Moving from i5-13600k to 7800x3d
Posted by morkail@reddit | buildapc | View on Reddit | 26 comments
So ran in to a bit of a... issue.. with my 13th gen i5 which i bought in January and thankfully amazon was willing to take it back along with the motherboard but i only had 7 days to send it, que me overthinking the subject for nearly the whole week before going down to the opening day of the Miami microcenter and getting my same motherboard but AM5 and a 7800x3d for 35 dollar difference once my refund came in. I considered my self damn lucky everything worked out so well. MSI MAG b650 and a 7800x3d from a MSI MAG z790 and i5-13600k and a 4070 super FE
Now when it comes gaming i expected a massive!!.....1-10 FPS difference in most of the games i play which is exactly what i got cyberpunk 2077 gained about 1 fps and was actual lower in some areas. RDR2 did see a 10-30 fps increase. and world of warcraft when sitting in town got another 10-20 fps increase. not counting the games where it really helps like in most competitive shooters, but overall about what i expected which in gaming 1440p is nearly no change at all. Now what was a change was the temps, the i5-13600k with a contact frame and a Air cooler would idle around 33-38C and while running around night city (cyberpunk 2077) would climb up to 80-84C on average. the 7800x3d with contact frame and Air cooler idles around 50c and climbs to 55c when interacting with Chrome (will get to that). and while gaming i see anywhere between 65c-75c but can rise to 80c ish if alt tabing while gaming. I don't know the significance of the difference in temps consdering both were operating about 10c from starting to thermal throttle 100°C on the i5-13600k and 89°C on the 7800x3d. that said it felt like when running cyberpunk 2077 on my i5-13600k i FELT the heating being pushed out by my fans yet i feel mostly cool air exiting my pc on the 7800x3d regardless of how hot it seeming got, not sure what to make of that
https://imgur.com/k6HvyFo pic from cyberpunk 7800x3d on 4070 super. tempts in benchmark are very different from in game.
example i5-13600k 4070 super https://imgur.com/ztRcSVI 60c
example 7800x3d 4070 super https://imgur.com/kojyWc5 60c
in benchmarks nearly the same performance about what i expected, when i was building my pc back in january the 7800x3d was way outside my budget for a 4070 super card since the i5 was 288 and the 7800x3d was nearly 400ish at the time. the i6-13600k was the better buy if you weren't getting a 3D chip.
Anyway, The real area i was concerned about when switching from the i5-13600k to the 7800x3d was as a desktop the i5 was the stronger chip, not productivity but ease of use of desktop, opening crome tabs, alt tabbing in games to look something up or use discord that sort of thing. and yes there was a difference not necessarily slower at most a few seconds but rather as one of those people, someone who leaves 60 chrome tabs open at a time and will routinely save 30 tabs and open them all at once. was it any slower? by a few seconds maybe but the real difference i noticed is the 50c idle temp jumping to 65-70c and my fans ramping up as if i just started loading a demanding game. which was a bit of a shock for me because the i5-13600k never even noticed when i routinely did the same thing, the temps only ever went up in games or if i was running cinebench. meanwhile installing a large program can also cause the temps to rise on the 7800x3d. they quicky climb back down but it was still a big surprise to see temps rise so easily from opening chrome tabs, did it effect performance? no not far as i can tell but i guess that's a example of the intel E-COREs actual doing something in comparison. while writing this temp is sitting at 55c
So my primary concern was that switching to the Ryzen chip with less cores would effect my easy of use as a deck top, and i guess technical it did, but being a few seconds slower at most in terms of installing programs, using a web browsers or unpacking isn't really a problem consdering its a much stronger gaming CPU on a platform that will get at least one more CPU in its lifespan. Don't know if this will help anyone never thought i would be forced to switch CPUs so suddenly.
TapIndividual7101@reddit
Thank you for saving me heartache and money. As I was about to pull the trigger on upgrading with the same specs. Not worth it. I’ll just wait
morkail@reddit (OP)
out of curiosity what are your current specs?
TapIndividual7101@reddit
13600 with a 4070super. 32GB 6000ram
morkail@reddit (OP)
oh ya your fine, did you manage to dodge the intel instability problem? they say its fixed at this point but i would be leery. I had the K version and ran it overclocked from when i got it in January to my regret.
TapIndividual7101@reddit
I never overclocked it. I actually undervolted slightly. And it was enough to keep it running 48-50deg while in game. Prior to undervolt it never got over 78deg.
morkail@reddit (OP)
you can overclock a none K model? huh never knew that.
Currently running my 7800x3d with a -20 offset on all cores.
Wasn't hardcore overclocking or anything on the i5-13600k just intel's built in overclocking software which i think was +300mhz, but yes the heat build up was kind of extreme and at the time i didn't realize how nuts it was, sucking down so many watts and temps being in the 80cs while doing intense games. as mentioned above the 7800x3d usually hovers around 65-70c in games while the i5 would climb well above that but the throttle limit for both was a good 10c with the 7800x3d being 89c and the i5 being 100c. speaking to others the major difference in heat output from my pc had more to do with the amount of watts the i5 was using more then anything else. at the time i didn't track the amount used for the i5.
if it wasn't for my own problems with intel 13th gen i would not of changed over. but I'm happy enough with it now and doesn't seem like the 9800x3d will be much better 2-13% more towards 2% so one more CPU lineup left in AM5 and if it isn't a banger that whole platform longevity argument wont amount to much.
Any gaming performance negatives from undervolted from what you expected to get?
TapIndividual7101@reddit
No I didn’t overclock. I undervolted. Actually only thing I did was turn off turbo in bios and change fan cooling type. Which lowered the temps tremendously. I’m guessing by lowering clock speed?
morkail@reddit (OP)
Turning off turbo would effect FPS in games pretty badly i would think. but doing all that might explain why you have had no issues so far.
TapIndividual7101@reddit
I also just found that my reshade was killing my FPS. I happen to turn it off and gained 30Frames. I uninstalled it and now getting 100-140 consistently. I was shocked
TapIndividual7101@reddit
I tried it both on and off. No difference. Maybe 2-3 FPS. But sure keeps my room cooler.
Fred_Mcvan@reddit
I an e been looking at that cpu as well. I am intrigued by those x3d chips. But you see negativity on both sides. Not everyone is a PC elitist. I try not to get caught up in that jargon. I want to always try things for myself and make my own decisions. These CPU’s are not always one size fits all. They can be tweaked and adjusted per your gaming or workload. Yes they have limitations. But I feel you need to explore and research to get your own answers. Always been a curious person and different thing and functions are fun to try.
morkail@reddit (OP)
yes, i did a ton of research before settling on the i5-13600k originally a very balanced CPU overall and in most titles within 10% of the performance of the 7800x3d if you discount the titles where the 3Dcach gives crazy returns of plus 50-100 FPS in some titles like say counter strike or Factorio. so far the only noticeable difference i see between them is as i said using the desktop for chrome or just kicking it out of sleep mode i see a trackable uptick in CPU usage compared to the i5-13600k which basically never noticed i did anything unless it was start to load up cinebench or a game. Did this effect how fast things loaded? ehh not really maybe a few seconds at most if opening 30-60 chrome tabs at once, but that causes a bit of lag regardless, installing a program was again a few seconds slower on average.
On paper intel chips can be confusing the i5 is a 6 core chip with 8 E-cores but wtf do the E-cores actual do? the 7800x3d even in production tasks is only like 10ish % slower even if the V-cach will cause slow towns due to temps.
Fred_Mcvan@reddit
I have been doing the same. I just want to try it out to see if there is a big difference.
Fred_Mcvan@reddit
I have been wondering the same thing. I was thinking about giving the 7800x3d chip a try. I am currently using the same 13600k but with a rtx 4070. Looking to upgrade GPU to a 4080 super. I wanted to purchase the 7800x3d just to try out and see the difference. I game and work on my system. Not sure the affect on production.
maledis87@reddit
I would look up benchmarks on stuff you use and see how they work together. Eith a cpu and gpu upgrade there will be a difference in gaming, but they also have 7950x3d I believe that is more suited for production and gaming.
morkail@reddit (OP)
to be clear on a 4070 the performance difference of a 7800x3d and i5-13600k is damn near the same outside of some titles that really use that 3Dcach. I didn't change to the AM5 platform i did it because my i5-13600k chip had degraded and amazon was willing to take it back. so i side stepped the whole LG1700 socket problem and went AM5. now on 4080 you will see a difference but again the gap closes depending if your gaming at 1080 or 1440p if you game at 4k you can use a 5 year old CPU and notice little to no difference.
maledis87@reddit
Yeah, I see. From what I can tell the x3d chips mostly benefit from higher 1 percent lows compared to other amd processors. That's one main reason I bought the 5800x3d. Good point on resolution I hear the higher you go the less the cpu matters
morkail@reddit (OP)
Watch any of the major youtube tech reviewers and most of there gaming benchmarks are 1080p low settings higher the resolution the less the CPU matters. but of course a newer CPU will last you longer in terms of lifespan.
https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html
scroll down to the overall benchmarks and your see a picture of 1080p scroll across and 1440p and it doesn't cover 4k but thats because they are all the same 50-60FPS .
One thing i think is misleading about these type CPU listing is the 7800x3D can seem MUCH stronger then any other cpu on the market in gaming . and it is when compared to a i9-14700k its neck and neck with the 7800x3d ahead but a few FPS. the reason it seems so much stronger is because in certain titles it can gain 30-50 or even nearly 100FPS which is nuts... unless you don't play any of those games in which case it doesn't mater for you. the real focus should be that you get a current gens i9 gaming performance with out needing to spend 500-600 plus water cooling because you can NOT air cool a i9.
And for me personally i see on average of 10-30FPS more 10ish in the games i play when going from a 4070 super and i5-13600k to the 7800x3d. which is mostly world of warcraft and a bunch of single player games cyberpunk, Alan wake 2 and such games. huh should mention i was overclocking my i5-13600k to 5.3GHz on DDR5 even used the same XMP ram on my am5 board and it ran at 6000 just fine.
Random thought: the ram training AM5 motherboards is scary as hell the first few times it happens wtf does it light up a warning light on the motherboard? someone might get the wrong idea and think something is wrong.
maledis87@reddit
I was coming from a 3700x that I accidently dropped when I was changing my motherboard. I'll probably look into the x3d again when I need to upgrade again. I haven't actually verified myself if it actually improved performance
morkail@reddit (OP)
I went from a i7-2600 to i5-13600k/7800x3d build my last pc in 7/25/2011 and replaced it January this year, GPU wise went from 560 TI, 970, 1660 super (used) and a 4070 super for the current built. only reason i upgraded was games started requiring avx2 (uncharted 4 at launch) and kept running in to bugs in games due to my cpu being so old.
Stargate_1@reddit
Perfectly normal temperature behaviour. Current Ryzen CPUs simply boost to max at any given task. My 7800 regularly throws out spikes. Most notably during loading screens, like loading into a new area in BG3 or Path of Exile. The 7800 also produces less Watts of heat, meaning less actual heat dispersed into your room. Temperature has nothing to do with Watts.
As for the fans, set a custom fan curve. My PC is very quiet, no fan in my PC can spin faster than 60%
morkail@reddit (OP)
i use FanControl software to control all my fans and yep my curve was still set as if it was a i5-13600k so couple the idle temps of 50c and going up to 55c if doing near anything had my fans kicking it then slowing down a few seconds later. which i found funny more then anything need to edit that curve to only start ramping up around 60C so i don't see it when opening chrome tabs. because right now i feel like my pc is asking me wtf are you doing whenever i opening 30-60 tabs at once.
Stargate_1@reddit
Yeah my fancurve is basically "top out at 50° with about 45% fan speed" and that's it. The fans are effectively always running the same rpm but because the 7800 uses such few Watts it manages the temps perfectly
Erianzel@reddit
I wish I had the funding to switch platforms right now. Stuck with 13th gen i7 and ddr4. Upgrading to AM5 would be a huge investment right now.
New_Torch@reddit
Your not alone. Lets just try and enjoy our little machines 😢
f1rstx@reddit
It's nice to see pretty levelheaded user experience. Not many people parroting "JUST X3D or nothing its 20-30-40-50% faster" understand that at high res/high settings it won't be any noticeably faster than any modern CPU.