Anon lives in Ancapistan

I feel like statists do a much worse job at looking at the future. Libertarianism gives long term benefit rather than short term, as systems that are built on the State and its tyranny would crumble before being replaced by better systems. The common people are not good judges of what 20 years would look like with the ideology, and rather make braindead strawmen such as these that end up just being more State control and completely contradictory to libertarianism. Saying "oh bbut your braindead ideology will just become an exaggerated version of the status quo we already have in 20 years and the opposite of itself, now listen to my delusional fantasy story" is not a valid critique of the system in of itself. This is like saying "communism is bad because after 20 years it will become capitalism and it will be very bad and scary", rather than the actual real life critique of "communism is bad because the definition of "stateless, moneyless, classless" is oxymoronic as the latter two cannot be enforced without a State. socialism the actual economic system is bad due to the economic calculation problem in that without pricing based on supply and demand and competition you cannot know how much of what people need, leading to surpluses of unnecessary items and shortage of necessary items such as food leading to famine" Hey, despite agreeing with many libertarian ideas I can easily point out issues such as greater threat of foreign invasion, allowing immoral and degenerate behavior leading to many suffering in the short term, uninformed and comforming customers not giving enough checks on companies, among many other REAL LIFE things rather than bullshit like "uhhh you will live in blackrock pod and eat ze bug and oh shit this is what ultra statists are saying"