I want to preface this by saying that I'm not 100% on vaccines being malevolent, as I too am vaccinated because my work requires it. But I've grown suspicious as of late, with AstraZeneca blood clots and whatnot.

Astrazeneca blood clots were a real issue, not a conspiracy, and they caused it to get recalled. Blood clotting is a normal rare response to both the vaccine and the virus. Greater risk of blood clots by getting the virus usually, but that particular vaccine had an elevated amount of blood clots compared to the alternatives so it got discontinued since there were better alternatives

If it had gone unnoticed, I wouldn't be talking about it now would I? Plus I get my info from 2 (albeit unreliable) insiders working in Moderna, that speculate that Pzifer may also be doing the same thing. Believing that major scientific publications are either comprised or simply incompetent isn't that far fetched, as it has been proven time and time again that they are 1)biased 2)easily tricked into publishing falsehood. I want you to dwell on that a bit.

this is just schizo nonsense. Anyone who knows how to do PCR (a very basic bio lab procedure) can immediately tell what sequences of RNA are in the vaccine. Would an entire global depopulation conspiracy risk it all on something that thousands upon thousands of independent people can discover immediately? or do you think it's more likely that the vaccine contains exactly what it says? Just because you can't verify something doesn't mean it's not easy to verify. You shouldnt trust your "Moderna insiders" if they aren't even competent enough to realize that

Yes. I do think that a large portion of the scientific community is compromised, but not all. I already said, I have seen the papers about covid19 being a man-made virus created in a Chinese-American lab in Wuhan. It was never explicitly stated that it was covid19, but that it was a Coronavirus that was specifically tested on bats. It was 5 years ago so I don't remember most of the research, but it has since been scrubbed off the web and even from Nature. Suspicious, no? I believe there are good enough reasons to not trust official and mainstream sources on this, especially since those "countries with competing interests" didn't actually import Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, China and Iran come to mind in that regard. As to why they haven't exposed them, I have no idea. Could be anything from them having their own plots or them being uninterested in how western powers decide to go about decimating their population.

Covid could have originated from a leak in the Wuhan institute of virology, but probably wouldn't have originated from an intentional leak. Otherwise, it would've been transported somewhere else before being leaked so that it's origin would be harder to trace. It seems like China did try to hide the origin of covid so it's possible they know something we don't. Not really convincing evidence that it's part of some global depopulation agenda.

So if this is a global conspiracy and many countries which received the sputnik vaccine (Russia, Iran, etc.) simply choose not to expose the truth about American vaccines, then why did some countries receive both the Russian and Western vaccines? Seems like a poorly thought-out depopulation plan, no? it just doesn't make any sense. I've yet to see convincing evidence that the vaccine is anything more than what we've been told it is. It's funny, the real thing that's been memory-holed about all this is that conservatives supported the vaccine while liberals distrusted it before the 2020 election, then suddenly that got flipped on its head. Whoever happens to be president at the time doesn't really affect the effectiveness of vaccine research, so why did so many people flip on this issue? It's because most people are stupid and they evaluate issues based on which president is in power rather than on critical thought