Why Did Tulsi Endorse Trump for President in Detroit, Michigan?
Posted by PoliticalHub24@reddit | tulsi | View on Reddit | 124 comments
Posted by PoliticalHub24@reddit | tulsi | View on Reddit | 124 comments
Myspace203260@reddit
Could you imagine a tie between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump? Crazy but possible.
A 269-269 tie in the Electoral College is a rare and interesting scenario. For Kamala Harris and Donald Trump to each receive 269 votes, the following might happen:
Swing States Split: Key battleground states like Florida, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Arizona would need to split almost evenly between the two candidates.
Nebraska and Maine’s Split Electoral Votes: Both states award some of their electoral votes proportionally. A split in the votes from these states could contribute to the tie.
Changes in Demographics and Voter Turnout: Slight shifts in demographic voting patterns or turnout rates could easily influence the outcome in key states.
Here’s a possible map scenario:
Trump wins: Texas, Florida, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Georgia, Ohio, Iowa, Wisconsin.
Harris wins: California, New York, Illinois, Virginia, Colorado, New Mexico, Minnesota, Michigan, and Arizona.
Nebraska and Maine split: 4 for Trump from Nebraska and 1 for Harris; 3 for Harris and 1 for Trump from Maine.
The key is in how swing states and the few proportionally rewarded electoral votes play out, resulting in this narrow and precise tie.
A 269-269 tie in the Electoral College has significant implications:
House of Representatives Decides the President
Each State Gets One Vote: The newly elected House of Representatives decides the President. Each state’s delegation gets one vote. The candidate with the majority (26 or more) wins.
Potential for Deadlock: If the House cannot reach a majority, a deadlock might occur, delaying the selection of a President.
Senate Decides the Vice President
Each Senator Votes: The Senate chooses the Vice President. Each senator gets one vote, with a majority of 51 needed to decide the outcome.
Party Lines and Majority Control: The party control of the Senate could heavily influence this outcome.
Acting President
Political Implications
Intense Negotiations: Expect backroom negotiations, coalitions, and political maneuvers as parties and candidates lobby for support among representatives and senators.
Public Reaction: Nationwide reactions might be polarized, causing significant political tension and public debate.
Legal Challenges
Historical Precedent
Impact on Governance
This scenario would be unprecedented in modern times and would bring focus on the processes outlined in the Constitution for resolving Electoral College ties.
porkfriedtech@reddit
So you’re saying there’s a chance?
Myspace203260@reddit
A poem of fairness
The rich and greedy hoard their gold,
While workers toil, the truth unfolds.
The 1% own wealth and power,
But tides are turning, hour by hour.
From mansions high, they look below,
But soon the people’s voice will grow.
No need for cats and dogs to feast,
The wealthy are the chosen beast.
The 99% awaken with collective strength see,
Through greed and hoarding lies the key.
To right this wrong, to share the wealth,
We must dismantle stealth and stealth.
What feast can make the poor man rich?
Devour the rich in every niche.
Myspace203260@reddit
Always a chance
AQMessiah@reddit
Tulsi abandoned her vice chair post at the DNC because of a rigged system against Sanders..
She was railroaded running for president herself from, you guessed it, more corruption and a rigged system.
RFK railroaded from running in a primary against Biden. DNC changed rules, made it impossible for him to run in the 11th hour.
Kamala was picked, not by democratic primary, but by circumstantial processes.
There's a common thread here.
SeasonsGone@reddit
I wonder how she feels about what happens to any GOP official who speaks up against Trump, and if she feels it’s any similar to how DNC officials treated her for not supporting Clinton
nevertulsi@reddit
She does not give a shit because she has no principles, she only cares about amassing power. She went from moderate/conservative to Democrat, then endorsed Sanders, then endorsed Biden, and now Trump. Do you really think it's because of some deeply held belief? No, it's because she tries to worm herself into positions of influence through endorsements. You can go through each endorsement and find the "team" she was originally with didn't give her the power she sought, so she dumped them and endorsed the opposition ... every single time.
Why did she go from moderate democrat to endorsing Sanders? Hillary did not give her the power she wanted
Why did she go from endorsing Sanders to endorsing Biden? Sanders didn't give her the power she wanted
Why did she become a Trumpist after endorsing Biden? She wasn't getting the power she wanted from Biden/Harris.
rk808hi@reddit
WELP! This ought to be her shortest career move.
nevertulsi@reddit
Lmao she made the mistake of actually having to do something rather than snipe and bitch... And she failed miserably
SeasonsGone@reddit
She really does just go wherever she can find profitable contrarianism, regardless of the validity or substance of its claims
AQMessiah@reddit
What happens? I don’t get your point.
SeasonsGone@reddit
You don’t think there are consequences within the party for anti-Trump speak?
PlayerofVideoGames@reddit
Well, theres thinking there are, and then there is proving there are.
So out with it, what are the consequences that have been dealt out?
With Dems you can be a sitting US President and the party will maneuver to take you out of the race.
Republicans wanted Trump out in 2016 elections but they let the democratic process play through honestly, and the people chose Trump.
Post 2016 election the Democratic party argued in court against Sanders that its ultimately up to the party, not the people, to decide who gets to be the nominee.
Republicans respects democracy, the Democrats have proven they don't.
Mind you im saying this as a former democrat of 25 years, now independent.
zen_sunshine@reddit
Cheney lost her primary in Wyoming.
NA_KhaZix_Bot@reddit
How is getting wiped in a primary because you pissed off your voterbase at all equivalent to getting scammed out of the primary by your own party's officials?
Cheney got slapped because her constituents decided she was a scumbag and got rid of her through a primary.
Kennedy got ripped off because his party's elites installed a different candidate without a primary.
What are you on about?
zen_sunshine@reddit
Ideological tribalism. May play out differently in different situations but the effect is the same.
NA_KhaZix_Bot@reddit
The other guy said "Republicans respect Democracy" and you challenged it by citing a Republican losing a democratic election.
Cheney was defeated by democracy.
Kennedy was defeated by an elitist scam.
That isn't the same thing, even if you water it down to something as meaningless and broad as "ideological tribalism". That wasn't even the point you were originally making.
nevertulsi@reddit
If she's "against the rigged system" and against the DNC why did she endorse Biden over Sanders in 2020?
The answer is very simple, all her endorsements are based on spite and trying to worm herself into positions of influence. She wanted Sanders to endorse her and not run in 2020, when he did run himself she stuck it to him by endorsing Biden instead. It's the exact same reason why she endorsed Sanders in 2016 - Hillary did not give her the power she sought. And now she thinks Trump will give her the power she so desperately sought that she did not get from Biden-Harris. It's the same shit as always, and people still fall for the grift.
AQMessiah@reddit
thank you for your unbiased view u/nevertulsi...
nevertulsi@reddit
I'm not making it a secret im against her. Idk what that proved
misterbasic@reddit
Democrats love screwing with their primaries. I walked away after the shenanigans in 2008 with Michigan and Florida.
Observe:
In 2008, where they awarded Obama Michigan delegates based on exit polls even though he wasn’t on the ballot
In 2016 with Superdelegates against Sanders
In 2020 with using polling to keep Tulsi off the debate stage and then changing their rule about being on the stage if you won delegates on Super Tuesday (after she did in AmSam).
In 2024 with RFK and now whatever this is with Kamala
This has gone on for years since the DNC Rules and bylaws committee which fucked over HILLARY of all people (lol). Democrats don’t care about their party corruption. They’ve been getting away with it for going on 2 decades.
PMmeNothingTY@reddit
Wait until you hear about GOP gerrymandering
Ibo-Naw@reddit
What about the part where he stole classified documents and obstructed the investigation?
What about extorting a foreign president to dig up dirt of a political opponent?
What about attempting to overturn an election?
What about being a convicted felon?
fernandez21@reddit
Your forgetting about how he dropped bombs on Syria to protect the oil fields (remember the MSM calling it majestic and how he became president that day?), or how he bombs an airport to kill a general, or how he stroked tensions by cancelling the Iran deal, or how he ramped up drone strikes killing a lot more civilians (including an American little girl), or how he was bragging about sending weapons to Ukraine, or how he looked the other way when a journalist was killed by Saudi Arabia, or how he vetoed a bill that came out of congress to stop us of aiding a genocide in Yemen, or how he had sent troops to the Congo near Niger (remember the jokes on how he would struggle pronouncing that country?), or how he tried to facilitate a coup in Venezuela, or how he was always increasing the military budget, or how he back out out of the nuclear treaty causing a new arms race, or how he moved the US embassy to Jerusalem stoking more tensions with Palestine, or the Abraham Accords, or how he wants to deploy our soldiers to Mexico to “take care” of the cartel (would you be ok with a foreign country sending their troops here to take care of our organized crime?)
But sure, the guy didn’t start “new” wars.
AQMessiah@reddit
Yeah, most of your points are misconstrued or flat out wrong to push your agenda. That’s fine and all, but I’d rather not be involved in another decades long war.
fernandez21@reddit
“My agenda”? I only responded to your claim of Trump being “anti war”, what you said about the dems screwing over RFK and a tulsi is correct, but stop pretending Trump is this anti war guy. Trump is out on the campaign trail right now talking about how Israel needs to “finish” the job, as in “hurry up Israel and finish the genocide and take over the West Bank”.
Back in 2019-2020 Tulsi was even out saying about how we were closer to WW3 than ever during his presidency (remember the Hawaii bomb text story she would tell?)
Of course now she says the same thing but about Biden and Harris.
AQMessiah@reddit
You forgot the part where he's a rapist, white supremacist and an agent for Russia
streetwearbonanza@reddit
Biden and Harris didn't start any new wars either
DNA98PercentChimp@reddit
Lol. As if after these past ~8 years of her political career ANYONE can say with any certainty why the hell she does anything she does….
The only ‘constant’ appears to be her blowing like a feather in the wind towards whatever might give her a shred of relevancy, audience, and money.
She oversold so hard on ‘having integrity’ in the late 2010s that is now clearly revealing as a projection of her deficiency.
If I had to guess the reason why is that her grift has worked well enough on the right to put her in position where she might get a cabinet position to further her own career. It’s that simple.
Sleepyhed007@reddit
Deficiency? She stepped down as chairman of the DNC because she felt there was corruption, she was then a victim of OUTRIGHT corruption when the DNC moved the goalposts on the debate.
You don't think her natural drift towards the other side is a result of her inside perspective on the workings of the Democratic Party? Nothing about that is listing in the wind.. open your eyes
overland_park@reddit
Because there is the Democrats and then everyone else. The democrats will do anything in their power to limit the scope of democracy.
zombierapture@reddit
The fact that no Democrats on reddit will even acknowledge that what the Dems did to RFK is literally undermining democracy is atrocious. People are so swallowed in Trump hate they will take all Democrat corruption with no questions.
Dennygreen@reddit
what exactly did they do to him
I havent been paying attention
zombierapture@reddit
The Democrats used their lawyers in their clear choice super pact to fight his inclusion on the ballot in every state. They tried to drain his campaign in legal fees and kept him off any debates. Democrats should not be using their money and resources to thwart third party candidates and even if you vote Kamala you should never let them live that down or do it again. I don't see Democrats caring though.
martini-meow@reddit
oh, but they're keeping him on the Michigan ballot, because 'reasons'. So they're only doing it selectively, strategically.
Npl1jwh@reddit
Maybe the Dems fought so hard against him because RFK is a Steve Bannon chaos agent, set up to run as a spoiler to Biden.
But what Bannon and Trump didn’t expect was RFK was gonna pull more MAGA votes away from Trump than votes away from Biden.
Well they couldn’t have that, so now drop out and endorse Trump selling your votes for a cabinet position…RFK senior is turning over in his grave.
paultheschmoop@reddit
This sub has less backbone than Tulsi herself (a low bar). You will be downvoted into oblivion.
Npl1jwh@reddit
Yea and I’m willing to bet zombierapture didn’t complain about Trumps 60+ court cases showing no actual proof of election fraud?
I bet old zomb was crickets about Trumps endless appeals on everything in every fucking criminal cases Donny’s indicted for?
zombierapture@reddit
This is the TULSI sub. I am pointing out that the democrats stopping third party candidates is bad. I support third party candidates don't assume I support Trump and don't allow the Democrats to stop third party candidates just because you have swallowed your Trump derangement so fully
Npl1jwh@reddit
I used to be a tulsi supporter. I bragged her up to my Left Leaning better half…watching Tulsi’s transformation over the last decade has been a let down to say the least.
paultheschmoop@reddit
The guy you’re responding to has probably furiously typed out “THE DEMOCRATS” 500 times in the past month. It’s kinda sad honestly lol
zombierapture@reddit
So you have a conspiracy theory to justify why it's ok that Democrats ensure that third parties have no chance. Ok
Ibo-Naw@reddit
The irony. All your posts in this thread is exactly that, conspiracy theories.
SeasonsGone@reddit
Re: debates, I thought they require a significant polling percentage in order to participate? That’s always been the case in any election I’ve paid attention to.
misterbasic@reddit
They screwed Tulsi out of the debate when the rule was you needed to be awarded delegates and then said lol jk to keep her off the debate stage against Bernie/Biden where she would have shone like a star
SeasonsGone@reddit
She participated in several debates during the DNC primary. Even then she wasn’t winning any elections. As the primary season goes on only those who are achieving a minimum threshold of electoral success are given a slot on the debate.
That would’ve been true for any of the other candidates, she just chose not to suspend her campaign. I liked Tulsi, but sometimes people just don’t perform well in primaries. She was polling in single digits well before the Biden/Sanders debates
misterbasic@reddit
They didn’t care
In 2008, where they awarded Obama Michigan delegates based on exit polls even though he wasn’t on the ballot
In 2016 with Superdelegates against Sanders
In 2020 with using polling to keep Tulsi off the debate stage and then changing their rule about being on the stage if you won delegates on Super Tuesday (after she did in AmSam).
In 2024 with RFK and now whatever this is with Kamala
This has gone on for years since the DNC Rules and bylaws committee which fucked over HILLARY of all people (lol). Democrats don’t care about their party corruption. They’ve been getting away with it for going on 2 decades.
Ibo-Naw@reddit
The Democrats did no such thing lol. Maybe they should have followed state rules.
zombierapture@reddit
https://www.clearchoicepac.com/ is their website mission statement on their homepage.
Gonzo115015@reddit
How dare they
PassTheBallToTucker@reddit
Well...yeah. When their whole campaign is centered around Trump being a "threat to democracy" and then the DNC does everything in their power to limit or outright prohibit debates and to fight 3PCs off the ballot...yeah. It looks pretty hypocritical.
zombierapture@reddit
It's complicated but boils down to Russia not wanting Ukraine in NATO. The US would do the same and would not allow a foreign alliance to put weapons on our border. There is more to it as well but it is not Putin going for world domination starting with Ukraine like the media would like to dumb it down to.
Ibo-Naw@reddit
Were you saying this during the 2020 Republican primary?
overland_park@reddit
Also Jill Stein.
paultheschmoop@reddit
Exactly. I refused to ever vote for Democrats after they literally tried to overturn an election by sending a slate of fake electors-wait a minute….
overland_park@reddit
No the Dems send lawyers to keep opposition off state ballots. Then install a candidate who has not been elected and completely failed in the last election cycle.
Ibo-Naw@reddit
How about you be specific. What "Dems" did this? You all are never specific, all y'all ever say is THE DEMOCRATS THE DEMOCRATS THE DEMOCRATS.
overland_park@reddit
Literally the DNC has fought to keep RFK jr and Jill Stein off of ballots.
Ibo-Naw@reddit
You have a link to the Democratic National Committee (DNC) suing RFK Jr to keep him off the ballot?
paultheschmoop@reddit
And Trump sent lawyers to try to overturn the results of an election that he knows he lost.
So what’s your point? Politics are a game of lesser evils. What Trump did is objectively worse in every imaginable way.
Would I have preferred an open primary this year for the Dems? Sure. RFK, of course, would have lost, because he’s a nutjob, but that’s fine.
But trying to stand on the high horse of upholding democracy while shilling for someone who quite literally tried to overturn a democratic result is wildly hypocritical at best and is more likely just you being disingenuous because you don’t actually care about these things at all.
overland_park@reddit
I’m not standing on any high horse just speaking to how the democrats have run this election cycle. They have misinformed and distorted the process.
paultheschmoop@reddit
Again, if we’re evaluating which party has done more to “misinform and distort the process”, the party of Trump has done more by a factor of 1,000.
So again, what exactly is your point?
overland_park@reddit
But I’m not speaking to that. I’m speaking directly to how the Dems have behaved. You are admitting that I am correct but then are trying to create a “but Trump” argument.
How the democrats have behaved for the last 8 years has been worse for our country as a whole. They lost me in 2020. “But Trump” arguments don’t hold weight anymore.
paultheschmoop@reddit
Err, yeah, Trump v Harris are the options.
Hey, same! As I already said, I’m not a fan of not having an open primary in 2024. Incidentally the republicans didn’t have one in 2020 either.
My point is you have no leg to stand on. You can pretend to be offended by how the “Dems have behaved”, but if you actually care about that behavior, oh boy, would you be furious with Donald Trump, who behaved far worse and went to far greater lengths to circumvent democracy.
Worse than literally trying to overturn a democratic election? How do you figure?
AkinasPotato@reddit
So overturning an election is worse than circumventing the democratic process? I think we're really fucked when we are okay with siding either the less fucked up problem. Regardless of what side you are radical on, a third party should always have as much campaign power as the other 2 and should not be snubbed by either sode. It's only right.
Ibo-Naw@reddit
See the thing here is, you're being mislead about something you want to believe. The other thing ACTUALLY happened the way it was described.
paultheschmoop@reddit
I mean….yes? Lmao
Big if true
Agreed. What is the relevance?
AkinasPotato@reddit
Ahh, the ole sarcastic response to signal intellectual superiority. Very original.
paultheschmoop@reddit
You’re now the second person to just flat out give up on presenting any sort of actual argument here
What
Is
Your
Point
Yes, undeniably, Trump’s attempt to overturn an election is worse than the Dems not giving RFK a fair shot in the primary. Yes, I would’ve preferred an open 2024 Dem primary. No I do not support the Democratic Party or either of the major political parties, as both are corrupt. Yes I think there should be viable 3rd parties.
So again, what point are you trying to make here? This is a Tulsi Gabbard thread. She’s a morally bankrupt chameleon who endorsed Trump because she decided a right wing grift was more financially lucrative.
AkinasPotato@reddit
I mean, for being so opinionated, i shouldn't have to explain why RFK being shafted from the debates does not do any favors for the voters. While Trump is a flawed candidate, you can't possibly trust the dem party with their history to appoint somebody any better?
As far as Tulsi, in spite of being loved by voters and polling higher than the two in office in the 2020 Primary, ever since she called out Kamala in the debates on her prosecution history, Hillary and the left have been relentless on slandering and doing everything to ruin her reputation, regardless of Tulsi falling in line that year and endorsed Joe.
Your argument on Tulsi stands entirely on the left narrative and ignores that she was challenging the party to put in a decent candidate with cross-party appeal who instead would rather play shenanigans with witch-hunt buzzwords and leveraging the media for power.
paultheschmoop@reddit
Why would you? I never said it did lol
Lol
I don’t trust them to do anything. But yes, obviously they have indeed put up better candidates than Trump, 3 times. A low bar, because Trump is one of the worst presidential candidates of all time, but nonetheless.
Lol
Source? I’m sure she probably polled higher than Harris (again, low bar) but she polled consistently pretty horribly. Not really controversial nor debatable.
I mean, I guess. She’s done herself no favors.
Agreed! Tulsi wasn’t one of them, but sure, neither of Harris nor Biden were in my top 5 out of the bunch.
overland_park@reddit
Yep. Worse.
The-Curiosity-Rover@reddit
Ah, I see. You’re one of those people who’s fine with an authoritarian government as long as it’s “your” authoritarian government.
paultheschmoop@reddit
Thank you, that was a very convincing argument.
overland_park@reddit
About as compelling as yours.
paultheschmoop@reddit
Holy shit bro I just got OWNED! You couldn’t make a good case for your disingenuous position, but at least you got a sick burn in 😎
I respect it
overland_park@reddit
Thanks for acknowledging that.
Ibo-Naw@reddit
Hold up, what? 🤣
What do you call attempting to overturn a presidential election then?
overland_park@reddit
Take a step back and actually read what I wrote. I know it’s hard but you can do it.
Ibo-Naw@reddit
Take a step back and actually read what I wrote. I know it’s hard but you can do it. Come back to me when you understand.
overland_park@reddit
Nice try but you really didn’t say anything.
Ibo-Naw@reddit
Ok, seems like you need help. I will ask again.
What do you call attempting to overturn a presidential election then?
The-Curiosity-Rover@reddit
You said “the democrats will do everything in their power to limit the scope of democracy”, which is an utterly insane statement given that Trump and MAGA Republicans violently tried to overturn the last election.
overland_park@reddit
The dnc is worse.
The-Curiosity-Rover@reddit
The Democrats will do everything in their power to limit the scope of democracy?
Who did this?
Ibo-Naw@reddit
Because shes a traitor.
FluffyPurpleBear@reddit
Donald Trump has already proven that he is a threat to democracy. Anyone standing behind him after his actions and inactions on Jan 6 2021 is a traitor that includes Tulsi.
Ibo-Naw@reddit
Yep!
nevertulsi@reddit
This sub has been taken over by Trumpers, don't mind the downvotes
PoliticalHub24@reddit (OP)
Really?
Ibo-Naw@reddit
I, Tulsi Gabbard, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.
Man she endorses attempted to overturn the 2020 election and on January 6, 2021 sat in his office for hours watching domestic terrorists attack the US capitol and police officers and did nothing.
Yes, really.
zombierapture@reddit
The Democrats fought to keep RFK off the ballot and off the debates. They used their clear choice pact as a weapon to ensure they remain the only viable option all while using the slogan "protecting democracy". Jan 6 was a terrible day that showed Trump's lack of leadership in allowing the protest to continue. He did however ask for greater security but when that wasn't given it was his job to control the crowd and he failed and did so intentionally to feed his own ego. That is still not as bad as proactively ensuring no 3rd party has a chance. You can't even reform the Democrats because there is so little chance to get a real candidate in there. They used super delegates or just skip the primary all together. You can hate Trump I get it but I respect Tulsi and her choice. She is not dumb and she is not a grifter she is a veteran and has done more for people than anyone in this comment section.
Ibo-Naw@reddit
Man, where do you get your info from? So much misinformation. 😂
zombierapture@reddit
What part is misinfo. The part where the Democrats used the clear choice super pact to fight RFKS inclusion on the ballot in every state, Jan 6 being a huge failure in Trump's leadership, or Tulsi being a veteran?
Ibo-Naw@reddit
RFK Jr.’s ballot access is more about state laws and less about some mythical super PAC.
zombierapture@reddit
How are they a myth- https://www.clearchoicepac.com/ there is their website nd their mission statement is on their homepage
Ibo-Naw@reddit
Didn't say they weren't real but not the Hulk Hogan of super pacs brother.
Remy0507@reddit
News flash: The Republicans don't want 3rd party candidates getting any traction either...
zombierapture@reddit
What did they do to stop 3rd parties beyond want
Ibo-Naw@reddit
I mean, the RNC canceled primaries in 2020 because they didn't want Trump challengers.... but yeah let's talk about the Democrats all day everyday lol.
Ibo-Naw@reddit
On January 6, 2021, who did the President make the request for greater security to?
Capt_Irk@reddit
No, not really. That person is still under the delusion that there was an insurrection.
Ibo-Naw@reddit
What's the definition of insurrection?
The-Curiosity-Rover@reddit
You’re wasting your time. These people would deny that the moon landing happened if it helped them to justify their views.
Ibo-Naw@reddit
I know, but I like talking to these folk.
The-Curiosity-Rover@reddit
Makes sense
The-Curiosity-Rover@reddit
Jesus, you’ve really gone round the bend, haven’t you?
MappingYork@reddit
How is she a traitor?
Ibo-Naw@reddit
I mean, she's gone from endorsing Joe Biden to endorsing Donald Trump, a man facing a buffet of felony charges. And let's not forget, this is the same guy who’s been indicted for trying to overthrow an election and for playing hide-and-seek with classified documents AND obstructing the investigation. Yet here’s Tulsi, a military reserve, who swore to defend the Constitution, now cheering on someone accused of trampling all over it. If that’s not a plot twist worthy of a bad soap opera, I don’t know what is! It’s almost like she skipped the part in basic training about honoring her oath.
EddieAdams007@reddit
Total sellout.
fernandez21@reddit
Couple of reasons, her personal feelings about fighting back against the DNC is greater than her policy beliefs (if she had any), she is irrelevant now as a democrat and as a republican she has a fighting chance at relevancy again (especially if she kisses the ring, Trump will prop her up), and she’s willing to lie to get a chance of getting power again.
sayzitlikeitis@reddit
The lengths to which she would go to become a fox news regular
beavis617@reddit
Nikki Haley trashed Trump then endorsed him looking for a spot in his administration...RFK Jr did the same, trashed Trump and apparently made a deal for a position in the Trump administration in return for his endorsement and now Tulsi is sucking up to Trump hoping for some scraps from the banquet table at Trumplandia. These folks are opportunistic slimeballs...they just want a seat at the table of power...😖
The-Curiosity-Rover@reddit
Sounds pretty accurate. They all have a price.
iLikeSmallGuns@reddit
Because she’s smart. The democrats are out of control.
dawgfan24348@reddit
Yeah cause Trump is definitely the same pick here
The-Curiosity-Rover@reddit
I’m dismayed that this sub has so smoothly transitioned into a pro-MAGA dumpster fire
The-Curiosity-Rover@reddit
Because she’s lost all grip on reality
Adept_Board_8785@reddit
I don’t think that what’s she’s doing.
Old-Body-4301@reddit
Head scratcher... She has no idea what she stands for. First, she was all about Bernie... then went independent. I get it...
But her "my service brothers and sisters" now falls completely flat when endorsing a man who calls them loser and that the metal of honor "everybody gets" and is not as big as the presidential metal...
Holy crap....Selling her soul much?
Y_Y_why@reddit
Because she is a pos and sold her soul to the devil. Pretty simple.
AuntPolgara@reddit
Because she has no integrity
aduncan8434@reddit
Money, these people have a nice lifestyle and if one side stops paying switch to one who will.
overland_park@reddit
Freedom, she has a belief in a nice lifestyle and when one side stops offering it switch to the one that will.