlight Walz saying he’d serve if called on—if called on, not a declaration that he was definitely going to Iraq with his unit. That’s a nice chunk of background info, but here’s the thing: you still haven’t answered my original question.
Did Walz say he would be going to Iraq with his unit? That was the question. Your quote mentions his commitment to serve if needed, but it doesn’t confirm whether he specifically stated he’d deploy with his unit regardless of the rumors. You’ve shown he was aware of a possible deployment, sure, but you’ve danced around the core of what I asked.
Now, let’s break down the difference between if and would, just in case there’s any lingering confusion:
If: Walz said he’d serve if called on. This means he might go to Iraq, but only if he’s specifically asked to. It’s a possibility, not a guarantee.
Would: If Walz had said he would go to Iraq, that would mean he was definitely planning to go, no matter what. It’s a clear commitment.
Walz saying he’d serve if called on is not the same as saying he would definitely go to Iraq. One is a possibility; the other is a commitment. It’s a basic distinction but a crucial one—especially in the context of your argument.
So, while you’ve brought some relevant info to the table, your response still misses the mark. If you want to revisit that reading comprehension exercise, I’m here to help because of the spirit of aloha.
cyberfx1024@reddit
Yes, he did say he would go. Then a month and half later he put in his retirement papers
Ibo-Naw@reddit
When did he say he WOULD go? This is what I keep asking.
cyberfx1024@reddit
How about read his direct quote. I found it 2 minutes and quoted part of it above along with the news article.
So go read it again bc it's there
Ibo-Naw@reddit
Is if the same as would? Yes or no.
cyberfx1024@reddit
Yes, he said he would go there if called up to Iraq
https://web.archive.org/web/20050420004957/http://www.timwalz.org/pr.php?pr=1
Ibo-Naw@reddit
No, they are not the same. lol
Potential-Most-3581@reddit (OP)
See part of me wants to explain this to you and part of me realizes that since you never wore the uniform you'll never understand. Waltz knew his unit was going to Iraq and he bailed.
Ibo-Naw@reddit
Still a traitor.
Potential-Most-3581@reddit (OP)
How so?
Ibo-Naw@reddit
Easy! You can't say you're defending the Constitution and then choosing to endorse and work with a person that refused to defend the Constitution, ignore the Constitution and tried to overthrow the government in which she used to work.
Potential-Most-3581@reddit (OP)
Could you repeat that in English please?
Ibo-Naw@reddit
Tulsi promised to protect the Constitution when she joined the government and the military. But then she chose to endorse and work for Trump, who didn't protect the Constitution and tried to change the results of the 2020 election.
Sources:
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/08/27/read-trump-indictment-00176509
https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/constitution-transcript
https://www.army.mil/values/oath.html#:\~:text=I%2C%20_____%2C%20do%20solemnly%20swear,orders%20of%20the%20officers%20appointed
noposlow@reddit
Her other choice is a party who subverted the primaries and the will of its constituents, then forced out the standing President in order to install its internally chosen replacement. A replacement that Tulsi humiliated in the 2020 debates. An act got her excommunicated from the party she had so long believed in and supported.
Tulsi served our great country both on the battlefield and in Washington. Yet you and your cheeto eating fat fingers have the nerve to call her a traitor. Go do something with your life rather than disparaging those who have.
Remy0507@reddit
Oh please, she's been simping for Trump since long before Biden dropped out of the race.
But since you seem so concerned with the Democrats "constituents" (funny how only people who are voting for Trump seem concerned about this), let me reassure you that the vast majority of Democrat voters greatly prefer the current situation over when Biden was still in the race. Nothing was "subverted". It became clear that the current candidate was no longer viable, and he chose to drop out of the race. This could happen in any election. Maybe there was pressure applied to convince him to do this, but it was his choice ultimately. At that point having his sitting Vice President (who was already ON the same electoral ticket) move to the top of the ticket was the best option available. Nevermind the fact that there isn't even a constitutionally defined process for how a party has to pick their candidate. They could literally make up any system they want. So no, democracy was not subverted here. That's what was attempted on January 6th, 2021 at the encouragement of Donald Trump. Who Tulsi is now endorsing. So yeah, I don't care what she's done in the past. What she's doing now makes her a traitor in my book.
noposlow@reddit
I mean, you are regurgitating their barative to perfection. Two things can be true at once. Kamala is likely the lesser of 2 evils. But you know as well as I that Biden has not been cabable for a couple of years now. Dems were asking for debates and a prinary and were told, up to less than a month of Joe stepping down, that he was sharper than ever and ready to lead the country. Kamala is the DNC's chosen one, but the American people would have never elected her. Both of these parties are despicable. Well, Trump is an outsider for sure, definitely not a uniparty type. Unfortunately, I, like you, don't believe him to be the answer.
Btw it is curious to see people like Tulsi and RFK backing Trump. It speaks volumes to what must be happening behind closed doors when a true Dem patriot and a Kennedy turn away from the "party of the people." Sure, it's easier for people to chalk it up to "simping" or "grifting" than to look at what really is going on. The Dems have some real issues to work out, and I'm not convinced that with how politically polarized the country has become, they will be able to change anything soon. This is Trumps last hoorah. After he is gone, the GOP will be all in. Rather than worrying about a man who, like Biden, will possibly be dead in the next 4 years, the DNC should be thinking about the message he presents that esonate with his constituents. Because the 'They are all bad un-American racist redneck deplorables' message has grown old and is, as we all know, BS.
harrybrowncox69@reddit
the truth as it happened is just a narrative to you?
noposlow@reddit
I don't believe you hear the irony in your own statement.
Ibo-Naw@reddit
How has President Biden not been capable? Have you seen his accomplishments as the President? 😂
He's accomplished more than any in 4 years during your entire life.
I don't care if he's not the greatest speaker or aged while in office, it's whether or not he was doing his job or not.
noposlow@reddit
I'm simply pointing out what was obvious for years and, ultimately, led to him stepping down. If he was still capable, he'd still be running. Wtf are you talking about?
Ibo-Naw@reddit
I asked you two questions and you answered not one.
noposlow@reddit
Well, I answered the first. Regarding his accomplishments as presodent... you'd have to point out to me what impresses you so much. In my view, he's been a mediocre president at best. Under his watch, we've seen the rich get richer, the middle class get poorer, and the poor stay poor. But maybe you're judging his presidency on something else... his support of wars, maybe? Possibly his attempt at creating a bureaucracy to define what is misinfornation and what isn't? Maybe his recent criticism on our right to own asualt weapons? You'd have to give specifics.
Ibo-Naw@reddit
You didn't directly answer either of my questions; instead, you shared your own opinions without addressing the specifics I asked about.
Anyway, time to educate yourself https://www.whitehouse.gov/therecord/. Please don't be like most here that will...
A) not click and read
B) Dismiss it as Biden propaganda as if you can't fact check what you see.
Enjoy learning.
Remy0507@reddit
I'm not regurgitating any narrative. I'm describing events as I saw them and heard them, with my own eyes and ears.
No one is claiming the Democratic Party doesn't have their own issues. I didn't want Biden as the candidate back in 2020, and I sure as hell didn't want him in 2024. I definitely wasn't happy with what the DNC has been doing.
But then I look across the aisle at what has become of the Republican party, and suddenly "lesser of two evils" seems like a colossal understatement. There WERE Republicans who I might have considered voting for. I live in MA, and if our previous governor Charlie Baker had run for President and gotten the nomination, I would have voted for him in a heartbeat. But instead he left politics altogether, and I think a big part of the reason is because he no longer recognized his own party. So instead the Republicans gave us Donald Trump...again. That party is broken beyond repair at this point.
And for someone like Tulsi, who uses to claim to align with same sort of values as Bernie Sanders, to now back trump...well that's why I call her a grifter, because no matter how broken you may think the Democratic party is, it's impossible for me to believe that anyone who could endorse Trump now ever truly held the beliefs that she claimed to hold. She is a political opportunist who will go whichever directions seems most beneficial to her career, and I don't see any evidence to suggest that RFJ Jr. is any different.
Meanwhile you have multitudes of actual Republicans who have held public office or worked under various administrations who are now speaking out against Trump. What does that tell you about him?
noposlow@reddit
Like I stated. He is definitely not welcomed by the established. But again, i really don't think that's the conversation America needs to concern itself with. Win, we don't see Trump again after 4 years. Lose, we don't see Trump again. But the Dems have lost the ear of the working American. They've become the party of Union bosses, not Union workers. Do I think the Republicans are the answer for the workers... no. However, the GOP offers hope in the form of jobs. On the other hand, all we have gained in the last 4 years is a masive wealth tranfer from the working class to the wealthy, combined with massive inflation while the American dream slips away. So where does that leave the working class of America? As a middle-class American, our family saw no financial advantages from Trumps time in office. But under Biden, we lost ground. Combine that with the Dems' new proclivity to test the boundaries of our rights as Americans and... well... hmmm what's the bigger threat?
Remy0507@reddit
The pandemic had more to do with the things that have happened in the economy than any policies of the Biden administration, and I feel like anyone who's being intellectually honest should be able to see that. And Harris has proposed some new policies to attempt to address the cost of living increases (whether they will be effective or not remains to be seen).
But I have a problem with this statement here:
You act like he can't do any potentially irreparable damage in that 4 years. Look at what happened in his first 4 years. Look at the Supreme Court. Look at the Project 2025 agenda and what those who want to see Trump put back into power want to do. Look at what he tried to make happen on January 6th 2021.
Yes, both parties have some major work to do. But none of that can start until we get through this election, and we have only two choices who can actually win. If, after everything that has happened, you still think Trump is the better option, then I don't see how there's any getting through to you.
noposlow@reddit
Not once have a said Trump is the better option. In fact, I've stated the opposite more than once.
Regarding the COVID... we should have never shut down. Full stop. States had a choice, and blue states chose wrong. The Feds needed to stay out of it and continue business as usual. I absolutely look at this administration and think... that's on you.
I personally live in a state that bought in hook, line, and sinker. We were the last the lift restrictions. I was called a racist for not wearing a mask. Lmao off...a racist! That's the moment I knew something was very off with the way Americans viewed one another based solely on politics.
I long for the days of McCain admonishing a supporter for questioning Obama's character and citizenship. I personally believe that Trump lowered the bar... we don't need more of that. But I don't believe him to be a threat. Despite Jan 6.
Again, I believe the question should be why. Just like the riots of 2020. In my city, I watched rioters fire bomb our federal building. Vandalize businesses (mine included). Deface art and erase history. Use facist tactics... in order to "combat facism." Do I think they were wrong and misguided just as the rioters of Jan 6 were... absolutely. But the question to me is, why? Why the anger? Why the angst? Why the misguided and pointless aggression and violence. Why are both sides so fed up? We can point out the illness until we are blue in the face. But until we address the cause, it will return over and over and over.
So yes, Trump is a cancer. A horrible, terminal, quick speading, metastisized cancer. (Granted his most adamant supporters view him as Americas cure rsther than a cancer) Unfortunately, the difference with Dems is simply that they are a horrible, SLOW spreading cancer... that will lead to death just the same.
Remy0507@reddit
Okay, and Tulsi Gabbard, who you are defending here, chose to endorse that "horrible, terminal, quick spreading, metastasized cancer". What does that tell you about her judgment? Her motivations? I supported her in 2019. Even donated to her campaign. But she has long since burned any good will that I had left towards her.
noposlow@reddit
Again. Why is the question? What advantage does she see in a quick death v. a long, slow death? I know this... their are advantages and disadvantages to each. I've watched both. Neither are appealing to me.
Remy0507@reddit
She sees an advantage to her own career. That's what this whole grift and shift to the right has been about. Who knows if she ever actually had any principles or she's always just been motivated by what seemed like the most advantageous position for her to be in at the time.
noposlow@reddit
I'm curious... who is it you think makes choices not based on personal interests? That can't be what you really believe. You don't think Biden, ot Harris, or Pelosi, or ANY politician, makes their choices based on personal interest. That makes zero sense. Early during his time as VP Biden made it clear that the administration didn't support gay marriage. Why? Because polling at the tike showed that supporting it would lose votes. That's a ridiculous litmus.
Remy0507@reddit
Changing positions on an issue based on public sentiment (or pressure from your donors) is one thing. Yeah, all politicians do that.
That's a very different thing that doing a complete 180 and suddenly supporting a party and candidate that go against almost every value you used to claim to care about.
Ibo-Naw@reddit
Tulsi’s endorsement of Trump was just a stellar career move! Who cares if Trump tried to undermine the Constitution—she’s clearly the hero here, right? And let's not forget her brilliant debate performance in 2020 that totally justifies every decision she's made since. It’s truly inspiring to see someone who defends the Constitution by endorsing someone who, you know, allegedly tried to overturn an election. But hey, keep championing the real issue: my eating habits. That’s definitely the most important part of this debate
noposlow@reddit
Tulso had to make a choice between 2 evils. Or do you believe that their is some sort of enate goodness in the current "oligarch" run Democratic party? No, no rational pragmatic observer would ever believe that. Leave it to supporters of this administration to disparage our military.
Championing... lmao... I could care less if you're a fat ass. I'm definitely not in any way supporting it. But, I mean... It sounds like I wasn't far off.
Ibo-Naw@reddit
I don't know what you're babbling on about, but the fact that you think Tulsi had to make a choice between two evils proves that you know nothing about Vice President Kamala Harris outside of whatever right wing and "independent" media you consume.
noposlow@reddit
You know exactly what I'm "babbling about." Don't argue with conviction and, honestly, very good points... but claim nievity when a valid, alternate perspective makes it convenient. It's fine if you're a supporter of the party politics the Dems are playing at the moment. But to act like you don't understand them is simply disingenuous. I simply don't believe you're that ignorant and misinformed.
Ibo-Naw@reddit
I don't need to get on here and lie. I really didn't. I don't do this, "them, they," talk because that is very ignorant and misinformed. I like to be specific.
El_Padrino_Fred@reddit
I love this. Calling out someone’s hypocrisy and backing it up with facts!
El_Padrino_Fred@reddit
100% correct.
HarveyMushman72@reddit
rUsSiAN aSset! Poo-tin!
alivenotdead1@reddit
She was a traitor to the traitorous DNC. That makes her a hero.
TMI-nternets@reddit
Supporting Putin isn't a lifestyle choice.
That's being in a war, and wanting the other side to win.
What kind of an American are you?
alivenotdead1@reddit
Tulsi doesn't support Putin. I don't support Putin. Trump doesn't support Putin. Republicans don't support Putin. You dems need to come up with more convincing lies to try to win your arguments. They don't work. People just roll their eyes at you.
harrybrowncox69@reddit
you're wrong, he does, and by extension by supporting him she is supporting them both.
Ibo-Naw@reddit
https://youtu.be/urW-LzeTpS8?si=5Cmecfb_dcWLpMm9
alivenotdead1@reddit
This is MSNBC and not real news. Everyone knows that you can't trust liberal media. They're extremely biased. You'd be an idiot to trust anything that they have to say.
Ibo-Naw@reddit
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3CWagU2pkgo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A3OgiJV10oI&pp=ygULdHJ1bXAgcHV0aW4%3D
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s7UYfnmTd5s&pp=ygUTdHJ1bXAgcHJhaXNlcyBwdXRpbg%3D%3D
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNxvSxaGeDE&pp=ygUTdHJ1bXAgcHJhaXNlcyBwdXRpbg%3D%3D
alivenotdead1@reddit
Look, Trump will get us out of this useless war. Harris will only make it worse. This was war was the main cause of inflation. Just watch and see after Trump wins. There is no chance that Harris will win. The DNC is done and getting exposed as we speak. Even Zuckerberg is switching sides.
Ibo-Naw@reddit
So I combat the nonsense you wrote and this is your response, more nonsense? lol
alivenotdead1@reddit
It's not nonsense to likely more than half of the voters in this country. So I wish you luck being on the losing side.
Ibo-Naw@reddit
It is nonsense. Trump has never gotten close to half the voters in an election, if you think he get MORE will this time, you're even more delusional, than I thought.
alivenotdead1@reddit
Harris will lose. Mark my words.
Ibo-Naw@reddit
Why would I put faith in someone that thinks Trump will get more than 50% of the vote despite no evidence that he can? lol
alivenotdead1@reddit
I don't care what you think. Harris is going to lose. You guys didn't even get to vote for her. She was the first to drop out in 2020 when she ran because of Tulsi, lol. She was chosen to be Biden's running mate because of the color of her skin, lol. The DNC backstabbed their guy and placed her in the position. No work on her part at all. No one knows her policies. She has copied two of Trump's policies as of today and hasn't been interviewed once, even after saying in early August that she would interview in August. It is now August 28th. She will not win.
Ibo-Naw@reddit
I swear this sub is filled with people who only know how to spew right wing talking points. Most of you all say the same exact thing and I know what you will say before you say it.
EBW42@reddit
She is such a freakin badass.
Potential-Most-3581@reddit (OP)
Have you ever met someone who wasn't
Ibo-Naw@reddit
Yes, Tulsi.
ParatusPlayerOne@reddit
Charlatan
S0ulace@reddit
Wrong sub buddy.
Adept_Board_8785@reddit
COOL 😎.
BeerFarts86@reddit
Cool.